Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) of Socio-Economic Systems: a systematic review

References

• Ahmed, K.; Sanchez-Triana, E. (Eds.). 2008. Strategic environmental assessment for policies. Washington, DC: World Bank. 222 p.
   Google Scholar
• Abbasianjahromi, H.; Rajaie, H. 2012. Developing a project portfolio selection model for contractor firms considering the risk factor, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 18(6): 879–889. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2012.734856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozejko, W.; Hejducki, Z.; Wodecki, M. 2012. Applying metaheuristic strategies in construction projects management, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 18(5): 621–630. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2012.719837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, L.; Thérivel, R. 2000. Principles to guide the development of strategic environmental assessment methodology, Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal 18(3): 183–189. http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/147154600781767385.
   Google Scholar
• Brauers, W. K. M.; Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2010. Regional development in Lithuania considering multiple objectives by the MOORA method, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 16(4): 613–640. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalal-Clayton, B.; Sadler, B. (Eds.). 2005. Strategic environmental assessment: a sourcebook and reference guide to international experience. London: Earthscan. 504 p.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, T. B. 2003. Strategic environmental assessment in post-modern times, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 23(2): 155–170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00094-X.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, T. B. 2007. Theory and practice of strategic environmental assessment: London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Gachechiladze-Bozheskua, M.; Fischer, T. B. 2012. Benefits of and barriers to SEA follow-up – theory and practice, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 34: 22–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.11.006.
   Google Scholar
• Geneletti, D. 2013. Ecosystem services in environmental impact assessment and strategic environmental assessment, Environmental impact assessment review, Special Issue on Ecosystem Services in EIA and SEA (SI) 40: 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R. B. 2006. Beyond the pillars: sustainability assessment as a framework for effective integration of social, economic and ecological considerations in significant decision-making, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy & Management 8(3): 259–280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1464333206002517.
   Google Scholar
• Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2003b. Quantitative evaluation of the significance of hierarchically structured indices, Business: Theory and Practice 3(3): 111–116.
   Google Scholar
• Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2003a. Quantitative evaluation of the significance of hierarchically structured indexes, in International Conference on Modelling and Simulation of Business System, May 13–14, 2003, Vilnius, Lithuania, 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2004a. Quantitative evaluation of the strategic potential of enterprises, Business: Theory and Practice 4(1): 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2004b. Hierarchical structuring of elements based on their transitivity, Business: Theory and Practice 4(3): 85–89.
   Google Scholar
• Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2005. Generation of a set of evaluation criteria, Business: Theory and Practice 6(4): 199–207.
   Google Scholar
• Ginevicius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2007. Complex assessment of sustainable development of the state regions with emphasis on ecological and dwelling conditions, Ekologija 53: 41–48.
   Google Scholar
• Ginevičius, R.; Butkevičius, A.; Podvezko, V. 2006. Complex evaluation of economic development of the Baltic States and Poland, Ekonomický časopis 54(9): 918–930.
   Google Scholar
• Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V.; Andruškevičius, A. 2007. Quantitative evaluation of building technology, International Journal of Technology Management 40(1/2/3): 192–214.
   Google Scholar
• Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2008a. Multicriteria graphical-analytical evaluation of the financial state of construction enterprises, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 14(4): 452–461. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1392-8619.2008.14.452-461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2008b. Housing in the context of economic and social development of Lithuanian regions, International Journal of Environment and Pollution (IJEP) 35(2/3/4): 309–330.
   Google Scholar
• Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2008c. Multicriteria evaluation of Lithuanian banks from the perspective of their reliability for clients, Journal of Business Economics and Management 9(4): 257–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1611-1699.2008.9.257-267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V.; Bruzgė, Š. 2008a. Evaluating the effect of state aid to business by multicriteria methods, Journal of Business Economics and Management 9(3): 167–180. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1611-1699.2008.9.167-180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V.; Raslanas, S. 2008b. Evaluating the alternative solutions of wall insulation by multicriteria methods, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 14(4): 217–226. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1392-3730.2008.14.20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginevicius, R.; Gineviciene, V.; Podvezko, V. 2008c. The effectiveness of enterprise marketing system, in International Conference on Marketing and Management Sciences (ICMMS), May, 2008, Athens, Greece, 31–32.
