Executive directors' compensation and monitoring: the influence of gender diversity on Spanish boards

References

• Adams, R. B.; Ferreira, D. 2009. Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance, Journal of Financial Economics 94: 291–309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arellano, M.; Bover, O. 1995. Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models, Journal of Econometrics 68: 2–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baixauli-Soler, J. S; Sanchez-Marin, G. 2011. Organizational governance and TMT pay level adjustment, Journal of Business Research 64: 862–870. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baixauli-Soler, J. S.; Sanchez-Marin, G. 2015. Executive compensation and corporate governance in Spanish listed firms: a principal-principal perspective, Review of Managerial Science 9(1): 115–140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11846-014-0122-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bear, S.; Rahman, N.; Post, C. 2010. The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation, Journal of Business Ethics 97: 207–221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebchuk, L. A.; Fried, J. M.; Walker, D. I. 2002. Managerial power and rent extraction in the design of executive compensation, University of Chicago Law Review 69(3): 751–846. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1600632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blundell, R.; Bond, S. R. 1998. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models, Journal of Econometrics 87: 115–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brick, I. E.; Palmon, O.; Wald, J. K. 2006. CEO compensation, director compensation, and firm performance: evidence of cronyism, Journal of Corporate Finance 12(3): 403–423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2005.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Código Unificado de Buen Gobierno. 2006. Informe del grupo especial de trabajo sobre el buen gobierno de las sociedades cotizadas. CNMV, Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• Conyon, M. J.; He, L. R. 2004. Compensation committees and CEO compensation incentives in U.S. entrepreneurial firms, Journal of Management Accounting Research 16(16): 35–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/jmar.2004.16.1.35
   Google Scholar
• Conyon, M. J.; He, L. R. 2011. Executive compensation and corporate governance in China, Journal of Corporate Finance 17(4): 1158–1175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2011.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daily, C. M.; Dalton, D. R. 2003. Women in the boardroom: a business imperative, Journal of Business Strategy 24(5): 8–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jbs.2003.28824eaf.002
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, D. R.; Dalton, C. M. 2011. Integration of micro and macro studies in governance research: CEO duality, board composition, and financial performance, Journal of Management 37(2): 404–411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206310373399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devers, C. E.; Cannella, A. A.; Reilly, G. P.; Yoder, M. E. 2007. Executive compensation: a multidisciplinary review of recent developments, Journal of Management 33(6): 1016–1072. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dezso, C. L.; Ross, D. G. 2012. Does Female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation, Strategic Management Journal 33(9): 1072–1089. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.1955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez-Mejia, L. R.; Wiseman, R. M. 1997. Reframing executive compensation: and assessment and outlook, Journal of Management 23: 291–374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0149-2063(97)90035-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, D. A.; Klein, K. J. 2007. What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations, Academy of Management Review 32: 1199–1228. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.26586096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidrick and Struggles. 2011. Challenging board performance. European Corporate Governance Report 2011 [online], [cited 20 August 2014]. Heidrick and Struggles International. Available from Internet: http://www.heidrick.com/PublicationsReports/PublicationsReports/HS_European-CorpGovRpt2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Higgs, D. 2003. Review of the role and effectiveness of non-executive directors. The Department of Trade and Industry, The Stationery Office, London.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J.; Dalziel, T. 2003. Boards of directors and firm performance: integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives, Academy of Management Review 28: 383–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himmelberg, C. P.; Hubbard, R. G.; Palia, D. 1999. Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership and the link between ownership and performance, Journal of Financial Economics 53: 353–384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00025-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izraeli, D. 2000. Women directors in Israel, in Burke, R., Mattis, M. (Eds.). Women on corporate boards of directors: international challenges and opportunities, 75–96.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C.; Murphy, K. J. 1990. Performance and top management incentives, Journal of Political Economy 98: 225–264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S.; La Porta, R.; Lopez-De-Silanes, F.; Shleifer, A. 2000. Tunneling, American Economic Review 90: 22–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.2.