Ephrin-Eph signaling in embryonic tissue separation

References

• Tepass U, Godt D, Winklbauer R. Cell sorting in animal development: signalling and adhesive mechanisms in the formation of tissue boundaries. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2002; 12:572-82; PMID:12200163; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-437X(02)00342-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dahmann C, Oates AC, Brand M. Boundary formation and maintenance in tissue development. Nat Rev Genet 2011; 12:43-55; PMID:21164524; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg2902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krens SF, Heisenberg CP. Cell sorting in development. Curr Top Dev Biol 2011; 95:189-213; PMID:21501752; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385065-2.00006-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Batlle E, Wilkinson DG. Molecular mechanisms of cell segregation and boundary formation in development and tumorigenesis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2012; 4:a008227; PMID:22214769; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a008227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottger A, Hassel M. Hydra, a model system to trace the emergence of boundaries in developing eumetazoans. Int J Dev Biol 2012; 56:583-91; PMID:22689360; http://dx.doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.113454ab
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holtfreter J. Gewebsaffinität, ein Mittel der embryonalen Formbildung. Arch Exp Zellforsch Gewebeszücht 1939; 23: 169-209.
   Google Scholar
• Holtfreter J. A study of the mechanics of gastrulation. J Exp Zool 1944; 95:171-212; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jez.1400950203
   Google Scholar
• Townes PL, Holtfreter J. Directed movements and selective adhesion of embryonic amphibian cells. J Exp Zool 1955; 128:53-120; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jez.1401280105
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg MS. Reconstruction of tissues by dissociated cells. Some morphogenetic tissue movements and the sorting out of embryonic cells may have a common explanation. Science 1963; 141:401-8; PMID:13983728; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.141.3579.401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg MS. Does differential adhesion govern self-assembly processes in histogenesis? Equilibrium configurations and the emergence of a hierarchy among populations of embryonic cells. J Exp Zool 1970; 173:395-434; PMID:5429514; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jez.1401730406
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foty RA, Steinberg MS. The differential adhesion hypothesis: a direct evaluation. Dev Biol 2005; 278:255-63; PMID:15649477; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.11.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman GM. Cell adhesion molecules in the regulation of animal form and tissue pattern. Annu Rev Cell Biol 1986; 2:81-116; PMID:3548776; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cb.02.110186.000501
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takeichi M. Morphogenetic roles of classic cadherins. [Review]. Curr Op Cell Biol 1995; 7:619-27; PMID:8573335; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0955-0674(95)80102-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foty RA, Steinberg MS. Cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion and tissue segregation in relation to malignancy. Int J Dev Biol 2004; 48:397-409; PMID:15349815; http://dx.doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.041810rf
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niessen CM, Gumbiner BM. Cadherin-mediated cell sorting not determined by binding or adhesion specificity. J Cell Biol 2002; 156:389-99; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200108040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Q, Chien YH, Leckband D. Biophysical properties of cadherin bonds do not predict cell sorting. J Biol Chem 2008; 283:28454-63; PMID:18552401; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M802563200
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Youssef J, Nurse AK, Freund LB, Morgan JR. Quantification of the forces driving self-assembly of three-dimensional microtissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108:6993-8; PMID:21482784; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1102559108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maitre JL, Berthoumieux H, Krens SF, Salbreux G, Julicher F, Paluch E, Heisenberg CP. Adhesion Functions in Cell Sorting by Mechanically Coupling the Cortices of Adhering Cells. Science 2012; 338:253-6; PMID:22923438; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1225399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris AK. Is Cell sorting caused by differences in the work of intercellular adhesion? A critique of the Steinberg hypothesis. J Theor Biol 1976; 61:267-85; PMID:985668; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(76)90019-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodland GW. The Differential Interfacial Tension Hypothesis (DITH): a comprehensive theory for the self-rearrangement of embryonic cells and tissues. J