References
- van der Voet E, Lifset RJ, Luo L. Life-cycle assessment of biofuels, convergence and divergence. Biofuels1(3),435–449 (2010).
- Wibe S. [Carbon Dioxide Effects of Ethanol: an Overview of Current Research]. Fritzes Kundtjänst, Stockholm, Sweden (2010).
- Akinci B, Kassebaum PG, Fitch JV, Thompson RW. The role of bio-fuels in satisfying US transportation fuel demands. Energy Policy36(9),3485–3491 (2008).
- Granda CB, Zhu L, Holtzapple MT. Sustainable liquid biofuels and their environmental impact. Environ. Prog.26(3),233–250 (2007).
- McCormick K, Bomb C, Deurwaarder E. Governance of biofuels for transport in Europe: lessons from Sweden and the UK. Biofuels3(3),293–305 (2012).
- Ponton JW. Biofuels: thermodynamic sense and nonsense. J. Clean. Prod.17(10),896–899 (2009).
- Martin M, Eklund M. Improving the environmental performance of biofuels with industrial symbiosis. Biomass Bioenergy35(5),1747–1755 (2011).
- EU Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. Official J. Eur. UnionL140, 5 June 2009 16–47 (2009).
- Chertow MR. Industrial symbiosis: literature and taxonomy. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ.25,313–337 (2000).
- Saunders JA, Rosentrater KA. Survey of US fuel ethanol plants. Bioresour. Technol.100(13),3277–3284 (2009).
- Piotrowska P, Zevenhoven M, Hupa M, Giuntoli J, de Jong W. Residues from the production of biofuels for transportation: characterization and ash sintering tendency. Fuel Process. Technol. (2011) (In Press).
- Chertow MR, Lombardi DR. Quantifying economic and environmental benefits of co-located firms. Environ. Sci. Technol.39(17),6535–6541 (2005).
- Eklund M. Industrial symbiosis for the sustainable use of biofuels. Biofuels1(3),373–375 (2010).
- Börjesson P. Good or bad bioethanol from a greenhouse gas perspective – what determines this? Appl. Energy86(5),589–594 (2009).
- Börjesson P. [Energy balance of bioethanol – a review]. In: IMES/EESS Report No. 59. Lund University, Lund, Sweden (2006).
- Börjesson P. Energy analysis of transportation fuels from grain and ley crops. In: IMES/EESS Report No. 54. Lund University, Lund, Sweden (2004).
- Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA et al. Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science319(5867),1238–1240 (2008).
- Melillo JM, Reilly JM, Kicklighter DW et al. Indirect emissions from biofuels: how important? Science326(5958),1397–1399 (2009).
- Cherubini F, Bird ND, Cowie A, Jungmeier G, Schlamadinger B, Woess-Gallasch S. Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: key issues, ranges and recommendations. Resour. Conserv. Recycling53(8),434–447 (2009).
- Murphy JD, Power NM. How can we improve the energy balance of ethanol production from wheat? Fuel87(10–11),1799–1806 (2008).
- Börjesson P, Tufvesson LM. Agricultural crop-based biofuels – resource efficiency and environmental performance including direct land use changes. J. Clean. Prod.19,108–120 (2011).
- Sokka L, Lehtoranta S, Nissinen A, Melanen M. Analyzing the environmental benefits of industrial symbiosis: life cycle assessment applied to a Finnish forest industry complex. J. Ind. Ecol.15(1),137–155 (2011).
- Mattila TJ, Pakarinen S, Sokka L. Quantifying the total environmental impacts of an industrial symbiosis – a comparison of process-, hybrid and input-output life cycle assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol.44(11),4309–4314 (2010).
- Eckelman MJ, Chertow MR. Quantifying life cycle environmental benefits from the reuse of industrial materials in Pennsylvania. Environ. Sci. Technol.43(7),2550–2556 (2009).
- Green BN, Johnson CD, Adams A. Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. J. Chiroprac. Med.5(3),101–117 (2006).
- Martin M, Fonseca J. A Systematic Literature Review of Biofuel Synergies. IEI Report Number LIU IEI R 10/0092 SE. Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden (2012).
- Centre of Excellence in Cleaner Production. Regional Resource Synergies for Sustainable Development in Heavy Industrial Areas: An Overview of Opportunities and Experiences. Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia (2007).
- Martin M, Ivner J, Svensson N, Eklund M. Biofuel Synergy Development: Classification and Identification of Synergies using Industrial Symbiosis. Linköping University. IEI Report Number LIU IEI R 09/0063 SE. Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden (2009).
- Bossilkov A, Lund C. Market Assessment for the Reuse of Inorganic Industrial By-Products in the Kwinana Industrial Area. Centre for Sustainable Resource Processing, Perth, Australia (2008).
- Quintella SA, Saboya RMA, Salmin DC et al. Transesterification of soybean oil using ethanol and mesoporous silica catalyst. Renew. Energy38(1),136–140 (2012).
- Jensen PD, Basson L, Hellawell EE, Bailey MR, Leach M. Quantifying ‘geographic proximity’: experiences from the United Kingdom’s national industrial symbiosis programme. Resour. Conserv. Recycling55(7),703–712 (2011).
- Patterson T, Esteves S, Dinsdale R, Guwy A. Life cycle assessment of biogas infrastructure options on a regional scale. Bioresour. Technol.102(15),7313–7323 (2011).
- Poeschl M, Ward S, Owende P. Environmental impacts of biogas deployment. Part I: life cycle inventory for evaluation of production process emissions to air. J. Clean. Prod.24(0),168–183 (2012).
- Alburquerque JA, de la Fuente C, Ferrer-Costa A et al. Assessment of the fertiliser potential of digestates from farm and agroindustrial residues. Biomass Bioenergy40,181–189 (2012).
- Diaz-Chavez RA. Assessing biofuels: aiming for sustainable development or complying with the market? Energy Policy39(10),5763–5769 (2011).
- De Vuyst EA, Pryor SW, Lardy G, Eide W, Wiederholt R. Cattle, ethanol, and biogas: does closing the loop make economic sense? Agric. Syst.104(8),609–614 (2011).