Advanced search
Publication Cover
Future Medicinal Chemistry Volume 2, 2010 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,175
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

Patent Prosecution of Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Patents in a Changing Legal Landscape

Deborah L Lua Frommer Lawrence & Haug LLP, 745 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY10151, USACorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
,
Thomas J Kowalskia Frommer Lawrence & Haug LLP, 745 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY10151, USACorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
&
Judy Jarecki-Blackb Merial Limited, 3239 Satellite Boulevard, Duluth, Georgia30096–4640, USACorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
Pages 7-9 | Published online: 22 Dec 2009

Bibliography

  • Diamond versus Chakrabarty , 447 US303 (1980).
  • Tafas versus Doll , 559 F.3d 1345 (Federal Circuit 2009)
  • KSR International Inc. versus Teleflex Inc ., 127 S.Ct. 1727 (2007).
  • Larson Manufacturing Company versus Aluminart Products Ltd. , 559 F.3d 1317 (Federal Circuit 2009).
  • Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (8th Edition) . Revision 4, section 2142 (2007).
  • Pfizer v. Apotex Inc. , 480 F.3d 1458 (Federal Circuit 2007).
  • KSR International Inc. versus Teleflex Inc. , 127 S.Ct. 1727, 1732–1742 (2007).
  • KSR International Inc. versus Teleflex Inc. , 127 S.Ct. 1727, 1742–1743 (2007).
  • Aventis Pharma Deutschland versus Lupin Ltd. , 499 F.3d 1293 (Federal Circuit 2007).
  • Aventis Pharma Deutschland versus Lupin Ltd. , 499 F.3d 1293, 1302 (Federal Circuit 2007).
  • Aventis Pharma Deutschland verus Lupin Ltd. , 499 F.3d 1293, 1303 (Federal Circuit 2007).
  • Forest Laboratories versus Ivax Pharmaceuticals , 501 F.3d 1263 (Federal Circuit 2007).
  • In re Omeprazole Patent Litigation , 490 F. Supp. 2d 381 (SDNY 1 June 2007).
  • In re Kubin , 561 F.3d 1351 (Federal Circuit 2009).
  • Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (8th Edition). Revision 4, section 2001 (2007).
  • Larson Manufacturing Company versus Aluminart Products Ltd. , 559 F.3d 1317 (Federal Circuit 2009).
  • Dayco Products Inc. versus Total Containment Inc ., 329 F.2d 1548, 1368 (Federal Circuit 2003).
  • McKesson Information Solutions Inc. versus Bridge Medical Inc. , 487 F.3d 897 (Federal Circuit 2007).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.