   Google Scholar
• Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2009. Evaluating the changes in economic and social development of Lithuanian counties by multiple criteria methods, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 15(3): 418–436. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.418-436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V.; Novotny, M.; Komka, A. 2012. Comprehensive quantitative evaluation of the strategic potential of an enterprise, Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research 46(1): 65–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V.; Ginevičius, A. 2013. Quantitative evaluation of enterprise marketing activities, Journal of Business Economics and Management 14(1): 200–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2012.731143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilding-Rydevik, T.; Bjarnadóttir, H. 2007. Context awareness and sensitivity in SEA implementation, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 27(7): 666–684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.05.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaklauskas, A.; Kelpšienė, L.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Bardauskienė, D.; Kaklauskas, G.; Urbonas, M.; Sorakas, V. 2011. Crisis management in construction and real estate: conceptual modeling at the micro-, meso-and macro-levels, Land Use Policy 28(1): 280–293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapliński, O. 2010. Review of trans-border co-operation in construction management between Lithuania, Germany and Poland, Evolution of Science and Technology 2(1): 5–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/est.2010.22.
   Google Scholar
• Kapliński, O.; Peldschus, F. 2011. The problems of quantitative evaluation of socio-economic system development: review, Inzinerine Ekonomika – Enginering Economics 22(4): 345–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke, Y.; Wang, S. Q.; Chan, A. P. C. 2012. Risk management practice in China's public-private partnership projects, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 18(5): 675–684. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2012.723380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornov, L.; Thissen, W. 2000. Rationality in decision and policy-making: implications for strategic environmental assessment, Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal 18(3): 191–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/147154600781767402.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, N.; Walsh, F. 1992. Strategic environmental assessment: an overview, Project Appraisal 7(3): 126–136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02688867.1992.9726853.
   Google Scholar
• Marsden, S. 2008. Strategic environmental assessment in international and European law. London: Earthscan. 330 p.
   Google Scholar
• Marzuki, P. F.; Permadi, H.; Sunaryo, I. 2012. Factors affecting job satisfaction of workers in Indonesian construction companies, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 18(3): 299–309. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2012.698889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maskeliunaitė, L.; Sivilevičius, H.; Podvezko, V. 2009. Research on the quality of passenger transportation by railway, Transport 24(2): 100–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1648-4142.2009.24.100-112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, R. K. 2012. Environmental impact assessment: the state of the art, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 30(1): 5–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.661557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M.; Dalkmann, H. 2001. Decision making and strategic environmental assessment, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy & Management 3(3): 305–327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1464333201000728.
   Google Scholar
• Nitz, T.; Brown, L. 2001. SEA must learn how policy making works, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy & Management 3(3): 329–342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S146433320100073X.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, B.; Storey, K. 2001. Towards a structured approach to strategic environmental assessment, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy & Management 3(4): 483–508. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1464333201000832.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, B. F. 2000. Strategic environmental assessment: what is it and what makes it strategic?, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy & Management 2(2): 203–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S146433320000014X.
   Google Scholar
• Partidario, M. R. 1996. Strategic environmental assessment: key issues emerging from recent practice, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 16(1): 31–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0195-9255(95)00106-9.
   Google Scholar
• Partidario, M. R. 2000. Elements of an SEA framework: improving the added-value of SEA, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 20(6): 647–663. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00069-X.
   Google Scholar
• Partidario, M. R. 2007. Scales and associated data: what is enough for SEA needs?, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 27(5): 460–478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partidario, M. R.; Arts, J. 2005. Exploring the concept of strategic environmental assessment follow-up, Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal 23(3): 246–257. http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/147154605781765481.
   Google Scholar
• Podvezko, V. 1984. Design and analysis of complex probabilistic models of prediction: Disertation [Postroenie i analiz kompleksa modeley veroiatnostnogo prognozirovaniia] (in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Podvezko, V. 2006. Complex evaluation of social and economic processes: Habilitation: Vilnius: Technika.
   Google Scholar
• Podvezko, V. 2009. Application of AHP technique, Journal of Business Economics and Management 10(2): 181–189. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1611-1699.2009.10.181-189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podvezko, V. 2011. The comparative analysis of MCDA methods SAW and COPRAS, Inzinerine Ekonomika – Engineering Economics 2(22): 134–146.
   Google Scholar
• Podvezko, V.; Podviezko, A. 2010. Dependence of multi-criteria evaluation result on choice of preference functions and their parameters, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 16(1): 143–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.09.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podvezko, V.; Mitkus, S.; Trinkuniene, E. 2010. Complex evaluation of contracts for construction, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 16(2): 287–297. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2010.33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez, F.; Seco, A. 2012. Civil engineering at the crossroads in the twenty-first century, Science and Engineering Ethics 18(4): 681–687. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9258-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ren, Y.; Skibniewski, M. J.; Jiang, S. 2012. Building information modeling integrated with electronic commerce material procurement and supplier performance management system, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 18(5): 642–654. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2012.719835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiederig, T.; Tietze, F.; Herstatt, C. 2012. Green innovation in technology and innovation management – an exploratory literature review, R&D Management 42(2): 180–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00672.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheate, W. R.; Dagg, S.; Richardson, J.; Aschemann, R.; Palerm, J.; Steen, U. 2003. Integrating the environment into strategic decision-making: conceptualizing policy SEA, European Environment 13(1): 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eet.305.
   Google Scholar
• Sivilevičius, H.; Podvezko, V.; Vakrinienė, S. 2011. The use of constrained and unconstrained optimization models in gradation design of hot mix asphalt mixture, Construction and Building Materials 25(1): 115–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoeglehner, G.; Brown, L.; Kornov, L. 2009. SEA and planning: ownership of strategic environmental assessment by the planners is the key to its effectiveness, Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal 27(2): 111–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/146155109X438742.
   Google Scholar
• Tamošaitienė, J.; Bartkienė, L.; Vilutienė, T. 2010. The new development trend of operational research in civil engineering and sustainable development as a result of collaboration between German-Lithuanian-Polish scientific triangle, Journal of Business Economics and Management 11(2): 316–340. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2010.16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbanavičienė, V.; Kaklauskas, A.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Seniut, M. 2009. The web-based real estate multiple criteria negotiation decision support system: a new generation of decision support systems, International Journal of Strategic Property Management 13(3): 267–286. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1648-715X.2009.13.267-286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ustinovičius, L.; Podvezko, V.; Ginevičius, R. 2006. A method of determining risk zones of investment in real estate, Control and Cybernetics 35(2): 471–486.
   Google Scholar
• Ustinovičius, L.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Podvezko, V. 2007. Application of a quantitative multiple criteria decision making (MCDM-1) approach to the analysis of investments in construction, Control and Cybernetics 36(1): 251–268.
   Google Scholar
• Verheem, R.; Tonk, J. 2000. Strategic environmental assessment: one concept, multiple forms, Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal 19(3): 177–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/147154600781767411.
   Google Scholar
• Vicente, G.; Partidaacuterio, M. R. 2006. SEA: enhancing communication for better environmental decisions, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 26(8): 696–706. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2006.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, L.-R.; Chen, J.-H.; Wang, H.-W. 2012. Assessing impacts of information technology on project success through knowledge management practice, Automation in Construction 22: 182–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.06.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K.; Ginevičius, R.; Tamošaitienė, J.; Banaitis, A. 2013. Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods in civil engineering: overview and trends, Bauprozessmanagement und Immobilienentwicklung: Schriftenreihe des Lehrstuhl für Bauprozessmanagement und Immobilienentwicklung. Band. 33 Munchen: Technische Universitat Munchen. (Lehrstuhl fur Bauprozessmanagement und Immobilienentwicklung, Band 33): 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A. 2007. Mehrzielselektion für Entscheidungen im Bauwesen: Stuttgart: Fraunhofer IRB Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A.; Turskis, Z.; Tamošaitienė, J. 2009. Multi-attribute decision-making model by applying grey numbers, Informatica 20(2): 305–320 [online], [cited 17 April 2013]. Vilnius: Matematikos ir informatikos institutas. ISSN 0868-4952. Available from Internet: http://www.mii.lt/informatica/pdf/INFO750.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A.; Turskis, Z.; Tamosaitiene, J.; Kalibatas, D. 2011b. Assessment of the indoor environment of dwelling houses by applying the COPRAS-G method: Lithuania case study, Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 10(5): 637–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z. 2011. Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 17(2): 397–427. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2011.593291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z.; Tamosaitiene, J. 2011a. Selection of construction enterprises management strategy based on the SWOT and multi-criteria analysis, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 11(4): 1063–1082. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1644-9665(12)60096-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y.; Ng, S. T. 2012. An ant colony system based decision support system for construction time-cost optimization, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 18(4): 580–589. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2012.704164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar