References
- Aguezzoul, A. 2014. Third-party logistics selection problem: a literature review on criteria and methods, Omega 49: 69–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.05.009
- Arms, H.; Wiecher, M.; Kleiderman, V. 2012. Dynamic models for managing big decisions, Strategy & Leadership 40(5): 39–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10878571211257177
- Bana e Costa, C. A.; Vansnick, J. C. 1994. MACBETH: an interactive path towards the construction of cardinal value functions, International Transactions in Operational Research 1(4): 489–500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0969-6016(94)90010-8
- Behzadian, M.; Kazemzadeh, R. B.; Albadvi, A.; Aghdasi, M. 2010. PROMETHEE: a comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications, European Journal of Operational Research 200(1): 198–215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.021
- Behzadian, M.; Khanmohammadi Otaghsara, S.; Yazdani, M.; Ignatius, J. 2012. A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications, Expert Systems with Applications 39(17): 13051–13069. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056
- Brans, J. P.; Mareschal, B.; Vincke, P. 1984. PROMETHEE: a new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis, in J. P. Brans (Ed.). Operational Research ‘84 IFORS 84, 6–10 August 1984, Washington, D.C., USA. North Holland, 477–490.
- Brauers, W. K. M.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2006. The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy, Control and Cybernetics 35(2): 443–468.
- Brauers, W. K. M.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2010. Project management by MULTIMOORA as an instrument for transition economies, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 16(1): 5–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.01
- Campanella, G.; Ribeiro, R. A. 2011. A framework for dynamic multiple-criteria decision making, Decision Support Systems 52(1): 52–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2011.05.003
- Chai, J.; Liu, J. N. K.; Ngai, E. W. T. 2013. Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: a systematic review of literature, Expert Systems with Applications 40(10): 3872–3885. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.040
- Chen, Y.; Li, B. 2011. Dynamic multi-attribute decision making model based on triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers, Scientia Iranica B18(2): 268–274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2011.03.022
- Durbach, I. N.; Stewart, T. J. 2012. Modeling uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis, European Journal of Operational Research 223(1): 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.04.038
- Ginevicius, R. 2011. A new determining method for the criteria weights in multi-criteria evaluation, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 10(6): 1067–1095. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219622011004713
- Gonzalez-Prida, V.; Viveros, P.; Barbera, L.; Crespo Marquez, A. 2014. Dynamic analytic hierarchy process: AHP method adapted to a changing environment, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 24(4): 457–475.
- Hashemkhani Zolfani, S.; Aghdaie, M. H.; Derakhti, A.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Morshed Varzandeh, M. H. 2013. Decision making on business issues with foresight perspective; an application of new hybrid MCDM model in shopping mall locating, Expert Systems with Applications 40(17): 7111–7121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.06.040
- Hwang, C. L.; Yoon, K. 1981. Multiple attribute decision making: a state of the art survey: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 186. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
- Ishizaka, A.; Labib, A. 2011. Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process, Expert Systems with Applications 38(11): 14336–14345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143
- Jassbi, J. J.; Ribeiro, R. A.; Varela, L. R. 2014. Dynamic MCDM with future knowledge for supplier selection, Journal of Decision Systems 23(3): 232–248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2014.886850
- Keršulienė, V.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z. 2010. Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA), Journal of Business Economics and Management 11(2): 243–258. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2010.12
- Leong, T. Y. 1998. Multiple perspective dynamic decision making, Artificial Intelligence 105(1–2): 209–261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(98)00082-4
- Lin, Y.; Lee, P.; Ting, H. 2008. Dynamic multi-attribute decision making model with grey number evaluations, Expert Systems with Applications 35(4): 1638–1644. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.064
- Liou, J. J. H.; Tzeng, G. H. 2012. Comments on “MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING (MCDM) Methods in Economics: an overview”, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 18(4): 672–695. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.753489
- Lou, C.; Kou, G.; Peng, Y.; Ge, X. 2010. DMCDM: a dynamic multi criteria decision making model for sovereign credit default risk evaluation, 2nd International Conference on Software Engineering and Data Mining (SEDM), 23–25 June 2010, Chengdu, 489–494.
- MacCrimon, K. R. 1968. Decision marking among multiple–attribute alternatives: a survey and consolidated approach. RAND Memorandum, RM-4823-ARPA. The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif.
- Mardani, A.; Jusoh, A.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2015. Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications –two decades review from 1994 to 2014, Expert Systems with Applications 42(8): 4126–4148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.003
- Rezaei, J. 2015. Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method, Omega 53: 49–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009
- Roy, B. 1968. Classement et choix en presence de point de vue multiples: Le methode ELECTRE, Revue Francaise d'Informatique et de Recherche Operationnelle (RIRO) 8: 57–75.
- Ondrus, J.; Bui, T.; Pigneur, Y. 2014. A foresight support system using MCDM methods, Group Decision and Negotiation 24(2): 333–358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10726-014-9392-8
- Opricovic, S. 1998. Multiple criteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade (in Serbian).
- Ozernoy, V. M. 1988. Multiple criteria decision making in the USSR: a survey, Naval Research Logistics 35(6): 543–566. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1520-6750(198812)35:6<543::AID-NAV3220350604>3.0.CO;2-Q
- Saaty, T. L. 1980. The analytical hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Saaty, T. L. 2007. Time dependent decision-making; dynamic priorities in the AHP/ANP: generalizing from points to functions and from real to complex variables, Mathematical and Computer Modelling 46(7–8): 860–891. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.028
- Salo, A.; Gustafsson, T.; Ramanathan, R. 2003. Multi-criteria methods for technology foresight, Journal of Forecasting 22(2–3): 235–255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/for.850
- Scott, J. A.; Ho, W.; Dey, P. K. 2012. A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for bioenergy systems, Energy 42(1): 146–156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.03.074
- Tadic, S. R.; Zecevic, S. M.; Krstic, M. D. 2014. Ranking of logistics system scenarios for central business district, Promet –Traffic & Transportation 26(2): 159–167.
- Teng, D. 2011. Topsis method for dynamic evaluation of hi-tech enterprises strategic performance with intuitionistic fuzzy information, Advances in Information Sciences and Service Sciences 3(11): 443–449. http://dx.doi.org/10.4156/aiss.vol3.issue11.55
- Trutnevyte, E.; Stauffacher, M.; Scholz, R. W. 2012. Linking stakeholder visions with resource allocation scenarios and multi-criteria assessment, European Journal of Operational Research 219(3): 762–772. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.01.009
- Wang, J. Q.; Zhang, H. Y.; Ren, S. C. 2013. Grey stochastic multi-criteria decision-making approach based on expected probability degree, Scientia Iranica E20(3): 873–878.
- Wang, Y.; Shi, X.; Sun, J.; Qian, W. 2014. A grey interval relational degree-based dynamic multi-attribute decision making method and its application in investment decision making, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Article ID 607016, 1–6.
- Xu, Z. 2008. On multi-period multi-attribute decision making, Knowledge-Based Systems 21(2): 164–171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2007.05.007
- Xu, Z.; Yager, R. 2008. Dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 48(1): 246–262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2007.08.008
- Yao, S. 2010. A distance method for multi-period fuzzy multi-attribute decision making, International Conference on E-Product E-Service and E-Entertainment (ICEEE), 7–9 November 2010, Henan, 1–4.
- Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A. 1996. Determination of an efficient contractor by using the new method of multicriteria assessment, in D. A. Langford, A. Retik (Eds.). International Symposium for “The Organisation and Management of Construction”. Shaping Theory and Practice 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65; London, Weinheim, New York, Tokyo, Melbourne, Madras. –London: E and FN SPON, 94–104.
- Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z. 2010. A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 16(2): 159–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.10
- Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z. 2011. Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 17(2): 397–427. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2011.593291
- Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z.; Antucheviciene, J.; Zakarevicius, A. 2012. Optimization of weighted aggregated sum product assessment, Electronics and Electrical Engineering (6): 3–6.
- Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z.; Kildiene, S. 2014. State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 20(1): 165–179. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2014.892037
- Zhang, Z. 2012. An approach to dynamic multi-attribute decision making for choosing green supplier, Journal of Convergence Information Technology 7(21): 261–269. http://dx.doi.org/10.4156/jcit.vol7.issue21.33
- Zulueta, Y.; Martínez-Moreno, J.; Martínez, L.; Espinilla, M. 2013. A discriminative dynamic index based on bipolar aggregation operators for supporting dynamic multi-criteria decision making, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 228: 237–248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39165-1_25