Recent advances in fluidized bed technology in biomass processes

• Demirbas A. Biorefineries: current activities and future developments. Energy Convers. Manage.50(11),2782–2801 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balat M. New biofuel production technologies. Energy Educ Sci Technol. Part A22(2),147–161 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Jeschke B. Plant oil biofuel. Rationale, production and application. In: Biofuels. Soetaert W, Vandamme EJ (Ed.), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, West Sussex, UK, 117–127 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Cherubini F, Jungmeier G, Wellisch M et al. Toward a common classification approach for biorefinery systems. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin.3(5),534–546 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balat M, Balat M, Kırtay E, Balat H. Main routes for the thermo-conversion of biomass into fuels and chemicals: part 2. Gasification systems. Energy Convers. Manage.50(12),3158–3168 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Jones DD, Hanna MA. Thermochemical biomass gasification. A review of the current status of the technology. Energies2(3),556–581 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyal HB, Seal D, Saxena RC. Bio-fuels from thermochemical conversion of renewable resources. A review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.12(2),504–517 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirbas MF. Biorefineries for biofuel upgrading. A critical review. Appl. Energy86(Suppl. 1),S151–S161 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naik SN, Goud VV, Rout PK, Dalai AK. Production of first and second generation biofuels. A comprehensive review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.14(2),578–597 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieminen J, Kivelä M. Biomass CFB gasifier connected to a 350 MWth steam boiler fired with coal and natural GAS-thermie demonstration project in lahti in Finland. Biomass Bioenergy15(3),251–257 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen D, Jiang H, Zhang K. Supercritical fluids technology for clean biofuel production. Prog. Nat. Sci.19(3),273–284 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang W. Bubbling fluidized beds (Chapter 3). In: Handbook of Fluidization and Fluid-Particle Systems. Yang W (Ed.). Marcel Dekker, Inc., NY, USA, 53–113 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Jeon JH, Kim SD, Kim SJ, Kang Y. Combustion and heat transfer characteristics in a square internally circulating fluidized bed combustor with draft tube. Fuel87(17–18),3710–3713 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hupa M. Current status and challenges within fluidized bed combustion. Adv. Combust. Aerothermal Technol.1,87–101 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Koornneef J, Junginger M, Faaij A. Development of fluidized bed combustion – an overview of trends, performance and cost. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.33(1),19–55 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pecho J, Schildhauer TJ, Sturzenegger M, Biollaz S, Wokaun A. Reactive bed materials for improved biomass gasification in a circulating fluidised bed reactor. Chem. Eng. Sci.63(9),2465–2476 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu Prabir, Kaushal, Priyanka. Modeling of pyrolysis and gasification of biomass in fluidized beds: a review. Chem. Prod. Proc. Mod.4(1),21 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Balat M. Gasification of biomass to produce gaseous products. Energy Sources Part A31(6),516 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv P, Yuan Z, Wu C, Ma L, Chen Y, Tsubaki N. Bio-syngas production from biomass catalytic gasification. Energy Conv. Manage.48(4),1132–1139 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rossum G, Kersten SRA, van Swaaij, Wim PM. Catalytic and noncatalytic gasification of pyrolysis oil. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res46(12),3959–3967 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapuerta M, Hernández JJ, Pazo A, López J. Gasification and co-gasification of biomass wastes: effect of the biomass origin and the gasifier operating conditions. Fuel Process Technol.89(9),828–837 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preto F, Zhang X, Wang J. Gasification behavior of carbon residue in bed solids of black liquor gasifier. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.32(7),1421–1428 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanping C, Bin L, Haiping Y, Guolai Y, Shihong Z. Experimental investigation of biomass gasification in a fluidized bed reactor. Energy Fuels22(5),3493–3498 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moilanen A, Nasrullah M, Kurkela E. The effect of biomass feedstock type and process parameters on achieving the total carbon conversion in the large scale fluidized bed gasification of biomass. Environ. Prog. Sustainable Energy28(3),355–359 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv PM, Xiong ZH, Chang J, Wu CZ, Chen Y, Zhu JX. An experimental study on biomass air–steam gasification in a fluidized bed. Bioresour. Technol.95(1),95–101 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzeng LM, Zainal ZA. Operational investigation of a bubbling fluidized bed biomass gasification system. Energy Sustain. Develop.11(1),88–93 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• González JF, Román S, Bragado D, Calderón M. Investigation on the reactions influencing biomass air and air/steam gasification for hydrogen production. Fuel Process Technol.89(8),764–772 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skoulou V, Koufodimos G, Samaras Z, Zabaniotou A. Low temperature gasification of olive kernels in a 5-kW fluidized bed reactor for H2-rich producer gas. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy33(22),6515–6524 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao G, Ni M, Chi Y, Cen K. Low-temperature gasification of waste tire in a fluidized bed. Energy Convers. Manage.49(8),2078–2082 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerachanchai P, Horio M, Tangsathitkulchai C. Effects of gasifying conditions and bed materials on fluidized bed steam gasification of wood biomass. Bioresour. Technol.100(3),1419–1427 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Eskridge K, Jones DD, Hanna MA. Steam–air fluidized bed gasification of distillers grains: effects of steam to biomass ratio, equivalence ratio and gasification temperature. Bioresour. Technol.100(6),2062–2068 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haryanto A, Fernando SD, Pordesimo LO, Adhikari S. Upgrading of syngas derived from biomass gasification: a thermodynamic analysis. Biomass Bioenergy33(5),882–889 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong W, Ünal Ö, Andries J, Hein KRG, Spliethoff H. Biomass and fossil fuel conversion by pressurised fluidised bed gasification using hot gas ceramic filters as gas cleaning. Biomass Bioenergy25(1),59–83 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin Y, Huang H, Wu Z, Feng J, Li W, Xie K. Characterization of tar from sawdust gasified in the pressurized fluidized bed. Biomass Bioenergy31(4),243–249 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cousins A, Zhuo Y, George A, Paterson N, Dugwell DR, Kandiyoti R. Development of a bench-scale high-pressure fluidized bed reactor and its sequential modification for studying diverse aspects of pyrolysis and gasification of coal and biomass. Energy Fuels22(4),2491–2503 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miccio F, Kalisz S, Baxter D, Svoboda K. Combustion of liquid bio-fuels in an internal circulating fluidized bed. Chem. Eng. J.143(1–3),172–179 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thamavithya M, Dutta A. An investigation of MSW gasification in a spout-fluid bed reactor. Fuel Process Technol.89(10),949–957 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao X, Le DD, Morishita K, Zhang S, Li L, Takarada T. Multi-stage biomass gasification in internally circulating fluidized bed gasifier (ICFG): test operation of animal-waste-derived biomass and parametric investigation at low temperature. Fuel Process Technol. (2009) (In Press).
   Google Scholar
• Xu G, Murakami T, Suda T, Matsuzawa Y, Tani H. The superior technical choice for dual fluidized bed gasification. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.45(7),2281–2286 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murakami T, Xu G, Suda T, Matsuzawa Y, Tani H, Fujimori T. Some process fundamentals of biomass gasification in dual fluidized bed. Fuel86(1–2),244–255 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen L, Gao Y, Xiao J. Simulation of hydrogen production from biomass gasification in interconnected fluidized beds. Biomass Bioenergy32(2),120–127 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuoka K, Kuramoto K, Murakami T, Suzuki Y. Steam gasification of woody biomass in a circulating dual bubbling fluidized bed system. Energy Fuels22(3),1980–1985 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Kam MJ, Vance Morey R, Tiffany DG. Biomass integrated gasification combined cycle for heat and power at ethanol plants. Energy Convers. Manage.50(7),1682–1690 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfesberger U, Aigner I, Hofbauer H. Tar content and composition in producer gas of fluidized bed gasification of wood – influence of temperature and pressure. Environ. Prog. Sustainable Energy28(3),372–379 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu G, Murakami T, Suda T, Matsuzaw Y, Tani H. Two-stage dual fluidized bed gasification: its conception and application to biomass. Fuel Process Technol.90(1),137–144 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corella J, Toledo JM, Molina G. A review on dual fluidized bed biomass gasifiers. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.46(21),6831–6839 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan AA, de Jong W, Jansens PJ, Spliethoff H. Biomass combustion in fluidized bed boilers: Potential problems and remedies. Fuel Process Technol.90(1),21–50 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirbas A. Biofuels securing the planet’s future energy needs. Energy Convers. Manage.50(9),2239–2249 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W. Automotive fuels from biomass via gasification. Fuel Process Technol. (2009) (In Press).
   Google Scholar
• Iliuta I, Leclerc A, Larachi F. Allothermal steam gasification of biomass in cyclic multi-compartment bubbling fluidized bed gasifier/combustor – new reactor concept. Bioresour. Technol.101(9),3194–3208 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Weller CL, Jones DD, Hanna MA. Contemporary issues in thermal gasification of biomass and its application to electricity and fuel production. Biomass Bioenergy32(7),573–581 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svoboda K, Pohořelý M, Hartman M, Martinec J. Pretreatment and feeding of biomass for pressurized entrained flow gasification. Fuel Process Technol.90(5),629–635 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Chen Q, Zhao H et al. Biomass–oxygen gasification in a high-temperature entrained-flow gasifier. Biotechnol. Adv.27(5),606–611 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Sun S, Tian H, Qian J, Su F, Ling F. Characteristics of rice husk gasification in an entrained flow reactor. Bioresour. Technol.100(23),6040–6044 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon SJ, Choi Y, Son Y, Lee S, Lee J. Gasification of biodiesel by-product with air or oxygen to make syngas. Bioresour. Technol.101(4),1227–1232 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai J, Sokhansanj S, Grace JR, Bi X, Lim CJ, Melin S. Overview and some issues related to co-firing biomass and coal. Can. J. Chem. Eng.86(3),367–386 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varol M, Atimtay AT. Combustion of olive cake and coal in a bubbling fluidized bed with secondary air injection. Fuel86(10–11),1430–1438 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasa Rao Venkat KN, Reddy G. Effect of secondary air injection on the combustion efficiency of sawdust in a fluidized bed combustor. Brazil J. Chem. Eng25(1),129–141 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prins MJ, Ptasinski KJ, Janssen FJJG. Torrefaction of wood: part 2. analysis of products. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis77(1),35–40 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uslu A, Faaij APC, Bergman PCA. Pre-treatment technologies, and their effect on international bioenergy supply chain logistics. techno-economic evaluation of torrefaction, fast pyrolysis and pelletisation. Energy33(8),1206–1223 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prins MJ, Ptasinski KJ, Janssen FJJG. More efficient biomass gasification via torrefaction. Energy31(15),3458–3470 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridgeman TG, Jones JM, Shield I, Williams PT. Torrefaction of reed canary grass, wheat straw and willow to enhance solid fuel qualities and combustion properties. Fuel87(6),844–856 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couhert C, Salvador S, Commandré J. Impact of torrefaction on syngas production from wood. Fuel88(11),2286–2290 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng J, Wang G, Kuang J, Zhang Y, Luo Y. Pretreatment of agricultural residues for co-gasification via torrefaction. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis86(2),331–337 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson LS, Tullin C, Leckner B, Sjövall P. Particle emissions from biomass combustion in small combustors. Biomass Bioenergy25(4),435–446 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han J, Kim H, Cho S, Shimizu T. Fluidized bed combustion of some woody biomass fuels. Energy Sources Part A30(19),1820 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassilev SV, Baxter D, Andersen LK, Vassileva CG. An overview of the chemical composition of biomass. Fuel89(5),913–933 (2009) (In Press).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okasha F. Staged combustion of rice straw in a fluidized bed. Exp Therm Fluid Sci32(1),52–59 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaumer T. Combustion and co-combustion of biomass: fundamentals, technologies, and primary measures for emission reduction . Energy Fuels17(6),1510–1521 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin W, Dam-Johansen K, Frandsen F. Agglomeration in bio-fuel fired fluidized bed combustors. Chem. Eng. J.96(1–3),171–185 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scala F, Chirone R, Salatino P. The influence of fine char particles burnout on bed agglomeration during the fluidized bed combustion of a biomass fuel. Fuel Process Technol.84(1–3),229–241 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scala F, Chirone R. Fluidized bed combustion of alternative solid fuels. Exp Therm. Fluid. Sci.28(7),691–699 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llorente MJF, Laplaza JMM, Cuadrado RE, García JEC. Ash behaviour of lignocellulosic biomass in bubbling fluidised bed combustion. Fuel85(9),1157–1165 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chirone R, Miccio F, Scala F. Mechanism and prediction of bed agglomeration during fluidized bed combustion of a biomass fuel: effect of the reactor scale. Chem. Eng. J.123(3),71–80 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones JM, Darvell LI, Bridgeman TG, Pourkashanian M, Williams A. An investigation of the thermal and catalytic behaviour of potassium in biomass combustion. Proc. Combust. Inst.31(2),1955–1963 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nutalapati D, Gupta R, Moghtaderi B, Wall TF. Assessing slagging and fouling during biomass combustion: a thermodynamic approach allowing for alkali/ash reactions. Fuel Process Technol.88(11–12),1044–1052 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser HJM, Lith SCV, Kiel JHA. Biomass ash-bed material interactions leading to agglomeration in FBC. J. Energy Res. Technol.130(1),011801 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Bartels M, Lin W, Nijenhuis J, Kapteijn F, van Ommen JR. Agglomeration in fluidized beds at high temperatures: mechanisms, detection and prevention. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.34(5),633–666 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidsson KO, Amand L, Steenari B, Elled A, Eskilsson D, Leckner B. Countermeasures against alkali-related problems during combustion of biomass in a circulating fluidized bed boiler. Chem. Eng. Sci.63(21),5314–5329 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vamvuka D, Zografos D, Alevizos G. Control methods for mitigating biomass ash-related problems in fluidized beds. Bioresour. Technol.99(9),3534–3544 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vamvuka D, Pitharoulis M, Alevizos G, Repouskou E, Pentari D. Ash effects during combustion of lignite/biomass blends in fluidized bed. Renewable Energy34(12),2662–2671 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels M, Nijenhuis J, Lensselink J et al. Detecting and counteracting agglomeration in fluidized bed biomass combustion. Energy Fuels23(1),157–169 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Feng Y, Wu S, Liu D. The role of ash particles in the bed agglomeration during the fluidized bed combustion of rice straw. Bioresour. Technol.100(24),6505–6513 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mettanant V, Basu P, Butler J. Agglomeration of biomass fired fluidized bed gasifier and combustor. Can. J. Chem. Eng.87(5),656–684 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Z. “Clean” heat flux sensor for ash fouling monitoring. M.A.Sc. Dissertation, Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Queen’s University, Belfast, UK (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Steenari B, Lundberg A, Pettersson H, Wilewska-Bien M, Andersson D. Investigation of ash sintering during combustion of agricultural residues and the effect of additives. Energy Fuels23(11),5655–5662 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aho M, Silvennoinen J. Preventing chlorine deposition on heat transfer surfaces with aluminium–silicon rich biomass residue and additive. Fuel83(10),1299–1305 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirbas A. Combustion characteristics of different biomass fuels. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.30(2),219–230 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glazer MP, Khan NA, de Jong W, Spliethoff H, Schurmann H, Monkhouse P. Alkali metals in circulating fluidized bed combustion of biomass and coal: measurements and chemical equilibrium analysis. Energy Fuels19(5),1889–1897 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broström M, Kassman H, Helgesson A et al. Sulfation of corrosive alkali chlorides by ammonium sulfate in a biomass fired CFB boiler. Fuel Process Technol.88(11–12),1171–1177 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsberg C, Brostrom M, Backman R et al. Principle, calibration, and application of the in situ alkali chloride monitor. Rev. Sci. Instrum.80(2),023104 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu CY, Hwang SJ. Flue gas desulfurization in an internally circulating fluidized bed reactor. Powder Technol.154(1),14–23 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu X, Amano RS. Feasible experimental study on the utilization of a 300 MW CFB boiler desulfurizating bottom ash for construction applications. J. Energy Res. Technol.128(4),311–318 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony EJ, Jia L, Iribarne AP, Welford G, Wang J, Trass O. Calcium sulphide in FBC boilers and its fate using liquid water reactivation. Fuel85(12–13),1871–1879 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony EJ, Bulewicz EM, Jia L. Reactivation of limestone sorbents in FBC for SO2 capture. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci33(2),171–210 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozelle PL, Pisupati SV, Scaroni AW. Prediction of sorbent performance in a circulating fluidized bed boiler based on petrographic properties. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power129(2),565–571 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Grace JR, Jim Lim C. Limestone particle attrition and size distribution in a small circulating fluidized bed. Fuel87(7),1360–1371 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montagnaro F, Nobili M, Salatino P, Telesca A, Valenti GL. Hydration products of FBC wastes as SO2 sorbents: comparison between ettringite and calcium hydroxide. Fuel Process Technol.89(1),47–54 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montagnaro F, Salatino P, Scala F, Urciuolo M. Sorbent inventory and particle size distribution in circulating fluidized bed combustors. The influence of particle attrition. Presented at: Proceedings of the 32nd meeting of the Italian section of the Combustion Institute. Naples, Italy, 26–28 April 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Svoboda K, Baxter D, Martinec J. Nitrous oxide emissions from waste incineration. Chemical Papers60(1),78–90 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tayyeb Javed M, Irfan N, Gibbs BM. Control of combustion-generated nitrogen oxides by selective non-catalytic reduction. J. Environ. Manage.83(3),251–289 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran K, Kilpinen P, Kumar N. In situ catalytic abatement of NOx during fluidized bed combustion – a literature study. Appl. Catal., B78(1–2),129–138 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou X, Zhang H, Pilawska M, Lu J, Yue G. The formation of N2O during the reduction of NO by NH3. Fuel87(15–16),3271–3277 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barišić V, Klingstedt F, Naydenov A, Stefanov P, Kilpinen P, Hupa M. Catalytic activity of bed materials from industrial CFB boilers for the decomposition of N2O. Catal. Today100(3–4),337–342 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou X, Yang S, Lu J, Zhang H, Yue G. Effect of circulating ash from CFB boilers on NO and N2O emission. Front. Energy Power Eng. Chin.3(2),241–246 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Dong L, Gao S, Song W, Xu G. Experimental study of NO reduction over biomass char. Fuel Process Technol.88(7),707–715 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourunen A, Saastamoinen J, Nevalainen H. Experimental trends of NO in circulating fluidized bed combustion. Fuel88(7),1333–1341 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, McIlveen-Wright D, Rezvani S, Wang YD, Hewitt N, Williams BC. Biomass co-firing in a pressurized fluidized bed combustion (PFBC) combined cycle power plant: a techno-environmental assessment based on computational simulations. Fuel Process Technol.87(10),927–934 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brus E, Ohman M, Nordin A. Mechanisms of bed agglomeration during fluidized bed combustion of biomass fuels. Energy Fuels19(3),825–832 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson A, Einvall J, Andersson A, Sanati M. Physical and chemical characterisation of potassium deactivation of a SCR catalyst for biomass combustion. Top. Catal.45(1),149–152 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Y, Jensen AD, Johnsson JE, Thøgersen JR. Deactivation of V2O5-WO3-TiO2 SCR catalyst at biomass fired power plants: elucidation of mechanisms by lab- and pilot-scale experiments. Appl. Catal., B83(3–4),186–194 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishom F, Harada T, Aoyagi T, Sakanishi K, Korai Y, Mochida I. Problems in PFBC boiler (2): characterization of bed materials found in a commercial PFBC boiler at different load levels. Fuel83(7–8),1019–1029 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olofsson G, Ye Z, Bjerle I, Andersson A. Bed agglomeration problems in fluidized bed biomass combustion. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.41(12),2888–2894 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sondreal EA, Benson SA, Hurley JP et al. Review of advances in combustion technology and biomass cofiring. Fuel Process Technol.71(1–3),7–38 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De S, Assadi M. Impact of cofiring biomass with coal in power plants – a techno-economic assessment. Biomass Bioenergy33(2),283–293 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kangas H, Lintunen J, Uusivuori J. The cofiring problem of a power plant under policy regulations. Energy Policy37(5),1898–1904 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atimtay AT, Kaynak B. Co-combustion of peach and apricot stone with coal in a bubbling fluidized bed. Fuel Process Technol.89(2),183–197 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghani WAWAK, Alias AB, Savory RM, Cliffe KR. Co-combustion of agricultural residues with coal in a fluidised bed combustor. Waste Manage.29(2),767–773 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szemmelveisz K, Szũcs I, Palotás ÁB, Winkler L, Eddings EG. Examination of the combustion conditions of herbaceous biomass. Fuel Process Technol.90(6),839–847 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIlveen-Wright DR, Huang Y, Rezvani S, Wang Y. A technical and environmental analysis of co-combustion of coal and biomass in fluidised bed technologies. Fuel86(14),2032–2042 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed I, Gupta AK. Evolution of syngas from cardboard gasification. Appl. Energy86(9),1732–1740 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryda LE, Panopoulos KD, Kakaras E. Agglomeration in fluidised bed gasification of biomass. Powder Technol.181(3),307–320 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campoy M, Gómez-Barea A, Vidal FB, Ollero P. Air–steam gasification of biomass in a fluidised bed: process optimisation by enriched air. Fuel Process Technol.90(5),677–685 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross D, Noda R, Horio M, Kosminski A, Ashman P, Mullinger P. Axial gas profiles in a bubbling fluidised bed biomass gasifier. Fuel86(10–11),1417–1429 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li K, Zhang R, Bi J. Experimental study on syngas production by co-gasification of coal and biomass in a fluidized bed. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy (2009) (In Press).
   Google Scholar
• Vélez JF, Chejne F, Valdés CF, Emery EJ, Londoño CA. Co-gasification of colombian coal and biomass in fluidized bed: an experimental study. Fuel88(3),424–430 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirbas A. Progress and recent trends in biofuels. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.33(1),1–18 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji P, Feng W, Chen B. Production of ultrapure hydrogen from biomass gasification with air. Chem. Eng. Sci.64(3),582–592 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu W, Teng L, Xiao W. Simulation and experiment study of dimethyl ether synthesis from syngas in a fluidized bed reactor. Chem. Eng. Sci.59(22–23),5455–5464 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaripour F, Baghaei F, Schmidt I, Perregaard J. Catalytic dehydration of methanol to dimethyl ether (DME) over solid-acid catalysts. Catal. Commun.6(2),147–152 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sai Prasad PS, Bae JW, Kang S, Lee Y, Jun K. Single-step synthesis of DME from syngas on Cu–ZnO–Al2O3/zeolite bifunctional catalysts: the superiority of ferrierite over the other zeolites. Fuel Process Technol.89(12),1281–1286 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mysov VM, Reshetnikov SI, Stepanov VG, Ione KG. Synthesis gas conversion into hydrocarbons (gasoline range) over bifunctional zeolite-containing catalyst: experimental study and mathematical modelling. Chem. Eng. J.107(1–3),63–71 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolesnichenko N, Kitaev L, Bukina Z et al. Synthesis of gasoline from syngas via dimethyl ether. Kinet. Catal.48(6),789–793 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou H, Wang Y, Wei F, Wang D, Wang Z. In situ synthesis of SAPO-34 crystals grown onto α-Al2O3 sphere supports as the catalyst for the fluidized bed conversion of dimethyl ether to olefins. Appl. Catal., A341(1–2),112–118 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramani V, Gangwal SK. A review of recent literature to search for an efficient catalytic process for the conversion of syngas to ethanol. Energy Fuels22(2),814–839 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He J, Zhang W. Research on ethanol synthesis from syngas. J. Zhejiang University – Science A9(5),714–719 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Yang X, Zhou L, Su Y, Liu Z. Conversion of syngas to higher alcohols over Cu-Fe-Zr catalysts induced by ethanol. J. Nat. Gas Chem.18(3),337–340 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Mozaffarian M, Zwart RWR, Boerrigter H, Deurwaarder EP. Biomass and waste-related SNG production technologies. Technical, economic and ecological feasibility. Presented at: 2nd World Conference and Technology Exhibition on Biomass for Energy, Industry and Climate Protection. Rome, Italy, 10–14 May 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Seemann MC, Schildhauer TJ, Biollaz SMA, Stucki S, Wokaun A. The regenerative effect of catalyst fluidization under methanation conditions. Appl. Catal. A313(1),14–21 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurašĉík M, Sues A, Ptasinski KJ. Exergy analysis of synthetic natural gas production method from biomass. Energy35(2),880–888 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Meijden CM, Veringa HJ, Rabou LPLM. The production of synthetic natural gas (SNG): a comparison of three wood gasification systems for energy balance and overall efficiency. Biomass Bioenergy34(3),302–311 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson AP, Lutz AE. Exergy analysis of hydrogen production via steam methane reforming. Int J Hydrogen Energy32(18),4811–4820 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon D. Low temperature WGS catalysts for hydrogen station and fuel processor applications. Catal. Surv. Asia13(3),191–204 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes D, Mendes A, Madeira LM, Iulianelli A, Sousa JM, Basile A. The water–gas shift reaction: from conventional catalytic systems to pd-based membrane reactors – a review. Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng. (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Kalinci Y, Hepbasli A, Dincer I. Biomass-based hydrogen production: a review and analysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy34(21),8799–8817 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tijmensen MJA, Faaij APC, Hamelinck CN, van Hardeveld MRM. Exploration of the possibilities for production of Fischer–Tropsch liquids and power via biomass gasification. Biomass Bioenergy23(2),129–152 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guettel R, Kunz U, Turek T. Reactors for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. Chem. Eng. Technol31(5),746–754 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lögdberg S, Tristantini D, Borg Ø et al. Hydrocarbon production via Fischer–Tropsch synthesis from H2-poor syngas over different Fe-Co/γ-Al2O3 bimetallic catalysts. Appl. Catal., B89(1–2),167–182 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Steen E, Claeys M. Fischer–Tropsch catalysts for the biomass-to-liquid (BTL)-process. Chem. Eng. Technol.31(5),655–666 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahimpour MR, Elekaei H. Optimization of a novel combination of fixed and fluidized bed hydrogen-permselective membrane reactors for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis in GTL technology. Chem. Eng. J.152(2–3),543–555 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahimpour MR, Elekaei H. A comparative study of combination of Fischer–Tropsch synthesis reactors with hydrogen-permselective membrane in GTL technology. Fuel Process Technol.90(6),747–761 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLendon TR, Lui AP, Pineault RL, Beer SK, Richardson SW. High-pressure co-gasification of coal and biomass in a fluidized bed. Biomass Bioenergy26(4),377–388 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce J, Dixon T, Diniz da Costa JC. Characterization of sugar cane waste biomass derived chars from pressurized gasification. Process Saf. Environ. Prot.84(6),429–439 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim MT, Alimuddin Z. Bubbling fluidized bed biomass gasification – performance, process findings and energy analysis. Renewable Energy33(10),2339–2343 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fermoso J, Arias B, Plaza MG et al. High-pressure co-gasification of coal with biomass and petroleum coke. Fuel Process Technol.90(7–8),926–932 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimantos P, Koukouzas N, Katsiadakis A, Kakaras E. Air-blown biomass gasification combined cycles (BGCC): system analysis and economic assessment. Energy34(5),708–714 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahimpour MR, Elekaei H. Enhancement of methanol production in a novel fluidized bed hydrogen-permselective membrane reactor in the presence of catalyst deactivation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy34(5),2208–2223 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He T, Cheng X, Li L, Meng G. Study of methanol-to-gasoline process for production of gasoline from coal. J. Coal Sci. Eng. (China)15(1),104–107 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Dunker AM, Kumar S, Mulawa PA. Production of hydrogen by thermal decomposition of methane in a fluidized bed reactor – effects of catalyst, temperature, and residence time. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy31(4),473–484 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammendola P, Chirone R, Ruoppolo G, Russo G, Solimene R. Some issues in modelling methane catalytic decomposition in fluidized bed reactors. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy33(11),2679–2694 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammendola P, Chirone R, Ruoppolo G, Russo G. Production of hydrogen from thermo-catalytic decomposition of methane in a fluidized bed reactor. Chem. Eng. J.154(1–3),287–294 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppatz S, Pfeifer C, Rauch R, Hofbauer H, Marquard-Moellenstedt T, Specht M. H2 rich product gas by steam gasification of biomass with in situ CO2 absorption in a dual fluidized bed system of 8 MW fuel input. Fuel Process Technol.90(7–8),914–921 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin G, Ryu H, Jo S, Lee S, Son S, Kim S. Hydrogen production in fluidized bed by chemical-looping cycle. Korean J. Chem. Eng.24(3),542–546 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Go KS, Son SR, Kim SD, Kang KS, Park CS. Hydrogen production from two-step steam methane reforming in a fluidized bed reactor. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy34(3),1301–1309 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Diego LF, Ortiz M, García-Labiano F, Adánez J, Abad A, Gayán P. Hydrogen production by chemical-looping reforming in a circulating fluidized bed reactor using Ni-based oxygen carriers. J. Power Sources192(1),27–34 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youn MH, Seo JG, Jung JC, Park S, Song IK. Hydrogen production by auto-thermal reforming of ethanol over nickel catalyst supported on mesoporous yttria-stabilized zirconia. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy34(13),5390–5397 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Grace JR, Jim Lim C, Li A. Experimental studies of pure hydrogen production in a commercialized fluidized bed membrane reactor with SMR and ATR catalysts. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy32(13),2359–2366 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahecha-Botero A, Boyd T, Gulamhusein A et al. Pure hydrogen generation in a fluidized bed membrane reactor: Experimental findings. Chem. Eng. Sci.63(10),2752–2762 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye G, Xie D, Qiao W, Grace JR, Lim CJ. Modeling of fluidized bed membrane reactors for hydrogen production from steam methane reforming with aspen plus. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy34(11),4755–4762 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallucci F, Van Sint Annaland M, Kuipers JAM. Pure hydrogen production via autothermal reforming of ethanol in a fluidized bed membrane reactor: a simulation study. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy35(4),1659–1668 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes FAN, Sousa EMM. Fischer–Tropsch synthesis product grade optimization in a fluidized bed reactor. AICHE J52(8),2844–2850 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivas S, Malik RK, Mahajani SM. Fischer–Tropsch synthesis using bio-syngas and CO2. Energy Sustainable Development11(4),66–71 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Linghu W, Li X, Asami K, Fujimoto K. Supercritical phase Fischer–Tropsch synthesis over cobalt catalyst. Fuel Process Technol.85(8–10),1121–1138 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malek Abbaslou RM, Soltan Mohammadzadeh JS, Dalai AK. Review on Fischer–Tropsch synthesis in supercritical media. Fuel Process Technol.90(7–8),849–856 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshmukh SARK, Heinrich S, Mörl L, van Sint Annaland M, Kuipers JAM. Membrane assisted fluidized bed reactors: potentials and hurdles. Chem. Eng. Sci.62(1–2),416–436 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahng M, Mukarakate C, Robichaud DJ, Nimlos MR. Current technologies for analysis of biomass thermochemical processing: a review. Anal. Chim. Acta651(2),117–138 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma SD, Dolan M, Park D et al. A critical review of syngas cleaning technologies – fundamental limitations and practical problems. Powder Technol.180(1–2),115–121 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han J, Kim H. The reduction and control technology of tar during biomass gasification/pyrolysis: an overview. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.12(2),397–416 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balat M. Mechanisms of thermochemical biomass conversion processes: part 2: reactions of gasification. Energy Sources Part A30(7),636 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yung MM, Jablonski WS, Magrini-Bair K. Review of catalytic conditioning of biomass-derived syngas. Energy Fuels23(4),1874–1887 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma SD, Dolan M, Ilyushechkin AY, McLennan KG, Nguyen T, Chase D. Recent developments in dry hot syngas cleaning processes. Fuel89(4),817–826 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Suzuki K. Tar property, analysis, reforming mechanism and model for biomass gasification – an overview. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.13(3),594–604 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li XT, Grace JR, Lim CJ, Watkinson AP, Chen HP, Kim JR. Biomass gasification in a circulating fluidized bed. Biomass Bioenergy26(2),171–193 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Świerczyński D, Libs S, Courson C, Kiennemann A. Steam reforming of tar from a biomass gasification process over Ni/olivine catalyst using toluene as a model compound. Appl. Catal. B74(3–4),211–222 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Felice L, Courson C, Jand N, Gallucci K, Foscolo PU, Kiennemann A. Catalytic biomass gasification: simultaneous hydrocarbons steam reforming and CO2 capture in a fluidised bed reactor. Chem. Eng. J.154(1–3),375–383 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rossum G, Potic B, Kersten SRA, van Swaaij WPM. Catalytic gasification of dry and wet biomass. Catal. Today145(1–2),10–18 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arena U, Zaccariello L, Mastellone ML. Tar removal during the fluidized bed gasification of plastic waste. Waste Manage.29(2),783–791 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasaka K, Furusawa T, Tsutsumi A. Biomass gasification in fluidized bed reactor with co catalyst. Chem. Eng. Sci.62(18–20),5558–5563 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azhar Uddin M, Tsuda H, Wu S, Sasaoka E. Catalytic decomposition of biomass tars with iron oxide catalysts. Fuel87(4–5),451–459 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miccio F, Piriou B, Ruoppolo G, Chirone R. Biomass gasification in a catalytic fluidized reactor with beds of different materials. Chem. Eng. J.154(1–3),369–374 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura T, Miyazawa T, Nishikawa J et al. Development of ni catalysts for tar removal by steam gasification of biomass. Appl. Catal. B68(3–4),160–170 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato K, Fujimoto K. Development of new nickel based catalyst for tar reforming with superior resistance to sulfur poisoning and coking in biomass gasification. Catal. Commun.8(11),1697–1701 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammendola P, Piriou B, Lisi L, Ruoppolo G, Chirone R, Russo G. Dual bed reactor for the study of catalytic biomass tars conversion. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.34(3),269–274 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nacken M, Ma L, Heidenreich S, Baron GV. Performance of a catalytically activated ceramic hot gas filter for catalytic tar removal from biomass gasification gas. Appl. Catal. B88(3–4),292–298 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeifer C, Hofbauer H. Development of catalytic tar decomposition downstream from a dual fluidized bed biomass steam gasifier. Powder Technol.180(1–2),9–16 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briens C, Piskorz J, Berruti F. Biomass valorization for fuel and chemicals production – a review. Int. J. Chem. React. Eng.6 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Boukis IP, Grammelis P, Bezergianni S, Bridgwater AV. CFB air-blown flash pyrolysis. part I: engineering design and cold model performance. Fuel86(10–11),1372–1386 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersten SRA, Wang X, Prins W, van Swaaij, Wim PM. Biomass pyrolysis in a fluidized bed reactor. Part 1: literature review and model simulations. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.44(23),8773–8785 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerhof RJM, Brilman DWF, van Swaaij, Wim PM, Kersten SRA. Effect of temperature in fluidized bed fast pyrolysis of biomass: oil quality assessment in test units. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Shen J, Wang X, Garcia-Perez M, Mourant D, Rhodes MJ, Li C. Effects of particle size on the fast pyrolysis of oil mallee woody biomass. Fuel88(10),1810–1817 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Kersten SRA, Prins W, van Swaaij, Wim PM. Biomass pyrolysis in a fluidized bed reactor. Part 2: experimental validation of model results. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.44(23),8786–8795 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohan D, Pittman, Charles U, Steele PH. Pyrolysis of Wood/Biomass for bio-oil: a critical review. Energy Fuels20(3),848–889 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Chang J, Wang T, Xu Y. Review of biomass pyrolysis oil properties and upgrading research. Energy Convers. Manage.48(1),87–92 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Chang J, Wang T, Xu Y. Upgrading bio-oil over different solid catalysts. Energy Fuels20(6),2717–2720 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott DC. Historical developments in hydroprocessing bio-oils. Energy Fuels21(3),1792–1815 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Wang Q, Hu X, Li C, Zhu X. Characterization of the lubricity of bio-oil/diesel fuel blends by high frequency reciprocating test rig. Energy (Oxford, UK)35(1),283–287 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang X, Ellis N. Upgrading bio-oil through emulsification with biodiesel: mixture production. Energy Fuels, ACS ASAP (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Pan Y, Dong T et al. Production of hydrogen from catalytic steam reforming of bio-oil using C12A7-O-based catalysts. Appl. Catal. A320,24–34 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aktas S, Karakaya M, Avci AK. Thermodynamic analysis of steam assisted conversions of bio-oil components to synthesis gas. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy34(4),1752–1759 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matas Gueell B, Babich I, Nichols KP, Gardeniers JGE, Lefferts L, Seshan K. Design of a stable steam reforming catalyst-A promising route to sustainable hydrogen from biomass oxygenates. Appl. Catal. B90(1–2),38–44 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medrano JA, Oliva M, Ruiz J, Garcia L, Arauzo J. Catalytic steam reforming of model compounds of biomass pyrolysis liquids in fluidized bed reactor with modified Ni/Al catalysts. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis85(1+2),214–225 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekstra E, Hogendoorn KJA, Wang X et al. Fast pyrolysis of biomass in a fluidized bed reactor: in situ filtering of the vapors. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.48(10),4744–4756 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aho A, Kumar N, Eränen K, Salmi T, Hupa M, Murzin DY. Catalytic pyrolysis of biomass in a fluidized bed reactor: Influence of the acidity of H-β zeolite. Process Saf. Environ. Prot.85(5),473–480 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Xiao R, Wang D et al. Catalytic fast pyrolysis of biomass in a fluidized bed with fresh and spent fluidized catalytic cracking (FCC) catalysts. Energy Fuels23(12),6199–6206 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadikis K, Gu S, Bridgwater AV. CFD modelling of the fast pyrolysis of biomass in fluidised bed reactors: modelling the impact of biomass shrinkage. Chem. Eng. J.149(1–3),417–427 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balat M. Mechanisms of thermochemical biomass conversion processes. Part 3: reactions of liquefaction. Energy Sources Part A30(7),649 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrendt F, Neubauer Y, Oevermann M, Wilmes B, Zobel N. Direct liquefaction of biomass. Chem. Eng. Technol.31(5),667–677 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang B, von Keitz M, Valentas K. Thermochemical liquefaction of high-diversity grassland perennials. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis84(1),18–24 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang G, Li W, Li B, Chen H, Bai J. Direct liquefaction of sawdust under syngas with and without catalyst. Chem. Eng. Process46(3),187–192 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Gilbert A, Xu C. Production of bio-crude from forestry waste by hydro-liquefaction in sub-/super-critical methanol. AICHE J55(3),807–819 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirbas A. Liquefaction of biomass using glycerol. Energy Sources Part A30(12),1120 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Zhang F. Effects of various solvents on the liquefaction of biomass to produce fuels and chemical feedstocks. Energy Convers. Manage.49(12),3498–3504 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu C, Lad N. Production of heavy oils with high caloric values by direct liquefaction of woody biomass in sub/near-critical water. Energy Fuels22(1),635–642 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saka S. Recent progress in supercritical fluid science for biofuel production from woody biomass. Forestry Studies China8(3),9–15 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Kruse A. Supercritical water gasification. Biofuels, Bioprod. Biorefin.2(5),415–437 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse A. Hydrothermal biomass gasification. J. Supercrit. Fluids47(3),391–399 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumura Y, Minowa T. Fundamental design of a continuous biomass gasification process using a supercritical water fluidized bed. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy29(7),701–707 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu YJ, Guo LJ, Ji CM, Zhang XM, Hao XH, Yan QH. Hydrogen production by biomass gasification in supercritical water: a parametric study. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy31(7),822–831 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan XZ, Li H, Zeng GM, Tong JY, Xie W. Sub- and supercritical liquefaction of rice straw in the presence of ethanol–water and 2-propanol–water mixture. Energy32(11),2081–2088 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldner MH, Vogel F. Renewable production of methane from woody biomass by catalytic hydrothermal gasification. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.44(13),4543–4551 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Y, Wang SZ, Xu DH, Gong YM, Ma HH, Tang XY. Review of catalytic supercritical water gasification for hydrogen production from biomass. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.14(1),334–343 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar

▪ Website

• FAO corporate document repository. The research progress of biomass pyrolysis processes www.fao.org/docrep/t4470E/t4470e0a.htm#7.2.%20biomass%20pyrolysis%20system
   Google Scholar