References
- Appleyard, D.; Lynch, K.; Myer, J. R. 1964. The view from the road. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Conroy, R. 2003. The secret is to follow your nose: route path selection and angularity, Environment and Behavior 35: 107–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916502238867
- Figueiredo, L.; Amorim, L. 2005. Continuity lines in the axial system, in A. van Nes (Ed.). Proceedings of the 5th International Space Syntax Symposium, 2005 TU Delft, Faculty of Architecture, Delft, 161–174.
- Gell, A. 1985. How to read a map: remarks on the practical logic of navigation, Man, New series 20(2): 271–285.
- Golledge, R.; Garling, T. 2003. Cognitive maps and urban travel, Research paper No. 601. University of California Transportation Center.
- Hilier, B.; Hanson, J. 1984. Social logic of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597237
- Hillier, B. 1996. Space is the machine. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Hölscher, C.; Conroy, D. R.; Turner, A. 2007. Space syntax and spatial cognition, Proceedings of the Workshop held in Bremen 2007 2006, SFB/TR 8 Monographs (2).
- Istomin, K.; Dawyer, M. 2009. Finding the way: a critical discussion of anthropological theories of human spatial orientation, Current Anthropology 50(1): 29–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/595624
- Jacobs, A. B. 1993. Great streets. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Lynch, K. 1960. The image of the city. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Marshall, S. 2005. Streets & patterns. London: New York.
- Penn, A. 2003. Space syntax and spatial cognition: or why the axial line?, Environment and Behavior 35: 30–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916502238864
- Sadalla, E. K.; Montello, D. R. 1989. Remembering changes in direction, Environment and Behavior 21(3): 346–363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916589213006
- Sanoff, H. 1991. Visual research methods in design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
- Space Syntax [online], [cited 15 November 2010]. Available from Inernet: www.spacesyntax.com
- Whitehand, J. W. R. 1987. M. R. G. Conzen and the intellectual parentage of urban morphology, Planning History Bulletin 9: 35–41.