Evaluating construction project success with use of the M-TOPSIS method

References

• Alarcon , L. F. ; Serpell , A. 1996 . Performance measuring benchmarking and modelling of construction projects . Chile : Department of Construction Engineering and Management, School of Engineering Santiago [Online], [cited 18 September 2010]. Available from Internet: rmance_benchmarking.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Antuchevičienė , J. ; Zavadskas , E. K. ; Zakarevičius , A 2010 . Multiple criteria construction management decisions considering relations between criteria , Technological and Economic Development of Economy 16 1 : 109 – 125 . http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barin , A. ; Canha , N. L. ; Magnago , K. ; Abaide da Rosa , A. ; Wottrich , B 2009 . Multicriteria decision making for management of storage energy technologies on renewable hybrid systems – the analytic hierarchy process and the th tion project success evaluation. The method is based on fuzzy logic , in Proc. of the 6th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM 2009) , 27–29 May , 2009 , Leuven , Belgium , 1 – 6 . http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2009.5311421
   Google Scholar
• Błaszczyk , T. ; Nowak , M 2009 . The time-cost trade-off analysis in construction project using computer simulation and interactive procedure , Technological and Economic Development of Economy 15 4 : 523 – 539 . http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.523-539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamodrakas , I. ; Leftheriotis , I. ; Matakos , D 2011 . In-depth analysis and simulation study of an innovative fuzzy approach for ranking alternatives in multiple attribute decision making problems based on TOPSIS , Applied Soft Computing 11 1 : 900 – 907 . http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2010.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doloi , H. ; Lim , Y. M 2007 . Measuring performance in construction projects – A critical analysis with an Australian Perspective. [Online] , London : RICS [cited 18 September 2010]. Available from Internet: http://www.rics.org/site/scripts/download_info.aspx?fileID=3401&categoryID=526
   Google Scholar
• Houška , M. ; Domeova , L 2007 . Cost and benefit criteria in methods based on distances from ideal and negative ideal variants [Online] , Czech Republic : Czech University of Agriculture in Prague [cited November 9, 2010]. Available from Internet: http://pef.czu.cz/~houska/Clanky/MM_CVUT_03.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hwang , C. L. ; Yoon , K 1981 . Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications . Lecture Notes in Economics & Mathematical Systems . Berlin : Springer – Verlag . 259 p . http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
   Google Scholar
• Ilbeigi , M. ; Heravi , G 2009 . Developing a model to evaluate project performance: contractor company's viewpoint , in CIB Joint International Symposium , 2009 , Rotterdam , Netherlands , 130 – 139 .
   Google Scholar
• Mahdavi , I. ; Faziollahtabar , H. ; Paydar , M. M. ; Heidarzade , A 2008 . Applying multi-criteria decision methods and SWOT factors to analyze the role of information technology in industry development in Iran , Journal of Applied Sciences 8 17 : 2983 – 2990 . http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/jas.2008.2983.2990
   Google Scholar
• Marković , Z 2010 . Modification of TOPSIS method for solving of multicriteria tasks , Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research 20 1 : 117 – 143 . http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/YJOR1001117M
   Google Scholar
• Medanić , B. ; Pšunder , I. ; Skendrović , V 2005 . Neki aspekti financiranja i financijskog odlučivanja u građevinarstvu [Some financing and financial decision making views in civil engineering] . Osijek , , Croatia : Faculty of Civil Engineering . 166 p.
   Google Scholar
• Park , S. H 2009 . Whole life performance assessment: critical success factors , Journal of Construction Engineering and Management ASCE 135 11 : 1146 – 1161 . http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pšunder , M. , Klanšek , U. and Šuman , N. 2009 . Gradbeno poslovanje [Construction operations] , 170 Maribor , , Slovenia : University of Maribor, Faculty of Civil Engineering .
   Google Scholar
• Ren , L. ; Zhang , Y. ; Wang , Y. ; Sun , Z 2007 . Comparative analysis of a novel M-TOPSIS method and TOPSIS , Applied Mathematics Research eXpress , vol. 2007 , article ID abm005 . 10 p.
   Google Scholar
• Salminen , J 2005 . Measuring performance and determining success factors of construction sites . PhD thesis , Helsinki, Espoo , , Finland : University of Technology, Construction, Economics and Management . 175 p.
   Google Scholar
• Šaparauskas , J. and Turskis , Z. 2006 . Evaluation of construction sustainability by multiple criteria methods . Technological and Economic Development of Economy , 12 ( 4 ) : 321 – 326 .
   Google Scholar
• Šarka , V. ; Zavadskas , E. K. ; Ustinovičius , L. ; Šarkienė , E. ; Ignatavičius , Č 2008 . System of project multicriteria decision synthesis in construction , Technological and Economic Development of Economy 14 4 : 546 – 565 . http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1392-8619.2008.14.546-565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šubrt , T. 2004 . Multiple criteria network models for project management . Agricultural Economics , 50 ( 2 ) : 71 – 75 .
   Google Scholar
• Takim , R. ; Akintoye , A 2002 . Performance indicators for successful construction project performance , in D. Greenwood . Proc. of the 18th Annual ARCOM Conference , 2–4 September , 2002 , USA : University of Northumbria: Association of Researchers in Construction Management , Vol. 2 , 545 – 555 .
   Google Scholar
• Vukomanović , M. ; Radujković , M 2008 . Critical success factors and criteria in construction projects , in The 8th International Conference of Organization, Technology and Management in Construction , 17–20 September , 2008 , Umag , Croatia . Book of abstracts, 59 .
   Google Scholar
• Zavadskas , E. K. ; Turskis , Z. ; Tamošaitiene , J 2010 . Risk assessment of construction projects , Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 16 1 : 33 – 46 . http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2010.03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar