The state of genetically modified crop regulation in Canada

References

• Watson JD, Crick FH. Molecular structure of nucleic acids: a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature 1953; 171:737-8; PMID: 13054692; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/171737a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg P, Baltimore D, Boyer HW, Cohen SN, Davis RW, Hogness DS, Nathans D, Roblin R, Watson JD, Weissman S, et al. Potential biohazards of recombinant DNA molecules. PNAS 1974; 71: 7:2593-94; PMID: 4527935; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.71.7.2593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James C, Krattinger AF. Global review of the field testing and commercialization of transgenic plants, 1986–1995: the first decade of crop biotechnology. ISAAA Briefs 1996; 1:1-44
   Google Scholar
• Ryan CD, McHughen A. Tomatoes, potatoes and flax: exploring the cost of lost innovations. Ch. 51 In: SJ Smyth, PWB Phillips and D Castle (eds.) Handbook on Agriculture, Biotechnology and Development. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2014; 841-52
   Google Scholar
• Smyth SJ, Phillips PWB. Competitors co-operating: establishing a supply chain to manage genetically modified canola. Int Food and Agrib Mgt Rev 2001; 4:51-66.
   Google Scholar
• Wozniak CA, McHughen A. Regulation of Agricultural Biotechnology: The United States and Canada. New York: Springer, 2012
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Soybean Council. Industry statistics. [accessed 2014 Feb 15] Available from http://www.soybeancouncil.ca/Industry Statistics/tabid/200/language/en-US/Default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Canola Council of Canada. HT and conventional canola: 1995–2010. [accessed 2014 Feb 15] Available from http://www.canolacouncil.org/markets-stats/statistics/estimated-acreage-and-percentage/
   Google Scholar
• Hategekimana B, Beaulieu M. Genetically modified crops: steady growth in Ontario and Quebec. Catalogue no. 21-004-XIE. [accessed 2014 Feb 15] Available from http://www.publications.gc.ca/Collection/Statcan/21-004-X/21-004-XIE2002112.pdf
   Google Scholar
• James C. ISAAA Briefs. [accessed 2014 Feb 15] Available from http://www.isaaa.org/Resources/publications/briefs
   Google Scholar
• Gusta M, Smyth SJ, Belcher K, Phillips PWB, Castle D. Economic benefits of genetically-modified herbicide-tolerant canola for producers. AgBioForum 2011; 14:1:1-13
   Google Scholar
• Smyth SJ, Gusta M, Belcher K, Phillips PWB, Castle D. Changes in herbicide use following the adoption of HR canola in Western Canada. Weed Technol 2011; 25:3:492-500; http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-10-00164.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth SJ, Gusta M, Belcher K, Phillips PWB, Castle D. Environmental impacts from herbicide tolerant canola production in Western Canada. Agr Syst 2011; 104:5:403-10; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2011.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter J, Gouse M, Yorobe J. Maize/corn. Ch. 37 In: SJ Smyth, PWB Phillips and D Castle (eds.) Handbook on Agriculture, Biotechnology and Development. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2014; 583-603
   Google Scholar
• Government of Manitoba. Agricultural statistics: november estimates of production of principle field crops, 2013. [accessed 2014 Feb 17] Available from http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/market-prices-and-statistics/crop-statistics/pubs/november_estimates_of_ production.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Saskatchewan Agriculture and Food. Factsheet: statistics – november estimates of 2013 crop production, 2013. [accessed 2014 Feb 17] Available from http://www.agriculture.gov.sk.ca/Default.aspx?DN=d46e4194-19b6-4f46--848c-8f2d1992a18b
   Google Scholar
• Kaminski DMR. Genetic invention licensing in healthcare: an analysis of policy instruments. Masters’ of Science thesis, University of Saskatchewan, 2012. [accessed 2014 Feb 17] Available from http://ecommons.usask.ca/handle/10388/ETD-2012-02-344
   Google Scholar
• Smyth SJ, Gray R. Intellectual property sharing agreements in gene technology: implications for research and commercialization. Int’l J. Intellectual Prop Manage 2011; 4:3:179-90
   Google Scholar
• Monsanto Canada Inc. v. Schmeiser, 1 S.C.R. 902, 2004
   Google Scholar
• Monsanto Canada Inc. v. Schmeiser, F.C.J. 436, 2001;
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman v. Monsanto Canada Inc. S. K. Q. B. 225, 2005;
   Google Scholar
• Khoury L, Smyth SJ. Reasonable foreseeability and liability in relation to genetically modified organisms. Bull Sci, Technol Soc 2007; 27:3:215-32; http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0270467607300635
   Google Scholar
• Smyth SJ Castle D. Consumer attitudes and preferences for GM products. Chapter 18 In: SJ Smyth, PWB Phillips and D Castle (eds.) Handbook on Agriculture, Biotechnology and Development. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2014; 243-255
   Google Scholar
• Snell C, Bernheim A, Bergé J-B, Kuntz M, Pascal G, Paris A, Ricroch AE. Assessment of the health impact of GM plant diets in long-term and multigenerational animal feeding trials: a literature. Food Chem Toxicol 2012; 50:3–4:1134-1148; PMID: 22155268; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2011.11.048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zilberman D, Kaplan S, Kim E, Waterfield G. Lessons from the California GM labeling proposition on the state of crop biotechnology. Chapter 34 In: SJ Smyth, PWB Phillips and D Castle (eds.) Handbook on Agriculture, Biotechnology and Development. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2014; 538-49
   Google Scholar
• GMO Compass. Chymosin. 2010. [accessed 2014 Feb 21] Available from http://www.gmocompass.org/eng/database/enzymes/83.chymosin.html
   Google Scholar
• GMO Compass. Yeast. 2009. [accessed 2014 Feb 21] Available from http://www.gmo-compass.org/eng/database/ingredients/124.yeast.html
   Google Scholar
• Kettlitz B. EU food industry expectations regarding future trade impacts and market acceptance with regard to the expanding GM-pipeline. Presentation at GMCC-13 conference. [accessed 2014 Feb 21] Available from http://www.gmcc13.org/docs/15%20Nov.%20Friday/Castelo %20VIII%20&%20IX/9.00/P_IPS15_BeateKettlitz.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Government of Canada. Bill C-287 labelling of genetically modified foods. 2001. [accessed 2014 Feb 21] Available from http://www.cfa-fca.ca/upload/fact_ sheets_CFA_C-287.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Government of Canada. Labelling of genetically modified food and its impact on farmers. 2002. [accessed 2014 Feb 21] Available from http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?DocId=1032111&Language=E&Mode=1&Pa rl=37&Ses=1
   Google Scholar
• Government of Canada. Voluntary labelling and advertising of foods that are and are not products of genetic engineering. 2004. [accessed 2014 Feb 21] Available from http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/ongc-cgsb/programme-prog-ram/normes-standards/internet/032--0315/index-eng.html
   Google Scholar
• Government of Canada. Bill C-456 an act to amend the food and drugs act (mandatory labelling for genetically modified foods). 2007. [accessed 2014 Feb 21] Available from http://openparliament.ca/bills/39-1/C-456/
   Google Scholar
• Government of Canada. Bill C-257 an act to amend the food and drugs act (mandatory labelling for genetically modified foods). 2011. [accessed 2014 Feb 21] Available from http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Language=E&Mode=1&DocId=5110050&File=27
   Google Scholar
• Stein AJ, Rodríguez-Cerezo E. International trade and the global pipeline of GM crops. Nat Biotechnol 2010; 28:1:23-5; PMID: 20062032; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt0110-23b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graff GD, Zilberman D, Bennett AB. The contraction of agbiotech product quality innovation. Nat Biotechnol 2009; 27:8:702-4; PMID: 19668173; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt0809-702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips PWB. LLP impacts on global trade, agricultural innovation and commodity prices. Presentation to GM Co-existence Conference, Vancouver, Canada, October 27, 2011
   Google Scholar
• James C. Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2013. ISAAA Brief 44; 2014. [accessed 2014 Feb 28] Available from http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/46/executivesummary/default.asp
   Google Scholar
• Smyth SJ, Kerr WA, Phillips PWB. Accelerating adoption of GM crops through a trade liability regime. Plant Biotechnol J 2013; 11:527-34; PMID: 23601418; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booker H, Lamb E. Quantification of low-level genetically modified (GM) seed presence in large seed lots: a case study of GM seed in Canadian flax breeder seed lots. Seed Sci Res 2011; 21:4:315-21; http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0960258511000213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan CD, Smyth SJ. Economic implications of low-level presence in a zero-tolerance European import market: the case of Canadian triffid flax. AgBioForum 2012; 15:1:21-30
   Google Scholar
• Low level presence of GMOs not authorized in Europe: the Linseed CDC Triffid case. Report. Brussels, Belgium: COCERAL/FEDIOL, July 2010
   Google Scholar
• Government of Canada. Press release: canadian food inspection agency joins health portfolio. 2013. [accessed 2014 Feb 28[ Available from http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ahc-asc/media/nr-cp/_2013/2013-137-eng.php
   Google Scholar