Politics, institutions and entrepreneurship: city decisions leading to inventoried GHG emissions

• Peterson, Paul E. City Limits. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1981).
   Google Scholar
• Choi, Sang OK, Bae SS, Kwon S-W, Feiock R. County limits: policy types and expenditure priorities, The American Review of Public Administration40,29–45 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Dierwechter Y. Metropolitan geographies of US climate action: cities, suburbs, and the ‘local divide’ in global responsibilities. J. Environ. Pol. Plan.12(1),59–82 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon JW. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Longman, UK (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Mack WR, Green D, Vedlitz A. Innovation and implementation in the public sector: an examination of public entrepreneurship. Rev. Pol. Res.25(3),233–252 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matisoff, Daniel C. The adoption of state climate change policies and renewable portfolio standards: regional diffusion or internal determinants? Rev. Pol. Res.25(6),527–546 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Zahran S, Brody SD, Vedlitz A, Grover H, Miller C. Vulnerability and capacity: explaining local commitment to climate change policy in the United States. Environ. Plan. C Govern. Pol.26(3),544–562 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock RC, Kassekert A, Berry FS, Yi H. Institutional incentives and early adoption of sustainable energy innovations. Presented at: The American Political Science Association’s annual meeting. Toronto, Canada. 3–6 September 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Krause RM. Policy innovation, intergovernmental relations, and the adoption of climate protection initiatives by US cities. J. Urban Affairs33(1),45–60 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp EB, Dorothy MD, Michael SL. Understanding local adoption and implementation of climate change mitigation policy. Presented at: The Midwest Political Science Association’s annual meeting. Chicago, IL, 22–25 April 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Portney KE. Taking Sustainable Cities Seriously. The MIT Press, Massachusetts and London (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Portney KE, Jeffrey MB, Farrington K, Bond K. Urban nonprofits, city governance, and sustainability in American cities, Presented at: The American Political Science Association’s annual meeting. Toronto,Canada. 3–6 September 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Portney KE Jeffrey MB. Participation and the pursuit of sustainability in US cities, Urban Affairs Rev.46(1),119–139 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North DC. Institutions, Institutional change and Economic performance. CambridgeUniversity Press, Cambridge, UK (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Lubell M, Feiock RC, Ramirez E. Political institutions and conservation by local governments. Urban Affairs Rev.40(6),706–729 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell M, Feiock RC, Ramirez E. Local institutions and the politics of urban growth. Am. J. Political Sci.53(3),649–665 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell M, Feiock RC, Handy S. City adoption of environmentally sustainable policies in California’s central valley, J. Am. Plan. Assoc.75(3),293–308 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• de la Cruz R, Edgar E. Local political institutions and smart growth: an empirical study of the politics of compact development. Urban Affairs Rev.45(2),218–246 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kousky C, Schneider H. Global climate policy: will cities lead the way? Climate Policy,3,359–372 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler SM. State and Municipal climate change plans: the first generation. J. Am. Plan. Assoc.74(4),481–496 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeemering ES. What does sustainability mean to city officials? Urban Affairs Rev.45(2),247–273 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathan F, Feiock RC. A Guide for Local Government Executives on Sustainable Energy Management. Washington DC. IBM Institute for the Business of Government (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Howard F. High-powered and low-powered incentives in the public sector, J. Public Admin. Res. Theory6,365–381 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Oliver W. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. NY: The Free Press (1985).
   Google Scholar
• Yahong Z. Local Official’s Incentives and Policy-making: through the Lens of the Politics-Administration Relationship. Florida State University Dissertation, School of Public Administration (2007).
   Google Scholar
• James C, Feiock RC. Institutional Constraints and Local Policy Choices: An Exploration of Local Governance. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Alston LJ. Empirical Work in Institutional Economics, in Empirical Studies in Institutional Change. Alston LJ, Eggertsson T, Douglass C (Eds). Cambridge University Press, North Cambridge, UK (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Armen AA, Demsetz H. Production, information costs and economic organization. Am. Econ. Rev.62(5),777–795 (1973).
   Google Scholar
• Eggertsson T. Economic Behavior and Institutions. CambridgeUniversity Press, Cambridge, UK (1990).
   Google Scholar
• William R. Liberalism Against Populism: A Confrontation Between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. Waveland Press Inc. Illinois, USA (1982).
   Google Scholar
• Arthur D, Weingast B. Recent developments in zoning and property rights. forward: the political economy of land use regulation, Urban Law Ann.23,385–405 (1982).
   Google Scholar
• Molotch HL. The city as a growth machine: toward a political economy of place, Am. J. Soc.86,1387–400 (1976).
   Google Scholar
• John L, Molotch H. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA (1987).
   Google Scholar
• Vogel RK, Swanson BE. The growth machine versus the antigrowth coalition. Urban Affairs Quarterly,25,63–85 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Feiock RC. The political economy of growth management: local impacts of the Florida growth management act, American Politics Quarterly22,208–20 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Clingermayer JC. Heresthetics and happenstance: intentional and unintentional exclusionary impacts of the zoning decision-making process, Urban Studies41(2),377–388 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider M, Teske P. Toward a theory of the political entrepreneur: evidence from local government. Am. Political Sci. Rev.86,737–747 (1992).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintrom M. Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation. Am. J. Political Sci.41,738–770 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddock S, Post J. Social entrepreneurs and catalytic change. Public Admin. Rev.51,393–400 (1991)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts N, King P. Transforming Public Policy. Dynamics of Policy Entrepreneurship and Innovation. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, USA (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Roper J, Cheney G. Leadership, learning and human resource management: the meanings of social entrepreneurship today. Corporate Governance,5,95–104 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Korosec R, Berman E. Municipal support for social entrepreneurship. Public Admin. Rev.446–460 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Osborne D, Gaebler T. Reinventing Government, How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. A William Patrick Book, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc. Boston, USA (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Betsill M, Bulkeley H. Cities and the multilevel governance of global climate change. Global Governance12(2),141–159 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabe BG. States on steroids: the intergovernmental odyssey of American climate policy. Rev. of Policy Res.25,105–128 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock RC, Nathan F. Explaining the adoption of climate change policies in local government. Presented at: The Midwest Political Science Association’s annual meeting, Chicago, IL, USA, 22–25 April (2010).
   Google Scholar

▪ Websites

• Thomas LP. Haitao Y, Why do states adopt renewable portfolio standards? An empirical investigation (May 2007). http://ssrn.com/abstract=1025513
   Google Scholar
• Rui W. Leaders, followers and laggards: adoption of the US conference of mayors climate protection agreement in California. UC Berkeley; University of California Transportation Center (2010). http://escholarship.org/uc/item/7z31n285
   Google Scholar
• Feiock RC, Lubell M, Lee I-W. The political market framework for local policy change, Florida State University: Devoe Moore Center. http://localgov.fsu.edu/publication_files/Policy%20Change_RF.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Francis NJ, Feiock RC. A Guide for Local Government Executives on Energy Efficiency and Sustainability. www.businessofgovernment.org/report/guide-local-government-executives-energy-efficiency-and-sustainability
   Google Scholar