New MCEQLS TFN method for evaluating quality and reusability of learning objects

References

• Antuchevičienė, J.; Turskis, Z.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2006. Modelling renewal of construction objects applying methods of the game theory, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 12(4): 263–268.
   Google Scholar
• Balezentis, A.; Balezentis, T.; Brauers, W. K. M. 2012. MULTIMOORA-FG: a multi-objective decision making method for linguistic reasoning with an application to personnel selection, Informatica 23(2): 173–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becta. 2007. Quality principles for digital learning resources [online], [cited 22 May 212]. Available from Internet: http://www.teachfind.com/becta/becta-schools-resources-digital-resources-quality-principles-digital-learning-resources-0
   Google Scholar
• Belton, V.; Stewart, T. J. 2002. Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4
   Google Scholar
• Brauers, W. K. M.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2012. Robustness of MULTIMOORA: a method for multi-objective optimization, Informatica 23(1): 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brereton, P.; Budgen, D.; Bennett, K.; Munro, M.; Layzell, P.; Macaulay, L. 1999. The future of software: defining the research agenda, Communications of the ACM 42(12): 78–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzemyda, G.; Šaltenis, V.; Tiešis, V. 2007. Optimizavimo metodai [Optimisation methods]. Vilnius: Moksloaidai, 144–159. (In Lithuanian).
   Google Scholar
• eQNet (Quality Network for a European Learning Resource Exchange) project official site. 2012 [online], [cited 22 May 2012]. Available from Internet: http://eqnet.eun.org
   Google Scholar
• EUN (European Schoolnet) official site. 2012 [online], [cited 22 May 2012]. Available from Internet: http://www.eun.org/
   Google Scholar
• IEEE LTSC (the Learning Technology Standards Committee's of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) official site. 2012 [online], [cited 22 May 2012]. Available from Internet: http://ieeeltsc.org/
   Google Scholar
• ISO/IEC 14598-1:1999. Information technology – Software product evaluation – Part 1: General overview. 1st ed.
   Google Scholar
• ISO/IEC 9126-1:2001(E). Software engineering – Product quality – Part 1: Quality model.
   Google Scholar
• Koppi, T.; Lavitt, N. 2003. Institutional use of learning objects three years on: lessons learned and future directions, Presented at Edmedia 2001: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, 2003, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Kurilovas, E.; Vinogradova, I.; Serikoviene, S. 2011. Application of multiple criteria decision analysis and optimisation methods in evaluation of quality of learning objects, International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design 1(4): 62–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105.
   Google Scholar
• Kurilovas, E.; Dagiene, V. 2010. Evaluation of quality of the learning software. Basics, concepts, methods: Monograph: Saarbrücken, Germany: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Leacock, T. L.; Nesbit, J. C. 2007. A framework for evaluating the quality of multimedia learning resources, Educational Technology & Society 10(2): 44–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, P. 2012. An approach to group decision making based on 2-dimension uncertain linguistic information, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 18(3): 424–437. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.702139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LRE (European Learning Resource Exchange service for schools) official site. 2012 [online], [cited 22 May 2012]. Available from Internet: http://lreforschools.eun.org/web/guest/home
   Google Scholar
• McGreal, R. 2004. Learning objects: a practical definition, International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning 1: 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• MELT (Metadata Ecology for Learning and Teaching) project official site. 2008 [online], [cited 22 May 2012]. Available from Internet: http://melt-project.eun.org
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 2000. An introduction to the evaluation of learning technology, Educational Technology & Society 3(4): 20–30.
   Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S.; Tzeng, G. H. 2003. Defuzzification within a multicriteria decision model, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 11(5): 635–652. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218488503002387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ounaies, H. Z.; Jamoussi, Y.; Ben Ghezala, H. H. 2009. Evaluation framework based on fuzzy measured method in adaptive learning system, Themes in Science and Technology Education 1(1): 49–58.
   Google Scholar
• Paulsson, F.; Naeve, A. 2006a. Establishing technical quality criteria for learning objects [online], [cited 22 May 2012]. Available from Internet: http://www.frepa.org/wp/wp-content/files/Paulsson-Establ-Tech-Qual_finalv1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Paulsson, F.; Naeve, A. 2006b. Virtual workspace environment (VWE): a taxonomy and service oriented architecture framework for modularized virtual learning environments – applying the learning object concept to the VLE, International Journal on E-Learning 5(1): 45–57.
   Google Scholar
• Petkus, T.; Filatovas, E.; Kurasova, O. 2009. Investigation of human factors while solving multiple criteria optimization problems in computer network, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 15(3): 464–479. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.464-479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reigeluth, C. M.; Nelson, L. M. 1997. A new paradigm of ISD?, in Branch, R. C.; Minor, B. B. (Eds.). Educational media and technology yearbook 22: 24–35. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Song, W. W.; Andersson, M. B.; Hakkarainen, S. E.; Karlberg, P.; Soltesz, T. 1999. Metadata for the management of electronic documents in the governmental organisations and learning objects in the learning domain. SITI, SISU, Kista, Research report SITI 99:03, June, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Sosteric, M.; Hesemeier, S. 2002. When is a learning object not an object: a first step towards a theory of learning objects, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 3.
   Google Scholar
• Stanujkic, D.; Magdalinovic, N.; Stojanovic, S.; Jovanovic, R. 2012. Extension of ratio system part of MOORA method for solving decision-making problems with interval data, Informatica 23(1): 141–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turskis, Z. 2008. Multi-attribute contractors ranking method by applying ordering of feasible alternatives of solutions in terms of preferability technique, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 14(2): 224–239. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1392-8619.2008.14.224-239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uppuluri, V. R. R. 1989. Prioritization techniques based on stochastic paired comparisons, in Karpak, B.; Zionts, S. (Eds.). Multiple criteria decision making and risk analysis using microcomputers, NATO ASI Series, F56, 293–303.
   Google Scholar
• Vargo, J.; Nesbit, J. C.; Belfer, K.; Archambault, A. 2003. Learning object evaluation: computer mediated collaboration and inter-rater reliability, International Journal of Computers and Applications 25(3): 198–205.
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, D. A. 2000. Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: a definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy [online], [cited 22 May 2012]. Available from Internet: http://www.reusability.org/read/
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, D. A. 2002. The instructional use of learning objects, in Wiley, D. A. (Ed.). 1st ed. Bloominton: Agency for Instructional Technology and Association for Educational Communications & Technology, 15–19.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, W. W.; Lee, Y. T. 2007. Developing global manager's competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method, Expert Systems with Applications 32(2): 499–507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2005.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z. 2008. A new logarithmic normalization method in games theory, Informatica 19(2): 303–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z. 2010. A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 16(2): 159–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K.; Zakarevičius, A.; Antuchevičienė, J. 2006. Evaluation of ranking accuracy in multicriteria decisions, Informatica 17(4): 601–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zolfani, S. H.; Chen, I.-S.; Rezaeiniya, N.; Tamošaitienė, J. 2012. A hybrid MCDM model encompassing AHP and COPRAS-G methods for selecting company supplier in Iran, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 18(3): 529–543. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.709472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Žilinskas, A. 2005. Matematinis programavimas [Mathematical Programming] [online], [cited 22 May 2012]. Available from Internet: http://www.vdu.lt/MatematinisProgramavimas/ (in Lithuanian).
   Google Scholar