Decision-making tools for evaluating the impact of materials selection on the carbon footprint of buildings

• Brass L. A glimpse of the energy future. Oak Ridge Natl Lab. Rev.40(2),2–7 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• USGBC. The LEED Reference Guide for Green Building Design and Construction For the Design, Construction, and Major Renovations of Commercial and Institutional Buildings Including Core & Shell and K-12 School Projects 2009 ed. United States Green Building Council, Washington, DC (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Hill RC, Bowen PA. Sustainable construction: principles and a framework for attainment. Constr. Manag. Econ.15(3),223–239 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Berge B. The Ecology of Building Materials. Architectural Press, Burlington, MA, USA (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Anastas PT, Zimmerman JB. Design through the 12 principles of green engineering. Environ. Sci. Technol.1,94–101 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Barrie DS, Paulson BC Jr. Professional Construction Management. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Book Company. NY, USA (1984).
   Google Scholar
• Brahme R, Mahdavi A, Lam KP, Gupta S. Complex building performance analysis in the early stages of design. Proceedings of the Seventh International IBPSA Conference. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: International Building Performance Simulation Association (2001).
   Google Scholar
• GRI. Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. Global Reporting Initiative, Amsterdam (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Yale Office of Sustainability. Yale Sustainability Metrics. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA (2005).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, Measuring Progress Towards a More Sustainable Europe: Proposed Indicators for Sustainable Development, Eurostat, Editor. Office of Official Publications of the European Communities, Brussels, Belgium (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Esty DC, Srebotnjak T, Kim CH et al.Pilot 2006 Environmental Performance Index. Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, New Haven, CT, USA (2006).
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, ASTM E 2432–05: Standard Guide for General Principles of Sustainability Relative to Buildings. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA (2005).
   Google Scholar
• McLennan JF. The Living Building Challenge v1.0: In Pursuit of True Sustainability in the Built Environment. CASCADIA Region Green Building Council, Portland, OR,USA (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method, BREEAM: the Environmental Assessment Method for Buildings Around The World. BRE Global, Garston, UK (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Green Globes, ANSI/GBI 01–2010: Green Building Assessment Protocol for Commercial Buildings. Green Building Initiative, Jessup, MD, USA (2010).
   Google Scholar
• BOMA, BOMA BESt. Building Owners and Managers Association, Toronto, ON, Canada (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Chapman RJ. The role of system dynamics in understanding the impact of changes to key project personnel on design production within construction projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag.16(4),235 – 247 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• McGraw-Hill Construction. Interoperability in the Construction Industry: SmartMarket Report: Design and Construction Intelligence. Gudgel JE (Ed.). McGraw-Hill, Bedford, MA, USA (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Howard HC, Levitt RE, Paulson BC, Pohl JG, Tatum CB. Computer integration: reducing fragmentation in AEC industry. J. Comp. in Civil Engineering3(1),18–32 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Singh H, Dunn WH. Integrating facilities stovepipes for total asset management (TAM). J. Build. Info. Mod. Spring, 30–32 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Fujii H, Tanimoto J. Integration of building simulation and agent simulation for exploration to environmentally symbiotic architecture. Building and Environ.39(8),885–893 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Hensen JLM, Lamberts R, Negrao COR. Building performance simulation at the start of the 3rd millennium. Building and Environ.37,765–767 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Augenbroe G, Hensen J. Simulation for better building design. Building and Environ.39(8),875–877 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester JW. Industrial Dynamics. 1st Edition. Wiley, NY, USA (1961).
   Google Scholar
• von Bertalanffy L, General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. 1st Edition, Braziller, NY, USA (1968).
   Google Scholar
• Caulfield CW, Maj SP. A case for systems thinking and system dynamics. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. Tucson, AZ, USA. (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Homer JB, Hirsch GB. System dynamics modeling for public health: background and opportunities. Am. J. Public Health96(3),452–458 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg GM. An Introduction to General Systems Thinking. Wiley and Sons, NY, USA (1975).
   Google Scholar
• Thompson BP, Bank LC. Use of system dynamics as a decision-making tool in building design and operation. Building and Environ.45(4),1006–1015 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chritamara S, Ogunlana SO, Bach NL. System dynamics modeling of design and build construction projects. Construction Innovation2(4),269–295 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Randers J. From limits to growth to sustainable development or SD (sustainable development) in a SD (system dynamics) perspective. Sys. Dyn. Rev.16(3),213–224 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Associated General Contractors of America. The Contractor’s Guide to BIM. First Edition. AGC Arlington, VA, USA (2006).
   Google Scholar
• American Institute of Architects. Integrated Project Delivery: A Working Definition. AIA California Council, Sacramento, CA, USA (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Russell JS. Trends in our industry. J. Manage. Engin.1(1),3 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Building Sciences. National Building Information Modeling Standard. NIBS, Washington, DC (2007).
   Google Scholar
• General Services Administration, GSA BIM Guide Overview. US GSA, Washington, DC (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Blackwell M, Texas Adopts Building Information Modeling (BIM) Capability for State Design and Construction Projects. Texas Facilities Commission, Austin, TX, USA (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Napier B. Wisconsin leads by example. J.Building Info. Model. Fall 2008, 30–31 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Fallon KK, Palmer ME. General Buildings Information Handover Guide. US Dept. of Commerce, Editor. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Malin N. Building information modeling and green design. Environ. Build. News May, 1 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• XJ Technologies. AnyLogic 6.5.0. AnyLogic North America, Hampton, NJ, USA (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Navarro M. Some buildings not living up to green label. New York Times, NY, USA Aug. 31, A8 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• No Authors Listed. Overrated ratings. Nature461(7261),146 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bank LC, McCarthy M, Thompson BP, Menassa CC. Integrating BIM with system dynamics as a decision-making framework for sustainable building design and operation. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Sustainable Urbanization (ICSU), HongKong, 15–17 December 2010.
   Google Scholar

▪ Websites

• US Department of Energy. www.eere.energy.gov/buildings/tools_directory/
   Google Scholar
• SDS, System dynamics society. System Dynamics Society (2008). www.systemdynamics.org/ (accessed Dec. 5, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Autodesk Building Solutions. Revit Architecture. Autodesk, San Rafael, CA, USA (2008). http://usa.autodesk.com/revit-architecture/how-to-buy/
   Google Scholar