Multi-criteria decision making in civil engineering: Part I – a state-of-the-art survey

References

• Antucheviciene, J.; Kala, Z.; Marzouk, M.; Vaidogas, E. R. 2015. Solving civil engineering problems by means of fuzzy and stochastic MCDM methods: current state and future research, Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2015: 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/362579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. J. 1951. Social choice and individual values. New Haven / New York / London: J. Wiley / Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Belton, V.; Stewart, T. J. 2002. Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 372 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4
   Google Scholar
• Borda, J. C. de. 1784. Mémoire sur les élections au scrutin. Paris: Historie de l'Academie Royale des Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Bose, P.; Chakrabarti, R. 2003. Application of optimized multicriteria decision-making in an environmental impact assessment study, Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 20(1): 31–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10286600302230 doi: 10.1080/10286600302230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouyssou, D.; Marchant, T.; Pirlot, M.; Tsoukias, A.; Vincke, P. 2006. Evaluation and decision models with multiple criteria: Stepping stones for the analyst. New York: Springer. 459 p.
   Google Scholar
• Brauers, W. K. 2004. Optimization methods for a stakeholder society, a revolution in economic thinking by multi-objective optimization. Boston / Dordredit / London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cantor, G. 1874. Ein Beitrag zur Mannigfaltigkeitslehre, J Reine Angew. Math 84: 242–258.
   Google Scholar
• Charnes, A.; Cooper, W. W.; Rhodes, E. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research 2: 429–444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8 doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z.; Li, H. 2006. Environmental management in construction: A quantitative approach. London and New York: Taylor & Francis. 232 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203030363
   Google Scholar
• Condorcet, N. Marquis de. 1785. Essay on the application of analysis to the probability of majority decisions. Bibliotheque National de France.
   Google Scholar
• Dantzig, G. B. 1948. Linear programming, in Problems for the Numerical Analysis of the Future, Proceedings of the Symposium on Modern Calculating Machinery and Numerical Methods, UCLA, 29–31 July 1948, Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Debreu, G. 1959. Theory of value: an axiomatic analysis of economic equilibrium. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doumpos, M.; Grigoroudis, E. 2013. Multicriteria decision aid and artificial intelligence: links, theory and applications. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons. 368 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118522516
   Google Scholar
• Duckstein, L.; Bobée, B.; Ashkar, F. 1991. A multiple criteria decision modeling approach to selection of estimation techniques for fitting extreme floods, Stochastic Hydrology and Hydraulics 5(3): 227–238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01544059 doi: 10.1007/BF01544059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgeworth, F. Y. 1881. Mathematical psychics: an essay on the application of mathematics to the moral sciences. London: Kegan Paul & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, W. 1954. The theory of decision making, Psychological Bulletin 41: 380–417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0053870 doi: 10.1037/h0053870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrgott, M.; Figueira, R. J.; Greco, S. (Eds.). 2010. Trends in multiple criteria decision analysis, in International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Vol. 142. Springer US. 412 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5904-1
   Google Scholar
• Fiedler, K.; Peldschus, F.; Zavadskas, E. K. 1986. Methoden Bautechnologischen Entscheidung. Wiss. Berichte der Technische Hochschule Leipzig H. 17: 1–56.
   Google Scholar
• Figueira, J.; Greco, S.; Ehrgott, M. (Eds.). 2005. Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys, in International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Vol. 78. Boston: Springer. 1085 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/b100605
   Google Scholar
• Filip, F. G.; Suduc, A.-M.; Bîzoi, M. 2014. DSS in numbers, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 20(1): 154–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2014.890139 doi: 10.3846/20294913.2014.890139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishburn, P. C. 1964. Decision and value theory. New York: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Fishburn, P. C. 1970. Utility theory for decision making. New York: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, B. 1772. Letter to Joseph Priestley. Reprinted in the Benjamin Franklin Sampler, 1956. New York: Fawcett.
   Google Scholar
• Frisch, R. 1961. Numerical determination of a quadratic preference function for use in macroeconomic programming, Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia 20: 3–43.
