Ionic liquids versus amine solutions in biogas upgrading: the level of volatile organic compounds

• Rasi S, Lehtinen J, Rintala J. Determination of organic silicon compounds in biogases from waste water treatments plants, landfills, and co-digestion plants. Renew. Energ.32(12),2666–2673 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold M. Reduction and Monitoring of Biogas Trace Compounds. VTT Research Notes 2496. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Finland, 74 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Ajhar M, Travesset M, Yüce S, Melin T. Siloxane removal from landfill and digester gas – a technology overview. Bioresour. Technol.101(9),2913–2923 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billig E, Grope J. Overview of biomethane grid injection in Germany. Proceedings of 20th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition. Milan, Italy, 18–22 June 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Rasi S, Veijanen A, Rintala J. Trace compounds of biogas from different biogas production plants. Energy32(8),1375–1380 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Läntelä J, Rasi S, Lehtinen J, Rintala J. Landfill gas upgrading with pilot-scale water scrubber: performance assessment with absorption water recycling. Appl. Energy92,307–314 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starr K, Gabarrell X, Villalba G, Talens L, Lombardi L. Life cycle assessment of biogas upgrading technologies. Waste Manage.32(5),991–999 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grande CA, Rodrigues AE. Layered vacuum pressure-swing adsorption for biogas upgrading. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.46(23),7844–7848 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou W, Guo J, Tan H. Upgrading of methane from biogas by pressure swing adsorption. Adv. Mater. Res.236–238,268–271 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Santos MPS, Grande CA, Rodrigues AE. Pressure swing adsorption for biogas upgrading: effect of recycling streams in pressure swing adsorption design. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.50(2),974–985 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liyuan D, Hagg M-B. Techno-economic evaluation of biogas upgrading process using CO2 facilitated transport membrane. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con.4(4),638–646 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favre E, Bounaceur R, Roizard D. Biogas, membranes and carbon dioxide capture. J. Membr. Sci.92,307–314 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuinier MJ, van Sint Annaland M. Biogas purification using cryogenic packed-bed technology. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.51(15),5552–5558 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environment Agency. Guidance on Gas Treatment Technologies for Landfill Gas Engines. Environment Agency, Bristol, UK (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Blumberga D, Kuplais Ģ, Veidenbergs I, Dãce E. Benchmarking method for estimation of biogas upgrading schemes. Latvian J. Phy. Tech. Sci.46(4),23–35 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Brennecke JF, Gurkan BE. Ionic liquids for CO2 capture and emission reduction. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.1(24),3459–3464 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bara JE, Camper DE, Gin DL, Noble RD. Room-temperature ionic liquids and composite materials: platform technologies for CO2 capture. Acc. Chem. Res.43(1),152–159 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Privalova EI, Maki-Arvela P, Murzin DY, Mikkola J-P. Capturing CO2: conventional versus ionic-liquid based technologies. Rus. Chem. Rev.81(5),435–457 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasib-ur-Rahman M, Siaj M, Larachi F. Ionic liquids for CO2 capture-development and progress. Chem. Eng. Process.49,313–322 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserscheid P, Welton T. Ionic Liquids in Synthesis. Wiley-WCH, Weinheim, Germany (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Bidart C, Jimenez R, Carlesi C, Flores M, Berg A. Synthesis and usage of common and functionalized ionic liquids for biogas upgrading. Chem. Eng. J.175,388–395 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Privalova E, Rasi S, Mäki-Arvela P et al. CO2 capture from biogas: absorbent selection. RSC Adv.3,2979–2994 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolev N. Packed Bed Columns: For Absorption, Desorption, Rectification and Direct Heat Transfer. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Derbal K, Bencheikh-Lehocine M, Meniai AH. Study of biodegradability of organic fraction of municipal solids waste. Energy Procedia19,239–248 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Kim JK, Oh BR, Chun YN, Kim SW. Effects of temperature and hydraulic retention time on anaerobic digestion of food waste. J. Biosci. Bioeng.102(4),328–332 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vindis P, Mursec B, Janzekovic M, Cus F. The impact of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion on biogas production. J. Achieve. Mat. Manuf. Eng.36(2),192–198 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Gaur A, Park J-W, Maken S, Song H-J, Park J-J. Landfill gas (LFG) processing via adsorption and alkanolamine absorption. Fuel Process. Technol.91(6),635–640 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryckebosch E, Drouillon M, Vervaeren H. Techniques for transformation of biogas to biomethane. Biomass Bioenergy35(5),1633–1645 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anabel R, Levesque F, Hanif L. Separations technology improves amine system’s overall reliability. Oil Gas J.108(1),46–48, 50–53 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Chu X, Hu Y, Li J et al. Desulfurization of diesel fuel by extraction with [BF4]- based ionic liquid. Chin. J. Chem. Eng.16(6),881–884 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Zhang Q, Zhang ZC. Extractive desulfurization and denitrogenation of fuels using ionic liquids. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.43(2),614–622 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mochizuki Y, Sugawara K. Removal of organic sulfur from hydrocarbon resources using ionic liquids. Energy Fuels22(5),3303–3307 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nejad NF, Zand EK. A new approach to dearomatization of gasoline by ionic liquid and liquid–liquid extraction. Pet. Sci. Technol.29(22),2372–2376 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čekanova P, Jasminska N, Brestovic T, Schvarzbacherova E. Biogas upgrading processes for the production of natural gas substitute. Holist. Approach Environ.1(2),53–62 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Osorio F, Torres JC. Biogas purification from anaerobic digestion in a wastewater treatment plant for biofuel production. Renew. Energ.34(10),2164–2171 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson FAT, Karlsson A, Svensson BH. Occurrence and abatement of volatile sulfur compounds during biogas production. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc.54(7),855–861 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smet E, Lens P, Van Langenhove H. Treatment of waste gases contaminated with odorous sulfur compounds. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol.28(1),89–117 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu T, Wang X, Li D, Yi Z. Emission of volatile organic sulfur compounds (VOSCs) during aerobic decomposition of food wastes. Atmos. Environ.44(39),5065–5071 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumoto M, Inomoto Y, Kondo K. Selective separation of aromatic hydrocarbons through supported liquid membranes based on ionic liquids. J. Memb. Sci.246,77–81 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassol CC, Umpierre AP, Ebeling G, Ferrera B, Chiaro SSX, DuPont J. On the extraction of aromatic compounds from hydrocarbons by imidazolium ionic liquids. Int. J. Mol. Sci.8,593–605 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabaço MI, Besnard M, Danten Y, Coutinho JAP. Carbon dioxide in 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate. I. Unusual solubility investigated by Raman spectroscopy and DFT calculations. J. Phys. Chem. A116(6),1605–1620 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasi S, Läntelä J, Veijanen A, Rintala J. Landfill gas upgrading with countercurrent water wash. Waste Manage.28(9),1528–1534 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossol D, Schmelz K. Siloxane im Faulgas. GWF Wasser/Abwasser146(1),55–61 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Brooke DN, Crookes MJ, Gray D, Robertson S. Using science to create a better place. In: Environmental Risk Assessment Report: Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane. Environment Agency, Bristol, UK (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Dewil R, Appels L, Baeyens J. Energy use of biogas hampered by the presence of siloxanes. Energy Convers. Manage.47,1711–1722 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweigkofler M, Niessner R. Determination of siloxanes and VOC in landfill gas and sewage gas by canister sampling and GC–MS/AES analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol.33(20),3680–3685 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prochazkova A, Vrbovaand V, Ciahotmy K. Removal of siloxanes from biogas using adsorption. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress on Biotechniques for Air Pollution Control. Delft, The Netherlands, 321–329 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Schweigkofler M, Niessner R. Removal of siloxanes in biogases. J. Hazard. Mater. B83,183–196 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meindersma GW, Podt A, Klaren MB, Haan ABD. Separation of aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons with ionic liquids. Chem. Eng. Comm.193,1384–1396 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farhadian M, Duchez D, Vachelard C, Larroche C. Monoaromatics removal from polluted water through bioreactors – a review. Water Res.42(6–7),1325–1341(2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lide D. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 77th Edition. CRC Press, NY, USA (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Phuphuakrat T, Namioka T, Yoshikawa K. Absorptive removal of biomass tar using water and oily materials. Bioresour. Technol.102(2),543–549 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nefedieva M, Lebedeva O, Kultin D, Kustov L, Borisenkova S, Krasovskiy V. Ionic liquids based on imidazolium tetrafluoroborate for the removal of aromatic sulfur-containing compounds from hydrocarbon mixtures. Green Chem.12,346–349 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammarata L, Kazarian SG, Salter PA, Welton T. Molecular states of water in room temperature ionic liquids. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.3,5192–5200 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao W, He G, Zhang L et al. Effect of water in ionic liquid on the separation performance of supported ionic liquid membrane for CO2/N2. J. Membr. Sci.350(1–2),279–285 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantz RA, Trulove PC. Chapter 3.2. Viscosity and density of ionic liquids. In: Ionic Liquids in Synthesis. Wasserscheid P, Welton T (Eds). Wiley-WCH, Weinheim, Germany, 56–68 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Xue QM, Liu YS, Huo P. Dynamic removal of CO2 on MDEA-loaded SBA-15 for biogas upgrading. Adv. Mater. Res.204–210,1245–1249 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Boulinguiez B, Le Cloirec P. Biogas pre-upgrading by adsorption of trace compounds onto granular activated carbons and an activated carbon fiber-cloth. Water Sci. Technol.59(5),935–944 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montanari T, Finocchio E, Salvatore E et al. CO2 separation and landfill biogas upgrading: a comparison of 4A and 13X zeolite adsorbents. Energy36(1),314–319 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan B, Ma D, Wang X et al. A microporous, moisture-stable, and amine-functionalized metal-organic framework for highly selective separation of CO2 from CH4. Chem. Commun.48(8),1135–1137 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaszova M, Vejrazka J, Vesely V et al. A water-swollen thin film composite membrane for effective upgrading of raw biogas by methane. Sep. Purif. Technol.89,212–216 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raab K, Lamprecht M, Brechtel K, Scheffknecht G. Innovative CO2 separation of biogas by polymer resins: operation of a continuous lab-scale plant. Eng. Life Sci.12(3),327–335 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozdemir C, Dursun S, Sen N. Anaerobic removal of volatile organic compounds (VOC) from wastewater using methanol and ethylene glycol as co-substrate. J. Int. Environ. Appl. Sci.2(1),33–39 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Baciocchi R, Corti A, Costa G, Lombardi L, Zingaretti D. Storage of carbon dioxide captured in a pilot-scale biogas upgrading plant by accelerated carbonation of industrial residues. Energy Procedia4,4985–4992 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Budzianowski WM. Benefits of biogas upgrading to biomethane by high-pressure reactive solvent scrubbing. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin.6(1),12–20 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baciocchi R, Costa G, Gavasci R, Lombardi L, Zingaretti D. Regeneration of a spent alkaline solution from a biogas upgrading unit by carbonation of APC residues. Chem. Eng. J.179,63–71 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois L, Thomas D. Comparison of various alkaline solutions for H2S/CO2-selective absorption applied to biogas purification. Chem. Eng. Technol.33(10),1601–1609 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao C-Y, Chiu S-Y, Huang T-T et al. A mutant strain of microalga Chlorella sp. for the carbon dioxide capture from biogas. Biomass Bioenergy36,132–140 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao C-Y, Chiu S-Y, Huang T-T, Dai L, Hsu L-K, Lin C-S. Ability of a mutant strain of the microalga Chlorella sp. to capture carbon dioxide for biogas upgrading. Appl. Energy93,176–183 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo G, Angelidaki I. Integrated biogas upgrading and hydrogen utilization in an anaerobic reactor containing enriched hydrogenotrophic methanogenic culture. Biotechnol. Bioeng.109(11),2729–2736 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

▪ Websites

• AEBIOM, European Biomass Association. www.aebiom.org (accessed 15 January 2013)
   Google Scholar
• European Biofuels Technology Platform. Biomethane for use as a transport fuel. www.biofuelstp.eu/biogas.html (accessed 15 January 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Clean Vehicle Europe. Local and regional level, Blekinge County. www.cleanvehicle.eu/info-per-country-and-eu-policy/member-states/sweden/local-regional-level (accessed 30 October 2012)
   Google Scholar
• National Toxicology Program, Department of Health and Human Services. http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov (accessed 30 October 2012)
   Google Scholar