Novel species of Celoporthe from Eucalyptus and Syzygium trees in China and Indonesia

LITERATURE CITED

• AnagnostakisSL. 1987. Chestnut blight: the classical problem of an introduced pathogen. Mycologia 79: 23–37, 10.2307/3807741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AnagnostakisSL. 1992. Chestnuts and the introduction of chestnut blight. Ann Rep N Nut Grow Assoc 83:39–42.
   Google Scholar
• BegoudeBADGryzenhoutMWingfieldMJRouxJ. 2010. Aurifilum, a new fungal genus in the Cryphonectriaceae from Terminalia species in Cameroon. Anton Leeuw Int J G 98:263–278, 10.1007/s10482-010-9467-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CarboneIKohnLM. 1999. A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia 91:553–556, 10.2307/3761358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CastleburyLARossmanAYJaklitschWJVasilyevaLN. 2002. A preliminary overview of the Diaporthales based on large subunit nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycologia 94:1017–1031, 10.2307/3761867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CheewangkoonRGroenewaldJZSummerellBAHydeKDTo-anunCCrousPW. 2009. Myrtaceae, a cache of fungal biodiversity. Persoonia 23:55–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChenSFGryzenhoutMRouxJXieYJWingfieldMJZhouXD. 2010. Identification and pathogenicity of Chrysoporthe cubensis on Eucalyptus and Syzygium species in south China. Plant Dis 94:1143–1150, 10.1094/PDIS-94-9-1143
   Google Scholar
• FairchildD. 1913. The discovery of the chestnut bark disease in China. Science 38:297–299, 10.1126/science.38.974.297
   Google Scholar
• FarrisJSKallersjoMKlugeAGBultC. 1995. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10:315–319, 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1994.tb00181.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FelsensteinJ. 1985. Confidence intervals on phylogenetics: an approach using bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791, 10.2307/2408678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GlassNLDonaldsonGC. 1995. Development of primersets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:1323–1330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GryzenhoutMMyburgHvan der MerweNAWingfieldBDWingfieldMJ. 2004. Chrysoporthe, a new genus to accommodate Cryphonectria cubensis. Stud Mycol 50: 119–142.
   Google Scholar
• GryzenhoutMMyburgHWingfieldBDWingfieldMJ. 2006a. Cryphonectriaceae (Diaporthales), a new family including Cryphonectria, Chrysoporthe, Endothia and allied genera. Mycologia 98:239–249, 10.3852/mycolo-gia.98.2.239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GryzenhoutMRodasCAMenas PortalesJCleggPWingfieldBDWingfieldMJ. 2006b. Novel hosts of the Eucalyptus canker pathogen Chrysoporthe cubensis and a new Chrysoporthe species from Colombia. Mycol Res 110: 833–845, 10.1016/j.mycres.2006.02.010
   Google Scholar
• GryzenhoutMTariganMCleggPAWingfieldMJ. 2010. Cryptometrion aestuescens gen. sp. nov. (Cryphonectriaceae) pathogenic to Eucalyptus in Indonesia. Australas Plant Path 39:161–169, 10.1071/AP09077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GryzenhoutMWingfieldBDWingfieldMJ. 2009. Taxonomy, phylogeny and ecology of bark-inhabiting and tree pathogenic fungi in the Cryphonectriaceae. St Paul, Minnesota: APS Press. 119 p.
   Google Scholar
• GuindonSGascuelO. 2003. A simple, fast and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol 52:696–704, 10.1080/10635150390235520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HeathRGryzenhoutMRouxJWingfieldMJ. 2006. Discovery of the canker pathogen Chrysoporthe austroafricana on native Syzygium spp. in South Africa. Plant Dis 90:433–438, 10.1094/PD-90-0433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HillisDMHuelsenbeckJP. 1992. Signal, noise and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analyses. J Hered 83:189–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HodgesCSAlfenasACFerreiraFA. 1986. The conspecificity of Cryphonectria cubensis and Endothia eugeniae. Mycologia 78:343–350, 10.2307/3793037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HuelsenbeckJPBullJJCunninghamCW. 1996. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends Ecol Evol 11: 152–158, 10.1016/0169-5347(96)10006-9
   Google Scholar
• KatohKMisawaKKumaKMiyataT. 2002. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 30: 3059–3066, 10.1093/nar/gkf436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KobayashiTItôK. 1956. Two new species of Endothia. Ann Phytopathol Soc Japan 21:151–152.
   Google Scholar
• MyburgHGryzenhoutMWingfieldBDMilgroomMGShigeruKWingfieldMJ. 2004. DNA sequence data and morphology define Cryphonectria species in Europe, China and Japan. Can J Bot 82: 1730– 1743, 10.1139/b04-135
   Google Scholar
• MyburgHGryzenhoutMWingfieldBDWingfieldMJ. 2002. β-tubulin and Histone H3 gene sequences distinguish Cryphonectria cubensis from South Africa, Asia and South America. Can J Bot 80:590–596, 10.1139/b02-039
   Google Scholar
• MyburgHGryzenhoutMWingfieldBDWingfieldMJ. 2003. Conspecificity of Endothia eugeniae and Cryphonectria cubensis: a reevaluation based on morphology and DNA sequence data. Mycoscience 44:187–196.
   Google Scholar
• MyburgHWingfieldBDWingfieldMJ. 1999. Phylogeny of Cryphonectria cubensis and allied species inferred from DNA analysis. Mycologia 91:243–250, 10.2307/3761369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NakabongeGGryzenhoutMRouxJWingfieldBDWingfieldMJ. 2006a. Celoporthe dispersa gen. et sp. nov. from native Myrtales in South Africa. Stud Mycol 55:255–267, 10.3114/sim.55.1.255
   Google Scholar
• NakabongeGRouxJGryzenhoutMWingfieldMJ. 2006b. Distribution of Chrysoporthe canker pathogens on Eucalyptus and Syzygium species in eastern and southern Africa. Plant Dis 90:734–740, 10.1094/PD-90-0734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NylanderJAA. 2004. MrModeltest 2.3. Program distributed by the author. Uppsala, Sweden: Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala Univ.
   Google Scholar
• PosadaDCrandallKA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818, 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RaynerRW. 1970. A mycological colour chart. Kew, Surrey, UK: Commonwealth Mycological Institute and British Mycological Society. 34 p.
   Google Scholar
• RehnerSASamuelsGJ. 1994. Taxonomy and phylogeny of Gliocladium analysed from nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycol Res 98:625–634, 10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80409-7
   Google Scholar
• RodasCAGryzenhoutMMyburgHWingfieldBDWingfieldMJ. 2005. Discovery of the Eucalyptus canker pathogen Chrysoporthe cubensis on native Miconia (Melastomataceae) in Colombia. Plant Path 54:460–470, 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2005.01223.x
   Google Scholar
• RonquistFHuelsenbeckJP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS Institute Inc. 1999. SAS/STAT 8 users’ guide. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute Inc.
   Google Scholar
• SharmaJKMohananCFlorenceEJM. 1985. Occurrence of Cryphonectria canker disease of Eucalyptus in Kerala, India. Ann Appl Biol 106:265–276, 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1985.tb03116.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShearCLStevensNE. 1913. The chestnut blight parasite (Endothia parasitica) from China. Science 38:295–297, 10.1126/science.38.974.295
   Google Scholar
• ShearCLStevensNE. 1916. The discovery of the chestnut blight parasite (Endothia parasitica) and other chestnut fungi in Japan. Science 43:173–176, 10.1126/science.43.1101.173-a
   Google Scholar
• SlippersBCrousPWDenmanSCoutinhoTAWingfieldBDWingfieldMJ. 2004. Combined multiple gene genealogies and phenotypic characters differentiate several species previously identified as Botryosphaeria dothidea. Mycologia 96:83–101, 10.2307/3761991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SlippersBStenlidJWingfieldMJ. 2005. Emerging pathogens: Fungal host jumps following anthropogenic introduction. Trends Ecol Evol 20:420–421, 10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SwoffordDL. 2002. PAUP* 4.0: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• TamuraKDudleyJNeiMKumarS. 2007. MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software. Mol Biol Evol 24:1596–1599, 10.1093/mol-bev/msm092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TengSC. 1934. Notes on Sphaeriales from China. Sinensia 4:359–433.
   Google Scholar
• van der MerweNAGryzenhoutMSteenkampETWingfieldBDWingfieldMJ. 2010. Multigene phylogenetic and population differentiation data confirm the existence of a cryptic species within Chrysoporthe cubensis. Fungal Biol 114:966–979, 10.1016/j.funbio.2010.09.007
   Google Scholar
• VermeulenMGryzenhoutMWingfieldMJRouxJ. 2011. New records of Cryphonectriaceae from southern Africa including Latruncellus aurorae gen. sp. nov. Mycologia 103:554–569, 10.3852/10-283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VilgalysRHesterM. 1990. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J Bacteriol 172:4238–4246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WhiteTJBrunsTLeeSTaylorJ. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: InnisAMGelfandDHSninskyJJWhiteTJ, eds. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. San Diego: Academic Press. p 315–322.
   Google Scholar
• WingfieldMJ. 2003. Increasing threat of diseases to exotic plantation forests in the southern hemisphere: lessons from Cryphonectria canker. Australas Plant Path 32: 133–139, 10.1071/AP03024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhangNBlackwellM. 2001. Molecular phylogeny of dogwood anthracnose fungus (Discula destructiva) and the Diaporthales. Mycologia 93:355–365, 10.2307/3761657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhouXXieYChenSFWingfieldMJ. 2008. Diseases of eucalypt plantations in China: challenges and opportunities. Fungal Divers 32:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar