Biological Sample Preparation: Attempts on Productivity Increasing in Bioanalysis

References

• Shou WZ , ZhangJ. Recent development in software and automation tools for high-throughput discovery bioanalysis. Bioanalysis4, 1097–1109 (2012).  
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnpenny P , FraierD, ChassaingC, DuckworthJ. Development of a μ-turbulent flow chromatography focus mode method for drug quantitation in discovery bioanalysis. J. Chromatogr. B856, 131–140 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mach AJ , AdeyigaOB, Di CarloD. Microfluidic sample preparation for diagnostic cytopathology. Lab Chip13, 1011–1026 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farhadi K , HatamiM, MatinAA. Microextraction techniques in therapeutic drug monitoring. Biomed. Chromatogr. 26, 972–989 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samanidou V , KovatsiL, FragouD, RentifisK. Novel strategies for sample preparation in forensic toxicology. Bioanalysis3, 2019–2046 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musenga A , CowanDA. Use of ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography coupled to high resolution mass spectrometry for fast screening in high throughput doping control. J. Chromatogr. A1288, 82–95 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue YJ , GaoH, JiQCet al. Bioanalysis of drug in tissue: current status and challenges. Bioanalysis4, 2637–2653 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu ML , LawiW, SnyderST, WongPK, LiaoJC, GauV. Matrix effects – a challenge toward automation of molecular analysis. J. Assoc. Lab. Autom. 15, 233–242 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Chambers E , Wagrowski-DiehlDM, LuZ, MazzeoJR. Systematic and comprehensive strategy for reducing matrix effects in LC/MS/MS analyses. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 852, 22–34 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y , ShiR, GeeW, BonderudR. Matrix effect and recovery terminology issues in regulated drug bioanalysis. Bioanalysis4, 271–279 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Côté C , BergeronA, MessJN, FurtadoM, GarofoloF. Matrix effect elimination during LC-MS/MS bioanalytical method development. Bioanalysis1, 1243–1257 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh C , ShashankG, ShindeCP, ChakrabortyB. A systematic approach to overcome the matrix effect during LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis by different sample extraction techniques. J. Bioeq. Bioavail. 3, 122–127 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Hughes NC , BajajN, FanJ, WongEY. Assessing the matrix effects of hemolyzed samples in bioanalysis. Bioanalysis1, 1057–1066 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawczak P , BaczekT. Recent theoretical and practical applications of micellar liquid chromatography (MLC) in pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis. Cent. Eur. J. Chem. 10, 570–584 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullett WM . Determination of drugs in biological fluids by direct injection of samples for liquid-chromatographic analysis. J. Biochem. Biophys. Meth. 70, 263–273 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Couchman L . Turbulent flow chromatography in bioanalysis: a review. Biomed. Chromatogr. 26, 892–905 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjelstad A , Pedersen-BjergaardS. Electromembrane extraction: a new technique for accelerating bioanalytical sample preparation. Bioanalysis3, 787–797 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole CF . New trends in solid-phase extraction. Trends Anal. Chem. 22, 362–373 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang MS , JiQ, ZhangJ, El-ShourbagyTA. Historical review of sample preparation for chromatographic bioanalysis: pros and cons. Drug Dev. Res. 68, 107–133 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassiano NM , LimaVV, OliveiraRV, PietroAC, CassQB. Development of restricted-access media supports and their application to the direct analysis of biological fluid samples via high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 385, 1580–1580 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Duner K , BackstromJ, MagnellN, SvennbergH, AhnoffM, LogrenU. Determination of ximelagatran, melagatran and two intermediary metabolites in plasma by mixed-mode solid phase extraction and LC-MS/MS. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 852, 317–324 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remane D , MeyerMR, PetersFT, WissenbachDK, MaurerHH. Fast and simple procedure for liquid-liquid extraction of 136 analytes from different drug classes for development of a liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric quantification method in human blood plasma. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 397, 2303–2314 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hojskov CS , HeickendorffL, MollerHJ. High-throughput liquid-liquid extraction and LCMSMS assay for determination of circulating 25(OH) vitamin D3 and D2 in the routine clinical laboratory. Clin. Chim. Acta411, 114–116 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englard S , SeifterS. Precipitation techniques. Methods Enzymol. 182, 285–300 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polson C , SarkarP, IncledonB, RaguvaranV, GrantR. Optimization of protein precipitation based upon effectiveness of protein removal and ionization effect in liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 785, 263–275 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddlecombe RA , PleasanceS. Automated protein precipitation by filtration in the 96-well format. J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl. 734, 257–265 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souverain S , RudazS, VeutheyJL. Protein precipitation for the analysis of a drug cocktail in plasma by LC-ESI-MS. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 35, 913–920 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musteata FM , PawliszynJ. Bioanalytical applications of solid-phase microextraction. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 26, 36–45 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musteata ML , MusteataFM. Analytical methods used in conjunction with solid-phase microextraction: a review of recent bioanalytical applications. Bioanalysis1, 1081–1102 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risticevic S1 , NiriVH, VuckovicD, PawliszynJ. Recent developments in solid-phase microextraction. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 393, 781–795 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cudjoe E1 , BojkoB, TogundeP, PawliszynJ. In vivo solid-phase microextraction for tissue bioanalysis. Bioanalysis4, 2605–2619 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuhu AA , BasheerC, SaadB. Liquid-phase and dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction techniques with derivatization: recent applications in bioanalysis. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 879, 1180–1188 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarafraz-Yazdi A , AmiriA. Liquid-phase microextraction. Trends Anal. Chem. 29, 1–14 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidi S , YaminiY, RezazadehM. Combination of electromembrane extraction with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction followed by gas chromatographic analysis as a fast and sensitive technique for determination of tricyclic antidepressants. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 914, 138–146 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Jeannot MA , PrzyjaznyA, KokosaJM. Single drop microextraction – development, applications and future trends. J. Chromatogr. A16, 2326–2336 (2010).  
   Google Scholar
• Jabbaribar F , MortazaviA, Jalali-MilaniR, JouybanA. Analysis of oseltamivir in Tamiflu capsules using micellar electrokinetic chromatography. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 56, 1639–1644 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Rehim M . Recent advances in microextraction by packed sorbent for bioanalysis. J. Chromatogr. A1217, 2569–2580 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobiszewski M , NamieśnikJ. Direct chromatographic methods in the context of green analytical chemistry. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 35, 67–73 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuckovic D , ZhangX, CudjoeE, PawliszynJ. Solid-phase microextraction in bioanalysis: New devices and directions. J. Chromatogr. A1217 (25), 4041–4060 (2010).  
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nováková L , VlčkováH. A review of current trends and advances in modern bio-analytical methods: chromatography and sample preparation. Anal. Chim. Acta656, 8–35 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Núñez O , Gallart-AyalaH, MartinsCP, LucciP, BusquetsR. State-of-the-art in fast liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry for bio-analytical applications. J. Chromatogr. B927, 3–21 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashri NY , Abdel-RehimM. Sample treatment based on extraction techniques in biological matrices. Bioanalysis3, 2003–2018 (2011).  
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kole PL , VenkateshG, KotechaJ, SheshalaR. Recent advances in sample preparation techniques for effective bioanalytical methods. Biomed. Chromatogr. 25 (1), 199–217 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill HM . Measuring productivity in bioanalysis. Bioanalysis4, 2317–2319 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saraji M , KhajeN. Recent advances in liquid microextraction techniques coupled with MS for determination of small-molecule drugs in biological samples. Bioanalysis4, 725–739 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSilva B , GarofoloF, RocciMet al. 2012 White paper on recent issues in bioanalysis and alignment of multiple guidelines. Bioanalysis4, 2213–2226 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hukari KW , ShultzM, IselyN, MilsonR, WestJA. A completely automated sample preparation instrument and consumable device for isolation and purification of nucleic acids. J. Lab. Autom. 16, 355–365 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vyawahare S , GriffithsAD, MertenCA. Miniaturization and parallelization of biological and chemical assays in microfluidic devices. Chem. Biol. 17 (10), 1052–1065 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Mello AJ , BeardN. Focus. Dealing with ‘real’ samples: sample pre-treatment in microfluidic systems. Lab Chip3, 11–20 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ríos Á , ZougaghM. Sample preparation for micro total analytical systems (μ-TASs). Trends Anal. Chem. 43, 174–188 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz-Vera M , LucenaR, CárdenasS, ValcárcelM. Sample treatments based on dispersive (micro)extraction. Anal. Methods3, 1719–1728 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucena R , Cruz-VeraM, CardenasS, ValcarcelM. Liquid-phase microextraction in bioanalytical sample preparation. Bioanalysis1, 135–149 (2009).  
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu R , LiuJF, YinYG, HuXL, JiangGB. Ionic liquids in sample preparation. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 393, 871–883 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu-Rabie P , SpoonerN. Direct quantitative bioanalysis of drugs in dried blood spot samples using a thin-layer chromatography mass spectrometer interface. Anal. Chem. 81, 10275–10284 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rambla-Alegre M , Martí-CentellesR, Esteve-RomeroJ, Carda-BrochS. Application of a liquid chromatographic procedure for the analysis of penicillin antibiotics in biological fluids and pharmaceutical formulations using sodium dodecyl sulphate/propanol mobile phases and direct injection. J. Chromatogr. A1218, 4972–4981 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raviolo MA , BrevaIC, Esteve-RomeroJ. Screening and monitoring antiretrovirals and antivirals in the serum of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome patients by micellar liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A1216, 3546–3552 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soltani S , JouybanA. A validated micellar LC method for simultaneous determination of furosemide, metoprolol and verapamil in human plasma. Bioanalysis4, 41–48 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musteata FM . Monitoring free drug concentrations: Challenges. Bioanalysis3, 1753–1768 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks G , UgesDR, FrankeJP. pH adjustment of human blood plasma prior to bioanalytical sample preparation. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 47 (1), 126–133 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakubowska N , PolkowskaZ, NamiesnikJ, PrzyjaznyA. Analytical applications of membrane extraction for biomedical and environmental liquid sample preparation. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 35, 217–235 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks G , UgesDR, FrankeJP. Reconsideration of sample pH adjustment in bioanalytical liquid-liquid extraction of ionisable compounds. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 853, 234–241 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrero M , MendiolaJA, CifuentesA, IbáñezE. Supercritical fluid extraction: recent advances and applications. J. Chromatogr. A1217, 2495–2511 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao C , TangM, LiJ, YinC-r, XiangG, XuL. Determination of sildenafil, vardenafil and aildenafil in human plasma by dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction-back extraction based on ionic liquid and high performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detection. J. Chromatogr. B931, 111–116 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaves AR , SilvaSM, QueirozRHC, LançasFM, QueirozMEC. Stir bar sorptive extraction and liquid chromatography with UV detection for determination of antidepressants in plasma samples. J. Chromatogr. B850, 295–302 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia L , LiX, WuY, HuB, ChenR. Ionic liquids based single drop microextraction combined with electrothermal vaporization inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry for determination of Co, Hg and Pb in biological and environmental samples. Spectrochim. Acta B Atom. Spect. 63, 1290–1296 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trujillo-Rodríguez MJ , Rocío-BautistaP, PinoV, AfonsoAM. Ionic liquids in dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 51, 87–106 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker SA . Matrix solid phase dispersion (MSPD). J. Biochem. Biophys. Meth. 70, 151–162 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang Y , MatherEL, BellJL, MadouM. MEMS-based sample preparation for molecular diagnostics. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 372, 49–65 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisowski P , ZarzyckiP. Microfluidic paper-based analytical devices (μPADs) and micro total analysis systems (μTAS): development, applications and future trends. Chromatographia76, 1201–1214 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang H , OuyangZ, ZengJet al. A user-friendly robotic sample preparation program for fully automated biological sample pipetting and dilution to benefit the regulated bioanalysis. J. Lab. Autom. 17, 211–221 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zacharis CK , VerdoukasA, TzanavarasPD, ThemelisDG. Automated sample preparation coupled to sequential injection chromatography: on-line filtration and dilution protocols prior to separation. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 49, 726–732 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuban P , BocekP. Direct analysis of formate in human plasma, serum and whole blood by in-line coupling of microdialysis to capillary electrophoresis for rapid diagnosis of methanol poisoning. Anal. Chim. Acta768, 82–89 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kromdijk W , PereiraSA, RosingH, MulderJW, BeijnenJH, HuitemaADR. Development and validation of an assay for the simultaneous determination of zidovudine, abacavir, emtricitabine, lamivudine, tenofovir and ribavirin in human plasma using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 919, 43–51 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma J , ShiJ, LeHet al. A fully automated plasma protein precipitation sample preparation method for LC–MS/MS bioanalysis. J. Chromatogr. B862, 219–226 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palandra J , WellerD, HudsonGet al. Flexible automated approach for quantitative liquid handling of complex biological samples. Anal. Chem. 79, 8010–8015 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah VP , BansalS. Historical perspective on the development and evolution of bioanalytical guidance and technology. Bioanalysis3, 823–827 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cudjoe E , BojkoB, TogundeP, PawliszynJ. In vivo solid-phase microextraction for tissue bioanalysis. Bioanalysis4, 2605–2619 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soltani S . Application of Micellar Liquid Chromatography to the Simultaneous Determination of Cardiovascular Drugs in Biological Fluids. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Soltani S , JouybanA. Optimization and validation of an isocratic HPLC-UV method for the simultaneous determination of five drugs used in combined cardiovascular therapy in human plasma. Asian J. Chem. 23, 1728–1734 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Dayyih WAA , MallahEM, Al-AkaylehFT, HamadMF, ArafatTA. A stability-indicating high performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) assay for the determination of cefaclor in biological fluid. Latin American J. Pharm. 32, 568–574 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kano EK , SerraCHDR, KoonoEEM, FukudaK, PortaV. An efficient HPLC-UV method for the quantitative determination of cefadroxil in human plasma and its application in pharmacokinetic studies. J. Liquid Chromatogr. Rel. Technol. 35, 1871–1881 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König K , GoethelSF, RusuVM, VogeserM. Deproteination of serum samples for LC–MS/MS analyses by applying magnetic micro-particles. Clin. Biochem. 46, 652–655 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddlecombe RA , PleasanceS. Automated protein precipitation by filtration in the 96-well format. J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl. 734, 257–265 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin YG , JonesSA, MurakamiSCet al. Validation and application of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric method for the determination of GDC-0834 and its metabolite in human plasma using semi-automated 96-well protein precipitation. Biomed. Chromatogr. 26, 1444–1451 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji C , WaltonJ, SuY, TellaM. Simultaneous determination of plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine using an integrated strategy of a fully automated protein precipitation technique, reductive ethylation labeling and UPLC-MS/MS. Anal. Chim. Acta670, 84–91 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medvedovici A , UdrescuS, AlbuF, TacheF, DavidV. Large-volume injection of sample diluents not miscible with the mobile phase as an alternative approach in sample preparation for bioanalysis: an application for fenspiride bioequivalence. Bioanalysis3, 1935–1947 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udrescu S , SoraID, AlbuF, DavidV, MedvedoviciA. Large volume injection of 1-octanol as sample diluent in reversed phase liquid chromatography: application in bioanalysis for assaying of indapamide in whole blood. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 54, 1163–1172 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarafraz-Yazdi A , AmiriA. Liquid-phase microextraction. Trends Anal. Chem. 29, 1–14 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H , DasguptaPK. Analytical chemistry in a drop. Solvent extraction in a microdrop. Anal. Chem. 68 (11), 1817–1821 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaee M , AssadiY, Milani HosseiniM-R, AghaeeE, AhmadiF, BerijaniS. Determination of organic compounds in water using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction. J. Chromatogr. A1116, 1–9 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordberg H , JerndalG, ThompsonRA. Direct injection of lipophilic compounds in the organic phase from liquid-liquid extracted plasma samples onto a reversed-phase column. Bioanalysis3, 1963–1973 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medvedovici A , UdrescuS, DavidV. Use of a green (bio) solvent - limonene - as extractant and immiscible diluent for large volume injection in the RPLC-tandem MS assay of statins and related metabolites in human plasma. Biomed. Chromatogr. 27, 48–57 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luque N , Ballesteros-GómezA, van LeeuwenS, RubioS. A simple and rapid extraction method for sensitive determination of perfluoroalkyl substances in blood serum suitable for exposure evaluation. J. Chromatogr. A1235, 84–91 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montesdeoca-Esponda S , Sosa-FerreraZ, Santana-RodríguezJJ. Combination of microwave-assisted micellar extraction with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry for the determination of fluoroquinolone antibiotics in coastal marine sediments and sewage sludges samples. Biomed. Chromatogr. 26, 33–40 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bostyn S , GaucherJ, ChristopheG, SoukehalR, PorteC. An automated liquid-liquid extraction system supervised by an industrial programmable logic controller. J. Assoc. Lab. Autom. 6, 53–57 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Xie W , MullettW, PawliszynJ. High-throughput polymer monolith in-tip SPME fiber preparation and application in drug analysis. Bioanalysis3, 2613–2625 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi K , KimJ, ChungDS. Single-drop microextraction in bioanalysis. Bioanalysis3, 799–815 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wielgomas B , CzarnowskiW. Headspace single-drop microextraction and GC-ECD determination of chlorpyrifos-ethyl in rat liver. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 390, 1933–1941 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong MI , HuangSD. Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction method based on solidification of floating organic drop combined with gas chromatography with electron-capture or mass spectrometry detection. J. Chromatogr. A21, 1–2 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Es’haghi Z , BabazadehF. Directly suspended droplet microextraction coupled with high performance liquid chromatography: a rapid and sensitive method for acetaldehyde assay in peritoneal dialysis fluids. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 891, 52–56 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghambarian M , YaminiY, EsrafiliA. Developments in hollow fiber based liquid-phase microextraction: principles and applications. Microchim. Acta177, 271–294 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardstu KF , HoTS, RasmussenKE, Pedersen-BjergaardS, JonssonJA. Supported liquid membranes in hollow fiber liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) – practical considerations in the three-phase mode. J. Sep. Sci. 30, 1364–1370 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang YQ , WengN. Salting-out assisted liquid–liquid extraction for bioanalysis. Bioanalysis5, 1583–1598 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanita SC , PadivitageNLT. Ammonium chloride salting out extraction/cleanup for trace-level quantitative analysis in food and biological matrices by flow injection tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta768, 1–11 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu G , ZhouN, ZhangMet al. Hydrophobic solvent induced phase transition extraction to extract drugs from plasma for high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometric analysis. J. Chromatogr. A15, 243–249 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Jönsson J . Membrane extraction: general overview and basic techniques. In: Comprehensive Sampling and Sample Preparation. JanuszP (Ed.). Academic PressOxford, UK, 461–474 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Liu W , LeeHK. Continuous-flow microextraction exceeding 1000-fold concentration of dilute analytes. Anal. Chem. 72, 4462–4467 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou M . Competitiveness of bioanalytical laboratories – technical and regulatory perspectives. In: Regulated Bioanalytical Laboratories. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA, 229–296 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Shusteff M . Rapid Automated Sample Preparation for Biological Assays. Technical Report. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA, USA (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Chimuka L , CukrowskaE, MichelM, BuszewskiB. Advances in sample preparation using membrane-based liquid-phase microextraction techniques. Trends Anal. Chem. 30, 1781–1792 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tweed JA , WaltonJ, GuZ. Automated supported liquid extraction using 2D barcode processing for routine toxicokinetic portfolio support. Bioanalysis4, 249–262 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang H , CaoH, ZhangY, FastDM. Systematic evaluation of supported liquid extraction in reducing matrix effect and improving extraction efficiency in LC–MS/MS based bioanalysis for 10 model pharmaceutical compounds. J. Chromatogr. B891, 71–80 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singleton C . Recent advances in bioanalytical sample preparation for LC-MS analysis. Bioanalysis4, 1123–1140 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roldan-Pijuan M , Alcudia-LeonM, LucenaR, CardenasS, ValcarcelM. Stir-membrane liquid microextraction for the determination of paracetamol in human saliva samples. Bioanalysis5, 307–315 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen NJ , RasmussenKE, Pedersen-BjergaardS, GjelstadA. Electromembrane extraction from biological fluids. Anal Sci. 27, 965–972 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdi AS . Surfactant-based extraction methods. Trends Anal. Chem. 30, 918–929 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madej K , PersonaK, WandasM, GomóbkaE. Sequential cloud-point extraction for toxicological screening analysis of medicaments in human plasma by high pressure liquid chromatography with diode array detector. J. Chromatogr. A1312, 42–48 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ríos A , ZougaghM, De AndréésF. Bioanalytical applications using supercritical fluid techniques. Bioanalysis2, 9–25 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole CF , PooleSK. Extraction of organic compounds with room temperature ionic liquids. J. Chromatogr. A1217, 2268–2286 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trujillo-Rodríguez MJ , Rocío-BautistaP, PinoV, AfonsoAM. Ionic liquids in dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction. Trends Anal. Chem. 51, 87–106 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padró JM , MarsónME, MastrantonioGE, AltchehJ, García-BournissenF, RetaM. Development of an ionic liquid-based dispersive liquid liquid microextraction method for the determination of nifurtimox and benznidazole in human plasma. Talanta107, 95–102 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao C , TangM, LiJ, YinC-r, XiangG, XuL. Determination of sildenafil, vardenafil and aildenafil in human plasma by dispersive liquid liquid microextraction-back extraction based on ionic liquid and high performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detection. J. Chromatogr. B931, 111–116 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W , LiuJ, HanY, HuangW, WangQ. The most convenient and general approach for plasma sample clean-up: multifunction adsorption and supported liquid extraction. Bioanalysis4, 223–225 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogeberg M , MalerodH, Roberg-LarsenH, AassC, WilsonSR. On-line solid phase extraction–liquid chromatography, with emphasis on modern bioanalysis and miniaturized systems. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 87, 120–129 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarrete A , Martínez-AlcázarMP, DuránIet al. Simultaneous online SPE-HPLC-MS/MS analysis of docetaxel, temsirolimus and sirolimus in whole blood and human plasma. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 921, 35–42 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomberg LG . Two new techniques for sample preparation in bioanalysis: microextraction in packed sorbent (MEPS) and use of a bonded monolith as sorbent for sample preparation in polypropylene tips for 96-well plates. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 393, 797–807 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kataoka H . Current developments and future trends in solid-phase microextraction techniques for pharmaceutical and biomedical analyses. Anal. Sci. 27, 893–905 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kataoka H , SaitoK. Recent advances in SPME techniques in biomedical analysis. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 54, 926–950 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho TS , ReubsaetJL, AnthonsenHS, Pedersen-BjergaardS, RasmussenKE. Liquid-phase microextraction based on carrier mediated transport combined with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. New concept for the determination of polar drugs in a single drop of human plasma. J. Chromatogr. A22, 29–36 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Su SW , LiaoYC, WhangCW. Analysis of alendronate in human urine and plasma by magnetic solid-phase extraction and capillary electrophoresis with fluorescence detection. J. Sep. Sci. 35, 681–687 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao D , DramouP, XiongNet al. Development of novel molecularly imprinted magnetic solid-phase extraction materials based on magnetic carbon nanotubes and their application for the determination of gatifloxacin in serum samples coupled with high performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A1274, 44–53 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontanals N , MarcéRM, BorrullF. Overview of the novel sorbents available in solid-phase extraction to improve the capacity and selectivity of analytical determinations. Contrib. Sci. 6, 199–213 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Haginaka J . Molecularly imprinted polymers as affinity-based separation media for sample preparation. J. Sep. Sci. 32, 1548–1565 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasarte-Aragonés G , LucenaR, CárdenasS, ValcárcelM. Nanoparticle-based microextraction techniques in bioanalysis. Bioanalysis3, 2533–2548 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders KC , GhanemA, Boon HonW, HilderEF, HaddadPR. Separation and sample pre-treatment in bioanalysis using monolithic phases: a review. Anal. Chim. Acta652, 22–31 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bj⊘rk MK , SimonsenKW, AndersenDWet al. Quantification of 31 illicit and medicinal drugs and metabolites in whole blood by fully automated solid-phase extraction and ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 405, 2607–2617 (2013).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Said R , PohankaA, Abdel-RehimM, BeckO. Determination of four immunosuppressive drugs in whole blood using MEPS and LC–MS/MS allowing automated sample work-up and analysis. J. Chromatogr. B897, 42–49 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiamegos YC , FlorouAV, StalikasCD. Headspace microextraction: recent bioanalytical applications and issues. Bioanalysis2, 123–141 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kataoka H . Column-switching sample preparation. In: Comprehensive Sampling and Sample Preparation. JanuszP (Ed.). Academic Press, Oxford, UK, 649–676 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Kataoka H , SaitoK. Recent advances in column switching sample preparation in bioanalysis. Bioanalysis4, 809–832 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassiano N , BarreiroJ, OliveiraR, CassQ. Direct bioanalytical sample injection with 2D LC-MS. Bioanalysis4, 2737–2756 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes BR , BarreiroJC, BaraldiPT, CassQB. Quantification of carbamazepine and its active metabolite by direct injection of human milk serum using liquid chromatography tandem ion trap mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 890, 17–23 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Abe E , RicardF, DarrouzainF, AlvarezJC. An automated method for measurement of methoxetamine in human plasma by use of turbulent flow on-line extraction coupled with liquid chromatography and mass spectrometric detection. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 405, 239–245 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzinke MA , BreaudAR, ClarkeW. The development and clinical validation of a turbulent-flow liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric method for the rapid quantitation of docetaxel in serum. Clin. Chim. Acta417, 12–18 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bousova K , SenyuvaH, MittendorfK. Multiresidue automated turbulent flow online LC-MS/MS method for the determination of antibiotics in milk. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control. Expo. Risk Assess. 29, 1901–1912 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah KA , PeoplesMC, HalquistMS, RutanSC, KarnesHT. Microfluidic direct injection method for analysis of urinary 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL) using molecularly imprinted polymers coupled on-line with LC-MS/MS. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 54, 368–378 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Midwoud PM , JanssenJ, MeremaMT, de GraafIAM, GroothuisGMM, VerpoorteE. On-line HPLC analysis system for metabolism and inhibition studies in precision-cut liver slices. Anal. Chem. 83 (1), 84–91 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun M , DuWB, FangQ. Microfluidic liquid-liquid extraction system based on stopped-flow technique and liquid core waveguide capillary. Talanta70, 392–396 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu RN , FanL, RieserMJ, El-ShourbagyTA. Recent advances in high-throughput quantitative bioanalysis by LC–MS/MS. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 44, 342–355 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar