Studies in the genus Glutinoglossum

Literature cited

• AguiletaGMartheySChiapelloHLebrunMHRodolpheFet al. 2008. Assessing the performance of single-copy genes for recovering robust phylogenies. Syst Biol 57:613–627, doi:10.1080/10635150802306527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlfaroMEZollerSLutzoniF. 2003. Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Mol Biol Evol 20:255–266, doi:10.1093/molbev/msg028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ArauzoSIglesiasP. 2014. La familia Geoglossaceae ss. str. En la Peninsula Ibérica y la Macaronesia. Errotari 11:166–259.
   Google Scholar
• BakerCF. 1914. The lower fungi of the Philippine Islands. Leaflets Philippine Bot 6:2065–2318.
   Google Scholar
• BenkertD. 1976. Bemerkenswerte Ascomyceten der DDR II. Die Gattungen Geoglossum und Trichoglossum in der DDR. Mykol Mitteilung 20:47–92.
   Google Scholar
• BrockPMDöringHBidartondoMI. 2009. How to know the unknown fungi: the role of a herbarium. New Phytol 181:719–724, doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02703
   Google Scholar
• CastresanaJ. 2000. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments and their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 17:540–552, doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CrousPWGamsWStalpersJARobertVStegehuisG. 2004. MycoBank: an online initiative to launch mycology into the 21st century. St Mycol 50:19–22.
   Google Scholar
• DarribaDTaboadaGLDoalloRPosadaD. 2012. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods 9:772, doi:10.1038/nmeth.2109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DennisRWG. 1961. Some inoperculate discomycetes from New Zealand. Kew Bull 15:293–320, doi:10.2307/4109373
   Google Scholar
• DennisRWG. 1978. British ascomycetes. Vaduz, Liechenstein: Cramer. 585 p.
   Google Scholar
• DurandEJ. 1908. The Geoglossaceae of North America. Ann Mycol 6:387–477.
   Google Scholar
• EdgarR. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797, doi:10.1093/nar/gkh340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EernisseDJKlugeAG. 1993. Taxonomic congruence versus total evidence, and amniote phylogeny inferred from fossils, molecules and morphology. Mol Biol Evol 10:1170–1195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El KholfySOutcoumitATouhamiAOBelahbibNBenkiraneRDouiraA. 2014. Bibliographic inventory of Tangier’s fungi: Catalog of the Ascomycetes fungal flora. Int J Plant, Animal Environ Sci 4:77–92.
   Google Scholar
• FelsensteinJ. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791, doi:10.2307/2408678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GouyMGuindonSGascuelO. 2010. SeaView 4: a multi-platform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Mol Biol Evol 27:221–224, doi:10.1093/molbev/msp259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GuindonSDufayardJFLefortVAnisimovaMHordijkWGascuelO. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: Assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol 59:307–321, doi:10.1093/sysbio/syq010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GuindonSGascuelO. 2003. A simple, fast and accurate method to estimate large phylogenies by maximum-likelihood. Syst Biol 52:696–704, doi:10.1080/10635150390235520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HazslinszkyF. 1881. Rendhagyó köggombák. Értek termés kör 11:1–24, Figs. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• HillisDMBullJJ. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst Biol 42:182–192, doi:10.2307/2992540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HinkovaTStoichevG. 1983. New and rare macromycetes for Bulgaria. Fitologiya 23:70–72.
   Google Scholar
• HustadVPMillerANDentingerBTMCannonPF. 2013. Generic circumscriptions in Geoglossomycetes. Persoonia 31:101–111, doi:10.3767/003158513X671235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HustadVPMillerANMoingeonJ-MPriouJ-P. 2011. Inclusion of Nothomitra in Geoglossomycetes. Mycosphere 2:646–654, doi:10.5943/mycosphere/2/6/5
   Google Scholar
• ImaiS. 1941. Geoglossaceae Japoniae. J Fac Agric Hokkaido Univ 45:155–264.
   Google Scholar
• ImaiS. 1942. Contributiones ad studia monographica Geoglossacearum. Bot Mag (Tokyo) 56:523–527, doi:10.15281/jplantres1887.56.523
   Google Scholar
• KearseySELabibK. 1998. MCM proteins: evolution, properties and role in DNA replication. Biochim Biophys Acta 1398:113–136, doi:10.1016/S0167-4781(98)00033-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KlugeAG. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst Biol 38:7–25, doi:10.1093/sysbio/38.1.7
   Google Scholar
• KučeraVLizoňP. 2012. Geoglossaceous fungi in Slovakia III. The genus Geoglossum. Biologia 67:654–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LandvikS. 1996. Neolecta, a fruit-body producing genus of the basal ascomycetes, as shown by SSU and LSU rDNA sequences. Mycol Res 100:199–202, doi:10.1016/S0953-7562(96)80122-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LutzoniFKauffFCoxCMcLaughlinDCelioGet al. 2004. Assembling the Fungal Tree of Life: progress classification and evolution of subcellular traits. Am J Bot 91:1446–1480, doi:10.3732/ajb.91.10.1446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas GeesteranusRA. 1964. De fungi van Nederland I. Geoglossaceae—aardtongen. Wentensch Meded Koninkl Nederl Natuurhist Verenig 52:1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Maas GeesteranusRA. 1965. Geoglossaceae of India and adjacent countries. Persoonia 4:19–46.
   Google Scholar
• MainsEB. 1954. North American species of Geoglossum and Trichoglossum. Mycologia 46:586–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MasseeG. 1897. A monograph of the Geoglossaceae. Ann Bot 11:225–306.
   Google Scholar
• MathenyPBLiuYJAmmiratiJFHallBD. 2002. Using RPB1 sequences to improve phylogenetic inference among mushrooms (Inocybe: Agaricales). Am J Bot 89:688–698, doi:10.3732/ajb.89.4.688
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MillerMAPfeifferWSchwartzT. 2010. Creating the CIPRES science gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), 14 Nov 2010, New Orleans, Louisiana.
   Google Scholar
• MitchelD. 2006. Survey of the grassland fungi of County Clare. Kilkenny: Heritage Council.
   Google Scholar
• MoingeonSMoingeonJM. 2003. Les Geoglossaceae en Franche-Comte. Bull Soc Hist Nat Doubs 89:61–66.
   Google Scholar
• MoirDStewardSEOsmondBCBotsteinD. 1982. Cold-sensitive cell division-cycle mutants of yeast: isolation, properties and pseudoreversion studies. Genetics 100:547–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NannfeldtJA. 1942. The Geoglossaceae of Sweden. Ark Bot 30A:1–67.
   Google Scholar
• OhenojaE. 1995. Occurrence of Geoglossum, Trichoglossum and Microglossum (Ascomycota, Leotiales) in Finland. Doc Mycol 25:285–294.
   Google Scholar
• OhenojaE. 2000. Geoglossaceae. In: HansenLKnudsenH, eds. Nordic Macromycetes. Vol. 1. Copenhagen: Nordsvamp. p 177–183.
   Google Scholar
• PersoonCH. 1794. Neuer Versuch einer systematischen Eintheilung der Schwämme. Neues Mag Bot 1:63–128.
   Google Scholar
• PersoonCH. 1796. Observationes Mycologicae 1. Leipzig, Germany: Gesnerus, Usterius & Wolfius.
   Google Scholar
• PersoonCH. 1797. Commentatio de Fungis Clavaeformius., Leipzig: Germany: Petrum, Phillipum & Wolf.
   Google Scholar
• PersoonCH. 1822. Mycologia Europaea, Erlangen: Germany: Palmius, vol 1.
   Google Scholar
• PosadaDBuckleyTR. 2004. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of Akaike information criterion and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Syst Biol 53:793–808, doi:10.1080/10635150490522304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PrasherIBSharmaR. 1997. Geoglossum Pers. Geoglossaceae, Leotiales in eastern Himalayas. In: ChahalSSPrasharIBRandhawaHSAryaS, eds. Achievements and prospects in mycology and plant pathology. Dehradun, India: International Book Distributors. p 12–19.
   Google Scholar
• PromputthaIMillerAN. 2010. Three new species of Acanthostigma (Tubeufiaceae, Dothideomycetes) from the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Mycologia 102:574–587, doi:10.3852/09-051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RajaHASchochCLHustadVPShearerCAMillerAN. 2011. Testing the phylogenetic utility of MCM7 in the Ascomycota. MycoKeys 1:46–56, doi:10.3897/mycokeys.1.1966
   Google Scholar
• RambautADrummondAJ. 2009. Tracer 1.5. Available from http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer.
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez-LopezIRiosMV. 2007. El conocimiento taxonómico de Geoglossaceae sensu lato (Fungi: Ascomycetes) en México con énfasis en la zona centro y sur. Rev Mex Micol 25:41–49.
   Google Scholar
• RonquistFTeslenkoMvan der MarkPAyersDDarlingAet al. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol 61:539–542, doi:10.1093/sysbio/sys029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SaccardoPA. 1884. Conspectus enerum Discomycetum hucusque cognitorum. Bot Cent 18:213–220, 247–257.
   Google Scholar
• SchmittICrespoADivakarPKFankhouserJDHerman-SackettEet al. 2009. New primers for single-copy genes in fungal phylogenetics and systematics. Persoonia 23:35–40, doi:10.3767/003158509X470602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchochCLSungG-HLópez-GiráldezFTownsendJPMiadlikowskaJet al. 2009. The Ascomycota tree of life: A phylum wide phylogeny clarifies the origin and evolution of fundamental reproductive and ecological traits. Syst Biol 58:224–239, doi:10.1093/sysbio/syp020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShirleyC. 2004. Fungi of Murphy’s Bush. Auckland Bot Soc J 59:101–103.
   Google Scholar
• SpoonerBM. 1987. Helotiales of Australasia: Geoglossaceae, Orbiliaceae, Sclerotiniaceae, Hyaloscyphaceae. Bib Mycol 116:1–711.
   Google Scholar
• StillerJWHallBD. 1997. The origin of red algae: implications for plastid evolution. PNAS 94: 4520–4525, doi:10.1073/pnas.94.9.4520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TownsendJP. 2007. Profiling phylogenetic informativeness. Syst Biol 56:222–231, doi:10.1080/10635150701311362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VelenovskyJ. 1934. Monographica Discomycetum Bohemiae., Novyt Bydzov: Janata.
   Google Scholar
• VilgalysRHesterM. 1990. Rapid identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J Bacteriol 172:4238–4246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VoitkA. 2013. Earth tongues of Newfoundland and Labrador. Omphalina 4:14–19.
   Google Scholar
• WaldropMWZakDRBlackwoodCBCurtisCDTilmanD. 2006. Resource availability controls fungal diversity across a plant diversity gradient. Ecol Lett 9:1127–1135, doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00965.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WangZBinderMHibbettD. 2005. Life history and systematics of the aquatic discomycetes Mitrula (Helotiales, Ascomycota) based on cultural, morphological and molecular studies. Am J Bot 92:1565–1574, doi:10.3732/ajb.92.9.1565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WangZNilssonRHLopez-GiraldezFZhuangWDaiYJohnstonPRTownsendJP. 2011. Tasting soil fungal diversity with earth tongues: Phylogenetic test of SATé alignments for environmental ITS data. PLoS One 6: e19039.
   Google Scholar
• WaterstonJMSindenJWWhetzelHH. 1945. Notes on the Geoglossaceae of Bermuda. Mycologia 37:32–36, doi:10.2307/3754847
   Google Scholar
• WhiteTJBrunsTLeeSTaylorJW. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: InnisMAGelfandDHSninskyJJWhiteTJ, eds. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. New York: Academic Press. p 315–322.
   Google Scholar
• WiensJJ. 1998. Combining datasets with different phylogenetic histories. Syst Biol 47:568–581, doi:10.1080/106351598260581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZervakisGIDimouDMPolemisEKaradelevM. 2002. Mycodiversity studies in selected ecosystems of Greece II. Macrofungi associated with conifers in the Taygetos Mountain (Peloponnese). Mycotaxon 82:177–205.
   Google Scholar
• ZhuangW. 1998. Geoglossaceae. Flora Fungorum Sin 8:78–127.
   Google Scholar