Biomech Eng 2002; 124:188-97; PMID:12002128; http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.1449491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodland GW, Yang J, Sweny J. Cellular interfacial and surface tensions determined from aggregate compression tests using a finite element model. HFSP J 2009; 3:273-81; PMID:20057960; http://dx.doi.org/10.2976/1.3175812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning BD, Barrett JG, Wallace JA, Granok H, Snyder M. Differential regulation of the Kar3p kinesin-related protein by two associated proteins, Cik1p and Vik1p. J Cell Biol 1999; 144:1219-33; PMID:10087265; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.144.6.1219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieg M, Arboleda-Estudillo Y, Puech PH, Kafer J, Graner F, Muller DJ, Heisenberg CP. Tensile forces govern germ-layer organization in zebrafish. Nat Cell Biol 2008; 10:429-36; PMID:18364700; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg MS, Takeichi M. Experimental specification of cell sorting, tissue spreading, and specific spatial patterning by quantitative differences in cadherin expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91:206-9; PMID:8278366; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.1.206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ninomiya H, David R, Damm EW, Fagotto F, Niessen CM, Winklbauer R. Cadherin-dependent differential cell adhesion in Xenopus causes cell sorting in vitro but not in the embryo. J Cell Sci 2012; 125:1877-83; PMID:22328523; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.095315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landsberg KP, Farhadifar R, Ranft J, Umetsu D, Widmann TJ, Bittig T, Said A, Julicher F, Dahmann C. Increased cell bond tension governs cell sorting at the Drosophila anteroposterior compartment boundary. Curr Biol 2009; 19:1950-5; PMID:19879142; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.10.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winklbauer R. Cell adhesion in amphibian gastrulation. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 2009; 278:215-75; PMID:19815180; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1937-6448(09)78005-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Q, Wilkinson DG. Boundary formation in the development of the vertebrate hindbrain. Wiley Interdisc Rev Dev Biol 2013; 2:735-45; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wdev.106
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan JG, Vanderhaeghen P. The ephrins and Eph receptors in neural development. Annu Rev Neurosci 1998; 21:309-45; PMID:9530499; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.21.1.309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein R. Eph/ephrin signaling in morphogenesis, neural development and plasticity. Curr Op Cell Biol 2004; 16:580-9; PMID:15363810; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2004.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasquale EB. Eph receptors and ephrins in cancer: bidirectional signalling and beyond. Nat Rev Cancer 2010; 10:165-80; PMID:20179713; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrc2806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durbin L, Brennan C, Shiomi K, Cooke J, Barrios A, Shanmugalingam S, Guthrie B, Lindberg R, Holder N. Eph signaling is required for segmentation and differentiation of the somites. Genes Dev 1998; 12:3096-109; PMID:9765210; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.12.19.3096
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu Q, Mellitzer G, Robinson V, Wilkinson DG. In vivo cell sorting in complementary segmental domains mediated by Eph receptors and ephrins. Nature 1999; 399:267-71; PMID:10353250; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/20452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellitzer G, Xu Q, Wilkinson D. Eph receptors and ephrins restrict cell intermingling and communication. Nature 1999; 400:77-81; PMID:10403252; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/21907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohani N, Canty L, Luu O, Fagotto F, Winklbauer R. EphrinB/EphB signaling controls embryonic germ layer separation by contact-induced cell detachment. PLoS Biol 2011; 9:e1000597; PMID:21390298; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000597
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fagotto F, Rohani N, Touret AS, Li R. A molecular base for cell sorting at embryonic boundaries: contact inhibition of cadherin adhesion by ephrin/ Eph-dependent contractility. Dev Cell 2013; 27:72-87; PMID:24094740; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2013.09.004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cavodeassi F, Ivanovitch K, Wilson SW. Eph/Ephrin signalling maintains eye field segregation from adjacent neural plate territories during forebrain morphogenesis. Development 2013; 140:4193-202; PMID:24026122; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.097048
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park EC, Cho GS, Kim GH, Choi SC, Han JK. The involvement of Eph-Ephrin signaling in tissue separation and convergence during Xenopus gastrulation movements. Dev Biol 2011; 350:441-50; PMID:21147090; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.12.012
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cooke JE, Kemp HA, Moens CB. EphA4 is required for cell adhesion and rhombomere boundary formation in the zebrafish. Curr Biol 2005; 15:536-42; PMID:15797022; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.02.019
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kemp HA, Cooke JE, Moens CB. EphA4 and EfnB2a maintain rhombomere coherence by independently regulating intercalation of progenitor cells in the zebrafish neural keel. Dev Biol 2009; 327:313-26; PMID:19135438; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.12.010
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barrios A, Poole RJ, Durbin L, Brennan C, Holder N, Wilson SW. Eph/Ephrin signaling regulates the mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition of the paraxial mesoderm during somite morphogenesis. Curr Biol 2003; 13:1571-82; PMID:13678588; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2003.08.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe T, Sato Y, Saito D, Tadokoro R, Takahashi Y. EphrinB2 coordinates the formation of a morphological boundary and cell epithelialization during somite segmentation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:7467-72; PMID:19380726; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0902859106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungbluth S, Larsen C, Wizenmann A, Lumsden A. Cell mixing between the embryonic midbrain and hindbrain. Curr Biol 2001; 11:204-7; PMID:11231158; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00049-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reintsch WE, Habring-Mueller A, Wang RW, Schohl A, Fagotto F. β-Catenin controls cell sorting at the notochord-somite boundary independently of cadherin-mediated adhesion. J Cell Biol 2005; 170:675-86; PMID:16103232; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200503009
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takahashi Y, Sato Y. Somitogenesis as a model to study the formation of morphological boundaries and cell epithelialization. Dev Growth Differ 2008; 50 Suppl 1:S149-55; PMID:18482400; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-169X.2008.01018.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maroto M, Bone RA, Dale JK. Somitogenesis. Development 2012; 139:2453-6; PMID:22736241; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.069310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohani N, Parmeggiani A, Winklbauer R, Fagotto F. Variable combinations of specific ephrin ligand/Eph receptor pairs control embryonic tissue separation. PloS Biol 2014; 12: e1001955; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001955
   Google Scholar
• Baker RK, Antin PB. Ephs and ephrins during early stages of chick embryogenesis. Dev Dyn 2003; 228:128-42; PMID:12950087; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.10354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aulehla A, Pourquie O. Oscillating signaling pathways during embryonic development. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2008; 20:632-7; PMID:18845254; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2008.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davy A, Soriano P. Ephrin-B2 forward signaling regulates somite patterning and neural crest cell development. Dev Biol 2007; 304:182-93; PMID:17223098; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.12.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helbling PM, Saulnier DM, Brandli AW. The receptor tyrosine kinase EphB4 and ephrin-B ligands restrict angiogenic growth of embryonic veins in Xenopus laevis. Development 2000; 127:269-78; PMID:10603345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan J, Mably JD, Serluca FC, Chen JN, Goldstein NB, Thomas MC, Cleary JA, Brennan C, Fishman MC, Roberts TM. Morphogenesis of prechordal plate and notochord requires intact Eph/ephrin B signaling. Dev Biol 2001; 234:470-82; http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2001.0281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Ruley HE. An enhancer element in the EphA2 (Eck) gene sufficient for rhombomere-specific expression is activated by HOXA1 and HOXB1 homeobox proteins. J Biol Chem 1998; 273:24670-5; PMID:9733765; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.38.24670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prin F, Serpente P, Itasaki N, Gould AP. Hox proteins drive cell segregation and non-autonomous apical remodelling during hindbrain segmentation. Development 2014; 141:1492-502; PMID:24574009; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.098954
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu Q, Alldus G, Holder N, Wilkinson DG. Expression of truncated Sek-1 receptor tyrosine kinase disrupts the segmental restriction of gene expression in the Xenopus and zebrafish hindbrain. Development 1995; 121:4005-16; PMID:8575301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke J, Moens C, Roth L, Durbin L, Shiomi K, Brennan C, Kimmel C, Wilson S, Holder N. Eph signalling functions downstream of Val to regulate cell sorting and boundary formation in the caudal hindbrain. Development 2001; 128:571-80; PMID:11171340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heasman J. Morpholino oligos: making sense of antisense? Dev Biol 2002; 243:209-14; PMID:11884031; http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2001.0565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calzolari S, Terriente J, Pujades C. Cell segregation in the vertebrate hindbrain relies on actomyosin cables located at the interhombomeric boundaries. EMBO J 2014; 33:686-701; PMID:24569501; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/embj.201386003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durbin L, Sordino P, Barrios A, Gering M, Thisse C, Thisse B, Brennan C, Green A, Wilson S, Holder N. Anteroposterior patterning is required within segments for somite boundary formation in developing zebrafish. Development 2000; 127:1703-13; PMID:10725246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacker S, Grimm K, Joos T, Winklbauer R. Development and Control of Tissue Separation at Gastrulation in Xenopus. Dev Biol 2000; 224:428-39; PMID:10926778; http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2000.9794
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winklbauer R, Luu O. Frizzled-7-dependent tissue separation in the Xenopus gastrula. Methods Mol Biol 2008; 469:485-92; PMID:19109728; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-469-2_31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blits-Huizinga CT, Nelersa CM, Malhotra A, Liebl DJ. Ephrins and their receptors: binding versus biology. IUBMB Life 2004; 56:257-65; PMID:15370889; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15216540412331270076
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Day B, To C, Himanen JP, Smith FM, Nikolov DB, Boyd AW, Lackmann M. Three distinct molecular surfaces in ephrin-A5 are essential for a functional interaction with EphA3. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:26526-32; PMID:15901737; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M504972200
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pabbisetty KB, Yue X, Li C, Himanen JP, Zhou R, Nikolov DB, Hu L. Kinetic analysis of the binding of monomeric and dimeric ephrins to Eph receptors: correlation to function in a growth cone collapse assay. CA>Protein Sci 2007; 16:355-61; http://dx.doi.org/10.1110/ps.062608807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noberini R, Rubio de la Torre E, Pasquale EB. Profiling Eph receptor expression in cells and tissues: a targeted mass spectrometry approach. Cell Adh Migr 2012; 6:102-12; PMID:22568954; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cam.19620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan JG, Vanderhaeghen P. The ephrins and Eph receptors in neural development. Annu Rev Neurosci 2003; 21:309-45; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.21.1.309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surawska H, Ma PC, Salgia R. The role of ephrins and Eph receptors in cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2004; 15:419-33; PMID:15561600; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cytogfr.2004.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astin JW, Batson J, Kadir S, Charlet J, Persad RA, Gillatt D, Oxley JD, Nobes CD. Competition amongst Eph receptors regulates contact inhibition of locomotion and invasiveness in prostate cancer cells. Nat Cell Biol 2010; 12:1194-204; PMID:21076414; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaupp A, Sabet O, Dudanova I, Ponserre M, Bastiaens P, Klein R. The composition of EphB2 clusters determines the strength in the cellular repulsion response. J Cell Biol 2014; 204:409-22; PMID:24469634; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201305037
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zimmer M, Palmer A, Kohler J, Klein R. EphB-ephrinB bi-directional endocytosis terminates adhesion allowing contact mediated repulsion. Nat Cell Biol 2003; 5:869-78; PMID:12973358; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston DJ, Dickinson S, Nobes CD. Rac-dependent trans-endocytosis of ephrinBs regulates Eph-ephrin contact repulsion. Nat Cell Biol 2003; 5:879-88; PMID:12973357; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janes PW, Saha N, Barton WA, Kolev MV, Wimmer-Kleikamp SH, Nievergall E, Blobel CP, Himanen JP, Lackmann M, Nikolov DB. Adam meets Eph: an ADAM substrate recognition module acts as a molecular switch for ephrin cleavage in trans. Cell 2005; 123:291-304; PMID:16239146; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimmer-Kleikamp SH, Nievergall E, Gegenbauer K, Adikari S, Mansour M, Yeadon T, Boyd AW, Patani NR, Lackmann M. Elevated protein tyrosine phosphatase activity provokes Eph/ephrin-facilitated adhesion of pre-B leukemia cells. Blood 2008; 112:721-32; PMID:18385452; http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-11-121681
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Halloran MC, Wolman MA. Repulsion or adhesion: receptors make the call. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2006; 18:533-40; PMID:16930978; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2006.08.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvanitis D, Davy A. Eph/ephrin signaling: networks. Genes Dev 2008; 22:416-29; PMID:18281458; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1630408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dravis C, Yokoyama N, Chumley MJ, Cowan CA, Silvany RE, Shay J, Baker LA, Henkemeyer M. Bidirectional signaling mediated by ephrin-B2 and EphB2 controls urorectal development. Dev Biol 2004; 271:272-90; PMID:15223334; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.03.027