   Google Scholar
• Gass, S.; Saaty, T. 1955. Parametric objective function (part 2) – Generalization, Journal of the Operations Research Society of America 3(4): 395–401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.3.4.395 doi: 10.1287/opre.3.4.395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes, L. F. A. M.; Lima, M. M. P. P. 1992. TODIM: basics and application to multicriteria ranking of projects with environmental impacts, Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences 16(4): 113–127.
   Google Scholar
• Gay, L. F.; Sinha, S. K. 2013. Resilience of civil infrastructure systems: literature review for improved asset management, International Journal of Critical Infrastructures 9(4): 330–350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijcis.2013.058172 doi: 10.1504/IJCIS.2013.058172
   Google Scholar
• Hanne, T. 2001. Intelligent strategies for meta Multiple criteria decision making. Boston: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera-Viedma, E. 2015. Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic in Multicriteria decision making. The 50th Anniversary of Prof. Lotfi Zadeh'S theory: introduction, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 21(5): 677–683. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2015.1084956 doi: 10.3846/20294913.2015.1084956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, C.-L.; Masud, A. S. M. 1979. Multiple objective decision making – methods and application. A state-of-the-art survey. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, C. L.; Yoon, K. 1981. Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications. Berlin, Hedelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, C. L.; Lin, M. J. 1987. Group decision making under multiple criteria: methods and applications. Berlin: SpringerVerlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A. Nemery, P. 2013. Multi-criteria decision analysis: methods and software. Chichester: John Willey & Sons, p. 296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118644898
   Google Scholar
• Jato-Espino, D.; Castillo-Lopez, E.; Rodriguez-Hernandez, J.; Canteras-Jordana, J. C. 2014. A review of application of multi-criteria decision making methods in construction, Automation in Construction 45: 151–162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.05.013 doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2014.05.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabir, G.; Sadiq, R.; Tesfamariam, S. 2013. A review of multicriteria decision-making methods for infrastructure management, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 10(9): 1176–1210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2013.795978 doi: 10.1080/15732479.2013.795978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman, C. (Ed.) 2008. Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making. Theory and applications with recent developments, in Springer Optimization and Its Applications, Vol. 16. Turkey: Springer, Science+Business Media, LLC. 591 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76813-7
   Google Scholar
• Kaklauskas, A.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2002. Internetinė sprendimų parama [Web-based intelligent decision support]. Vilnius: Technika (in Lithuanian).
   Google Scholar
• Kaklauskas, A.; Kaplinski, O.; Peldschus, F.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2005. Historie und Trends des Kolloquiums, 20 Jahre wissenschaftlicher Gedenken austausch, Podium, Sonderheft 11: 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kaklauskas, A.; Zavadskas, E. K. (Eds.). 2015. Multiple criteria analysis of the life cycle of the built environment: Monograph. Vilnius: Technika. 448 p.
   Google Scholar
• Kaliszewski, I. 2010. Soft computing for complex multiple criteria decision making. Berlin: Springer. 172 p.
   Google Scholar
• Kantorovich, L. 1939. Mathematical methods of organizing and planning production (in English 1960), in Management Science 6(4): 363–422.
   Google Scholar
• Kapliński, O. 1997. Modelling of construction processes: a managerial approach. Warszawa: Komitet Inzynierii Ladowej i Wodnej PAN. 175 p.
   Google Scholar
• Kapliński, O.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Peldschus, F.; Kaklauskas, A. 2004. Problems and envolving trends of construction colloquia on decision making and operational research, Foundations of Civil and Environmental Engineering 5: 83–90.
   Google Scholar
• Kapliński, O. (Ed.). 2007. Metody i modele badań w inżynerii przedsięwzięć budowlanych [Methods and models of research in construction project engineering]. Polish Academy of Science (in Polish). 415 p.
