Developing a performance evaluation scheme for engineering facilities in commercial buildings: state-of-the-art review

REFERENCES

• Amaratunga, D. 2000. Assessment of facilities management performance, Property Management 18(4): 258–266. https://doi.org/10.1108/02637470010348816
   Google Scholar
• American Society for Testing and Materials International. 2009. ASTM standards for whole building functionality and serviceability. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials International.
   Google Scholar
• Asian Institute of Intelligent Buildings. 2012. Intelligent Building Index (IBI) [online]. Asian Institute of Intelligent Buildings. Available at: http://www.aiib.net/ibi-index.htm [accessed 25 November 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Baird, G.; Gray, J.; Isaacs, N.; Kernohan, D.; McIndoe, G. 1995. Building evaluation techniques. Wellington, New Zealand: Mcgraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ballesty, S. 1999. Facility quality and performance, in R. Best; G. de Valence (eds.). Building in value: predesign issues. London: Arnold Publishers, 198–211.
   Google Scholar
• Best, R.; Langston, C.; de Valence, G. 2003. Workplace strategies and facilities management: building in value. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Bluyssen, P. M. 2009. The indoor environment handbook: how to make buildings healthy and comfortable. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bordass, B.; Leaman, A.; Ruyssevelt, P. 2001. Assessing building performance in use 5: conclusions and implications, Building Research & Information 29(2): 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210010008054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Institute of Facilities Management. 2015. Facilities management introduction [online]. British Institute of Facilities Management. Available at: http://www.bifm.org.uk/bifm/about/facilities [accessed 1 March 2015]
   Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution. 2006. Facility management – part 1: terms and definitions (BS EN 15221– 1:2006). London: British Standards Institution.
   Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution. 2007. Maintenance: maintenance key performance indicators (BS EN 15341:2007). London: British Standards Institution.
   Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution. 2009. Managing for the sustained success of an organization – a quality management approach (BS EN ISO 9004:2009). London: British Standards Institution.
   Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution. 2011. Facility management – part 3: guidance on quality in facility management (BS EN 15221–3:2011). London: British Standards Institution.
   Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution. 2012. Facility management – part 7: guidelines for performance benchmarking (BS EN 15221–7:2012). London: British Standards Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Building Services Research and Information Association. 2004a. O&M benchmarking network annual report – definitions booklet, Report 16225/2. UK: Building Services Research and Information Association.
   Google Scholar
• Building Services Research and Information Association. 2004b. O&M benchmarking network annual report, Report 16225/1. UK: Building Services Research and Information Association.
   Google Scholar
• Building Services Research and Information Association. 2011. KPIs for M&E contractors – 2010 results [online]. Building Services Research and Information Association. Available at: https://www.bsria.co.uk/news/article/me-kpis-2010/ [accessed 25 November 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Buildings Department. 2006a. Comprehensive environmental performance assessment scheme for buildings CEPAS application guidelines. Hong Kong: Buildings Department.
   Google Scholar
• Buildings Department. 2006b. Comprehensive environmental performance assessment scheme for buildings construction stage assessment manual. Hong Kong: Buildings Department.
   Google Scholar
• Buildings Department. 2006c. Comprehensive environmental performance assessment scheme for buildings design stage assessment manual. Hong Kong: Buildings Department.
   Google Scholar
• Buildings Department. 2006d. Comprehensive environmental performance assessment scheme for buildings operation stage assessment manual. Hong Kong: Buildings Department.
   Google Scholar
• Buildings Department. 2006e. Comprehensive environmental performance assessment scheme for buildings pre-design stage assessment manual. Hong Kong: Buildings Department.
   Google Scholar
• Buildings Department. 2012. Comprehensive environmental performance assessment scheme for buildings [online]. Buildings Department. Available at: http://www.bd.gov.hk/english/documents/index_CEPAS.html [accessed 15 September 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. D. 1995. Uptime: strategies for excellence in maintenance management. New York: Productivity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlucci, D. 2010. Evaluating and selecting key performance indicators: an ANP-based model, Measuring Business Excellence 14(2): 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683041011047876
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, C. L.; Oloufa, A. A. 1995. Postoccupancy evaluation of buildings and development of facility performance criteria, Journal of Architectural Engineering 1(2): 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASce)1076–0431(1995)1:2(77)
   Google Scholar
• Census and Statistics Department. 2015. Population [online]. Census and Statistics Department. Available at: http://www.censtatd.gov.hk/hkstat/sub/so20.jsp [accessed 2 April 2015]
   Google Scholar
• Chan, A. P. C.; Chan, A. P. L. 2004. Key performance indicators for measuring construction success, Benchmarking: An International Journal 11(2): 203–221. doi: 10.1108/14635770410532624
   Google Scholar
• Chan, K. T.; Lee, R. H. K.; Burnett, J. 2001. Maintenance performance: a case study of hospitality engineering systems, Facilities 19(13/14): 494–504. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770110409477
   Google Scholar
• Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers. 2015a. PROBE – post occupancy studies [online]. Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers. Available at: http://www.cibse.org/knowledge/building-services-case-studies/probe-post-occupancystudies [accessed 15 April 2015]
   Google Scholar
• Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers. 2015b. What is building services [online]. Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers. Available at: http://www.cibse.org/building-services/what-isbuilding-services [accessed 2 April 2015]
   Google Scholar
• Clift, M. 1996. Building quality assessment (BQA) for offices, Structural Survey 14(2): 22–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630809610122703
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, R.; Standeven, M.; Bordass, B.; Leaman, A. 2001. Assessing building performance in use 1: the Probe process, Building Research & Information 29(2): 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210010008018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, G.; Thatcher, C.; Blair, L. 1993a. Serviceability tools: methods for setting occupant requirements and rating buildings. Ottawa: International Centre for Facilities.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G.; Thatcher, C.; Blair, L. 1993b. Serviceability tools: scales for setting occupant requirements and rating buildings. Ottawa: International Centre for Facilities.
   Google Scholar
• Electrical and Mechanical Services Department and Environmental Protection Department. 2010. Guidelines to account for and report on greenhouse gas emissions and removals for buildings (commercial, residential or institutional purposes) in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Electrical and Mechanical Services Department, Environmental Protection Department.
   Google Scholar
• Electrical and Mechanical Services Department. 2007. Guidelines on energy audit. Hong Kong: Electrical and Mechanical Services Department.
   Google Scholar
• Electrical and Mechanical Services Department. 2012a. Code of practice for building energy audit. Hong Kong: Electrical and Mechanical Services Department.
   Google Scholar
• Electrical and Mechanical Services Department. 2012b. Code of practice for energy efficiency of building services installation. Hong Kong: Electrical and Mechanical Services Department.
   Google Scholar
• Electrical and Mechanical Services Department. 2012c. Energy end-use data and consumption indicators/ benchmarking tools: energy consumption indicators & benchmarking tools [online]. Electrical and Mechanical Services Department. Available at: http://www.emsd.gov.hk/emsd/eng/pee/ecib.shtml [accessed 15 October 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Electrical and Mechanical Services Department. 2012d. HK energy efficiency registration scheme for buildings [online]. Electrical and Mechanical Services Department. Available at: http://www.emsd.gov.hk/emsd/eng/pee/eersb.shtml [accessed 15 October 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Gilleard, J. D.; Wong, P. Y. L. 2004. Benchmarking facility management: applying analytic hierarchy process, Facilities 22(1): 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770410517915
   Google Scholar
• Göçer, Ö.; Hua, Y.; Göçer, K. 2015. completing the missing link in building design process: enhancing post-occupancy evaluation method for effective feedback for building performance, Buildng and Environment 89: 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haktanir, M.; Harris, P. 2005. Performance measurement practice in an independent hotel context: a case study approach, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 17(1): 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596110510577662
   Google Scholar
• Hinks, J.; Mcnay, P. 1999. The creation of a management-by-variance tool for facilities management performance assessment, Facilities 17(1/2): 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632779910248893
   Google Scholar
• Ho, D. C. W.; Chan, E. H. W.; Wong, N. Y.; Chan, M. W. 2000. Significant metrics for facilities management benchmarking in the Asia Pacific region, Facilities 18(13): 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770010358088
   Google Scholar
• Ho, D. C. W.; Chau, K. W.; Yau, Y.; Cheung, A. K. C.; Wong, S. K. 2005. Comparative study of building performance assessment schemes in Hong Kong, Hong Kong Surveyor 16(1): 47–58.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, D. C. W.; Yau, Y. 2004. Building safety and condition index: benchmarking tool for maintenance managers, in Proceedings of the CIB W70 Facilities Management and Maintenance Symposium 2004, 7–8 December 2004, Hong Kong, 149–155.
   Google Scholar
• Hong Kong Green Building Council. 2012a. BEAM Plus for existing buildings, Version 1.2. Hong Kong: Hong Kong green Building council.
   Google Scholar
• Hong Kong Green Building Council. 2012b. BEAM Plus for new buildings, Version 1.2. Hong Kong: Hong Kong green Building council.
   Google Scholar
• Hong Kong Quality Assurance Agency. 2012a. HKQAA sustainable building index [online]. Hong Kong Quality Assurance Agency. Available at: http://www.hkqaa.org/en_winestorage.php?catid=4 [accessed 2 August 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Hong Kong Quality Assurance Agency. 2012b. HKQAA sustainable building index report template and metrics handbook. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Quality Assurance Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Hong Kong Tourism Board. 2013. Overnight visitors to Hong Kong up 6.5% in 2012 [online]. Hong Kong Tourism Board. Available at: http://partnernet.hktb.com/filemanager/pressrelease/Tourism%20Stat%2012%202012.pdf [accessed 29 March 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Hopfe, C. J.; Augenbroe, G.; Hensen, J. L. M. 2013. Multi-criteria decision making under uncertainty in building performance assessment, Buildng and Environment 69: 87–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.07.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram, H.; Daskalakis, G. 1999. Measuring quality gaps in hotels: the case of Crete, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 11(1): 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596119910250364
   Google Scholar
• Innovate UK. 2015. Building performance evaluation [online]. Innovate UK. Available at: https://connect.innovateuk.org/web/building-performance-evaluation/tools-and-methods [accessed 18 June 2015]
   Google Scholar
• International Centre for Facilities. 2000. Use the serviceability tools and methods for productive and cost-effective workplaces [online]. International Centre for Facilities. Available at: http://www.icf-cebe.com/tools/what_is_stm.pdf [accessed 1 June 2015]
   Google Scholar
• International Facility Management Association. 2015. What is FM [online]. International Facility Management Association. Available at: http://www.ifma.org/know-base/browse/what-is-fm[accessed 1 March 2015]
   Google Scholar
• Kincaid, D. G. 1994. Measuring performance in facilities management, Facilities 12(6): 17–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632779410060265
   Google Scholar
• Koleoso, H.; Omirin, M.; Adewunmi, Y.; Babawale, G. 2013. Applicability of existing performance evaluation tools and concepts to the Nigerian facilities management practice, Internation Journal of Strategic Property Management 17(4): 361–376. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2013.861367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, U. 2006. Development and implementation of maintenance performance measurement system: issues and challenges, in J. Mathew; J. Kennedy; L. Ma; D. Tan; D. Anderson (eds.) Engineering and management. London: Springer, 738–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–1-84628–814–2_78
   Google Scholar
• Kutucuoglu, K. Y.; Hamali, J.; Irani, Z.; Sharp, J. L. 2001. A framework for managing maintenance using performance measurement system, International Journal of Operations & Production Management 21(1/2): 173–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570110358521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, J. H. K. 2010. Operation and maintenance budgeting for commercial buildings in Hong Kong, Construction Management and Economics 28: 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190903365665
   Google Scholar
• Lai, J. H. K. 2012. Analytical assessment and comparison of facilities management services for residential estates, Internation Journal of Strategic Property Management 16(3): 236–253. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2012.682183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, J. H. K. 2014. Maintenance performance: examination of the computer-aided maintenance data of a large commercial building, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 29(4): 04014118. https://doi. org/10.1061/(ASce)cF.1943–5509.0000619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, J. H. K.; Choi, E. C. K. 2015. Performance measurement for teaching hotels: a hierarchical system incorporating facilities management, Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education 16: 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2015.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, J. H. K.; Yik, F. W. H. 2006. Developing performance indicators for benchmarking building services operation and maintenance for commercial buildings, in Proceedings of CIBW70 Trondheim International Symposium: Changing User Demands on Buildings, 12–14 June 2006, Trondheim, norway, 283–294.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, J. H. K.; Yik, F. W. H. 2008. Benchmarking operation and maintenance costs of luxury hotels, Journal of Facilities Management 6(4): 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/14725960810908145
   Google Scholar
• Lai, J. H. K.; Yik, F. W. H. 2011. An analytical method to evaluate facility management services for residential buildings, Building and Environment 46(1): 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, J. H. K.; Yik, F. W. H. 2012. Hotel engineering facilities: a case study of maintenance performance, International Journal of Hospitality Management 31(1): 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, J. H. K.; Yik, F. W. H.; Jones, P. 2008. expenditure on operation and maintenance service and rental income of commercial buildings, Facilities 26(5/9): 242–265. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770810865014
   Google Scholar
• Lavy, S.; Garcia, J. A.; Dixit, M. K. 2010. establishment of KPIs for facilities performance measurement: review of literature, Facilities 18(9/10): 440–464. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632771011057189
   Google Scholar
• Lavy, S.; Garcia, J. A.; Manish, K. D. 2014a. KPIs for facility’s performance assessment, part I: identification and categorization of core indicators, Facilities 32(5/6): 256–274. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-09–2012–0066
   Google Scholar
• Lavy, S.; Garcia, J. A.; Manish, K. D. 2014b. KPIs for facility’s performance assessment, part II: identification of variables and deriving expressions for core indicators, Facilities 32(5/6): 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-09–2012–0067
   Google Scholar
• Lavy, S.; Shohet, L. M. 2007. A strategic integrated healthcare facility management model, International Journal of Strategic Property Management 11(3): 125–142.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, M. Y.; Lu, X.; Ip, H. Y. 2005. Investigating key components of the facility management of secondary schools in Hong Kong, Facilities 23(5): 226–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770510588637
   Google Scholar
• Loosemore, M.; Hsin, Y. Y. 2001. Customer-focused benchmarking for facilities management, Facilities 19(13): 464–475. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006204
   Google Scholar
• Lützkendorf, T.; Lorenz, D. P. 2006. using an integrated performance approach in building assessment tools, Building Research & Information 34(4): 334–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210600672914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Man, C. S.; Lai, J. H. K.; Yik, F. W. H. 2012. A review of the green building assessment methods of the US, UK, China and Hong Kong, in Proceedings of the 3rd Greater Pearl River Delta Conference on Building Operation and Maintenance, 10 November 2012, guangzhou, china, 29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Man, C. S.; Lai, J. H. K.; Yik, F. W. H. 2013. Developing a research framework for studying performance evaluation of engineering facilities in commercial buildings in Hong Kong, in S. Kajewski; K. Manley; K. Hampson (Eds.). Proceedings of the 19th International CIB World Building Congress, 5–9 May 2013, Queensland university of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, V.; Kennerley, M.; Neely, A. 2004. Impact of PMS on business performance: a methodological approach. Bedfordshire: Centre for Business Performance, cranfield School of Management, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• McDougall, G.; Kelly, J. R.; Hinks, J.; Bititci, U. S. 2002. A review of the leading performance measurement tools for assessing buildings, Journal of Facilities Management 1(2): 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1108/14725960310807881
   Google Scholar
• Min, H.; Min, H. 1996. Competitive benchmarking of Korean luxury hotels using the analytic hierarchy process and competitive gap analysis, Journal of Services Marketing 10(3): 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876049610119794
   Google Scholar
• Min, H.; Min, H. 1997. Benchmarking the quality of hotel services: managerial perspectives, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 14(6): 582–597. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656719710186209
   Google Scholar
• Min, H.; Min, H.; Chung, K. 2002. Dynamic benchmarking of hotel service quality, Journal of Services Marketing 16(4): 302–321. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040210433211
   Google Scholar
• Muchiri, P.; Pintelon, L.; Gelders, L.; Martin, H. 2011. Development of maintenance function performance measurement framework and indicators, International Journal of Production Economics 131(1): 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.04.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myeda, N. E.; Kamaruzzaman, S. N.; Pitt, M. 2011. Measuring the performance of office buildings maintenance management in Malaysia, Journal of Facilities Management 9(3): 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1108/14725961111148090
   Google Scholar
• Najmi, M.; Rigas, J.; Fan, I. S. 2005. A framework to review performance measurement systems, Business Process Management Journal 11(2): 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150510591129
   Google Scholar
• Neely, A.; Gregory, M.; Platts, K. 1995. Performance measurement system design: a literature review and research agenda, International Journal of Operations & Production Management 15(4): 80–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579510083622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parida, A.; Chattopadhyay, G. 2007. Methodology and theory – development of a multi-criteria hierarchical framework for maintenance measurement (MPM), Journal of Quality in Maintenance 13(3): 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552510710780276
   Google Scholar
• Parida, A.; Kumar, U. 2006. Applications and case studies – maintenance performance measurement (MPM): issues and challenges, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 12(3): 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552510610685084
   Google Scholar
• Pati, D.; Park, C. S.; Augenbroe, G. 2009. roles of quantified expressions of building performance assessment in facility procurement and management, Building and Environment 44(4): 773–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.06.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preiser, W.; Rabinowitz, H.; White, E. T. 1988. Postoccupancy evaluation. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
   Google Scholar
• Prill, R.; Kunkle, R.; Novosel, D. 2009. Development of an operation and maintenance rating system for commercial buildings. USA: National Center for Energy Management and Building Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Professional Retail Store Maintenance Association. 2012. KPI applications in retail facilities management – best practices white paper. Dallas, Texas: Professional Retail Store Maintenance Association.
