LITERATURE CITED
- Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman D. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Molec Bio 215:403–410.
- Alvarez F, Parlade J, Trappe JM. 1993. Loculotuber gennadii gen. et comb. nov. and Tuber multimaculatum sp. nov. Mycologia 84:926–929.
- Ceruti A, Fontana A, Nosenzo C. 2003. Le specie europee del genere Tuber: una revisione storica. Torino: Museo Regionale di Scienze Naurali. 467 p.
- Gardes M, Bruns TJ. 1993. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for Basidiomycetes—application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol 2:113–118.
- Gilkey HM. 1925. Five new hypogeous fungi. Mycologia 17: 250–255.
- ———1939. Tuberales of North America. Or State Monogr Stud Bot 1:1–63.
- Harkness HW. 1899. Californian hypogeous fungi. Proc Calif Acad Sci 1:241–292.
- Jeandroz S, Murat C, Wang Y, Bonfante P, Le Tacon F. 2008. Molecular phylogeny and historical biogeography of the genus Tuber, ‘the true truffles’. J Biogeogr 35:815–829.
- Lefevre CK, Pilz D, Trappe JM, Molina A. 2001. Tuber gibbosum and Leucangium carthusianum: ecology, harvesting and marketing. In: Actes Ve Congrès International Science et Culture de la Truffe. Aix-en-Provence: Fed. Française des Trufficulteurs.
- Maddison D, Maddison W. 2002. MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
- Montecchi A, Sarasini M. 2000. Funghi ipogei d’Europa. Vicenza: Fondazione Centro Studi Micologici. 714 p.
- Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574.
- Smith ME, Douhan GW, Fremier AK, Rizzo DM. 2009. Are true multihost fungi the exception or the rule? Dominant ectomycorrhizal fungi on Pinus sabiniana differ from those on co-occurring Quercus species. New Phytol 182:295–299.
- Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
- Trappe JM. 1969. Laminated ascus walls in the Tuberales. XI International Botanical Congress. 221 p.
- ——— 1975. Generic synonys in the Tuberales. Mycotaxon 2:109–122.
- ——— 1989. Are commercial rakers killing our truffles? Mushroom, the Journal 7(23):10–11.
- ———, Jumpponen AM, Cázares E. 1996. Nats truffle and truffle-like fungi 5: Tuber lyonii (= Tuber texense), with a key to the spiny-spored Tuber species groups. Mycotaxon 60:365–372.
- ———, Molina R, Luoma DL, Cázares E, Pilz D, Smith JE, Castellano MA, Miller SL, Trappe MJ. 2009. Diversity, ecology, and conservation of truffle fungi in forests of the Pacific Northwest. Portland, Oregon. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station Gen. Tech. Rep. GTR–772
- Uecker FA, Burdsall HH. 1977. Tuber spinoreticulatum, a new truffle from Maryland. Mycologia 69(3):626–630.
- Vilgalys R, Hester M. 1990. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J Bacterio 172:4238–4246.
- Wang Y, Tan ZM, Murat C, Jeandroz S, Le Tacon F. 2007. Molecular taxonomy of Chinese truffles belonging to the Tuber rufum and Tuber puberulum groups. Fungal Divers 24:301–328.
- White TM, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, eds. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. San Diego: Academic Press. p 315–321.
- Zwickl DJ. 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion [Doctoral dissertation]. Austin: Univ of Texas Press. 115 p.