   Google Scholar
• Kapliński, O. 2008a. Planning instruments in construction management, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 14(4): 449–451. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1392-8619.2008.14.449-451 doi: 10.3846/1392-8619.2008.14.449-451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapliński, O. 2008b. Development and usefulness of planning techniques and decision-making foundations on the example of construction enterprises in Poland, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 14(4): 492–502. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1392-8619.2008.14.492-502 doi: 10.3846/1392-8619.2008.14.492-502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplinski, O. 2009a. Sapere Aude: Professor Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, Inzinerinė Ekonomika – Engineering Economics 5: 113–119.
   Google Scholar
• Kapliński, O. 2009b. Professor Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas: the research achievements and transborder cooperation, Archives of Civil Engineering 53(3): 287–300.
   Google Scholar
• Kapliński, O. 2010. Review of trans-border co-operation in construction management between Lithuania, Germany and Poland, Evolution of Science and Technology – Mokslo ir Technikos Raida 2(1): 5–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/est.2010.22 doi: 10.3846/est.2010.22
   Google Scholar
• Kapliński, O.; Tamošaitienė, J. 2010. Game theory applications in construction engineering and management, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 16(2): 348–363. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.22 doi: 10.3846/tede.2010.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplinski, O.; Tupenaite, L. 2011. Review of the multiple criteria decision making methods, intelligent and biometric systems applied in modern construction economics, Transformations in Business & Economics 10(1): 166–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplinski, O.; Peldschus, F.; Tamosaitiene, J. 2014a. Professor Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas: his academic research, school of thought, and most eminent results of his work, Archives of Civil Engineering 60(2): 287–292. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/ace-2014-0019 doi: 10.2478/ace-2014-0019
   Google Scholar
• Kaplinski, O.; Peldschus, F.; Tupėnaitė, L. 2014b. Development of MCDM methods – in honour of Professor Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas on the occasion of his 70th birthday, International Journal of Computers Communications & Control 9(3): 305–312. http://dx.doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2014.3.1084 doi: 10.15837/ijccc.2014.3.1084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplinski, O.; Paslawski, J.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Gajzler, M. (Eds.) 2015. Innovative solutions in Construction Engineering and Management. Flexible Approach, Procedia Engineering 122: 1–320. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Kaplinski, O.; Tamošaitienė, J. 2015. Analysis of normalization methods influencing results: a review to honour Professor Friedel Peldschus on the occasion of his 75th birthday, Procedia Engineering 122: 2–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.001 doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Keeney, R.; Raiffa, H. 1976. Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value. New York: Tradeoffs, Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Keršulienė, V.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z. 2010. Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA), Journal of Business Economics and Management 11(2): 243–258. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2010.12 doi: 10.3846/jbem.2010.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khandekar, A. V.; Antuchevičienė, J.; Chakraborty, S. 2015. Small hydro-power plant project selection using fuzzy axiomatic design principles, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 21(5): 756–772. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2015.1056282 doi: 10.3846/20294913.2015.1056282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köksalan, M.; Wallenius, J.; Zionts, S. 2011. Multiple Criteria Decision Making: from early history to the 21st century. Singapore: World Scientific. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789814335591
   Google Scholar
• Koo, D. H.; Ariaratnam, S. T.; Kavazanjian, E. 2009. Development of sustainability assessment model. Development of sustainability assessment model for underground infrastructure. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller. 184 p.
   Google Scholar
• Koopmans, T. C. 1951. Analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities, in T. C. Koopmans (Ed.). Activity analysis of production and allocation. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Liou, J. J. H. 2013. New concepts and trends of MCDM for tomorrow – in honor of professor Gwu-Hsiung Tzeng on the occasion of his 70th birthday, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 19(2): 367–375. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2013.811037 doi: 10.3846/20294913.2013.811037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liou, J. J. H.; Tzeng, G.-H. 2012. Comments on “Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview”, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 18(4): 672–695. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.753489 doi: 10.3846/20294913.2012.753489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce, R. D.; Raiffa, H. 1957. Games and decisions: introduction and critical survey. New York: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• MacCrimmon, K. R. 1968. Decision making among multiple-attribute alternatives: a survey and consolidated approach. RAND Memorandum, RM-4823-ARPA.
   Google Scholar
• Mardani, A.; Jusoh, A.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2015. Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications – two decades review from 1994 to 2014, Expert Systems with Applications 42(8): 4126–4148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.003 doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardani, A.; Jusoh, A.; Nor, K. M. D.; Zakwan, N.; Valipour, A. 2015a. Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications – a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014, Economic Research – Ekonomska Istrazivanja 28(1): 516–571. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1331677x.2015.1075139 doi: 10.1080/1331677X.2015.1075139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardani, A.; Jusoh, A.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Cavallaro, F.; Khalifah, Z. 2015b. Sustainable and renewable energy: an overview of the application of Multiple Criteria Decision Making techniques and approaches, Sustainability 7(10): 13947– 13984. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su71013947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardani, A.; Jusoh, A.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Khalifah, Z.; Nor, K. M. D. 2015c. Application of multiple-criteria decision-making techniques and approaches to evaluating of service quality: a systematic review of the literature, Journal of Business Economics and Management 16(5): 1034–1068. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2015.1095233 doi: 10.3846/16111699.2015.1095233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mareschal, B.; Brans, J. P. 1992. PROMETHEE V: MCDM problems with segmentation constrains. Brussels: Universite Libre de Brusells.
   Google Scholar
• Masri, H. 2014. Quantitative economics as a scientific approach to the solution of problems of a complex nature – in honor of Professor Willem Karel M. Brauers on the occasion of his 90(th) birthday, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 20(3): 590–600. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2014.966350 doi: 10.3846/20294913.2014.966350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miettinen, K. 2009. Nonlinear multiobjective optimization. Berlin: Springer. 320 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5563-6
   Google Scholar
• Nash, J. 1950a. Equilibrium points in n-person games, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 36(1): 48–49. doi: 10.1073/pnas.36.1.48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, J. 1950b. The bargaining problem, Econometrica 18(2): 155–162. doi: 10.2307/1907266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S. 1998. Multicriteria optimization of Civil Engineering systems. Belgrade: University of Belgrade.
   Google Scholar
• Paelinck, J. H. P. 1976. Qualitative multiple criteria analysis: environmental protection and multiregional development, Papers of the Regional Science Association 36(1): 59–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01944375 doi: 10.1007/BF01944375
   Google Scholar
• Pareto, V. 1896–1897. Cours E-Economic. Rouge: Université de Lausanne.
   Google Scholar
• Pareto, V. 1906. Manuale di economia politica. Milan: Societá Editrice Libraria.
   Google Scholar
• Pareto, V. 1971. Manual of political economy. New York: Augustus M. Kelley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Pedrycz, W.; Ekel, P.; Parreiras, R. 2010. Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making: models, methods and applications. Chischester: John Willey & Sons. 360 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470974032
   Google Scholar
• Peldschus, F. 1986. Zur Anwendung der Theorie der Spiele für Aufgaben der Bautechnologie: Dissertation B. Technischen Hochschule Leipzig. 119 p.
   Google Scholar
• Peldschus, F. 1995. Fuzzy Methoden in Bauwesen. 5. Deutsch-Litauisch-Polnisches Kolloquium Planungs instrumente in Baubetriebswesen, Leipzig, Beitrӓge zu Lehre und Forschung Sondercheft der HTWK: 21–25.
   Google Scholar
• Peldschus, F. 2013. The 14th Colloquium – 33 Years of Successful Scientific Cooperation, in The 14th German-Lithuanian Colloquium on Innovative Solutions in Construction Technology and Management, 32–38.
   Google Scholar
• Peldschus, F.; Kapliński, O.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A. 2006. History and trends of the colloquiums, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 12(3): 227–235.
   Google Scholar
• Peldschus, F.; Zavadskas, E. K. 1997. Matrix games in building technology and management. Vilnius: Technika (in Lithuanian).
   Google Scholar
• Pourahmad, A.; Hosseini, A.; Banaitis, A.; Nasiri, H.; Banaitienė, N. & Tzeng, G.-H. 2015. Combination of fuzzy-AHP and DEMATEL-ANP with GIS in a new hybrid MCDM model used for the selection of the best space for leisure in a blighted urban site, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 21(5): 773–796. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2015.1056279 doi: 10.3846/20294913.2015.1056279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey, F. P. 1931. Truth and probability in the foundations of mathematics and other logical essays. London: Routledge and Kegan, 156–198.
   Google Scholar
• Razavi Hajiagha, S. H.; Amoozad Mahdiraji, H.; Hashemi, S. S.; Turskis, Z. 2015. Determining weights of fuzzy attributes for multi-attribute decision-making problems based on consensus of expert opinions, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 21(5): 738–755. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2015.1058301 doi: 10.3846/20294913.2015.1058301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, B. 1968. La methode ELECTRE, Revue d‘Informatique et. de Recherche Operationelle (RIRO) 8: 57–75.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, B. 1996. Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media. 293 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2500-1
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. 1996. Decision making with dependence and feedback. The analytic network process. Pitsburg: RWS Publications. 370 p.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. A. 1938. A note on the pure theory of consumer's behaviour, Economica 5: 61–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2548836 doi: 10.2307/2548836
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1970. Collective choice and social welfare. San Francisco: Holden Day.
   Google Scholar
• Shafike, N. G.; Duckstein, L.; Maddock, T. 1992. Multicriterion analysis of groundwater contamination management, Water Resources Bulletin 28(1): 33–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1992.tb03152.x doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1992.tb03152.x
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, C. E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication, The Bell System Technical Journal 27: 379–423; 623–656. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1955. A behavioral model of rational choice, Quarterly Journal of Economics 69: 99–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1884852 doi: 10.2307/1884852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobanjo, J. O.; Stukhart, G.; James, R. W. 1994. Evaluation of projects for rehabilitation of highway bridges, Journal of Structural Engineering-ASCE 120(1): 81–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1994)120:1(81) doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:1(81)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamosaitiene, J.; Bartkiene, L.; Vilutiene, T. 2010. The new development trend of operational research in Civil Engineering and sustainable development as a result of collaboration between German-Lithuanian-Polish scientific triangle, Journal of Business Economics and Management 11(2): 316–340. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2010.16 doi: 10.3846/jbem.2010.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamosaitiene, J.; Kapliński, O. 2013. Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) of socio-economic systems: a systematic review, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 19(4): 661–674. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2013.862882 doi: 10.3846/20294913.2013.862882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Association of European Operational Research Societies (Euro). 2015. Euro Working Group OR in Sustainable Development and Civil Engineering [online], [cited 15 November 2015]. Available from Internet: http://www.orsdce. vgtu.lt/?id=54427.33862
   Google Scholar
• Triantaphyllou, E. 2010. Multi-criteria decision making methods: a comparative study. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6
   Google Scholar
• Turskis, Z.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Antucheviciene, J.; Kosareva, N. 2015. A hybrid model based on fuzzy AHP and fuzzy WASPAS for construction site selection, International Journal of Computers Communications & Control 10(6): 873–888. http://dx.doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2015.6.2078 doi: 10.15837/ijccc.2015.6.2078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzeng, G.-H.; Huang, J.-J. 2011. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Von Neumann, J.; Morgenstern, O. 1944. Theory of games and economic behaviour. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiecek, M. M.; Ehrgott, M.; Fadel, G.; Figueira, J. R. 2008. Multiple criteria decision making for engineering, Omega 36(3): 337–339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2006.10.001 doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2006.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yager, R. R. 2015. Foreword. Special issue on fuzzy sets and applications (Celebration of the 50th anniversary of fuzzy sets), International Journal of Computers Communications & Control 10(6): 771. doi: 10.15837/ijccc.2015.6.2068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. 1965. Fuzzy sets, Information and Control 8: 338–353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0019-9958(65)90241-x doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K. 1987a. Multiattribute decision making in construction: Dr. Sc. Dissertation. Institute of Civil Engineering, Moscow (in Russian). 720 p.
   Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. 1987b. Complex estimation and choice of resource-saving decisions in construction. Vilnius: Mokslas (in Russian). 2010 p.
   Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K. 1991. System of estimation of technological solutions in building construction. Leningrad: Stroizdat (in Russian). 256 p.
   Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E.; Peldschus, F.; Kaklauskas, A. 1994a. Multiple criteria evaluation of projects in construction. Vilnius: Technika. 226 p.
   Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A.; Sarka, V. 1994b. The new method of multicriteria complex proportional assessment of projects, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 1(3): 131–139.
   Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E.; Kapliński, O.; Kaklauskas, A.; Brzeziński, J. 1995. Expert systems in construction industry. Trends, potencial & applications. Vilnius: Technika. 180 p.
   Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K.; Simanauskas, L.; Kaklauskas, A. 1998. Multiple criteria decision support systems. Vilnius: Technika (in Lithuanian).
   Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K. 2000. Mehrkriterielle Entscheidungen im Bauwesen. Vilnius: Technika.
   Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A.; Banaitienė, N. 2001. Pastato gyvavimo proceso daugiakriterinė analizė [Multiple criteria analysis of a building's life cycle]. Vilnius: Technika (in Lithuanian).
   Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K.; Ustinovichius, L.; Peldschus, F. 2003. Development of software for multiple criteria evaluation, Informatica 14(2): 259–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K.; Peldschus, F.; Ustinovicus, L.; Turskis, Z. 2004a. Game theory in building technology and management. Vilnius: Technika (in Lithuanian).
   Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A.; Banaitis, A.; Kvederyte, N. 2004b. Housing credit access model: the case for Lithuania, European Journal of Operational Research 155(2): 335–352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00091-2 doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00091-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A. 2007. Mehrzielselektion für Entscheidungen im Bauwesen. Stuttgart: IRB Verlag (in German). 276 p.
   Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K. 2008. History and evolving trends of construction colloquia on sustainability and operational research, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 14(4): 578–592. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1392-8619.2008.14.578-592 doi: 10.3846/1392-8619.2008.14.578-592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K.; Liias, R.; Turskis, Z. 2008. Multi-attribute decision-making methods for assessment of quality in bridges and road construction: state-of-the-art surveys, Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 3(3): 152–160. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1822-427X.2008.3.152-160 doi: 10.3846/1822-427X.2008.3.152-160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z. 2010. A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 16(2): 159–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.10 doi: 10.3846/tede.2010.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z. 2011. Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 17(2): 397–427. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2011.593291 doi: 10.3846/20294913.2011.593291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z.; Antuchevičienė, J.; Zakarevičius, A. 2012. Optimization of weighted aggregated sum product assessment, Electronics and Electrical Engineering 122(6): 3–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.eee.122.6.1810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z.; Kildiene, S. 2014. State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 20(1): 165–179. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2014.892037 doi: 10.3846/20294913.2014.892037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K.; Vilutienė, T. 2013. Operations research in areas of civil engineering and sustainable development: EURO working group activities, Organization, Technology & Management in Construction: An International Journal 5(1): 650–653.
   Google Scholar
• Zeleny, M. 1974. A concept of compromise solution and the method of displaced ideal, Computers and Operations Research 1(3): 479–496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(74)90064-1 doi: 10.1016/0305-0548(74)90064-1
   Google Scholar
• Zeleny, M. 1975. MCDM – State and future of arts, Operations Research 23(Supplement 2): B413–B413.
   Google Scholar
• Zeleny, M. 1982. Multiple criteria decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Zionts, S. 1979. MCDM – If not a Roman Numeral, then what, Interfaces 9(4): 94–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.9.4.94
   Google Scholar
• Zopounidis, C.; Pardalos, P. M. (Eds.). 2010. Handbook of multicriteria analysis. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92828-7
   Google Scholar