   Google Scholar
• Rashvand, P.; Majid, M. Z. A. 2014. Critical criteria on client and customer satisfaction for the issue of performance measurement, Journal of Management in Engineering 30(1): 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASce)Me.1943–5479.0000183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rating and Valuation Department. 2014. Hong Kong property review 2014. Hong Kong: Rating and Valuation Department.
   Google Scholar
• Rimbalová, J.; Vilčeková, S. 2013. The proposal of key performance indicators in facilities management and determination the weights of significance, Journal of Civil Engineering 8(2): 73–84. https://doi.org/10.2478/sspjce-2013–0020
   Google Scholar
• Riratanaphong, C.; Van der Voordt, T. J. M. 2014. Measuring the added value of workplace change: comparison between theory and practice, in Proceedings of CIB Facilities Management Conference: Using facilities in an open world creating value for all stakeholders, 21–23 May 2014, Copenhagen, Denmark, 94–105.
   Google Scholar
• Róka-Madarász, L. 2011. Performance measurement for maintenance management of real estate, Acta Polytechnica Hungarica 8(1): 161–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shohet, I. M. 2006. Key performance indicators for strategic healthcare facilities maintenance, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 132(4): 345–352. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733–9364(2006)132:4(345)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, J. D.; Glagoia, C.; Ledbetter, W. B. 1994. Quality-measuremnt matrix, Journal of Management in Engineering 10(6): 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASce)9742–597X(1994)10:6(30)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szigeti, F.; Davis, G. 2001. Matching people and their facilities: using the ASTM/AnSI standards on whole building functionality and serviceability, in Proceedings of CIB World Building Congress, April 2001, Wellington, New Zealand. Available at: http://www.icf-cebe.com/cib/papers/icf%20szigeti_davis_paper_99_cib2001.pdf [accessed 1 June 2015]
   Google Scholar
• Szigeti, F.; Davis, G. 2005. Performance based building: conceptual framework [online]. CIBdf. Available at: http://www.pebbu.nl/resources/allreports/downloads/04_framework_final.pdf [accessed 10 June 2015]
   Google Scholar
• The government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. 2015. Hong Kong – the facts, geography [online]. The government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Available at: http://www.gov.hk/en/about/abouthk/facts.htm [accessed 2 April 2015]
   Google Scholar
• Then, D. S. S. 2005. A proactive property management model that integrates real estate provision and facilities services management, Internation Journal of Strategic Property Management 9(1): 33–42.
   Google Scholar
• Then, D. S. S.; Tan, T. H.; Chau, C. K. 2004. An intergrated asset performance framework for operational buildings – preliminary results of focus group validations in Hong Kong and Australia, in Proceedings of CIB W70 2004 Hong Kong International Symposium – Human Elements in Facilities Management, 7–8 December 2004, cIB Publication no. 297. Hong Kong, 239–250.
   Google Scholar
• Thor, C. G. 1991. Performance measurement in a research organization, National Productivity Review 10(4): 499–507. https://doi.org/10.1002/npr.4040100407
   Google Scholar
• Training resources and Data exchange. 1995. How to measure performance: a handbook of techniques and tools. U.S. Department of Energy.
   Google Scholar
• Tsang, A. H. C.; Jardine, A. K. S.; Kolodny, H. 1999. Measuring maintenance performance: a holistic approach, International Journal of Operations & Production Management 19(7): 691–715. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579910271674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Horenbeek, A.; Pintelon, L. 2014. Development of a maintenance performance measurement framework – using the analytic network process (ANP) for maintenance performance indicator selection, Omega 42(1): 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2013.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vesela, V.; Michael, E. 2001. Indicators of sustainable production: framework and methodology, Journal of Cleaner Production 9: 519–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959–6526(01)00010–5
   Google Scholar
• Webster, C.; Hung, L. C. 1994. Measuring service quality and promoting decentring, The TQM Magazine 6(5): 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/09544789410067871
   Google Scholar
• Yusof, N. A.; Abdullah, S.; Mohd Najib, N. U. 2014. How does communication influence the perceived performance of maintenance services on multi-storey public housing?, Internation Journal of Strategic Property Management 18(4): 380–392. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2014.971918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimring, C. 2014. Facility performance evaluation (FPE) [online]. Washington, DC: National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS). Available at: http://www.wbdg.org/resources/fpe.php [accessed 18 April 2015]
   Google Scholar