Part 6: Solvent recycling and reclaiming issues

• Astarita G. Chapter 14: process selection. In: Gas Treating with Chemical Solvents. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA, 356–388 (1983).
   Google Scholar
• Wilson M, Tontiwachwuthikul P, Chakma A et al. Test results from a CO2 extraction pilot plant at boundary dam coal-fired power station. Energy29(9–10),1259–1267 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Bacon TR. Amine solution quality control through design, operation and correction. Presented at: Laurance Reid Gas Conditioning. Norman, OK, USA, 2 March 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings AL, Mecum SM. Increasing profitability and improving environmental performance by maintaining amine solvent purity. Presented at: 50th Annual Laurance Reid Gas Conditioning Conference. Norman, OK, USA, 27 February–1 March 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Supap T, Saiwan C, Idem R, Tontiwachwuthikul P. Part 2: Solvent management: solvent stability and amine degradation in CO2 capture processes. Carbon Management2(5),551–566 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciferno JP, Fout TE, Jones AP, Murphy JT. Capturing carbon from existing coal-fired power plants. Chem. Eng. Prog. April, 33–34 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Cummings AL, Smith GD, Nelsen DK. Advances in amine reclaiming – why there’s no excuse to operate a dirty amine system. Proc. Laurance Reid Gas Conditioning Conference227–244 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Jouravleva D, Davy P. Impact of continuous removal of heat stable salts on amine plant operation. 50th Annual Laurance Reid Gas Conditioning Conference. Norman, OK, USA, 27 February–1 March 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Abdi MA, Golker MM, Meisen A. Improve contaminant control in amine systems. Hydrocarb. Process.102 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Kohl AL, Nielsen RB. Gas Purification (5th Edition). Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, TX, USA (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Shao J, Lu G, Ye M. Removal of heat stable salts – a solution to amine plant operational problems. Chem. Eng. Petroleum Natural Gas J. December (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Harston JD, Ropital F. Amine Unit Corrosion in Refineries (EFC 46). Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, UK (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Ballard D. How to operate an amine plant. Hydrocarb. Process. April, 137–144 (1966).
   Google Scholar
• Dow. Gas Conditioning Fact Book. Dow Chemical Company, Midland, MI, USA (1962).
   Google Scholar
• Scheirman WL. Filter DEA treating solution, Hydrocarb. Process. August, 65–66 (1973).
   Google Scholar
• Perry D. What you should know about filters. Hydrocarb. Process. April, 145–148 (1966).
   Google Scholar
• Berlie EM, Estep JW, Ronicker FJ. Preventing MEA degradation. Chem. Eng. Prog.61(4),82–85 (1965).
   Google Scholar
• Asperger RG, Liu HJ, Dean JW. Accurate, reproducible measurment of reduced corrosion in gas treating amine systems after application of judicious neutralization techniques. Presented at: AICHE 1995 Spring National Meeting, Houston, TX, USA, 21–23 March 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Liu HJ, Dean JW, Bosen SF. Neutralization technology to reduce corrosion from heat stable amine salts. Presented at: NACE International, Corrosion 95. Orlando, FL, USA, March 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Burns D, Gregory RA. The UCARSEP process for on-line removal of non-regenerable salts from amine units. Presented at: Laurance Reid Gas Conditioning Conference. Norman, OK, USA, March 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings AL, Mecum SM. Remove heat stable salts for better amine plant performance. Hydrocarb. Process. August, 63–67 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Verma N, Verma A. Amine system problems arising from heat stable salts and solutions to improve system performance. Fuel Process. Technol.90(4),483–489 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Kindrick RC. A Prolonged Oxidation Test on Amine Solutions Resistant to Oxidation. The Girdler Corporation, Gas Processing Division, Process Development and Research Labratories, Louisville, KY, USA (1950).
   Google Scholar
• Kindrick RC, Atwood K, Arnold MR. The Relative Resistance to Oxidation of Commercially Avilable Amines. The Girdler Corporation, Gas Processing Division, Process Development and Research Labratories, Louisville, KY, USA (1950).
   Google Scholar
• Blachly CH, Ravner H. The Stabilization of Monoethanolamine Solutions for Submarine Carbon Dioxide Scrubbers. US Naval Research Labratory, Washington, DC, USA (1964).
   Google Scholar
• Keller AE, Kammiller RM, Veatch FC, Cummings AL, Thompsen JC, Mecum SM. Heat-stable salt removal from amines by the HSSX process using ion exchange. Presented at: Laurance Reid Gas Conditioning Conference. Norman, OK, USA, 2–4 March (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks C. Carbon Dioxide Removal from Coal-Fired Power Plants (1st Edition). Springer, NY, USA (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Uyanga IJ, Idem RO. Studies of SO2- and O2-induced degradation of aqueous MEA during CO2 capture from power plant flue gas streams. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.46(8),2558–2566 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy S, Johnson D, Gilmartin J. Fluor’s Econamine FG PlusSM technology for CO2 capture at coal-fired power plants. Presented at: Power Plant Air Pollutant Control Mega Symposium. Baltimore, MD, USA, 25–28 August 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Burns D, Gregory A. Waste minimization and compliance benefits to be gained from a good amine management program. Presented at: 1995 NPRA Environmental Conference. San Francisco, CA, USA, 15–17 October 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Price J, Burns D. Clean amine solvents economically and online. Hydrocarb. Process.74(8),140–141 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Parisi P, Bosen S. Electrodialysis – effective amine reclamation with minimal operational impact. Presented at: 85th GPA Annual Convention. Grapevine, TX, USA, 15–17 March 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Parisi P, Bosen S. Amine reclamation with minimal operational impact through electrodialysis. Presented at: Laurence Reid Gas Conditioning Conference. Norman, OK, USA, 27 February–1 March 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Bedell SA, Worley CM, Darst K, Simmons K. Thermal and oxidative disproportionation in amine degradation – O2 stoichiometry and mechanistic implications. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control5(3),401–404 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake RJ, Rothert KC. Reclaiming monoethanolamine solutions. Presented at: Laurance Reid Gas Conditioning Conference. Norman, OK, USA, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Butwell KF. How to maintain effective MEA solutions. Hydrocarb. Process.47(4),111–113 (1968).
   Google Scholar
• Wonder DK, Blake RJ, Frager JH, Tierney JV. An approach to monoethanolamine solution control: chemical analysis and its interpretation. Presented at: Laurance Reid Gas Conditioning Conference. Norman, OK, USA, 1959.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson Chemicals. Monoethanolamine reclaiming part II design considerations. Hydrocarb. Process. Refinery42(10),225 (1963).
   Google Scholar
• Blake RJ. Why reclaim monoethanolamine solutions? Oil Gas J.9,130–134 (1963).
   Google Scholar
• Millard MG, Beasley T. Contamination consequences and purification of gas treating chemicals using vacuum distillation. Presented at: Laurance Reid Gas Conditioning Conference. Norman, OK, USA, 1–3 March 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Meisen A, Abedinzadegan M, Abry RGF, Millard MG. Degraded amine solutions: nature, problems and distillative reclamation. Presented at: Laurance Reid Gas Conditioning Conference. Norman, OK, USA, 3–6 March 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Lohwater RK. Advances in the technology of molecular distillation. Vacuum17(1),1–3 (1967).
   Google Scholar
• Hollo J, Kurucz E, Borodi A. The Application of Molecular Distillation. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary (1971).
   Google Scholar
• Yang ST, White SA, Hsu ST. Extraction of carboxylic acids with tertiary and quaternary amines: effect of pH. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.30(6),1335–1342 (1991).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisinger H, King CJ. Extraction and sorption of acetic acid at pH above pKa to form calcium magnesium acetate. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.34(3),845–852 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Bora MM, Dutta NN, Bhattacharya KG. Extraction of 7-aminocephalosporanic acid with secondary, tertiary, and quaternary amines. J. Chem. Eng. Data43(3),318–324 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Kyuchoukov G, Marinova M, Molinier J, Albet J, Malmary G. Extraction of lactic acid by means of a mixed extractant. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.40(23),5635–5639 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Qin W, Dai Y. extraction behavior of amino sulfonic acid by tertiary and quaternary amines. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.41(23),5812–5818 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Keshav A, Chand S, Wasewar KL. Recovery of propionic acid from aqueous phase by reactive extraction using quarternary amine (Aliquat 336) in various diluents. Chem. Eng. J.152(1),95–102 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yankov D, Molinier J, Albet J, Malmary G, Kyuchoukov G. Lactic acid extraction from aqueous solutions with tri-n-octylamine dissolved in decanol and dodecane. Biochem. Eng. J.21(1),63–71 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong YK, Hong WH. Removal of acetic acid from aqueous solutions containing succinic acid and acetic acid by tri-n-octylamine. Sep. Purif. Technol.42(2),151–157 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yunhai S, Houyong S, Deming L, Qinghua L, Dexing C, Yongchuan Z. Separation of glycolic acid from glycolonitrile hydrolysate by reactive extraction with tri-n-octylamine. Sep. Purif. Technol.49(1),20–26 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Keshav A, Wasewar KL, Chand S. Extraction of propionic acid with tri-n-octyl amine in different diluents. Sep. Purif. Technol.63(1),179–183 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshav A, Wasewar KL, Chand S, Uslu H. Effect of binary extractants and modifier–diluents systems on equilbria of propionic acid extraction. Fluid Phase Equilibria275(1),21–26 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Idem R, Wilson M, Tontiwachwuthikul P et al. Pilot plant studies of the CO2 capture performance of aqueous MEA and mixed MEA–MDEA solvents at the University of Regina CO2 capture technology development plant and the Boundary Dam CO2 capture demonstration plant. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.45,2414–2420 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings AL, Street D, Lawson G. Contaminants and their effects on operations – yes! You can have better operating amine and glycol systems! Presented at: The Brimstone Sulfur Conference. Banff, Alberta, Canada, May 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings AL, Waite SW, Nelsen DK. Corrosion and corrosion enhancers in amine systems. Presented at: The Brimstone Sulfur Conference. Banff, Alberta, Canada, April 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson H, Dandekar S, Shao J, Norton D. Case study of effects of bicine in CO2 only amine treater service. Presented at: Laurance Reid Gas Conditioning Conference. Norman, OK, USA, February 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy S, Scherffius J, Freguia S, Roberts C. Fluor’s Econamine FG PlusSM technology an enhanced amine-based CO2 capture process. Presented at: The Second National Conference on Carbon Sequestration. Alexandria, VA, USA, 5–8 May 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Dandekar S, Shao J. Continuous removal of contaminants from amine solutions. Petroleum Technology Quarterly December, 81–87 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Morgan C, Klare T. Chloride removal from DEA by ion exchange. Presented at: Laurance Reid Gas Conditioning Conference. Norman, OK, USA, March 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Jameh AA. Amine solution recovery package and controlling corrosion in regeneration tower. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol.69,107–110 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Huntsman Performance Products. Diglycolamine® Agent Product Information. Huntsman Performance Products, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 1079–1399 (2005).
   Google Scholar

▪ Patents

• Paulsen HC, Holtzelaw JB, McNamara TP: US270175008 (1955).
   Google Scholar
• Anderson HM: US289277530 (1959).
   Google Scholar
• Rooney PC: US591238715 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Singh KP: US353526020 (1970).
   Google Scholar
• Faucher JA: US484077720 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Soria J: US576654816 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Idem R, Tontiwachwuthikul P, Saiwan C, Supap T: WO065218A128 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Bedell SA, Tsai SSK: US480828428 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Bedell SA, Tsai SSK: US481405121 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Roy V, Hakka LE, Sarlis JI: US529240708 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Gregory RA, Cohen MF: US591061108 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Byszewski CH: US0020625 A121 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Beasley T, Merritt DA: US515288706 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Beasley T, Merritt DA: US515864927 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Beasley T, Merritt DA: US544160515 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Beasley T, Merritt DA: US538920814 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Abry RG, Beasley TS, Carlson SW, Kresoyak SG: US599360830 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Razzaghi M, Kresnyak SG, Keast BA, Giles TW: WO0076624 A221 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Razzaghi M, Kresnyak SG, Keast BA, Giles TW: US6508916 B121 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Van Grinsven BFA, Van Heeringen GJ: US615299428 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Yan TY: US513770211 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Yan TY: US510855128 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Pottiez F, Verbeest R: US366493023 (1972).
   Google Scholar
• Van Scoy RW: US365846225 (1972).
   Google Scholar
• Turoff ML, Cummings AL, Waite SW, Horan RL: US7323600 B129 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Claud G, Blanc A: US529295808 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs E, Witzel T, Stadler KP: US548103702 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Rooney PC: US6353138 B105 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Idem R, Tontiwachwuthikul P, Saiwan C, Supap T, Pitipuech P: US8105420B2 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Saiwan C, Idem C, Tontiwachwuthikul P, Akkarachalanont P, Supap T: USPCT/CA2012/0000632012 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Coberly SH, Laven TH, Cummings AI: US578886404 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Brown CJ: US467350716 (1987).
   Google Scholar
• Keller AE: US504529103 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Cummings AL, Veatch FC, Keller AE, Thompson JC, Severson RA: US516208410 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• George JT: US6245128 B112 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Sarlis NJ: WO2007/104134 A220 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Anderson HM, Draemel FC, Lyons DJ: US291446924 (1959).
   Google Scholar
• Sokolik JE, Kosseim AJM, Awtood GR: US438938321 (1983).
   Google Scholar
• Burgers KL, Chakravarti S, Williams WR: US0148068 A128 (2007).
   Google Scholar

▪ Websites

• MPR Services, Inc. Amine Headache # 1 Understanding Amine System Terminology. www.mprservices.com/PDFs/amine_headache1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IDSWater. Ecotec AmiPur for CO2 Recovery, 2011. www.idswater.com/water/us/carbon_recovery/933/products.html
   Google Scholar
• ChemGroup, Inc. www.chem-group.com/services/amines.tpl
   Google Scholar
• Amine Purification Services. What is AmiPur®-PLUS? http://aminepurification.com/whatisamipur.html
   Google Scholar