Developing sugarcane lignocellulosic biorefineries: opportunities and challenges

• REN21. Renewables 2011 Global Status Report. REN21 Secretariat, Paris, France (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Jessup RW. Development and status of dedicated energy crops in the United States. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant45,282–290 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Rooney WL, Blumenthal J, Bean B, Mullet JE. Designing sorghum as a dedicated bioenergy feedstock. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin.1,147–157 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beadle CL, Long SP. Photosynthesis – is it limiting to biomass production? Biomass8,119–168 (1985).
   Google Scholar
• Beale CV, Morison JIL, Long SP. Water use efficiency of C4 perennial grasses in a temperate climate. Agric. Meteorol.96,103–115 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• de Vries SC, van de Ven GWJ, van Ittersum MK, Giller KE. Resource use efficiency and environmental performance of nine major biofuel crops, processed by first-generation conversion techniques. Biomass Bioenergy34,588–601 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renouf MA, Wegener MK, Nielsen LK. An environmental life cycle assessment comparing Australian sugarcane with US corn and UK sugar beet as producers of sugars for fermentation. Biomass Bioenergy32,1144–1155 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisentraut A. Sustainable Production of Second-Generation Biofuels. Potential and Perspectives in Major Economies and Developing Countries. International Energy Agency, Paris, France, 21–22 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Sims R, Taylor M, Saddler J, Mabee W. From 1st to 2nd Generation Biofuel Technologies. An Overview of Current Industry and RD&D activities. International Energy Agency, Paris, France, 114–116 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Nass LL, Pereira PAA, Ellis D. Biofuels in Brazil: an overview. Crop Sci.47,2228–2237 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bake JDV, Junginger M, Faaij A, Poot T, Walter A. Explaining the experience curve: cost reductions of Brazilian ethanol from sugarcane. Biomass Bioenergy33,644–658 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Dias MOS, Junqueira TL, Cavalett O et al. Integrated versus stand-alone second generation ethanol production from sugarcane bagasse and trash. Bioresour. Technol.103,152–161 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy AJ. Breeding improved cultivars for the Caribbean by utilization of total biomass production. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol.26,491–498 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Foreman J, Jackson P, Aitken K et al. Introduction and evaluation of clones derived from Chinese Saccharum spontaneum and Erianthus spp. Sugar Cane Int.25,3–12 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Ramdoyal K, Badaloo MGH. An evaluation of interspecific families of different nobilised groups in contrasting environments for breeding novel sugarcane clones for biomass. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol.26,632–643 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Sundaram KS, Krishnamurthi M, Rajeswari S, Sekar S, Shanmuganathan M. Genetic base broadening of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) by introgression of genes through intergeneric hybridization. Sugar Cane Int.28,174–178 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Clifton-Brown JC, Lewandowski I, Andersson B et al. Performance of 15 Miscanthus genotypes at five sites in Europe. Agron. J.93,1013–1019 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson P. Energy cane. In: Biomass Crops. Malay S (Ed.). Wiley-Blackwell, NJ, USA (2012) (In press).
   Google Scholar
• Botha FC. Energy yield and cost in a sugarcane biomass system. Proc. Aust. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol.31,1–10 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Rao PS, Albert-Thenet JR. Fuel cane biomass potential for year round energy production. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol.25,537 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Wang L-P, Jackson PA, Lu X et al. Evaluation of sugarcane x Saccharum spontaneum progeny for biomass composition and yield components. Crop Sci.48,951–961 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson MA, Agblevor F, Collins M, Johnson DK. Compositional analysis of biomass feedstocks by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Biomass Bioenergy11,365–370 (1996).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Century K, Reuber TL, Ratcliffe OJ. Regulating the regulators: the future prospects for transcription-factor-based agricultural biotechnology products. Plant Physiol.147,20–29 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong R, Lee C, Zhou J, McCarthy RL, Ye Z-H. A battery of transcription factors involved in the regulation of secondary cell wall biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell20,2763–2782 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubouzet JG, Sakuma Y, Ito Y et al.OsDREB genes in rice, Oryza sativa L., encode transcription activators that function in drought-, high-salt- and cold-responsive gene expression. Plant J.33,751–763 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oraby H, Venkatesh B, Dale B et al. Enhanced conversion of plant biomass into glucose using transgenic rice-produced endoglucanase for cellulosic ethanol. Transgenic Res.16,739–749 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ransom C, Balan V, Biswas G et al. Heterologous Acidothermus cellulolyticus 1,4-β-endoglucanase E1 produced within the corn biomass converts corn stover into glucose. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.137–140,207–219 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harrison MD, Geijske J, Coleman HD et al. Accumulation of recombinant cellobiohydrolase and endoglucanase in the leaves of mature transgenic sugarcane. Plant Biotechnol. J.9,884–896 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghu S, Anderson RC, Daehler CC et al. Ecology, adding biofuels to the invasive species fire? Science313,1742 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnett GD, Nowak E, Olivaries-Villegas JJ et al. Identifying the risk of transgene escape from sugarcane crops to related species, with particular reference to Saccharum spontaneum in Australia. Trop. Plant Biol.1,58–71 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Al Arni S, Bosio B, Arato E. Syngas from sugarcane pyrolysis: an experimental study for fuel cell applications. Renew. Energy35,29–35 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Filippis P, Borgianni C, Paolucci M, Pochetti F. Gasification process of Cuban bagasse in a two-stage reactor. Biomass Bioenergy27,247–252 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Xu R, Ferrante L, Briens C, Berruti F. Bio-oil production by flash pyrolysis of sugarcane residues and post treatments of the aqueous phase. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis91,263–272 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Islam MR, Haniu H, Islam MN, Uddin MS. Thermochemical conversion of sugarcane bagasse into bio-crude oils by fluidized-bed pyrolysis technology. J. Therm. Sci. Technol.5,11–23 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Xu R, Ferrante L, Hall K, Briens C, Berruti F. Thermal self-sustainability of biochar production by pyrolysis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis91,55–66 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• King D, Inderwildi OR, Williams A. The Future of Industrial Biorefineries. World Economic Forum, Geneva, Switzerland (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Seabra JEA, Tao L, Chum HL, Macedo IC. A techno-economic evaluation of the effects of centralized cellulosic ethanol and co-products refinery options with sugarcane mill clustering. Biomass Bioenergy34,1065–1078 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrini LF, de Oliveira S, Burbano JC. Supercritical steam cycles and biomass integrated gasification combined cycles for sugarcane mills. Energy35,1172–1180 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias MOS, Modesta M, Ensinas AV et al. Improving bioethanol production from sugarcane: evaluation of distillation, thermal integration and cogeneration systems. Energy36,3691–3703 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibbrandt NH, Knoetze JH, Gorgens JF. Comparing biological and thermochemical processing of sugarcane bagasse: an energy balance perspective. Biomass Bioenergy35,2117–2126 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter A, Ensinas AV. Combined production of second-generation biofuels and electricity from sugarcane residues. Energy35,874–879 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obando DS, Gualdron MA, Reno MLG, Lora EES. Techno-economic indicators for the thermochemical and biochemical routes for biofuels production using sugarcane bagasse as feedstock. Zuckerind135,601–606 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Aita GM, Kim M, Pretreatment technologies for the conversion of lignocellulosic materials to bioethanol. In: Sustainability of the Sugar and Sugar-Ethanol Industries. Eggleston G (Ed.). Oxford University Press, NY, USA, 1–19 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Akin DE. Grass lignocellulose. Strategies to overcome recalcitrance. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.136–140,3–15 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Abramson M, Shoseyov O, Shani Z. Plant cell wall reconstruction toward improved lignocellulosic production and processability. Plant Sci.178,61–72 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks ATWM, Zeeman G. Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol.100,10–18 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng J-K, Li X, Bonawitz ND, Chapple C. Emerging strategies of lignin engineering and degradation for cellulosic biofuel production. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.19,166–172 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Singh S, Singh OV. Bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass: biochemical and molecular perspectives. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol.35,377–391 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardona CA, Quintero JA, Paz IC. Production of bioethanol from sugarcane bagasse: status and perspectives. Bioresour. Technol.101,4754–4766 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canilha L, Santos VTO, Rocha GJM et al. A study on the pretreatment of a sugarcane bagasse sample with dilute sulfuric acid. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol.38,1467–1475 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin C, Marcet M, Thomsen AB. Comparison between wet oxidation and steam explosion as pretreatment methods for enzymatic hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse. Bioresources3,670–683 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabelo SC, Filho RM, Costa AC. Lime pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse for bioethanol production. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.153,139–150 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao XB, Wu RC, Liu DH. Production of pulp and lignin from sugarcane bagasse by alkali-peracetic acid delignification. Biomass Bioenergy35,2874–2882 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Rabelo SC, Filho RM, Costa AC. A comparison between lime and alkaline hydrogen peroxide pretreatments of sugarcane bagasse for ethanol production. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.148,45–58 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesa L, Gonzalez E, Cara C et al. An approach to optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis from sugarcane bagasse based on organosolv pretreatment. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.85,1092–1098 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan C, Sousa LDC, Jin MJ et al. Alkali-based AFEX pretreatment for the conversion of sugarcane bagasse and cane leaf residues to ethanol. Biotechnol. Bioeng.107,441–450 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hagerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. Bioresour. Technol.74,25–33 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh P, Suman A, Tiwari P et al. Biological pretreatment of sugarcane trash for its conversion to fermentable sugars. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.24,667–673 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isroi, Millati R, Syamsiah S et al. Biological pretreatment of lignocelluloses with white-rot fungi and its applications: a review. Bioresources6,5224–5259 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta R, Mehta G, Khasa YP, Kuhad RC. Fungal delignification of lignocellulosic biomass improves the saccharification of cellulosics. Biodegradation22,797–804 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searcy E, Flynn P. The impact of biomass availability and processing cost on optimum size and processing technology selection. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.154,271–286 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Aden A, Ruth M, Ibsen K et al.Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Process Design and Economics Utilizing Co-current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis for Corn Stover NREL/TP-510–32438. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA, 154 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Seabra JEA, Macedo IC. Comparative analysis for power generation and ethanol production from sugarcane residual biomass in Brazil. Energy Policy39,421–428 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias MOS, Ensinas AV, Nebra SA et al. Production of bioethanol and other bio-based materials from sugarcane bagasse: integration to conventional bioethanol production processes. Chem. Eng. Res. Des.87,1206–1216 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb WAC, Chapman LS. Dunder as a fertiliser for sugarcane in the central district of Queensland. Proc. Aust. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol.9,55–58 (1987).
   Google Scholar
• Wilke AC, Riedesel KJ, Owens JM. Stillage characterization and anaerobic treatment of ethanol stillage from conventional and cellulosic feedstocks. Biomass Bioenergy19,63–102 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Eggleston G, Grisham M, Tew T, Triche R, Antoine A. Potential biomass quantity and sugar processing quality of trash and stalk tissues by different US sugarcane varieties. Int. Sugar J.111,108–118 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Lavarack BP, Rainey TJ, Falzon KL, Bullock GE. A preliminary assessment of aqueous ethanol pulping of bagasse: the ecopulp process. Int. Sugar J.107,611–615 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Oliverio JL, Hilst AGP. DHR – DEDINI hidrolise rapida (DEDINI rapid hydrolysis) – revolutionary process for producing alcohol from sugar cane bagasse. Int. Sugar J.106,168–172 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Rossell CEV, Lahr DL, Hilst AGP, Leal MRLV. Saccharification of sugarcane bagasse for ethanol production using the Organosolv process. Zuckerind131,105–109 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Goncalves AR, Benar P, Costa SM et al. Integrated processes for use of pulps and lignins obtained from sugarcane bagasse and straw. A review of recent efforts in Brazil. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.121–124, 821–826 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoareau W, Oliveira FB, Grelier S et al. Fiberboards based on sugarcane bagasse lignin fibers. Macromol. Mater. Eng.291,829–839 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Doherty W, Halley P, Edye L et al. Studies on polymers and composites from lignin and fiber derived from sugar cane. Polym. Adv. Technol.18,673–678 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Yan LF, Yang NK, Pang H, Liao B. Production of levulinic acid from bagasse and paddy straw by liquefaction in the presence of hydrochloric acid. Clean Soil Air Water36,158–163 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick SW. The Biofine technology: a ‘bio-refinery’ concept based on thermochemical conversion of cellulosic biomass. In: Feedstocks for the Future: Renewables for the Production of Chemicals and Materials. Bozell JJ, Patel MK (Eds). American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, USA, 271–287 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Hames BR, Thomas SR, Sluiter AD, Roth CJ, Templeton DW. Rapid biomass analysis. New tools for compositional analysis of corn stover feedstocks and process intermediates from ethanol production. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.105–108, 5–16 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfrum EJ, Sluiter AD. Improved multivariate calibration models for corn stover feedstock and dilute-acid pretreated corn stover. Cellulose16,567–576 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuchikawa S. A review of recent near infrared research for wood and paper. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev.42,43–71 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou S, Li L. Rapid characterization of woody biomass digestibility and chemical composition using near-infrared spectroscopy. J. Integr. Plant Biol.53,166–175 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel KP, Dien BS, Jung HG et al. Quantifying actual and theoretical ethanol yields for switchgrass strains using NIRS analyses. Bioenergy Res.4,96–110 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier D, Dardenne P, Thuries L. Near infrared reflectance calibration optimisation to predict lignocellulosic compounds in sugarcane samples with coarse particle size. J. Near Infrared Spectrosc.19,199–209 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Staunton SP, Lethbridge PJ, Grimley SC et al. On-line cane analysis by infra-red spectroscopy. Proc. Aust. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol.21,20–27 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Staunton S, Mackintosh D, Peatey G. The application of network NIR calibration equations at the Maryborough Sugar Factory. Proc. Aust. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol.26 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Pope G, McDowall R, Massey W, Staunton S. The use of NIR spectroscopy in a cane quality incentive scheme. Proc. Aust. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol.26 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Jones JN, Schofield W, McKenzie NJ, Olson BC. Factory rate control based on more constant fibre rate. Proc. Aust. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol.24,362–366 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Simpson J, Staunton S, O’ Shea M. A review of NIR applications for process control purposes. Proc. Aust. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol.33 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• O’Shea MG, Staunton SP, Burleigh M. Implementation of on-line near infrared (NIR) technologies for the analysis of cane, bagasse and raw sugar in sugar factories to improve performance. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol.27 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Staunton SP, Wardrop K. Development of an online bagasse analysis system using NIR spectroscopy. Int. Sugar J.109,482–488 (2007).
   Google Scholar

▪ Website

• FAO. Global sugarcane production statistics, 2010. http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx
   Google Scholar