635
Views
63
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
News & Analysis

Policy Update: Multicomponent climate policy: why do emission metrics matter?

, &
Pages 191-197 | Published online: 10 Apr 2014

Bibliography

  • Weyant JP, de la Chesnaye FC, Blanford GJ. Overview of EMF-21: Multigas Mitigation and Climate Policy. The Energy Journal (Special issue 3: Multi-Greenhouse Gas Mitigation and Climate Policy),1–32 (2006).
  • Fisher BS, Nakicenovic N, Alfsen K et al. Issues related to mitigation in the long term context. In: Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change. Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR et al. (Eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2007).
  • Fuglestvedt JS, Berntsen TK, Godal O et al. Metrics of climate change: assessing radiative forcing and emission indices. Clim. Change58,267–331 (2003).
  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M et al. (Eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2007).
  • Fuglestvedt JS, Shine KP, Berntsen T et al. Transport impacts on atmosphere and climate: metrics. Atmo. Environ.44(37),4648–4677 (2010) (In Press).
  • Houghton JT, Jenkins GJ, Ephraums JJ. Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 364 (1990).
  • Pennington DW, Potting J, Finnveden G et al. Life cycle assessment part 2: current impact assessment practice. Environ. Int.30(5),721–739 (2004).
  • Finkbeiner M. Carbon footprinting – opportunities and threats. Int. J. LCA14,91–94 (2009).
  • Peters GP. Carbon footprints and embodied carbon at multiple scales. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain.2(4),245–250 (2010).
  • O’Neill BC. The jury is still out on global warming potentials. Clim. Change.44,427–443 (2000).
  • O’Neill BC. Economics, natural science, and the costs of global warming potentials – an editorial comment. Clim. Change58,251–260 (2003).
  • Shine KP, The global warming potential – the need for an interdisciplinary retrail. Clim. Change96,467–472 (2009).
  • Kandlikar M. The relative role of trace gas emissions in greenhouse abatement policies. Energy Policy23(10),879–883 (1995).
  • Manne AS, Richels RG. An alternative approach to establishing trade-offs among greenhouse gases. Nature410(6829),675–677 (2001).
  • Shine KP, Fuglestvedt JS, Hailemariam K, Stuber N. Alternatives to the global warming potential for comparing climate impacts of emissions of greenhouse gases. Clim. Change68,281–302 (2005).
  • Shine KP, Berntsen TK, Fuglestvedt JS, Skeie RB, Stuber N. Comparing the climate effect of emissions of short and long lived climate agents. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. A.365,1903–1914 (2007).
  • Tanaka K, O’Neill BC, Rokityanskiy D, Obersteiner M, Tol RSJ. Evaluating global warming potentials with historical temperature. Clim. Change96(4),443–466 (2009).
  • Gillett NP, Matthews HD. Accounting for carbon cycle feedbacks in a comparison of the global warming effects of greenhouse gases. Environ. Res. Lett.5(3),034011 (2010).
  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC Expert Meeting on the Science of Alternative Metrics: Meeting Report. Plattner G-K, Stocker T, Midgley P, Tignor M (Eds). IPCC Working Group I, Technical Support Unit, Bern, Switzerland, 75 (2009).
  • Rypdal K, Berntsen T, Fuglestvedt JS et al. Tropospheric ozone and aerosols in climate agreements: scientific and political challenges. Environ. Sci. Policy8(1),29–43 (2005).
  • Fuglestvedt JS, Berntsen TK, Godal O, Skodvin T. Climate impications of GWP-based reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. Geophys. Res. Lett.27,409–412 (2000).
  • Jackson SC. Parallel pursuit of near-term and long-term climate mitigation. Science326(5952),526–527 (2009).
  • Harvey LDD. Global Warming: The Hard Science. Prentice-Hall, Harlow, UK, 336 (2000).
  • Skodvin T, Fuglestvedt JS. A comprehensive approach to climate change: political and scientific considerations. Ambio26(6),351–358 (1997).
  • Tol RSJ, Berntsen TK. O’Neill BC et al. Metrics for aggregating the climate effect of different emissions: a unifying framework. Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin, Ireland (2008).
  • Tanaka K. Inverse estimation for the simple earth system model ACC2 and its applications. PhD dissertation. University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany, 296 (2008).
  • Unger N, Shindell DT, Koch DM, Streets DG. Cross influences of ozone and sulfate precursor emissions changes on air quality and climate. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA103(12),4377–4380 (2006).
  • Penner JE, Prather MJ, Isaksen ISA. Short-lived uncertainty? Nat. Geosci.3,587–588 (2010).
  • Rypdal K, Rive N, Berntsen T et al. Climate and air quality-driven scenarios of ozone and aerosol precursor abatement. Environ. Sci. Policy12(7),855–869 (2009).
  • Basset-Mens C, Kelliher FM, Ledgard S, Cox N. Uncertainty of global warming potential for milk production on a New Zealand farm and implications for decision making. Int. J. LCA14(7),630–638 (2009).
  • Berntsen T, Tanaka K, Fuglestvedt JS. Does black carbon abatement hamper CO2 abatement? Clim. Change Lett.103(3–4),627–633 (2010).
  • Aaheim A, Fuglestvedt JS, Godal O. Costs savings of a flexible multi-gas climate policy. The Energy Journal (Special issue 3: Multi-Greenhouse Gas Mitigation and Climate Policy),485–502 (2006).
  • Johansson DJA. Economics vs. Physical-based Metrics for Relative Greenhouse Gas Valuations. Department of Economics, School of Business, Economics and Law at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden (2009).
  • Stern NH. Stern Review Report on the Economics of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2007).
  • Sherwood S. Discounting and uncertainty: a non-economist’s view. Clim. Change80(3),205–212 (2007).
  • Nordhaus W. Economics: critical assumptions in the Stern Review on Climate Change. Science317(5835),201–202 (2007).
  • den Elzen MGJ, van Vuuren DP. Peaking profiles for achieving long-term temperature targets with more likelihood at lower costs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104(46),17931–17936 (2007).
  • Huntingford C, Lowe J. “Overshoot” scenarios and climate change. Science316(5826),829 (2007).
  • Schneider SH. Can we estimate the likelihood of climatic changes at 2100? Clim. Change52(4),441–451 (2002).
  • Berntsen TK, Fuglestvedt JS, Joshi MM et al. Response of climate to regional emissions of ozone precursors: sensitivities and warming potentials. Tellus B57(4),283–304 (2005).
  • Caldeira K, Kasting JF. Insensitivity of global warming potentials to carbon dioxide emission scenarios. Nature366(6452),251–253 (1993).
  • Wuebbles DJ, Jain AK, Patten KO, Grant KE. Sensitivity of direct global warming potentials to key uncertainties. Clim. Change29(3),265–297 (1995).
  • Smith SJ, Wigley TML. Global warming potentials: 2. Accuracy. Clim. Change44(4),459–469 (2000).
  • Boucher O, Friedlingstein P, Collins B, Shine KP. The indirect global warming potential and global temperature change potential due to methane oxidation. Environ. Res. Lett.4(4),044007 (2009).
  • Shindell DT, Faluvegi G, Koch DM, Schmidt GA, Unger N, Bauer SE. Improved attribution of climate forcing to emissions. Science326(5953),716–718 (2009).
  • Johansson D, Persson U, Azar C. The cost of using global warming potentials: analysing the trade off between CO2, CH4 and N2O. Clim. Change77(3),291–309 (2006).
  • Friedlingstein P, Cox P, Betts R. Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: results from the C4MIP model intercomparison. J. Climate19(14),3337–3353 (2006).
  • Frank DC, Esper J, Raible CC et al. Ensemble reconstruction constraints on the global carbon cycle sensitivity to climate. Nature463(7280),527–530 (2010).
  • Boucher O, Friedlingstein P, Collins B, Shine KP. The indirect global warming potential and global temperature change potential due to methane oxidation. Env. Res. Letters4(4),044007 (2009).
  • Knutti R, Abramowitz G, Collins M et al.IPCC Expert Meeting on Assessing and Combining Multi Model Climate Projections: Good Practice Guidance Paper on Assessing and Combining Multi Model Climate Projections. Stocker T, Dahe Q, Plattner G-K et al. (Eds). IPCC Working Group I, Technical Support Unit, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland, 117 (2010).
  • Hansen J, Sato M, Ruedy R et al. Efficacy of climate forcings. J. Geophys. Res.110(D18) D18104 (2005).
  • Shine KP, Berntsen TK, Fuglestvedt JS, Sausen R. Scientific issues in the design of metrics for inclusion of oxides of nitrogen in global climate agreements. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci.USA102(44),15768–15773 (2005).
  • Knutti R, Hegerl GC. The equilibrium sensitivity of the Earth’s temperature to radiation changes. Nat. Geosci.1(11),735–743 (2008).
  • Smith SJ, Wigley TML. Global warming potentials: 1. climatic implications of emissions reductions. Clim. Change44,445–457 (2000).
  • Reisinger A, Meinshausen M, Manning M, Bodeker G. Uncertainties of global warming metrics: CO2 and CH4. Geophys. Res. Lett.37,L14707 (2010).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.