‘Omics’ technologies and systems biology for engineering Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for lignocellulosic bioethanol production

• Hill J, Nelson E, Tilman D, Polasky S, Tiffany D. Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA103(30),11206–11210 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldemberg J. The Brazilian biofuels industry. Biotechnol. Biofuels1(1),6 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA et al. Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science319(5867),1238–1240 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Maris AJA, Abbott DA, Bellissimi E et al. Alcoholic fermentation of carbon sources in biomass hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: current status. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek90(4),391–418 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas KC, Hynes SH, Ingledew WI. Effect of lactobacilli on yeast growth, viability and batch and semi-continuous alcoholic fermentation of corn mash. J. Appl. Microbiol.90(5),819–828 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dien BS, Cotta MA, Jeffries TW. Bacteria engineered for fuel ethanol production: current status. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.63(3),258–266 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarboe LR, Grabar TB, Yomano LP, Shanmugan KT, Ingram LO. Development of ethanologenic bacteria. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol.108,237–261 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zyl WH, Lynd LR, Den Haan R, McBride JE. Consolidated bioprocessing for bioethanol production using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol.108,205–235 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaldivar J, Nielsen J, Olsson L. Fuel ethanol production from lignocellulose: a challenge for metabolic engineering and process integration. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.56(1–2),17–34 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynd L. Overview and evaluation of fuel ethanol from cellulosic biomass: technology, economics, the environment, and policy. Ann. Rev. Energy Environ.21,403–465 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Hahn-Hägerdal B, Karhumaa K, Jeppsson M, Gorwa-Grauslund MF. Metabolic engineering for pentose utilization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol.108,147–177 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida JRM, Modig T, Petersson A, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Lidén G, Gorwa-Grauslund MF. Increased tolerance and conversion of inhibitors in lignocellulosic hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.82(4),340–349 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Moyá M, Gonzalez R. Systems biology approaches for the microbial production of biofuels. Biofuels1(2),291–310 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Cheng J. Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresour. Technol.83(1),1–11 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hägerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. I: inhibition and detoxification. Bioresour. Technol.74(1),17–24 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith MT, Cameron DR, Duff SJB. Comparison of industrial yeast strains for fermentation of spent sulphite pulping liquor fortified with wood hydrolysate. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol.18(1),18–21 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larsson S, Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hägerdal B et al. The generation of fermentation inhibitors during dilute acid hydrolysis of softwood. Enz. Microb. Technol.24(3–4),151–159 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson L, Hahn-Hägerdal B. Fermentative performance of bacteria and yeasts in lignocellulose hydrolysates. Proc. Biochem.28(4),249–257 (1993).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasch AP, Spellman PT, Kao CM et al. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol. Biol. Cell11(12),4241–4257 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dihazi H, Kessler R, Eschrich K. High osmolarity glycerol (HOG) pathway-induced phosphorylation and activation of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase are essential for glycerol accumulation and yeast cell proliferation under hyperosmotic stress. J. Biol. Chem.279(23),23961–23968 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mager WH, Siderius M. Novel insights into the osmotic stress response of yeast. FEMS Yeast Res.2(3),251–257 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar P, Barrett DM, Delwiche MJ, Stroeve P. Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.48(8),3713–3729 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen H, Vibe-Pedersen J, Larsen J, Felby C. Liquefaction of lignocellulose at high-solids concentrations. Biotechnol. Bioeng.96(5),862–870 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Voorst F, Houghton-Larsen J, Jonson L, Kielland-Brandt MC, Brandt A. Genome-wide identification of genes required for growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under ethanol stress. Yeast23(5),351–359 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gasch AP, Spellman PT, Kao CM et al. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol. Biol. Cell11(12),4241–4257 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelinsky SA, Samson LD. Global response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to an alkylating agent. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA96(4),1486–1491 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasch AP, Huang M, Metzner S, Botstein D, Elledge SJ, Brown PO. Genomic expression responses to DNA-damaging agents and the regulatory role of the yeast ATR homolog Mec1p. Mol. Biol. Cell12(10),2987–3003 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasch AP, Werner-Washburne M. The genomics of yeast responses to environmental stress and starvation. Funct. Integr. Genom.2(4–5),181–192 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Griffin TJ, Gygi SP, Ideker T et al. Complementary profiling of gene expression at the transcriptome and proteome levels in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Proteomics1(4),323–333 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi N, McEntee K. Identification of cis and trans components of a novel heat shock stress regulatory pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol.13(1),248–256 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchler G, Schuller C, Adam G, Ruis H. A Saccharomyces cerevisiae UAS element controlled by protein kinase A activates transcription in response to a variety of stress conditions. EMBO J.12(5),1997–2003 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Pastor MT, Marchler G, Schüller C, Marchler-Bauer A, Ruis H, Estruch F. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae zinc finger proteins Msn2p and Msn4p are required for transcriptional induction through the stress response element (STRE). EMBO J.15(9),2227–2235 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi N, McClanahan TK, Simon JR, Treger JM, McEntee K. Structure and functional analysis of the multistress response gene DDR2 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm.229(2),540–547 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wojda I, Alonso-Monge R, Bebelman JP, Mager WH, Siderius M. Response to high osmotic conditions and elevated temperature in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by intracellular glycerol and involves coordinate activity of MAP kinase pathways. Microbiology149(Pt 5),1193–1204 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohmann S. Osmotic stress signaling and osmoadaptation in yeasts. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.66(2),300–372 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García R, Bermejo C, Grau C et al. The global transcriptional response to transient cell wall damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its regulation by the cell integrity signaling pathway. J. Biol. Chem.279(15),15183–15195 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García R, Rodríguez-Peña JM, Bermejo C, Nombela C, Arroyo J. The high osmotic response and cell wall integrity pathways cooperate to regulate transcriptional responses to zymolyase-induced cell wall stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem.284(16),10901–10911 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagorce A, Hauser NC, Labourdette D et al. Genome-wide analysis of the response to cell wall mutations in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem.278(22),20345–20357 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moskvina E, Schüller C, Maurer CT, Mager WH, Ruis H. A search in the genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for genes regulated via stress response elements. Yeast14(11),1041–1050 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinke HB, Thomsen AB, Ahring BK. Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by degradation products produced during pre-treatment of biomass. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.66(1),10–26 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alper H, Moxley J, Nevoigt E, Fink GR, Stephanopoulos G. Engineering yeast transcription machinery for improved ethanol tolerance and production. Science314(5805),1565–1568 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin FM, Qiao B, Yuan YJ. Comparative proteomic analysis of tolerance and adaptation of ethanologenic Saccharomyces cerevisiae to furfural, a lignocellulosic inhibitory compound. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.75(11),3765–3776 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ubiyvovk VM, Blazhenko OV, Gigot D, Penninckx M, Sibirny AA. Role of γ-glutamyltranspeptidase in detoxification of xenobiotics in the yeasts Hansenula polymorpha and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell. Biol. Int.30(8),665–671 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fleck CB, Brock M. Re-characterisation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ach1p: fungal CoA-transferases are involved in acetic acid detoxification. Fungal Genet. Biol.46(6–7),473–485 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bauer BE, Rossington D, Mollapour M, Mamnun Y, Kuchler K, Piper PW. Weak organic acid stress inhibits aromatic amino acid uptake by yeast, causing a strong influence of amino acid auxotrophies on the phenotypes of membrane transporter mutants. Eur. J. Biochem.270(15),3189–3195 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schüller C, Mamnun YM, Mollapour M et al. Global phenotypic analysis and transcriptional profiling defines the weak acid stress response regulon in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell15(2),706–720 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia JM, Yuan YJ. Comparative lipidomics of four strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals different responses to furfural, phenol, and acetic acid. J. Agric. Food Chem.57(1),99–108 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Casey E, Sedlak M, Ho NW, Mosier NS. Effect of acetic acid and pH on the cofermentation of glucose and xylose to ethanol by a genetically engineered strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res.10(4),385–393 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warringer J, Hult M, Regot S, Posas F, Sunnerhagen P. The HOG pathway dictates the short-term translational response after hyperosmotic shock. Mol. Biol. Cell21,3080–3092 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horváth IS, Franzén CJ, Taherzadeh MJ, Niklasson C, Lidén G. Effects of furfural on the respiratory metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in glucose-limited chemostats. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.69(7),4076–4086 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin FM, Tan Y, Yuan YJ. Temporal quantitative proteomics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to a nonlethal concentration of furfural. Proteomics9(24),5471–5483 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petersson A, Almeida JRM, Modig T et al. A 5-hydroxymethyl furfural reducing enzyme encoded by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ADH6 gene conveys HMF tolerance. Yeast23(6),455–464 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu ZL, Ma M, Song M. Evolutionarily engineered ethanologenic yeast detoxifies lignocellulosic biomass conversion inhibitors by reprogrammed pathways. Mol. Genet. Genom.282(3),233–244 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li BZ, Yuan YJ. Transcriptome shifts in response to furfural and acetic acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.86(6),1915–1924 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coburn RF. Polyamine effects on cell function: possible central role of plasma membrane PI(4,5)P2. J. Cell. Physiol.221(3),544–551 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Piper P, Mahe Y, Thompson S et al. The pdr12 ABC transporter is required for the development of weak organic acid resistance in yeast. EMBO J.17(15),4257–4265 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endo A, Nakamura T, Shima J. Involvement of ergosterol in tolerance to vanillin, a potential inhibitor of bioethanol fermentation, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.299,95–99 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundström L, Larsson S, Jönsson LJ. Identification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes involved in the resistance to phenolic fermentation inhibitors. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.161(1–8),106–115 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirasawa T, Ashitani K, Yoshikawa K et al. Comparison of transcriptional responses to osmotic stresses induced by NaCl and sorbitol additions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using DNA microarray. J. Biosci. Bioeng.102(6),568–571 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding MZ, Cheng JS, Xiao WH, Qiao B, Yuan YJ. Comparative metabolomic analysis on industrial continuous and batch ethanol fermentation processes by GC-TOF-MS. Metabolomics5(2),229–238 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai FW, Chen LJ, Zhang Z, Anderson WA, Moo-Young M. Continuous ethanol production and evaluation of yeast cell lysis and viability loss under very high gravity medium conditions. J. Biotechnol.110(3),287–293 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pina C, Couto JA, Hogg T. Inferring ethanol tolerance of Saccharomyces and non-Saccharomyces yeasts by progressive inactivation. Biotechnol. Lett.26(19),1521–1527 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexandre H, Ansanay-Galeote V, Dequin S, Blondin B. Global gene expression during short-term ethanol stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett.498(1),98–103 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinh TN, Nagahisa K, Hirasawa T, Furusawa C, Shimizu H. Adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells to high ethanol concentration and changes in fatty acid composition of membrane and cell size. PLoS One3(7),e2623 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Dinh TN, Nagahisa K, Yoshikawa K, Hirasawa T, Furusawa C, Shimizu H. Analysis of adaptation to high ethanol concentration in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using DNA microarray. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng.32(5),681–688 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogawa Y, Nitta A, Uchiyama H, Imamura T, Shimoi H, Ito K. Tolerance mechanism of the ethanol-tolerant mutant of sake yeast. J. Biosci. Bioeng.90(3),313–320 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolkman A, Olsthoorn MM, Heeremans CE, Heck AJ, Slijper M. Comparative proteome analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae grown in chemostat cultures limited for glucose or ethanol. Mol. Cell. Proteomics4(1),1–11 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirasawa T, Yoshikawa K, Nakakura Y et al. Identification of target genes conferring ethanol stress tolerance to Saccharomyces cerevisiae based on DNA microarray data analysis. J. Biotechnol.131(1),34–44 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma M, Liu LZ. Quantitative transcription dynamic analysis reveals candidate genes and key regulators for ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Microbiol.10,169 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carreto L, Eiriz MF, Gomes AC, Pereira PM, Schuller D, Santos MA. Comparative genomics of wild type yeast strains unveils important genome diversity. BMC Genom.9,524 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Argueso JL, Carazzolle MF, Mieczkowski PA et al. Genome structure of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain widely used in bioethanol production. Genome. Res.19(12),2258–2270 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mense SM, Zhang L. Heme: a versatile signaling molecule controlling the activities of diverse regulators ranging from transcription factors to MAP kinases. Cell. Res.16(8),681–692 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura K, Gu Y, Wang Q, Yamada T, Ito K, Shimoi H. A hap1 mutation in a laboratory strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae results in decreased expression of ergosterol-related genes and cellular ergosterol content compared to sake yeast. J. Biosci. Bioeng.98(3),159–166 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguilera F, Peinado RA, Millán C, Ortega JM, Mauricio JC. Relationship between ethanol tolerance, H+ -ATPase activity and the lipid composition of the plasma membrane in different wine yeast strains. Int. J. Food Microbiol.110(1),34–42 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Inoue T, Iefuji H, Fujii T, Soga H, Satoh K. Cloning and characterization of a gene complementing the mutation of an ethanol-sensitive mutant of sake yeast. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.64(2),229–236 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazawa H, Iwahashi H, Uemura H. Disruption of URA7 and GAL6 improves the ethanol tolerance and fermentation capacity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast24(7),551–560 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ho NW, Chen Z, Brainard AP, Sedlak M. Successful design and development of genetically engineered Saccharomyces yeasts for effective cofermentation of glucose and xylose from cellulosic biomass to fuel ethanol. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol.65,163–192 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verduyn C, Van Kleef R, Frank J, Schreuder H, Van Dijken JP, Scheffers WA. Properties of the NAD(P)H-dependent xylose reductase from the xylose-fermenting yeast Pichia. Stipitis. Biochem. J.226(3),669–677 (1985).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonderegger M, Jeppsson M, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Sauer U. Molecular basis for anaerobic growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on xylose, investigated by global gene expression and metabolic flux analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.70(4),2307–2317 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jin YS, Jeffries TW. Changing flux of xylose metabolites by altering expression of xylose reductase and xylitol dehydrogenase in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.105–108,277–286 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jin YS, Ni H, Laplaza JM, Jeffries TW. Optimal growth and ethanol production from xylose by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae require moderate D-xylulokinase activity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.69(1),495–503 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jin YS, Laplaza JM, Jeffries TW. Saccharomyces cerevisiae engineered for xylose metabolism exhibits a respiratory response. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.70(11),6816–6825 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karhumaa K, Påhlman AK, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Levander F, Gorwa-Grauslund MF. Proteome analysis of the xylose-fermenting mutant yeast strain TMB 3400. Yeast26(7),371–382 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkänen JP, Aristidou A, Salusjärvi L, Ruohonen L, Penttilä M. Metabolic flux analysis of xylose metabolism in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae using continuous culture. Metab. Eng.5(1),16–31 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krahulec S, Petschacher B, Wallner M, Longus K, Klimacek M, Nidetzky B. Fermentation of mixed glucose–xylose substrates by engineered strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: role of the coenzyme specificity of xylose reductase, and effect of glucose on xylose utilization. Microb. Cell. Fact.9,16 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grotkjaer T, Christakopoulos P, Nielsen J, Olsson L. Comparative metabolic network analysis of two xylose fermenting recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Metab. Eng.7(5–6),437–444 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin YS, Jeffries TW. Stoichiometric network constraints on xylose metabolism by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab. Eng.6(3),229–238 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bisson LF, Coons DM, Kruckeberg AL, Lewis DA. Yeast sugar transporters. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol.28(4),259–308 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamacher T, Becker J, Gárdonyi M, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Boles E. Characterization of the xylose-transporting properties of yeast hexose transporters and their influence on xylose utilization. Microbiology148(Pt 9),2783–2788 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saloheimo A, Rauta J, Stasyk OV, Sibirny AA, Penttilä M, Ruohonen L. Xylose transport studies with xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains expressing heterologous and homologous permeases. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.74(5),1041–1052 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedlak M, Ho NW. Characterization of the effectiveness of hexose transporters for transporting xylose during glucose and xylose co-fermentation by a recombinant Saccharomyces yeast. Yeast21(8),671–684 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salusjärvi L, Pitkänen JP, Aristidou A, Ruohonen L, Penttilä M. Transcription analysis of recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals novel responses to xylose. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.128(3),237–261 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salusjärvi L, Kankainen M, Soliymani R, Pitkänen JP, Penttilä M, Ruohonen L. Regulation of xylose metabolism in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb. Cell. Fact.7,18 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wahlbom CF, Cordero Otero RR, van Zyl WH, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Jönsson LJ. Molecular analysis of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant with improved ability to utilize xylose shows enhanced expression of proteins involved in transport, initial xylose metabolism, and the pentose phosphate pathway. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.69(2),740–746 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runquist D, Fonseca C, Rådström P, Spencer-Martins I, Hahn-Hägerdal B. Expression of the Gxf1 transporter from Candida intermedia improves fermentation performance in recombinant xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.82(1),123–130 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runquist D, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Rådström P. Comparison of heterologous xylose transporters in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. Biofuels3,5 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuyper M, Winkler AA, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT. Minimal metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient anaerobic xylose fermentation: a proof of principle. FEMS Yeast Res.4(6),655–664 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bengtsson O, Jeppsson M, Sonderegger M et al. Identification of common traits in improved xylose-growing Saccharomyces cerevisiae for inverse metabolic engineering. Yeast25(11),835–847 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng JS, Qiao B, Yuan YJ. Comparative proteome analysis of robust Saccharomyces cerevisiae insights into industrial continuous and batch fermentation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.81(2),327–338 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffries TW, Grigoriev IV, Grimwood J et al. Genome sequence of the lignocellulose-bioconverting and xylose-fermenting yeast Pichia stipitis. Nat. Biotechnol.25(3),319–326 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith DR, Quinlan AR, Peckham HE et al. Rapid whole-genome mutational profiling using next-generation sequencing technologies. Gen. Res.18(10),1638–1642 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin YS, Alper H, Yang YT, Stephanopoulos G. Improvement of xylose uptake and ethanol production in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae through an inverse metabolic engineering approach. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.71(12),8249–8256 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker J, Boles E. A modified Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain that consumes L-arabinose and produces ethanol. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.69(7),4144–4150 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisselink HW, Cipollina C, Oud B et al. Metabolome, transcriptome and metabolic flux analysis of arabinose fermentation by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab. Eng.12(6),537–551 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oberhardt MA, Palsson BØ, Papin JA. Applications of genome-scale metabolic reconstructions. Mol. Syst. Biol.5,320 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price ND, Reed JL, Palsson BØ. Genome-scale models of microbial cells: evaluating the consequences of constraints. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.2(11),886–897 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orth JD, Thiele I, Palsson BØ. What is flux balance analysis? Nat. Biotechnol.28(3),245–248 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgard AP, Pharkya P, Maranas CD. Optknock: a bilevel programming framework for identifying gene knockout strategies for microbial strain optimization. Biotechnol. Bioeng.84(6),647–657 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L, Cluett WR, Mahadevan R. EMILiO: a fast algorithm for genome-scale strain design. Metab. Eng.13(3),272–281 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mahadevan R, Edwards JS, Doyle FJ 3rd. Dynamic flux balance analysis of diauxic growth in Escherichia coli. Biophys. J.83(3),1331–1340 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bro C, Regenberg B, Förster J, Nielsen J. In silico aided metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for improved bioethanol production. Metab. Eng.8(2),102–111 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hjersted JL, Henson MA, Mahadevan R. Genome-scale analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolism and ethanol production in fed-batch culture. Biotechnol. Bioeng.97(5),1190–1204 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjersted JL, Henson MA. Steady-state and dynamic flux balance analysis of ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. IET Syst. Biol.3(3),167–179 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jeppsson M, Johansson B, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Gorwa-Grauslund MF. Reduced oxidative pentose phosphate pathway flux in recombinant xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains improves the ethanol yield from xylose. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.68(4),1604–1609 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bideaux C, Alfenore S, Cameleyre X, Molina-Jouve C, Uribelarrea JL, Guillouet SE. Minimization of glycerol production during the high-performance fed-batch ethanolic fermentation process in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, using a metabolic model as a prediction tool. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.72(3),2134–2140 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Çakir T, Arga KY, Altintaş MM, Ülgen KÖ. Flux analysis of recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae YPB-G utilizing starch for optimal ethanol production. Proc. Biochem.39(12),2097–2108 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Wright J, Bellissimi E, de Hulster E, Wagner A, Pronk JT, van Maris AJ. Batch and continuous culture-based selection strategies for acetic acid tolerance in xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. (2011) (In Press).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Almeida JR, Bertilsson M, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Liden G, Gorwa-Grauslund MF. Carbon fluxes of xylose-consuming Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains are affected differently by NADH and NADPH usage in HMF reduction. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.84(4),751–761 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomás-Pejó E, Ballesteros M, Oliva JM, Olsson L. Adaptation of the xylose fermenting yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae F12 for improving ethanol production in different fed-batch SSF processes. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol.37(11),1211–1220 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martín C, Marcet M, Almazán O, Jönsson LJ. Adaptation of a recombinant xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain to a sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate with high content of fermentation inhibitors. Bioresour. Technol.98(9),1767–1773 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi DJ, Wang CL, Wang KM. Genome shuffling to improve thermotolerance, ethanol tolerance and ethanol productivity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol.36(1),139–147 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu L, Pei X, Lei T, Wang Y, Feng Y. Genome shuffling enhanced L-lactic acid production by improving glucose tolerance of Lactobacillus rhamnosus. J. Biotechnol.134(1–2),154–159 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kai Z, Ping WX, Lina ZN et al. Screening and breeding of high taxol producing fungi by genome shuffling. Sci. China Ser. C-Life Sci.51(3),222–231 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wei P, Li Z, He P, Lin Y, Jiang N. Genome shuffling in the ethanologenic yeast Candida krusei to improve acetic acid tolerance. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem.49,113–120 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patnaik R, Louie S, Gavrilovic V et al. Genome shuffling of Lactobacillus for improved acid tolerance. Nat. Biotechnol.20(7),707–712 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang YX, Perry K, Vinci VA, Powell K, Stemmer WPC, del Cardayre SB. Genome shuffling leads to rapid phenotypic improvement in bacteria. Nature415(6872),644–646 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou L. Improved production of ethanol by novel genome shuffling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.160(4),1084–1093 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hou L. Novel methods of genome shuffling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. Lett.31(5),671–677 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajwa PK, Shireen T, D’Aoust F et al. Mutants of the pentose-fermenting yeast Pichia stipitis with improved tolerance to inhibitors in hardwood spent sulfite liquor. Biotechnol. Bioeng.104(5),892–900 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pinel D, D’Aoust F, del Cardayre S, Bajwa PK, Lee H, Martin VJJ. Genome shuffling of Saccharomyces cerevisiae through recursive population mating leads to improved tolerance to spent sulfite liquor. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. (2011) (In Press).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shaw AJ, Podkaminer KK, Desai SG et al. Metabolic engineering of a thermophilic bacterium to produce ethanol at high yield. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA105(37),13769–13774 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Den Haan R, Rose SH, Lynd LR, van Zyl WH. Hydrolysis and fermentation of amorphous cellulose by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab. Eng.9(1),87–94 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Den Haan R, Mcbride JE, La Grange DC, Lynd LR, Van Zyl WH. Functional expression of cellobiohydrolases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae towards one-step conversion of cellulose to ethanol. Enzyme Microb. Tech.40(5),1291–1299 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raden D, Hildebrandt S, Xu P, Bell E, Doyle FJ 3rd, Robinson AS. Analysis of cellular response to protein overexpression. Syst. Biol.152(4),285–289 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Stephanopoulos G. Challenges in engineering microbes for biofuels production. Science315(5813),801–804 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stambuk BU, Dunn B, Alves SL Jr, Duval EH, Sherlock G. Industrial fuel ethanol yeasts contain adaptive copy number changes in genes involved in vitamin B1 and B6 biosynthesis. Genome. Res.19(12),2271–2278 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCourt JA, Nixon PF, Duggleby RG. Thiamin nutrition and catalysis-induced instability of thiamin diphosphate. Br. J. Nutr.96(4),636–638 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borneman AR, Desany BA, Riches D et al. Whole-genome comparison reveals novel genetic elements that characterize the genome of industrial strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet.7(2),e1001287 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badotti F, Belloch C, Rosa CA, Barrio E, Querol A. Physiological and molecular characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cachaça strains isolated from different geographical regions in Brazil. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.26,579–587 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Garay-Arroyo A, Covarrubias AA, Clark I, Niño I, Gosset G, Martinez A. Response to different environmental stress conditions of industrial and laboratory Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.63(6),734–741 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith EN, Kruglyak L. Gene-environment interaction in yeast gene expression. PLoS Biol.6(4),e83 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

▪ Website

• Greene N, Celik FE, Dale B et al. Growing energy: how biofuels can help end America’s oil dependence. www.bioproducts-bioenergy.gov/pdfs/NRDC-Growing-Energy-Final.3.pdf
   Google Scholar