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurkus, A. F.; Park, J. C.; Woodard, L. 2011. Women in top management and agency costs, Journal of Business Research 64(2): 180–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, R.; Dharwadkar, R.; Brandes, P. 2005. Institutional ownership and CEO compensation: a longitudinal examination, Journal of Business Research 58(8): 1078–1088. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, A. M.; Kramer, V.; Erkut, S. 2008. Critical mass: the impact of three or more women on corporate boards, Organizational Dynamics 37(2): 145–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2008.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, V. W.; Konrad, A.; Erkut, S. 2006. Critical mass on corporate boards: why three or more women enhance governance. WCW Report 11. Boston: Wellesley Centers for Women.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, H. A.; Park, D. 2005. A few good women on top management teams, Journal of Business Research 58(12): 1712–1720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulich, C.; Trojanowski, G.; Ryan, M. K.; Haslam, S. A.; Renneboog, L. D. R. 2011. Who gets the carrot and who gets the stick? Evidence of gender disparities in executive remuneration, Strategic Management Journal 32(3): 301–321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, P.; Sivaramakrishnan, S. 2008. Who monitors the monitor? The effect of board independence on executive compensation and firm value, Review of Financial Studies 21: 1371–1401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Porta, R.; Lopez-De-Silanes, F.; Shleifer, A. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world, Journal of Finance 54: 471–517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leech, D.; Manjon, M. C. 2002. Corporate governance in Spain (with application of the power indices approach), European Journal of Law and Economics 13: 157–173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1013680820398
   Google Scholar
• Ley Organica. 2007. Igualdad efectiva de mujeres y hombres.
   Google Scholar
• Ley Organica. 2011. Economia Sostenible.
   Google Scholar
• Mahadeo, J. D.; Soobaroyen, T.; Hanuman, V. O. 2012. Board composition and financial performance: uncovering the effects of diversity in an emerging economy, Journal of Business Ethics 105: 375–388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0973-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateos de Cabo, R.; Gimeno, R.; Escot, L. 2011. Disentangling discrimination on Spanish boards of directors, Corporate Governance: an International Review 19(1): 77–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00837.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, C. 2013. Firm commitment: why the corporation is failing us and how to restore trust in it. London: Oxford UniversityPress.
   Google Scholar
• Morck, R.; Wolfenzon, D.; Yeung, B. 2005. Corporate governance, economic entrenchment, and growth, Journal of Economic Literature 63: 655–720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/002205105774431252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, S.; Huse, M. 2010. Women director’s contribution to board decision-making and strategic involvement: the role of equality perception, European Management Review 7: 16–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/emr.2009.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Marin, G.; Baixauli-Soler, J. S.; Lucas-Perez, M. E. 2010. When much is not better? Top management compensation, board structure and performance in Spanish firms, International Journal of Human Resource Management 21: 2778–2797. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2010.528660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapp, S. G. 2008. The impact of corporate governance on executive compensation, European Financial Management 14(4): 710–746. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2008.00443.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shleifer, A.; Vishny, R. W. 1997. A survey of corporate governance, Journal of Finance 52(2): 737–783. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 1998. On the economics and analysis of diversity. Working Paper Science Policy Research Unit Electronic. University of Sussex, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Terjesen, S.; Sealy, R.; Singh, V. 2009. Women directors on corporate boards: a review and research agenda, Corporate Governance: an International Review 17(3): 320–337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00742.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van BurenIII, H. J. 2010. Taking (and sharing power): how board of directors can bring about greater fairness for dependent stakeholders, Business and Society Review 115(2): 205–230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8594.2010.00362.x
   Google Scholar
• Werner, S.; Tosi, H. L.; Gomez-Mejia, L. R. 2005. Organizational governance and employee pay: how ownership structure affects the firm’s compensation strategy, Strategic Management Journal 26(4): 377–384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westphal, J. D.; Milton, L. P. 2000. How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards, Administrative Science Quarterly 45: 366–398. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2667075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. N.; Peng, M. W.; Ahlstrom, D.; Bruton, G. D.; Jian, Y. 2008. Corporate governance in emerging economies: a review of the principal-principal perspective, Journal of Management Studies 5(1): 196–220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00752.x
   Google Scholar