Computer-aided decision-making in construction project development

References

• Brauers, W. K. M.; Kildienė, S.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A. 2013. The construction sector in twenty European countries during the recession 2008–2009 – country ranking by Multimoora, International Journal of Strategic Property Management17(1): 58–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. A. 2012. Construction management: the management of the development, conservation and improvement of the built environment, Organization, Technology & Management in Construction: an International Journal4(2): 457–460.
   Google Scholar
• Corriere, F.; Di Vincenzo, D.; Guerrieri, M. 2013. A logic fuzzy model for evaluation of the railway station's practice ca-pacity in safety operating conditions, Archives of Civil EngineeringLIX(1): 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh, S; Amaya, L.; Skibniewski, M. J. 2012. Identifying areas of knowledge governance for successful projects, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management18(4): 495–504. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2012.700642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudienė, N.; Banaitis, A.; Podvezko, V.; Banaitienė, N. 2014. Identification and evaluation of the critical success factors for construction projects in Lithuania: AHP approach, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management20(3): 350–359. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2014.914082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemkhani, Z. S.; Aghdaie, M. H.; Derakhti, A.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Varzandeh, M. H. M. 2013. Decision-making on business issues with foresight perspective; an application of new hybrid MCDM model in shopping mall locating, Expert Systems with Applications40: 7111–7121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.06.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, C. L.; Yoon, K. 1981. Multiple attribute decision-making – methods and applications. A state of the art survey. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer Verlag. 250 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
   Google Scholar
• Kaya, İ.; Kahraman, C. 2014. A comparison of fuzzy multicriteria decision making methods for intelligent building assessment, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management20(1): 59–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2013.801906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kildienė, S.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Tamošaitienė, J. 2014. Complex assessment model for advanced technology deployment, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management20(2): 280–290. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2014.904813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozielecki, J. 1977. Psychologiczna teoria decyzji. Warsaw: PWN. 498 p.
   Google Scholar
• Krzemiński, M.; Książek, M. 2008. Wielokryterialna analiza wybranych obiektów budowlanych wraz z analizą kryteriów oceny przy zastosowaniu metody entropii [Multi-criteria analysis of selected works together with an analysis of evaluation criteria using the method of entropy]. Warsztaty Inżynierów Budownictwa,Problemy przygotowania i realizacji inwestycji budowlanych” [Workshop of Civil Engineers “Problems of preparation and implementation of construction projects”], Pulawy, Poland. 15 p. ( in Polish).
   Google Scholar
• Książek, M. 2010a. Wielokryterialna ocena rozwiązań projektowych budynków [Multi-criteria evaluation of building design solutions]. PhD thesis. Wydawnictwa Politechniki Warszawskiej, Warsaw. 241 p. ( in Polish).
   Google Scholar
• Książek, M. 2010b. Ekspercki system oceny rozwiązań deweloperskich – wykorzystanie praktyczne [Expert evaluation system development solutions – use in practice], in Theoretical Foundations of Civil Engineering, PolishUkrainian Transactions, 13–17 September 2010, Krym, Ukraine, Vol. 18. CD. (in Polish).
   Google Scholar
• Książek, M. 2011. Wykorzystanie wybranych metod wielokryterialnych do oceny inwestycji w procesie decyzyjnym [The use of selected methods for the evaluation of multi-criteria decision-making investments], in Logistyka3. CD. (in Polish).
   Google Scholar
• Książek, M. 2010c. Wykorzystanie systemu informatycznego w procesie decyzyjnym [Use of the information system in decision-making], in Logistyka6. CD. (in Polish).
   Google Scholar
• Książek, M.; Nowak, P. 2009. Expert methods for design solutions assessment, in Logistyka6. CD.
   Google Scholar
• MacCrimmon, K. R. 1968. Decision marking among multiple-attribute alternatives: A survey and consolidated approach. RAND Memorandum, RM-4823-ARPA. Santa Monica, California, . 78 p.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, K. H.; Tzeng, G. H. 2013. A hybrid dynamic MADM model for problem-improvement in economics and business, Technological and Economic Development of Economy19(4): 638–660. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2013.837114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radziszewska-Zielina, E. 2011. Assessment methods of partnering relations of Polish, Slovak and Ukrainian construction enterprises with the use of fuzzy logic, Archives of Civil EngineeringLVII(1): 87–118.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, B. 1991. The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods, Theory and Decision31: 49–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00134132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. 1994. Highlights and critical points in theory and application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, European Journal of Operational Research74: 426–447. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)90222-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simanavičienė, R.; Liaudanskienė, R.; Ustinovičius, L. 2014. Assessing reliability of design, construction, and safety related decisions, Automation in Construction39: 47–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turskis, Z.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Kutut, V. 2013. Model based on ARAS-G and AHP methods for multiple criteria prioritizing of heritage value, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making12(1): 45–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S021962201350003X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyszka, T. 1986. Analiza decyzyjna i psychologia decyzji [Analysis and psychology of decisions]. Warsaw: PWN. 259 p. (in Polish).
   Google Scholar
• Ustinovichius, L. 2004. Determination of efficiency of investments in construction, International Journal of Strategic Property Management8(1): 25–44.
   Google Scholar
• Ustinovichius, L. 2007. Methods of determining objective, subjective and integrated weights of attributes, International Journal of Management and Decision-Making8(5/6): 540–554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJMDM.2007.013417
   Google Scholar
• Ustinovichius, L.; Zavadskas, E.; Migilinskas, D.; Malewska, A.; Nowak, P.; Minasowicz, A. 2006. Verbal analysis of risk elements in construction contracts, Cooperative Design, Visualization, and Engineering4101: 295–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11863649_36
   Google Scholar
• Ustinovichius, L.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Podvezko, V. 2007. Application of a quantitative multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM-1) approach to the analysis of investments in construction, Control and Cybernetics36(1): 256–268.
   Google Scholar
• Ustinovichius, L.; Barvidas A.; Vishnevskaja, A.; Ashikhmin, I. V. 2011. Multicriteria verbal analysis of territory planning system's models from legislative perspective, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management17(1): 16–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2011.554173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vodopivec, B.; Žarnić, R.; Tamošaitienė, J. 2014. Renovation priority ranking by multi-criteria assessment of architec-tural heritage: the case of castles, International Journal of Strategic Property Management18(1): 88–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2014.889771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdani-Chamzini, A.; Fouladgar, M. M.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Haji Moini, S. H. 2013a. Selecting the optimal renewable energy using multi criteria decision-making, Journal of Business Economics and Management14(5): 957–978. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2013.766257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdani-Chamzini, A.; Razani, M.; Yakhchali, S. H.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z. 2013b. Developing a fuzzy model based on subtractive clustering for road header performance prediction, Automation in Construction35: 111–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. 1978. Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility, Fuzzy Sets and Systems1: 3–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(78)90029-5
   Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A.; Fu, K. S.; Tanaka, K.; Shimura, M. (Eds). 1975. Fuzzy sets and their applications to cognitive and decision processes. New York: Academic Press. 496 p.
   Google Scholar
• Zalewski, W. 2013. Applications of TOPSIS method in clustering of 24-hour loads in electric power distribution substations, Economics and Management5(4): 101–110.
   Google Scholar
• Zalewska, M.; Zalewski W. 2012. Application of the decision tree method in macroeconomics problems analysis, Economics and Management4(4): 58–69.
   Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K.; Vainiunas, P.; Turskis, Z.; Tamošaitienė, J. 2012. Multiple criteria decision support system for assessment of projects managers in construction, International Journal of Information Technology & DecisionMaking11(2): 501–520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219622012400135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z.; Kildienė, S. 2014a. State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods, Technological and Economic Development of Economy20(1): 165–179. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2014.892037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K.; Vilutiene, T.; Turskis, Z.; Šaparauskas, J. 2014b. Multi-criteria analysis of projects’ performance in construction, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering14: 114–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2013.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zolfani, S. H.; Esfahani, M. H.; Bitarafan, M.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Arefi Sh., L. 2013. Developing a new hybrid MCDM method for selection of the optimal alternative of mechanical longitudinal ventilation of tunnel pollutants during automobile accidents, Transport28(1): 89–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2013.782567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar