EU sustainability criteria for biofuels: uncertainties in GHG emissions from cultivation

• EC. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the Promotion of the Use of Energy From Renewable Sources and Amending and Subsequently Repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. EC, Brussels, Belgium (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Brander M, Tipper R, Hutchison C, Davis G. Consequential and attributional approaches to LCA: a guide to policy makers with specific reference to greenhouse gas LCA of biofuels. Ecometrica Press. Technical Paper, April (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Freibauer A. Regionalised inventory of biogenic greenhouse gas emissions from European agriculture. Eur. J. Agro.19(2),135–160 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons JM, Ramsden SJ, Blake A. Modelling uncertainty in greenhouse gas emissions from UK agriculture at the farm level. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.112(4),347–355 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings AF, Wattenbach M, Eugster W, Li C, Buchmann N, Smith P. Uncertainty propagation in soil greenhouse gas emission models: an experiment using the DNDC model and at the Oensingen cropland site. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.136(1–2),97–110 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Röös E, Sundberg C, Hansson P-A. Uncertainties in the carbon footprint of refined wheat products: a case study on Swedish pasta. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.16(4),338–350 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soimakallio S, Mäkinen T, Ekholm T, Pahkala K, Mikkola H, Paappanen T. Greenhouse gas balances of transportation biofuels, electricity and heat generation in Finland – dealing with the uncertainties. Energy Policy37(1),80–90 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Soimakallio S, Koponen K. How to ensure greenhouse gas emission reductions by increasing the use of biofuels – suitability of the European Union sustainability criteria. Biomass Bioenergy35(8),3504–3513 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards R, Szekeres S, Neuwahl F, Mahieu V. Biofuels in the European Context: Facts and Uncertainties. EC Joint Research Centre, Brussels, Belgium (2009).
   Google Scholar
• McKone TE, Nazaroff WW, Berck P et al. Grand challenges for life-cycle assessment of biofuels. Environ. Sci. Technol.45(5),1751–1756 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björklund A. Survey of approaches to improve reliability in LCA. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.7(2),64–72 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spielmann M, Scholz R, Tietje O, Haan P. Scenario modelling in prospective LCA of transport systems. Application of formative scenario analysis. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.10(5),325–335 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Bahr B, Steen B. Reducing epistemological uncertainty in life cycle inventory. J. Clean. Prod.12(4),369–388 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamagni A, Buttol P, Porta P et al. Critical Review of the Current Research Needs and Limitations Related to ISO-LCA Practice. Deliverable D7 of Work Package 5 of the CALCAS Project. The Italian National Agency on new Technologies, Energy and the Environment, Rome, Italy (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Johnson DR, Willis HH, Curtright AE, Samaras C, Skone T. Incorporating uncertainty analysis into life cycle estimates of greenhouse gas emissions from biomass production. Biomass Bioenergy35(7),2619–2626 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Plevin RJ, O´Hare M, Jones AD, Torn MS, Gibbs HK. Greenhouse gas emissions from biofuels. Indirect land use change are uncertain but may be much greater than previously estimated. Environ. Sci. Technol.44(21),8015–8021 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernesson S, Nilsson D, Hansson PA. A limited LCA comparing large- and small-scale production of ethanol for heavy engines under Swedish conditions. Biomass Bioenergy30(1),46–57 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. Production of Cereals, Dried Pulses, Oil Seed Crops, Potatoes and Temporary Grasses in 2007. Final Statistics. Swedish Board of Agriculture, Gothernberg, Sweden (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. Use of Fertilizers and Animal Manure in Agriculture in 2006/07. Final Statistics. MI 30 SM 0803. Swedish Board of Agriculture, Gothernberg, Sweden (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Ahlgren S, Hansson P-A, Kimming M, Aronsson P, Lundkvist H. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Cultivation of Agricultural Crops for Biofuels and Production of Biogas from Manure – Implementation of the Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources. (Revised Edition). Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson N. Uppdatering av Gårdens Spannmålstork. Ett Projekt Utfört på Uppdrag av SLA. JTI – Institutet för Jordbruks – Och Miljöteknik. Swedish Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Engineering, Stockholm, Sweden (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Uppenberg S, Alemark M, Lindfors L-G et al. Miljöfaktabok för bränslen. Del 2. Bakgrundsinformation och Teknisk bilaga. In: IVL Rapport B1334B-2. Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Stockholm, Sweden (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Swedenergy . The electricity year 2007. Underlag för beräkning av Nordisk elmix för ursprungsmärkning av el år 2007, Appendix 2. In: Vägledning angående ursprungsmärkning av el 2007. Swedenergy, Stockholm, Sweden (2008).
   Google Scholar
• IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme (Volume 4). Eggleston HS, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K. (Eds). IPCC, London, UK (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Rubinstein RY, Kroese DP. Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method. Wiley-Interscience, NY, USA, 707 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Chatterton J, Audsley E, Williams AG. Demonstrating significant differences in carbon-footprinting, despite N2O. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.16(2),102–105 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Plant R, Mermer A, Pettygrove G et al. Factors underlying grain yield spatial variability in three irrigated wheatfields. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng.42(5),1187–1202 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Landau S, Mitchell RC, Barnett V, Colls JJ, Craigon J, Payne RW. A parsimonious, multiple-regression model of wheat yield response to environment. Agric. For. Meteorol.101(2–3),151–166 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fargione JE, Plevin RJ, Hill JD. The ecological impact of biofuels. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. System.41(1),351–377 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC. Report from the Commission on Indirect Land-Use Change Related to Biofuels and Bioliquids. EC, Brussels, Belgium (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Wicke B, Verweij P, Van Meijl H, Van Vuuren DP, Faaij APC. Indirect land use change: review of existing models and strategies for mitigation. Biofuels3(1),87–100 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Mullins KA, Griffin WM, Matthews HS. Policy implications of uncertainty in modeled life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of biofuels. Environ. Sci. Technol.45(1),132–138 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

▪ Websites

• EC Renewable Energy Transparency Platform. Emissions from cultivation (Article 19[2]). http://ec.europa.eu/energy/renewables/transparency_platform/emissions_en.htm (Accessed 1 February 2012)
   Google Scholar
• BioGrace. Harmonization of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission calculations of biofuels throughout the European Union. www.biograce.net (Accessed 1 February 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Yara. The carbon footprint of fertilizers. www.yara.com/sustainability/climate/index.aspx (Accessed 1 February 2012)
   Google Scholar