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Senturk A, Pfennig S, Weiss A, Burk K, Acker-Palmer A. Ephrin Bs are essential components of the Reelin pathway to regulate neuronal migration. Nature 2011; 472:356-60; PMID:21460838; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09874
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dottori M, Hartley L, Galea M, Paxinos G, Polizzotto M, Kilpatrick T, Bartlett PF, Murphy M, Kontgen F, Boyd AW. EphA4 (Sek1) receptor tyrosine kinase is required for the development of the corticospinal tract. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998; 95:13248-53; PMID:9789074; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.22.13248
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Medina A, Swain RK, Kuerner KM, Steinbeisser H. Xenopus paraxial protocadherin has signaling functions and is involved in tissue separation. EMBO J 2004; 23:3249-58; PMID:15272309; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Yamamoto A, Bouwmeester T, Agius E, Robertis EM. The role of paraxial protocadherin in selective adhesion and cell movements of the mesoderm during Xenopus gastrulation. Development 1998; 125:4681-90; PMID:9806917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto A, Amacher SL, Kim SH, Geissert D, Kimmel CB, De Robertis EM. Zebrafish paraxial protocadherin is a downstream target of spadetail involved in morphogenesis of gastrula mesoderm. Development 1998; 125:3389-97; PMID:9693142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto A, Kemp C, Bachiller D, Geissert D, De Robertis EM. Mouse paraxial protocadherin is expressed in trunk mesoderm and is not essential for mouse development. Genesis 2000; 27:49-57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Jen WC, De Robertis EM, Kintner C. The protocadherin PAPC establishes segmental boundaries during somitogenesis in Xenopus embryos. Curr Biol 2000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawada A, Fritz A, Jiang YJ, Yamamoto A, Yamasu K, Kuroiwa A, Saga Y, Takeda H. Zebrafish Mesp family genes, mesp-a and mesp-b are segmentally expressed in the presomitic mesoderm, and Mesp-b confers the anterior identity to the developing somites. Development 2000; 127:1691-702; PMID:10725245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhee J, Takahashi Y, Saga Y, Wilson-Rawls J, Rawls A. The protocadherin papc is involved in the organization of the epithelium along the segmental border during mouse somitogenesis. Dev Biol 2003; 254:248-61; PMID:12591245; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0012-1606(02)00085-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chung HA, Yamamoto TS, Ueno N. ANR5, an FGF Target Gene Product, Regulates Gastrulation in Xenopus. Curr Biol 2007; 17:932-9; PMID:17475493; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.04.034
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winklbauer R, Medina A, Swain RK, Steinbeisser H. Frizzled-7 signalling controls tissue separation during Xenopus gastrulation. Nature 2001; 413:856-60; PMID:11677610; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35101621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hukriede NA, Tsang TE, Habas R, Khoo PL, Steiner K, Weeks DL, Tam PP, Dawid IB. Conserved requirement of Lim1 function for cell movements during gastrulation. Dev Cell 2003; 4:83-94; PMID:12530965; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00398-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maghzal N, Vogt E, Reintsch W, Fraser JS, Fagotto F. The tumor associated EpCAM regulates morphogenetic movements through intracellular signaling. J Cell Biol 2010; 119:645-59; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201004074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Gumbiner BM. Paraxial protocadherin mediates cell sorting and tissue morphogenesis by regulating C-cadherin adhesion activity. J Cell Biol 2006; 174:301-13; PMID:16847104; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200602062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Koh E, Yoder M, Gumbiner BM. A protocadherin-cadherin-FLRT3 complex controls cell adhesion and morphogenesis. PLoS ONE 2009; 4:e8411; PMID:20027292; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008411
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kraft B, Berger CD, Wallkamm V, Steinbeisser H, Wedlich D. Wnt-11 and Fz7 reduce cell adhesion in convergent extension by sequestration of PAPC and C-cadherin. J Cell Biol 2012; 198:695-709; PMID:22908314; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201110076
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Unterseher F, Hefele JA, Giehl K, De Robertis EM, Wedlich D, Schambony A. Paraxial protocadherin coordinates cell polarity during convergent extension via Rho A and JNK. EMBO J 2004; 23:3259-69; PMID:15297873; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Janicki P, Koster I, Berger CD, Wenzl C, Grosshans J, Steinbeisser H. Xenopus Paraxial Protocadherin regulates morphogenesis by antagonizing Sprouty. Genes Dev 2008; 22:878-83; PMID:18381892; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.452908
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kietzmann A, Wang Y, Weber D, Steinbeisser H. Xenopus paraxial protocadherin inhibits Wnt/β-catenin signalling via casein kinase 2beta. EMBO Rep. 2012; 13:129-34; PMID:22193776; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/embor.2011.240
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kao TJ, Kania A. Ephrin-mediated cis-attenuation of Eph receptor signaling is essential for spinal motor axon guidance. Neuron 2011; 71:76-91; PMID:21745639; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.011.05.031
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu Q, Wilkinson DG. Eph-related receptors and their ligands: mediators of contact dependent cell interactions. J Mol Med 1997; 75:576-86; PMID:9297625; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001090050142
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glazier JA, Zhang Y, Swat M, Zaitlen B, Schnell S. Coordinated action of N-CAM, N-cadherin, EphA4, and ephrinB2 translates genetic prepatterns into structure during somitogenesis in chick. Curr Top Dev Biol 2008; 81:205-47; PMID:18023729; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0070-2153(07)81007-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fagotto F The cellular basis of tissue separation. Development; 2014; 141:3303–3318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.090332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luu O, David R, Ninomiya H, Winklbauer R. Large-scale mechanical properties of Xenopus embryonic epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108:4000-5; PMID:21368110; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010331108
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aliee M, Roper JC, Landsberg KP, Pentzold C, Widmann TJ, Julicher F, Dahmann C. Physical mechanisms shaping the Drosophila dorsoventral compartment boundary. Curr Biol 2012; 22:967-76; PMID:22560616; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julich D, Mould AP, Koper E, Holley SA. Control of extracellular matrix assembly along tissue boundaries via Integrin and Eph/Ephrin signaling. Development 2009; 136:2913-21; PMID:19641014; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.038935
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richter DJ, King N. The genomic and cellular foundations of animal origins. Annu Rev Genet 2013; 47:509-37; PMID:24050174; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-111212-133456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellott DO, Burke RD. The molecular phylogeny of eph receptors and ephrin ligands. BMC Cell Biol 2008; 9:27; PMID:18495034; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2121-9-27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reddy PC, Bidaye SS, Ghaskadbi S. Genome-wide screening reveals the emergence and divergence of RTK homologues in basal Metazoan Hydra magnipapillata. J Biosci 2011; 36:289-96; PMID:21654083; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12038-011-9065-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chang LH, Chen P, Lien MT, Ho YH, Lin CM, Pan YT, Wei SY, Hsu JC. Differential adhesion and actomyosin cable collaborate to drive Echinoid-mediated cell sorting. Development 2011; 138:3803-12; PMID:21795280; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.062257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laplante C, Nilson LA. Asymmetric distribution of Echinoid defines the epidermal leading edge during Drosophila dorsal closure. J Cell Biol 2011; 192:335-48; PMID:21263031; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201009022
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin HP, Chen HM, Wei SY, Chen LY, Chang LH, Sun YJ, Huang SY, Hsu JC. Cell adhesion molecule Echinoid associates with unconventional myosin VI/Jaguar motor to regulate cell morphology during dorsal closure in Drosophila. Dev Biol 2007; 311:423-33; PMID:17936269; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.08.043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theil T, Frain M, Gilardi-Hebenstreit P, Flenniken A, Charnay P, Wilkinson DG. Segmental expression of the EphA4 (Sek-1) receptor tyrosine kinase in the hindbrain is under direct transcriptional control of Krox-20. Development 1998; 125:443-52; PMID:9425139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemler R. From cadherins to catenins: cytoplasmic protein interactions and regulation of cell adhesion. Trends Genet 1993; 9:317-21; PMID:8236461; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-9525(93)90250-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himanen JP, Rajashankar KR, Lackmann M, Cowan CA, Henkemeyer M, Nikolov DB. Crystal structure of an Eph receptor-ephrin complex. Nature 2001; 414:933-8; PMID:11780069; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/414933a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolov DB, Li C, Barton WA, Himanen JP. Crystal structure of the ephrin-B1 ectodomain: implications for receptor recognition and signaling. Biochemistry 2005; 44:10947-53; PMID:16101278; http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi050789w
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stein E, Huynh-Do U, Lane AA, Cerretti DP, Daniel TO. Nck recruitment to Eph receptor, EphB1/ELK, couples ligand activation to c-Jun kinase. J Biol Chem 1998; 273:1303-8; PMID:9430661; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.3.1303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himanen JP, Nikolov DB. Eph signaling: a structural view. Trends Neurosci 2003; 26:46-51; PMID:12495863; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(02)00005-X
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coulthard MG, Lickliter JD, Subanesan N, Chen K, Webb GC, Lowry AJ, Koblar S, Bottema CD, Boyd AW. Characterization of the Epha1 receptor tyrosine kinase: expression in epithelial tissues. Growth Fact 2001; 18:303-17; PMID:11519828; http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/08977190109029118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale NW, Holland SJ, Valenzuela DM, Flenniken A, Pan L, Ryan TE, Henkemeyer M, Strebhardt K, Hirai H, Wilkinson DG, et al. Eph receptors and ligands comprise two major specificity subclasses and are reciprocally compartmentalized during embryogenesis. Neuron 1996; 17:9-19; PMID:8755474; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80276-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janis LS, Cassidy RM, Kromer LF. Ephrin-A binding and EphA receptor expression delineate the matrix compartment of the striatum. J Neurosci 1999; 19:4962-71; PMID:10366629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith FM, Vearing C, Lackmann M, Treutlein H, Himanen J, Chen K, Saul A, Nikolov D, Boyd AW. Dissecting the EphA3/Ephrin-A5 interactions using a novel functional mutagenesis screen. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:9522-31; PMID:14660665; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M309326200
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Irie N, Takada Y, Watanabe Y, Matsuzaki Y, Naruse C, Asano M, Iwakura Y, Suda T, Matsuo K. Bidirectional signaling through ephrinA2-EphA2 enhances osteoclastogenesis and suppresses osteoblastogenesis. J Biol Chem 2009; 284:14637-44; PMID:19299512; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M807598200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamoto M. Eph receptors and ephrins. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2000; 32:7-12; PMID:10661890; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1357-2725(99)00096-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Himanen JP, Goldgur Y, Miao H, Myshkin E, Guo H, Buck M, Nguyen M, Rajashankar KR, Wang B, Nikolov DB. Ligand recognition by A-class Eph receptors: crystal structures of the EphA2 ligand-binding domain and the EphA2/ephrin-A1 complex. EMBO Rep 2009; 10:722-8; PMID:19525919; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/embor.2009.91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nieto MA, Gilardi-Hebenstreit P, Charnay P, Wilkinson DG. A receptor protein tyrosine kinase implicated in the segmental patterning of the hindbrain and mesoderm. Development 1992; 116:1137-50; PMID:1295734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker N, Seitanidou T, Murphy P, Mattei MG, Topilko P, Nieto MA, Wilkinson DG, Charnay P, Gilardi-Hebenstreit P. Several receptor tyrosine kinase genes of the Eph family are segmentally expressed in the developing hindbrain. Mech Dev 1994; 47:3-17; PMID:7947319; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0925-4773(94)90091-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bergemann AD, Cheng HJ, Brambilla R, Klein R, Flanagan JG. ELF-2, a new member of the Eph ligand family, is segmentally expressed in mouse embryos in the region of the hindbrain and newly forming somites. Mol Cell Biol 1995; 15:4921-9; PMID:7651410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helbling PM, Saulnier DM, Robinson V, Christiansen JH, Wilkinson DG, Brandli AW. Comparative analysis of embryonic gene expression defines potential interaction sites for Xenopus EphB4 receptors with ephrin-B ligands. Dev Dyn 1999; 216:361-73; PMID:10633856; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0177(199912)216:4/5%3c361::AID-DVDY5%3e3.0.CO;2-W
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith A, Robinson V, Patel K, Wilkinson DG. The EphA4 and EphB1 receptor tyrosine kinases and ephrin-B2 ligand regulate targeted migration of branchial neural crest cells. Curr Biol 1997; 7:561-70; PMID:9259557; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00255-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzanares M, Trainor PA, Nonchev S, Ariza-McNaughton L, Brodie J, Gould A, Marshall H, Morrison A, Kwan CT, Sham MH, et al. The role of kreisler in segmentation during hindbrain development. Dev Biol 1999; 211:220-37; PMID:10395784; http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1999.9318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helbling PM, Tran CT, Brandli AW. Requirement for EphA receptor signaling in the segregation of Xenopus third and fourth arch neural crest cells. Mech Dev 1998; 78:63-79; PMID:9858686; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4773(98)00148-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar