Interfacing Antibody-Based Microarrays and Digital Holography Enables Label-Free Detection for Loss of Cell Volume

References

• Marquet P , RappazB, MagistrettiPJ. Digital holographic microscopy: a noninvasive contrast imaging technique allowing quantitative visualization of living cells with subwavelength axial accuracy. Opt. Lett.30(5), 468–470 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappaz B , MarquetP, CucheEet al. Measurement of the integral refractive index and dynamic cell morphometry of living cells with digital holographic microscopy. Opt. Express13(23), 9361–9373 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mölder A , SebestaM, GustafssonMet al. Non-invasive, label-free cell counting and quantitative analysis of adherent cells using digital holography. J. Microscopy232(2), 240–247 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu L , MohantyS, ZhangJet al. Digital holographic microscopy for quantitative cell dynamic evaluation during laser microsurgery. Opt. Express17(14), 12031–12038 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemper B , BauwensA, VollmerAet al. Label-free quantitative cell division monitoring of endothelial cells by digital holographic microscopy. J. Biomed. Opt.15(3), 036009 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson J , MölderA, PetterssonSG, AlmK. Cell motility studies using digital holographic microscopy. In: Microscopy: Science, Technology, Applications and Education. Méndez-VilasA, Díaz ÁlvarezJ ( Eds). Formatex Research Center, Badajoz, Spain, 1063–1072 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Alm K , CirenajwisH, GisselssonLet al. Digital holography and Cell Studies. In: Holography, Research and Technologies. RosenJ ( Ed.). In Tech, Rijeka, Croatia, 237–252 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• El-Schish Z , MölderA, SebestaMet al. Digital holographic microscopy – innovative and non-destructive analysis of living cells. In: Microscopy: Science, Technology, Applications and Education. Méndez-VilasA, Díaz ÁlvarezJ ( Eds). Formatex Research Center, Badajoz, Spain, 1055–1062 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Mihailescu M , ScarlatM, GheorghiuAet al. Automated imaging, identification, and counting of similar cells from digital hologram reconstructions. Appl. Opt.50(20), 3589–3597 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavillon N , KühnJ, MoratalCet al. Early cell death detection with digital holographic microscopy. PLoS ONE7(1), e30912 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebesta M , GustafssonM. Object characterization with refractometric digital Fourier holography. Opt. Lett.30(5), 471–473 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Sucerquia J , XuW, JerichoSKet al. Digital in-line holographic microscopy. Appl. Opt.45(5), 836–850 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenart T , GustafssonM, ÖwallV. A hardware acceleration platform for digital holographic imaging. J. Sign. Process Syst.52(3), 297–311 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed JC . Mechanisms of apoptosis. Am. J. Pathol.157(5), 1415–1430 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortner CD , SifreMI, CidlowskiJA. Cationic gradient reversal and cytoskeleton-independent volume regulatory pathways define an early stage of apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem.283(11), 7219–7229 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroemer G , GalluzziL, VandenabeelePet al. Classification of Cell Death: Recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death. Cell Death Diff.16(1), 3–11 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khmaladze A , MatzRL, EpsteinTet al. Cell volume changes during apoptosis monitored in real time using digital holographic microscopy. J. Struct. Biol.178(3), 270–278 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingren C , JamesP, BorrebaeckCAK. Strategy for surveying the proteome using affinity proteomics and mass spectrometry. J. Proteomics9(6), 1511–1517 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Dexlin L , IngvarssonJ, FrendéusBet al. Design of recombinant antibody microarrays for cell surface membrane proteomics. J. Proteome Res.7(1), 319–327 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belov L , MulliganSP, BarberNet al. Analysis of human leukaemias and lymphomas using extensive immunophenotypes from an antibody microarray. Br. J. Haematol.135(2), 184–197 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellmark P , HögerkorpCM, EkSet al. Phenotypic protein profiling of different B cell sub-populations using antibody CD-microarrays. Cancer Lett.265(1), 98–106 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber N , GezS, BelovLet al. Profiling CD antigens on leukaemias with an antibody microarray. FEBS Lett.583(11), 1785–1791 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohnke PL , MulliganSP, ChristophersonRI. Membrane proteomics for leukemia classification and drug target identification. Curr. Opin. Mol. Ther.11(6), 603–610 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stybayeva G , MudanyaliO, SeoSet al. Lensfree holographic imaging of antibody microarrays for high-throughput detection of leukocyte numbers and function. Anal. Chem.82(9), 3736–3744 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrebaeck CAK , WingrenC. Recombinant antibodies for the generation of antibody arrays. In: Protein Microarrays: Methods in Molecular Biology. KorfU ( Ed.). Humana Press Inc., New York, NY, USA, 785, 247–262 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Borrebaeck CAK , WingrenC. Design of high-density antibody microarrays for disease proteomics: key technological issues. J. Proteomics72(6), 928–935 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dexlin-Mellby L , SandströmA, AntbergLet al. Design of recombinant antibody microarrays for membrane protein profiling of cell lysates and tissue extracts. Proteomics11(8), 1550–1554 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dexlin-Mellby L , SandströmA, CentlowMet al. Tissue proteome profiling of preeclamptic placenta using recombinant antibody microarrays. Proteomics Clin. Appl.4(10–11), 794–807 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson A , WuttgeDM, IngvarssonJet al. Serum protein profiling of systemic lupus erythematosus and systemic sclerosis using recombinant antibody microarrays. Mol. Cell. Proteomics10(5), M110.005033 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montecucco A , BiamontiG. Cellular response to etoposide treatment. Cancer Lett.252(1), 9–18 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trulsson M , YuH, GisselssonLet al. HAMLET binding to α-actinin facilitates tumor cell detachment. PLoS ONE6(3), e17179 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühn J , ShafferE, MenaJet al. Label-free cytotoxicity screening assay by digital holographic microscopy. Assay Drug Dev. Technol.11(2), 101–107 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y , YangY, WangDet al. Morphological measurement of living cells in methanol with digital holographic microscopy. Comput. Math. Methods Med.1–7 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe E.S . The 2008 WHO classification of lymphomas: implications for clinical practice and translational research. Hematology1, 523–531 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Bacher U. , SchnittgerS., HaferlachCet al. Molecular diagnostics in acute leukemias. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med.47(11), 1333–1341 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar