The Effect of the Housing System on the Welfare Quality of Dairy Cows

References

• Alvåsen,K. Jansson MörkM. Hallén SandgrenC. ThomsenP.T. EmanuelsonU.,2012. Herd-level risk factors associated with cow mortality in Swedish dairy herds. J. Dairy Sci. 95 :4352-4362.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• AnderssonM. SchaarJ. WiktorssonH.,1984. Effects of drinking water flow rates and social rank on performance and drinking behaviour of tied-up dairy cows. Livest. Prod. Sci. 11 :599-610.
   Google Scholar
• BeedeD.K.,2005. The most essential nutrient: water. pp 13-32 in Proc. 7th Western Dairy Management Conf., Reno, NV, USA.
   Google Scholar
• BertenshawC. RowlinsonP.,2009. Exploring stock managers’ perceptions of the human-animal relationship on dairy farms and an association with milk production. Anthrozoos 22 :59-69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BoyleL.A. BoyleR.M. FrenchP.,2008. Welfare and performance of yearling dairy heifers out-wintered on a woodchip pad or housed indoors on two levels of nutrition. Animal 2 :769-778.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BroomD. M.,1986. Indicators of poor welfare. Brit. Vet. J. 142 :524-526.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BroomD.M.,1991. Animal welfare: concepts and measurement. J. Anim. Sci. 69 :4167-4175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BurowE. ThomsenP.T. Sørensen,J.T. RousingT.,2011. The effect of grazing on cow mortality in Danish dairy herds. Prev. Vet. Med. 100 :237-241.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BusatoA. TrachselP. BlumJ.W.,2000. Frequency of traumatic cow injuries in relation to housing systems in Swiss organic dairy herds. J. Vet. Med. A 47 :221-229.
   Google Scholar
• CardotV. LeRoux Y. JurjanzS.,2008. Drinking behavior of lactating dairy cows and prediction of their water intake. J. Dairy Sci. 91 :2257-2264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChapinalN. BarrientosA.K. vonKeyserlingk M.A. GaloE. WearyD.M.,2013. Herd-level risk factors for lameness in freestall farms in the northeastern United States and California. J. Dairy Sci. 96 :318-328.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CookN.B.,2002. The influence of barn design on dairy cow hygiene, lameness and udder health. pp 97-103 in Proc. 35th Annual Nat. Meet. AABP, Madison, WI, USA.
   Google Scholar
• CookN.B.,2003. Prevalence of lameness among dairy cattle in Wisconsin as a function of housing type and stall surface. J. Am. Vet. Med. A 223 :1324-1328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CookN.B. NordlundK.V.,2009. The influence of the environment on dairy cow behavior, claw health and herd lameness dynamics. Vet. J. 179 :360-369.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DahlbornK. AkerlindM. GustafsonG.,1998. Water intake by dairy cows selected for high or low milk-fat percentage when fed two forage to concentrate ratios with hay or silage. Swed. J. Agr. Res. 28 :167-176.
   Google Scholar
• DechowC.D. SmithE.A. GoodlingR.C.,2011. The effect of management system on mortality and other welfare indicators in Pennsylvania dairy herds. Anim. Welfare 20 :145-158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De VriesM. Van SchaikG. BokkersE.A.M. DijkstraT. De BoerI.J.M.,2011. Characteristics of dairy herds in different Welfare Quality® categories. Page 9 (abstr.) in Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on the assessment of animal welfare at farm and group level. Guelph ON, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• DippelS. DolezalM. BrenninkmeyerC. BrinkmannJ. MarchS. KnierimU. WincklerC.,2009. Risk factors for lameness in cubicle-housed Austrian Simmental dairy cows. Prev. Vet. Med. 90 :102-112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EspejoL.A. EndresM.I. SalferJ.A.,2006. Prevalence of lameness in high-producing Holstein cows housed in free stall barns in Minnesota. J. Dairy Sci. 89 :3052-3058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EstevezI. AndersenI. Nævdal,E.,2007. Group size, density and social dynamics in farm animals. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 103 :185-204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FregonesiJ.A. LeaverJ.D.,2002. Influence of space allowance and milk yield level on behaviour, performance and health of dairy cows housed in strawyard and cubicle systems. Livest. Prod. Sci. 78 :245-257.
   Google Scholar
• GomezA. CookN.B.,2010. Time budgets of lactating dairy cattle in commercial freestall herds. J Dairy Sci. 93 :5772-5781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GreenoughP.R.,2005. Problematic bovine recumbency (Downer cow). In: KahnC.M. LineS. (eds.) The Merck Veterinary Manual, 9th ed. Merck & Co., Inc. Publ. Whitehouse Station NJ, USA.
   Google Scholar
• GustafsonG.M.,1993. Effects of daily exercise on the health of tied dairy cows. Prev. Vet. Med. 17 :209-223.
   Google Scholar
• HaskellM.J. RennieL.J. BowellV.A. BellM.J. LawrenceA.B.,2006. Housing system, milk production, and zero-grazing effects on lameness and leg injury in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 89 :4259-4266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HewsonC.J. DohooI.R. LemkeK.A. BarkemaH.W.,2007. Canadian veterinarians’ use of analgesics in cattle, pigs, and horses in 2004 and 2005. Can. Vet. J. 48 :155-164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HoffmannH. RistM.,1975. Tiergerechte und arbeitswitschaftlich günstige Anbinde-vorrichtungen für Kühe. Schweiz. Landw. Monats. 53 :119-126.
   Google Scholar
• Hörning B. 2003. Attempts to integrate different parameters into an overall picture of animal welfare using investigations in dairy loose houses as an example. Anim. Welfare 12 :557-563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HultgrenJ.,2002. Foot/leg and udder health in relation to housing changes in Swedish dairy herds. Prev. Vet. Med. 53 :167-189.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KaufmannL.D. Dohme-MeierF. MüngerA. BruckmaierR.M. van DorlandH.A.,2012. Metabolism of grazed vs. zero-grazed dairy cows throughout the vegetation period: hepatic and blood plasma parameters. J. Anim. Physiol. An. N. 96 :228-236.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KeelingL. 2009. An overview of the development of the Welfare Quality® Assessment Systems. Welfare Quality Reports N. 12. Available from: http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/cplan/sites/default/files/WQReport-12_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• KnierimU. WincklerC.,2009. On-farm welfare assessment in cattle: validity, reliability and feasibility issues and future perspectives with special regard to the Welfare Quality® approach. Anim. Welfare 18 :451-458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KossaibatiM.A. EsslemontR.J.,1997. The costs of production diseases in dairy herds in England. Vet. J. 154 :41-51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KrohnC.C.,1994. Behaviour of dairy cows kept in extensive (loose housing/pasture) or intensive (tie stall) environments. III. Grooming, exploration and abnormal behaviour. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 42 :73-86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KrohnC.C. MunksgaardL.,1993. Behavior of dairy cows kept in extensive (loose housing/pasture) or intensive (tie stall) environments II. Lying and lying-down behavior. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 37 :1-16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaisterS. Brörkens,N. LolliS.,2009. Reliability of measures of agonistic behaviour in dairy and beef cattle. In: ForkmanB. KeelingL. (eds.) Assessment of animal welfare measures for dairy cattle, beef bulls and veal calves. Welfare Quality Reports N. 11. SLU Service/Reproenheten Publ., Uppsala, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• LittleW. CollisK.A. GleedP.T. SansomB.F. AllenW.M. QuickA.J.,1980. Effect of reduced water intake by lactating dairy cows on behaviour, milk yield and blood composition. Vet. Rec. 106 :547-551.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MattielloS. KlotzC. BaroliD. MineroM. FerranteV. CanaliE.,2009. Welfare problems in alpine dairy cattle farms in Alto Adige (Eastern Italian Alps). Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 8(Suppl.2):628-630.
   Google Scholar
• Mc ConnelC.S. LombardJ.E. WagnerB.A. GarryF.B.,2008. Evaluation of factors associated with increased dairy cow mortality on United States dairy operations. J. Dairy Sci. 91 :1423-1432.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MeeJ.F.,2004. Managing the dairy cow at calving time. Vet. Clin. Food Anim. 20 :521-546.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MenkeC. WaiblingerS. FölschD.W.,2000. Die Bedeutung von Management-maßnahmen im Laufstall für das Sozialverhalten von Milchkühen. Deut. Tierarztl. Woch. 107 :262-268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MeyerU. EveringhoffM. GädekenD. FlachowskyG.,2004. Investigations in the water intake of lactating dairy cows. Livest. Prod. Sci. 90 :117-121.
   Google Scholar
• NordlundK.V. CookN.B. OetzelG.R.,2004. Investigation strategies for laminitis problem herds. J. Dairy Sci. 87 :27-35.
   Google Scholar
• Ostojic-AndricD. HristovS. NovakovicZ. PantelicV. PetrovicM.M. ZlatanovicZ. NiksicD.,2011. Dairy cows welfare quality in loose vs tie housing system. Biotech. Anim. Husbandry 27 :975-984.
   Google Scholar
• PhillipsC.J.C.,1993. Cattle behaviour. Farming Press Books, Ipswich UK.
   Google Scholar
• PhillipsC.J.C.,2002. The welfare of dairy cows, cattle behaviour and welfare. Blackwell Scientific Publ., Oxford UK.
   Google Scholar
• PleschG.,2011. Cleanliness versus cow comfort – an insolvable problem? The influence of cubicle design, management and cow sizes on lying comfort and udder cleanliness in Holstein Friesian dairy cows. Degree Diss., University of Kassel, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• PopescuS. BordaC. LazarE.A. HegedusI.C.,2009. Assessment of dairy cow welfare in farms from Transylvania. pp 752-756 in Proc. 44th Croatian and 4th Int. Symp. Agricolture, Opatija, Croatia.
   Google Scholar
• PopescuS. BordaC. SandruC.D. StefanR. LazarE., 2010a. The welfare assessment of tied dairy cows in 52 small farms in North-Eastern Transylvania using animal-based measurements. Slov. Vet. Res. 47 :77-81.
   Google Scholar
• PopescuS. StefanR. DiuganE.A. BordaC. SpinuM. SandruC.D., 2010b. Relationship between barn hygiene and lameness prevalence in thirty-five Transylvanian dairy farms. B. U. Agr. Med. Vet. M-Ve. 67 :222-227.
   Google Scholar
• RegulaG. DanuserJ. SpycherB. WechslerB.,2004. Health and welfare of dairy cows in different husbandry systems in Switzerland. Prev. Vet. Med. 66 :247-264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ReneauJ.K. SeykoraA.J. HeinsB.J. EndresM.I. FarnsworthR.J. BeyF.,2005. Association between hygiene scores and somatic cell scores in dairy cattle. J. Am. Vet. Med. A 227 :1297-1301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RousingT. BondeM. SørensenJ.T.,2000. Indicators for the assessment of animal welfare in a dairy cattle herd with cubicle housing system. In: BlokhuisH.J. EkkelE.D. WechslerB. (eds.) Improving health and welfare in animal production. EEAP Publ. N. 102. Academic Press Ltd., London UK, pp 37-44.
   Google Scholar
• RushenJ. HaleyD. de PassilléA.M.,2007. Effect of softer flooring in tie stalls on resting behavior and leg injuries of lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci. 90 :3647-3651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SandøeP. MunksgaardL. Bådsgaard,N.P. JensenK.H.,1997. How to manage the management factor – assessing animal welfare at farm level. In: SørensenJ.T. (ed.) Livestock farming systems more than food production. EAAP Publ. N. 89. Academic Press Ltd., London UK, pp 221-230.
   Google Scholar
• SimensenE. ØsteråsO. BøeK.E. KiellandC. RuudL.E. NæssG.,2010. Housing system and herd size interactions in Norwegian dairy herds; associations with performance and disease incidence. Acta Vet. Scand. 52 :1-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SogstadA.M. FjeldaasT. OsterasO.,2005. Lameness and claw lesions of the Norwegian Red Dairy Cattle housed in loose stalls in relation to environment, parity and stage of lactation. Acta Vet. Scand. 46 :203-217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ThomsenP.T. KjeldsenA.M. Sørensen,J.T. HoueH. ErsbollA.K.,2006. Herd-level risk factors for the mortality of cows in Danish dairy herds. Vet. Rec. 158 :622-626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ValdeJ.P. HirdD.W. ThurmondM.C. OsterasO.,1997. Comparison of ketosis, clinical mastitis, somatic cell count, and reproductive performance between free-stall and tiestall barns in Norwegian dairy herds with automatic feeding. Acta Vet. Scand. 38 :181-192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WaiblingerS. BoivinX. PedersenV. TosiM.V. JanczakA.M. VisserE. BryanK. JonesR.,2006. Assessing the human-animal relationship in farmed species: a critical review. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 101 :185-242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WearyD.M. TaszkunI.,2000. Hock lesions and loose-stall design. J. Dairy Sci. 83 :697-702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welfare Quality Consortium, 2009. Welfare Quality assessment protocol for cattle. Welfare Quality Consortium Publ., Lelystad, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• WhayH.R. MainD.C.J. GreenL.E. WebsterA.J.F.,2003. Assessment of the welfare of dairy cattle using animal-based measurements: direct observations and investigation of farm records. Vet. Rec. 153 :197-202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZurbriggK. KeltonD. AndersonN. MillmanS.,2005. Stall dimensions and the prevalence of lameness, injury, and cleanliness on 317 tie-stall dairy farms in Ontario. Can. Vet. J. 46 :902-909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar