Wastewater and landfill leachate testing: acute toxicity biotest results evaluation

References

• Białowiec, A.; Wojnowska-Baryła, I.; Agopsowicz, M. 2007. The efficiency of evapotranspiration of landfill leachate in the soil–plant system with willow Salix amygdalina L., Ecological Engineering 30(4): 356–361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2007.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaise, C.; Férard, J. F. 2005. Effluent assessment with the PEEP (Potential Ecotoxic Effect Probe), in C. Blaise, J. F. Férard (Eds). Small-scale freshwater toxicity investigations. Vol. 2. Hazard assessment schemes. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, 69–88.
   Google Scholar
• Bulich, A. 1982. A practical and reliable method for monitoring the toxicity of aquatic samples, Journal Process Biochemistry 17: 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Carbonell, G.; Fernandez, C.; Tarazona, J. V. 2010. A cost/effective screening method for assessing the toxicity of nutrient rich effluents to algae, Bulletin Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 85(1): 72–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00128-010-0035-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COHIBA. 2010. Control of hazardous substances in the Baltic Sea region. Whole effluent assessment (WEA). Proposed recommendations for the use of toxicity limits. Finish Environment Institute SYKE. 23 p.
   Google Scholar
• COHIBA. 2012. How to control and manage hazardous substances in the Baltic Sea region. Final summary report of the COHIBA Project, in A. Pilke, T. Nakari, E. Schultz, P. Munne, E. Brorström-Lundén, H. Andersson, C. Mathan, F. Marscheider-Weidemann, M. Durkin (Eds.). COHIBA project consortium [online], [cited 20 April 2014]. Available from Internet: www.cohiba-project.net/publications
   Google Scholar
• Council Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008 laying down test methods pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), Official Journal of the European Union L 142, 31.5.2008. 739 p.
   Google Scholar
• Cretescu, I.; Pohontu, C.; Iticescu, C.; Cioroi, M.; Ciocinta, R. C.; Bucur, D. 2013. Treatment of landfill leachate using Zea mays and Triticum sp. on antropogenic soils, Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment 11(3,4): 1507–1512.
   Google Scholar
• Četkauskaitė, A.; Bražėnaitė, J. 2004. Effects of mixtures of oleic acid with chlorinated herbicides on Vibrio fischeri bacteria, Biologija 4: 36–39.
   Google Scholar
• Den Besten, P. J.; Munawar, M. 2005. Ecotoxicological testing of marine and freshwater ecosystems: emerging techniques, trends and strategies. Boca Raton, London, New York, Singapore: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Directive 2008/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy, Official Journal of the European Communities L 348/84, 24.12.2008, 84–97.
   Google Scholar
• Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives, Official Journal of the European Union OJ L 312/3, 22.11.2008, 3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Embry, M. R.; Belanger, S. E.; Braunbeck, Th. A.; Burgos, M. G.; Halder, M.; Hinton, D. E.; Léonard, M. A.; Lillicrap, A.; Norberg-King, T.; Whale, G. 2010. The fish embryo toxicity test as an animal alternative method in hazard and risk assessment and scientific research, Aquatic Toxicology 97(2): 79–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2009.12.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU Commission recommendation of 18 June 2007 (2007/526/ EC) on guidelines for the accommodation and care of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes (notified under document number C (2007) 2525), (text with EEA relevance), Official Journal of the European Union L 197/1, 30.7.2007, 1–89.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2010a. Water Environment. Water is for life: How the Water Framework Directive helps safeguard Europe’s resources. European Commission Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Printed in Belgium. 28 p.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2010b. Environment. Being wise with waste: the EU’s approach to waste management. European Commission Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Printed in Belgium. 20 p.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety. 2004. Waste Water AbwV (Ordinance on Requirements for the Discharge of Waste Water into Waters). 121 p. [Promulgation of the New Version of the Waste Water Ordinance of 17 June 2004, coming into force on 1 January 2005]. Germany. Federal Law Gazette BGBl. 2004, Teil I. 1108–1184.
   Google Scholar
• Férard, J. F.; Ferrari, B. 2005. WSATOXHAZ: a bioanalytical strategy for solid wastes assessment, in C. Blaise, J. F. Férard (Eds.). Small-scale Freshwater Toxicity Investigations, Vol. 2. Hazard assessment schemes. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, 331–375.
   Google Scholar
• Gartiser, S.; Hafner, C.; Hercher, C.; Kronenberger-Schäfer, K.; Paschke, A. 2010. Whole effluent assessment of industrial wastewater for determination of BAT compliance. Part 1: paper manufacturing industry, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 17(4): 856–865. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-009-0289-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Günesf, E. H.; Günesf, Y.; Talenle, I. 2008. Toxicity evaluation of industrial and land base sources in a river basin, Desalination 226: 348–356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.02.116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodfellow, W.; McCelloh, W. 2005. Minimal toxicity necessary for an effective toxicity identification evaluation. Case Study 6.31, in T. Norberg-King (Ed.). Toxicity reduction and toxicity identification evaluations for effluents, ambient waters, and other aqueous media. Pensacola, USA: SETAC Press, 338–344.
   Google Scholar
• Greeley, M. S. Jr.; Kszos, L. A.; Morris, G. W.; Smith, J. G.; Stewart, A. J. 2011. Role of a comprehensive toxicity assessment and monitoring program in the management and ecological recovery of a wastewater receiving stream, Environmental Management 47(6): 1033–1046. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9679-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, P. D. 2007. Risk assessment of emerging contaminants in aquatic systems, Trends Analytical Chemistry 26(11): 1095–1099. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2007.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HELCOM LAND 12/2007. Practical guidance on whole effluent assessment (WEA). Doc. code 4.2/2, in Land-based Pollution Group 12th Meeting, 22–24 May 2007, Espoo, Finland. 31 p.
   Google Scholar
• HELCOM MONAS 15/2011. Helsinki commission, in HELCOM Monitoring and Assessment Group 15th Meeting, 4–7 October 2011, Vilnius, Lithuania. 18 p.
   Google Scholar
• Hernan, R.; O’Rourke K. 2011. Aquatic toxicity testing in Ireland, 2010. Ireland: Shannon. 27 p.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, Md. L.; Das S. R.; Hossain M. K. 2014. Impact of landfill leachate on surface and ground water quality, Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 7(6): 337–346. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/jest.2014.337.346
   Google Scholar
• Huschek, G.; Hansen, P. D. 2006. Ecotoxicological classification of the Berlin River system using bioassays in respect to the European Water Framework Directive, Environment Monitoring Assessment 121(1–3): 15–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-9061-0
   Google Scholar
• ISO 17616:2008. Soil quality – Guidance on the choice and evaluation of bioassays for ecotoxicological characterization of soils and soil materials. 11 p.
   Google Scholar
• Kalcienė, V.; Četkauskaitė, A. 2007. Environmental and synthetic sulfhydryl group inhibitors: effects on bioluminescence and respiration of Vibrio Fischeri, Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 35: 93–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazlauskienė, N.; Vosylienė, M. Z.; Marčiulionienė, D.; Montvydienė, D.; Beržinskienė, J. 2004. The assessment of toxicity of Kairiai landfill leachate and water of drainage ditches by use of biological methods, in Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference of 80 years Anniversary of Lithuanian University of Agriculture (Vandens telkinių apsauga ir valdymas [Protection and management of water bodies]), 23–24 October 2004, Kaunas, Lithuania, 100–109 (in Lithuanian).
   Google Scholar
• Kazlauskienė, N.; Vosylienė, M. Z. 2008. Characteristic features of the effect of Cu and Zn mixtures on rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss in ontogenesis, Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 17(2): 291–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klauck, C. R.; Rodrigues, M. A. S.; da Silva, L. B. 2013. Toxicological evaluation of landfill leachate using plant (Allium cepa) and fish (Leporinus obtusidens) bioassays, Waste Management Research 31(11): 1148–1153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0734242X13502388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontana, A.; Papadimitriou, C. A.; Samaras, P.; Zdragas, A.; Yiangou, M. 2008. Bioassays and biomarkers for ecotoxicological assessment of reclaimed municipal wastewater, Water Science and Technology 57(4): 947–953. http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.2008.196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs, F. 2005. The pT-method as a hazard assessment scheme for wastewaters, in C. Blaise, J. F. Férard (Eds.). Small-scale freshwater toxicity investigations. Vol. 2. Hazard Assessment Schemes. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, 115–137.
   Google Scholar
• Kulikowska, D.; Klimiuk, E. 2008. The effect of landfill age on municipal leachate composition, Bioresource Technology 99(13): 5981–5985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.10.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapa, N.; Barbosa, R.; Camacho, S.; Monteiro, R.; Fernandes, M. H. F. V.; Oliveira, J. F. S. 2006. Leaching behaviour of a glass produced from a MSWI bottom ash, in P. M. Vilarinho (Ed.). Materials Science Forum 514–516: 1736–1741. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.514-516.1736
   Google Scholar
• Latif, M.; Licek, E. 2004. Toxicity assessment of wastewaters, river waters, and sediments in Austria using cost-effective microbiotests, Environmental Toxicology 19(4): 302–309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tox.20027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libralato, G.; Volpi, G. A.; Francesco, A. 2010. How toxic is toxic? A proposal for wastewater toxicity hazard assessment, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 73(7): 1602–1611. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2010.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mankiewicz-Boczek, J; Nałęcz-Jawecki, G.; Drobniewska, A. M.; Sumorok, B.; Izydorczyk, K.; Zalewski, M.; Sawicki, J. 2008. Application of a microbiotests battery for complete toxicity assessment of rivers, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 71(3): 830–836. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2008.02.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manusadžianas, L.; Sadauskas, K.; Vitkus, R. 2010. Comparative study of indices used in toxicity evaluation of effluents, Desalination 250: 383–389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2009.09.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendonça, E.; Picado, A.; Paixão, S. M.; Silva, L.; Cunha, M. A.; Leitão, S.; Moura, I.; Cortez, C.; Brito, F. 2009. Ecotoxicity tests in the environmental analysis of wastewater treatment plants: case study in Portugal, Journal of Hazardous Materials 163(2–3): 665–670. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.012
   Google Scholar
• Montvydienė, D.; Marčiulionienė, E. D.; Kazlauskienė, N.; Svecevičius, G.; Jefanova, O.; Žukauskaitė, Z. 2014. Impact of closed Kairiai landfill on the Ginkunai Pond, Lithuania, in The 9th International Conference “Environmental engineering”, 22–23 May 2014, Vilnius, Lithuania.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, H.; Römbke, J. 2009. Ecotoxicological characterization of waste – Results and experiences of an European ring test. New York: Springer Ltd. 308 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-88959-7
   Google Scholar
• Moser, H.; Roembke, J.; Donnevert, G.; Becker, R. 2011. Evaluation of biological methods for a future methodological implementation of the Hazard criterion H14 “ecotoxic” in the European waste list (2000/532/EC), Waste Management Research 29(2): 180–187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0734242X10367844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norberg-King, T. 2005. Toxicity reduction and toxicity identification evaluations for effluents, ambient waters, and other aqueous media. Pensacola, USA: SETAC Press. 496 p.
   Google Scholar
• OSPAR Commission. 2007. Practical Guidance Document on Whole Effluent Assessment. OSPAR Hazardous Substances Series. Publication Number: 316/2007. 33 p.
   Google Scholar
• Palma, P.; Alvarenga, P.; Palma, V.; Matos, C.; Fernandes, R. M.; Soares, A.; Barbosa, A. R. 2008. Evaluation of surface water quality using an ecotoxicological approach: a case study of the Alqueva Reservoir (Portugal), Environmental Science and Pollution Research 17(3): 703–716. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-009-0143-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pablos, M. V.; Martini, F.; Fernández, C.; Babín, M. M.; Herraez, I.; Miranda, J.; Martínez, J.; Carbonell, G; San-Segundo, L.; García-Hortigüela, P.; Tarazona, J. V. 2011. Correlation between physicochemical and ecotoxicological approaches to estimate landfill leachates toxicity, Waste Management 31(8): 1841–1847. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.03.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandard, P.; Römbke, J. 2013. Proposal for a “harmonized” strategy for the assessment of the HP 14 Property, Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 9(4): 665–672. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronco, A.; Rossini, G. B.; Sobrero, C.; Apartin, C.; Castillo, G.; Diaz-Baez, M. C.; Ramirez, A. E.; Ahumada, I.; Mendoza, J. 2005. The application of hazard assessment schemes using the water toxicity testing battery, in C. Blaise, J. F. Férard (Eds.). Small-scale freshwater toxicity investigations. Vol. 2. Hazard Assessment Schemes. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, 233–255.
   Google Scholar
• Sauco, S.; Gómez, J.; Barboza, F. R.; Lercari, D.; Defeo, O. 2013. Modified whole effluent toxicity test to assess and decouple wastewater effects from environmental gradients, PLOS ONE 8(6): e66285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066285
   Google Scholar
• Şchiopu, A.-M.; Gavrilescu, M. 2010. Municipal solid waste landfilling and treatment of resulting liquid effluents, Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 9(7): 993–1019.
   Google Scholar
• Şchiopu, A.-M.; Piuleac, C.; Cojocaru, C.; Apostol, I.; Mămălygă, I.; Gavrilescu, M. 2012. Reducing environmental risk of landfills: leachate treatment by reversal osmosis, Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 11(12): 2319–2331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiernström, S.; Hemström; K; Wik, O.; Carlsson, G.; Bengtsson, B-E.; Breitholtz, M. 2011. An ecotoxicological approach for hazard identification of energy ash, Waste Management 31(2): 342–352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.05.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svecevičius, G. 2006. Acute toxicity of hexavalent chromium to European freshwater fish, Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 77(5): 741–747. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00128-006-1126-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svecevičius, G.; Kazlauskienė, N. 2011. Behavioral responses in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss as indicators of sublethal exposure to heavy metals, in D. Cygas, K. D. Froehner (Eds.) “Environmental Engineering”, VIII International Conference, Selected Papers, 19–20 May 2011, Vilnius, Lithuania, 374–377.
   Google Scholar
• Svecevičius, G.; Kazlauskienė, N.; Slučkaitė, A.; Makaras, T. 2013. Toxicological assessment of the effects of closed landfill on neighboring hydroecosystem, in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Environmental Management, Engineering, Planning and Economics (CEMEPE 2013) & SECOTOX Conference, 24–28 June 2013, Mykonos island, Greece, 799–804.
   Google Scholar
• Šaulienė, I.; Motiekaitytė, V.; Marčiulionienė, D.; Montvydienė, D. 2004. Application of biotests for toxicity evaluation of leachate and toxic tolerant vegetation processes in exploited landfill, in Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference of 80 years Anniversary of Lithuanian University of Agriculture (Vandens telkinių apsauga ir valdymas [Protection and management of water bodies]). Kaunas, Lithuania. 194–198.
   Google Scholar
• Šiaulių Regiono Plėtros Taryba. 2012. Sprendimas Nr. 51/5S-25. Dėl Šiaulių regiono komunalinių atliekų tvarkymo plano 2012–2020m. patvirtinimo. 2012.05.03, Šiauliai [Decision Regarding Confirmation of the Šiauliai Region Municipal Waste Management Plan for years 2012–2020. Šiauliai, 03.05.2012]. 82 p. (in Lithuanian).
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. J. L.; Tyrrel, S. F.; Smith, R.; Farrow, S. 2009. Bioassays for the evaluation of landfill leachate toxicity, Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Part B, 12: 83–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10937400802545292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tigini, V.; Giansanti P.; Mangiavillano, A.; Pannocchia, A.; Varese, G. C. 2011. Evaluation of toxicity, genotoxicity and environmental risk of simulated textile and tannery wastewaters with a battery of biotests, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 74(4): 866–873. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2010.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonkes, M.; de Graaf, P. J. F.; Graansma, J. 1999. Assessment of complex industrial effluents in the Netherlands using a whole effluent toxicity (or WET) approach, Water Science Technology 39(1): 55–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00253-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonkes, M.; den Besten, P. J.; Leverett, D. 2005. Bioassays and tiered approaches for monitoring surface water quality and effluents, in P. J. Den Besten, M. Munawar (Eds.). Ecotoxicological testing of marine and freshwater ecosystems: emerging techniques, trends and strategies. Boca Raton, London, New York: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, 43–86.
   Google Scholar
• Tsiridis, V.; Petala, M.; Samaras, P.; Kungolos, A.; Sakellaropoulos, G. P. 2012. Environmental hazard assessment of coal fly ashes using leaching and ecotoxicity tests, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 75(2): 212–220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasarevičius, S.; Čegariova, J.; Sližytė, D. 2005. Investigation and evaluation of landfill leachate permeability in the soil, Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management 13(3): 108–115.
   Google Scholar
• Vindimian, E. 2005. A multitest index of effluent toxicity by PLS regression, in C. Blaise, J. F. Férard (Eds.). Small-scale freshwater toxicity investigations. Vol. 2. Hazard assessment schemes. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, 89–114.
   Google Scholar
• Vosylienė, M. Z.; Kazlauskienė, N.; Baršienė, J.; Andreikėnaitė, L.; Milukaitė, A.; Taujanskis, E. 2010. Ecotoxicity and genotoxicity relating to fish in wastewaters discharged from the Vilnius treatment plant, Water Science and Technology 62(4): 859–865. http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.2010.916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilke, B. M.; Riepert, F.; Koch C.; Kühne T. 2008. Ecotoxicological characterization of hazardous wastes, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 70(2): 283–293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuttke, J.; Walther, M. 2013. Recommendations for the ecotoxicological characterization of wastes. Section 1.5 Municipal waste management, hazardous waste, focal point to the Basel Convention. Federal Environment Agency, Germany. 27 p.
   Google Scholar
• Zha, J.; Wang, Z. 2006. Acute and early life stage toxicity of industrial effluent on Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes), Science of the Total Environment 357(1–3): 112–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.04.038
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X.; Wiseman, S.; Giesy, J. 2012. Toxicology of water, in A. Luch (Ed.). Molecular, clinical and environmental toxicology. Experientia Supplementum 101, Basel AG Springer, 1–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8340-4_2
   Google Scholar