References
- K. Burrage and J.C. Butcher. Non-linear stability of a general class of differential equation methods. BIT, 20(2):185–203, 1980. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01933191. doi: 10.1007/BF01933191
- J.C. Butcher. Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations. Taylor & Francis, New York, 2003.
- J.C. Butcher. General linear methods. Acta Numer., 15:157–256, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0962492906220014. doi: 10.1017/S0962492906220014
- A. Cardone, D. Conte and B. Paternoster. A family of multistep collocation methods for Volterra integro-differential equations. AIP Conf. Proc., 1168:358–361, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3241469. doi: 10.1063/1.3241469
- A. Cardone and Z. Jackiewicz. Explicit Nordsieck methods with quadratic stability. Numer Algorithms, 60(1):1–25, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11075-011-9509-y. doi: 10.1007/s11075-011-9509-y
- A. Cardone, Z. Jackiewicz, J.H. Verner and B. Welfert. Order conditions for general linear methods. J. Comput. Appl. Math., 290:44–64, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2015.04.042. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2015.04.042
- M.H. Carpenter, D. Gottlieb, S. Abarbanel and W.-S. Don. The theoretical accuracy of Runge–Kutta time discretizations for the initial boundary value problem: A study of the boundary error. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 16(6):1241–1252, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/0916072. doi: 10.1137/0916072
- E.M. Constantinescu and A. Sandu. Optimal explicit strong-stability-preserving general linear methods. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 32(5):3130–3150, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/090766206. doi: 10.1137/090766206
- D. Conte, R. D'Ambrosio, Z. Jackiewicz and B. Paternoster. A practical approach for the derivation of algebraically stable two-step Runge–Kutta methods. Math. Model. Anal., 17(1):65–77, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/13926292.2012.644870. doi: 10.3846/13926292.2012.644870
- D. Conte, R. D'Ambrosio and B. Paternoster. Advances on collocation based numerical methods for ordinary differential equations and Volterra integral equations. In Recent Advances in Computational and Applied Mathematics, pp. 41–66, 2011.
- D. Conte, Z. Jackiewicz and B. Paternoster. Two-step almost collocation methods for Volterra integral equations. Appl. Math. Comput., 204(2):839–853, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2008.07.026. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2008.07.026
- R. D'Ambrosio, E. Esposito and B. Paternoster. General linear methods for y”=jf (y(t)). Numer. Algorithms, 61(2):331–349, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11075-012-9637-z.
- R. D'Ambrosio, G. Izzo and Z. Jackiewicz. Highly stable general linear methods for differential systems. AIP Conf. Proc., 1168:21–24, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3241431. doi: 10.1063/1.3241431
- R. D'Ambrosio, G. Izzo and Z. Jackiewicz. Perturbed MEBDF methods. Comput. Math. Appl., 63(4):851–861, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2011.11.050. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.11.050
- R. D'Ambrosio, G. Izzo and Z. Jackiewicz. Search for highly stable two-step Runge–Kutta methods. Appl. Numer. Math., 62(10):1361–1379, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apnum.2012.06.012. doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2012.06.012
- R. D'Ambrosio, G. De Martino and B. Paternoster. Order conditions for general linear Nystr¨om methods. Numer. Algorithms, 65(3):579–595, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11075-013-9819-3. doi: 10.1007/s11075-013-9819-3
- R. D'Ambrosio and B. Paternoster. A general framework for the numerical solution of second order ODEs. Math. Comput. Simulation, 110:113–124, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2014.04.007. doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2014.04.007
- L. Ferracina and M.N. Spijker. Stepsize restrictions for the total-variationdiminishing property in general Runge–Kutta methods. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 42(3):1073–1093, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/S0036142902415584. doi: 10.1137/S0036142902415584
- L. Ferracina and M.N. Spijker. An extension and analysis of the Shu–Osher representation of Runge–Kutta methods. Math. Comput., 74(249):201–219, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-04-01664-3. doi: 10.1090/S0025-5718-04-01664-3
- L. Ferracina and M.N. Spijker. Stepsize restrictions for total-variation-boundedness in general Runge–Kutta procedures. Appl. Numer. Math., 53(2–4):265–279, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apnum.2004.08.024. doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2004.08.024
- L. Ferracina and M.N. Spijker. Strong stability of singly-diagonally-implicit Runge–Kutta methods. Appl. Numer. Math., 58(11):1675–1686, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apnum.2007.10.004. doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2007.10.004
- S. Gottlieb. On high order strong stability preserving Runge–Kutta and multi step time discretizations. J. Sci. Comput., 25(1):105–128, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10915-004-4635-5. doi: 10.1007/s10915-004-4635-5
- S. Gottlieb, D.I. Ketcheson and C.-W. Shu. High order strong stability preserving time discretizations. J. Sci. Comput., 38(3):251–289, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10915-008-9239-z. doi: 10.1007/s10915-008-9239-z
- S. Gottlieb, D.I. Ketcheson and C.-W. Shu. Strong Stability Preserving Runge– Kutta and Multistep Time Discretizations. World Scientific, 2011. ISBN 9789814289269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/7498.
- S. Gottlieb and S.J. Ruuth. Optimal strong-stability-preserving time-stepping schemes with fast downwind spatial discretizations. J. Sci. Comput., 27(1– 3):289–303, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10915-005-9054-8. doi: 10.1007/s10915-005-9054-8
- S. Gottlieb and C.-W. Shu. Total variation diminishing Runge–Kutta schemes. Math. Comput., 67(221):73–85, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-98-00913-2. doi: 10.1090/S0025-5718-98-00913-2
- S. Gottlieb, C.-W. Shu and E. Tadmor. Strong stability-preserving high-order time discretization methods. SIAM Rev., 43(1):89–112, 2001. doi: 10.1137/S003614450036757X
- I. Higueras.On strong stability preserving time discretization methods. J. Sci. Comput., 21(2):193–223, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:JOMP.0000030075.59237.61. doi: 10.1023/B:JOMP.0000030075.59237.61
- I. Higueras. Monotonicity for Runge–Kutta methods: Inner product norms. J. Sci. Comput., 24(1):665–685, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10915-004-4789-1. doi: 10.1007/s10915-004-4789-1
- I. Higueras. Representations of Runge–Kutta methods and strong stability preserving methods. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 43(3):924–948, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/S0036142903427068. doi: 10.1137/S0036142903427068
- I. Higueras. Strong stability for Runge–Kutta schemes on a class of nonlinear problems. J. Sci. Comput., 57(3):518–535, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10915-013-9715-y. doi: 10.1007/s10915-013-9715-y
- W. Hundsdorfer and S.J. Ruuth. On monotonicity and boundedness properties of linear multistep methods. Math. Comput., 75(254):655–672, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-05-01794-1. doi: 10.1090/S0025-5718-05-01794-1
- W. Hundsdorfer, S.J. Ruuth and R.J. Spiteri. Monotonicity-preserving linear multistep methods. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 41(2):605–623, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/S0036142902406326. doi: 10.1137/S0036142902406326
- W.H. Hundsdorfer and J.G. Verwer. Numerical Solution of Time-Dependent Advection–Diffusion–Reaction Equations. Springer Ser. Comput. Math. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 2003. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-09017-6
- G. Izzo and Z. Jackiewicz. Construction of algebraically stable DIMSIMs. J. Comput. Appl. Math., 261:72–84, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2013.10.037. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2013.10.037
- G. Izzo and Z. Jackiewicz. Construction of strong stability preserving general linear methods. AIP Conf. Proc., 1648, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4912441.
- G. Izzo and Z. Jackiewicz. Strong stability preserving general linear methods. J. Sci. Comput., 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10915-014-9961-7. (in press)
- G. Izzo, Z. Jackiewicz, E. Messina and A. Vecchio. General linear methods for Volterra integral equations. J. Comput. Appl. Math., 234(9):2768–2782, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2010.01.023
- Z. Jackiewicz. General Linear Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations. Taylor & Francis, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2009. ISBN 9780470408551. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470522165.
- Z. Jackiewicz and S. Tracogna. A general class of two-step Runge–Kutta methods for ordinary differential equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 32(5):1390–1427, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/0732064. doi: 10.1137/0732064
- Z. Jackiewicz and R. Vermiglio. General linear methods with external stages of different orders. BIT Numer. Math., 36(4):688–712, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01733788. doi: 10.1007/BF01733788
- D.I. Ketcheson, S. Gottlieb and C.B. Macdonald. Strong stability preserving two-step Runge–Kutta methods. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 49(6):2618–2639, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/10080960X. doi: 10.1137/10080960X
- D.I. Ketcheson, C.B. Macdonald and S. Gottlieb. Optimal implicit strong stability preserving Runge–Kutta methods. Appl. Numer. Math., 59(2):373–392, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apnum.2008.03.034. doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2008.03.034
- J.F.B.M. Kraaijevanger. Contractivity of Runge–Kutta methods. BIT, 31(3):482–528, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01933264. doi: 10.1007/BF01933264
- C.B. Laney. Computational Gasdynamics. Taylor & Francis, Cambridge, New York, NY, 1998.
- R.J. LeVeque. Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems. Cambridge Texts Appl. Math. Taylor & Francis, Cambridge, New York, 2002.
- S.J. Ruuth and R.J. Spiteri. Two barriers on strong-stability-preserving time discretization methods. J. Sci. Comput., 17(1–4):211–220, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1015156832269. doi: 10.1023/A:1015156832269
- J.M. Sanz-Serna and J.G. Verwer. Convergence analysis of one-step schemes in the method of lines. Appl. Math. Comput., 31(C):183–196, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0096-3003(89)90118-5. doi: 10.1016/0096-3003(89)90118-5
- J.M. Sanz-Serna, J.G. Verwer and W.H. Hundsdorfer. Convergence and order reduction of Runge–Kutta schemes applied to evolutionary problems in partial differential equations. Numer. Math., 50(4):405–418, 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01396661. doi: 10.1007/BF01396661
- C.-W. Shu and S. Osher. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes. J. Comput. Phys., 77(2):439–471, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(88)90177-5. doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(88)90177-5
- C.W. Shu. High order ENO and WENO schemes for computational fluid dynamics. In H. Deconinck (Ed.), High-Order Methods for Computational Physics, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. Eng., pp. 439–582. Taylor & Francis, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03882-6 5.
- M.N. Spijker. Stepsize conditions for general monotonicity in numerical initial value problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 45(3):1226–1245, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/060661739. doi: 10.1137/060661739
- R.J. Spiteri and S.J. Ruuth. A new class of optimal high-order strong-stabilitypreserving time discretization methods. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 40(2):469–491, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/S0036142901389025. doi: 10.1137/S0036142901389025
- C. Zhang and S. Vandewalle. General linear methods for Volterra integrodifferential equations with memory. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 27(6):2010–2031, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/040607058. doi: 10.1137/040607058