Rhizidium phycophilum, a new species in Chytridiales

LITERATURE CITED

• Barr DJS. 1980. An outline for the reclassification of the Chytridiales, and for a new order, the Spizellomycetales. Can J Bot 58:2380–2394.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Hartmann VE. 1976. Zoospore ultrastructure of three Chytridium species and Rhizoclosmatium globosum. Can J Bot 54:2000–2013.
   Google Scholar
• Beakes GW, Canter HM, Jaworski GHM. 1988. Zoospore ultrastructure of Zygorhizidium affluens and Z. planktonicum, two chytrids parasitizing the diatom Asterionella formosa. Can J Bot 66:1054–1067.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———, ———. 1993. Sporangium differentiation and zoospore fine-structure of the chytrid Rhizophydium planktonicum, a fungal parasite of Asterionella formosa. Mycol Res 97:1059–1074.
   Google Scholar
• Bills GF, Christensen M, Powell MJ, Thorn G. 2004. Saprobic soil fungi. In: Mueller GM, Bills G, Foster MS, eds. Biodiversity of fungi: inventory and monitoring methods. Elsevier. p 271–302.
   Google Scholar
• Blackwell WH, Letcher PM, Powell MJ. 2006. Thallus development and the systematics of Chytridiomycota: an additional developmental pattern represented by Podochytrium. Mycotaxon 97:91–109.
   Google Scholar
• Canter HM, Jaworski GHM, Beakes GW. 1992. Formae speciales differentiation in the chytrid Zygorhizidium planktonicum Canter, a parasite of the diatoms Asterionella and Synedra. Nova Hedwigia 55:437–455.
   Google Scholar
• Dorward DW, Powell MJ. 1983. Cytochemical detection of polysaccharides and the ultrastructure of the cell coat of zoospores of Chytriomyces aureus and Chytriomyces hyalinus. Mycologia 75:209–220.
   Google Scholar
• Durso L, Lehnen LP, Powell MJ. 1993. Characteristics of extracellular adhesions produced during Saprolegnia ferax secondary zoospore encystment and cytospore germination. Mycologia 85:744–755.
   Google Scholar
• Haskins RH, Weston WH. 1950. Studies in the lower Chytridiales I: factors affecting pigmentation, growth and metabolism of a strain of Karlingia (Rhizophlyctis) rosea. Am J Bot 37:739–750.
   Google Scholar
• James TY, Letcher PM, Longcore JE, Mozley-Standridge SE, Porter D, Powell MJ, Griffith GW, Vilgalys R. 2006. A molecular phylogeny of the flagellated fungi (Chytridiomycota) and description of a new phylum (Blastocladiomycota). Mycologia 98:860–871.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Porter D, Leander CA, Vilgalys R, Longcore JE. 2000. Molecular phylogenetics of the Chytridiomycota supports the utility of ultrastructural data in chytrid systematics. Can J Bot 78:336–350.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffrey JM, Willoughby LG. 1964. A note on the distribution of Allomyces in Australia. Nova Hedwigia 7:505–515.
   Google Scholar
• Karling JS. 1944. Brazilian chytrids II: new species of Rhizidium. Am J Bot 31:254–261.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1949. Two new eucarpic inoperculate chytrids from Maryland. Am J Bot 39:681–687.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1970. Some zoosporic fungi of New Zealand. Arch Mikrobiol 70:266–287.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1988. Additional zoosporic fungi from Australian soils. Nova Hedwigia 46:239–253.
   Google Scholar
• Letcher PM, Powell MJ. 2005a. Kappamyces, a new genus in the Chytridiales (Chytridiomycota). Nova Hedwigia 80: 115–133.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———. 2005b. Phylogenetic position of Phlyctochytrium planicorne (Chytridiales, Chytridiomycota) based on zoospore ultrastructure and partial nuclear LSU rRNA gene sequence analysis. Nova Hedwigia 80:135–146.
   Google Scholar
• ———, McGee PA, Powell MJ. 2004a. Zoosporic fungi from soils of New South Wales. Australas Mycol 22:99–115.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———, ———. 2004b. Distribution and diversity of zoosporic fungi from soils of four vegetation types in New South Wales, Australia. Can J Bot 82:1490–1500.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Powell MJ, Chambers JG, Holznagel WE. 2004c. Phylogenetic relationships among Rhizophydium isolates from North America and Australia. Mycologia 96: 1339–1351.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———, ———, Longcore JE, Churchill PF, Harris PM. 2005. Ultrastructural and molecular delineation of the Chytridiaceae (Chytridiales). Can J Bot 83:1561–1573.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———, Churchill PF, Chambers JG. 2006. Ultrastructural and molecular phylogenetic delineation of a new order, the Rhizophydiales (Chytridiomycota). Mycol Res 110:898–915.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———, Barr DJS, Churchill PF, Wakefield WS, Picard KT. 2008a. Rhizophlyctidales—a new order in Chytridiomycota. Mycol Res 112:1031–1048.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Vélez CG, Barrantes ME, Powell MJ, Churchill PF, Wakefield WS. 2008b. Ultrastructural and molecular analyses of Rhizophydiales (Chytridiomycota) isolates from North America and Argentina. Mycol Res 112: 759–782.
   Google Scholar
• Longcore JE. 1992. Morphology, occurrence, and zoospore ultrastructure of Podochytrium dentatum sp. nov. (Chytridiales). Mycologia 84:183–192.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2005. Zoosporic fungi from Australian and New Zealand tree-canopy detritus. Aust J Bot 53:259–272.
   Google Scholar
• May TW, Pascoe IG. 1996. History of the taxonomic study of Australian fungi. In: Fungi of Australia. Vol. 1A. Canberra: ARBS. p 171–206.
   Google Scholar
• Miller CE. 1976. Substrate influenced morphological variations and taxonomic problems in freshwater, posteriorly uniflagellate phycomycetes. In: Jones EBG, ed. Recent advances in aquatic mycology. London: Elek Science. p 459–487.
   Google Scholar
• Mozley-Standridge SE, Letcher PM, Longcore JE, Porter D, Simmons DR. 2009. Cladochytriales—a new order in Chytridiomycota. Mycol Res 113:498–507.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson RA. 1963. Observations on two species of Rhizophydium from northern Michigan. Trans Brit Mycol Soc 46:530–536.
   Google Scholar
• Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818.
   Google Scholar
• Powell MJ. 1978. Phylogenetic implications of the microbody-lipid globule complex in zoosporic fungi. Biosystems 10:167–180.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1993. Looking at mycology with a Janus face: a glimpse at Chytridiomycetes active in the environment. Mycologia 85:1–20.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1994. Production and modifications of extracellular structures during development of Chytridiomycetes. Protoplasma 181:123–141.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Koch WJ. 1977a. Morphological variations in a new species of Entophlyctis I: The species concept. Can J Bot 55:1668–1685.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———. 1977b. Morphological variations in a new species of Entophlyctis II. Influence of growth conditions on morphology. Can J Bot 55:1686–1695.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons DR, James TY, Meyer AF, Longcore JE. 2009. Lobulomycetales, a new order in the Chytridiomycota. Mycol Res 113:450–460.
   Google Scholar
• Sparrow FK. 1960. Aquatic phycomycetes. 2nd ed. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Univ. Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods) 4.0b4a. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor JW. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, eds. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. New York: Academic Press. p 315–322.
   Google Scholar
• Willoughby LG. 1961. The ecology of some lower fungi at Esthwaite Water. Trans Brit Mycol Soc 44:305–332.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1965. A study of Chytridiales from Victorian and other Australian soils. Arch Microbiol 52:101–131.
   Google Scholar
• Zwickl DJ. 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion [Doctoral dissertation]. The University of Texas at Austin.
   Google Scholar