Involvement of the nuclear proteasome activator PA28γ in the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks

References

• Ciccia A, Elledge SJ. The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Mol Cell 2010; 40:179 - 204; PMID: 20965415; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiom K. Coping with DNA double strand breaks. DNA Repair (Amst) 2010; 9:1256 - 1263; PMID: 21115283; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.09.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieber MR. The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway. Annu Rev Biochem 2010; 79:181 - 211; PMID: 20192759; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.052308.093131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mladenov E, Iliakis G. Induction and repair of DNA double strand breaks: the increasing spectrum of non-homologous end joining pathways. Mutat Res 2011; 711:61 - 72; PMID: 21329706; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2011.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holthausen JT, Wyman C, Kanaar R. Regulation of DNA strand exchange in homologous recombination. DNA Repair (Amst) 2010; 9:1264 - 1272; PMID: 20971042; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.09.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warmerdam DO, Kanaar R. Dealing with DNA damage: relationships between checkpoint and repair pathways. Mutat Res 2010; 704:2 - 11; PMID: 20006736; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2009.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekker-Jensen S, Lukas C, Kitagawa R, Melander F, Kastan MB, Bartek J, et al. Spatial organization of the mammalian genome surveillance machinery in response to DNA strand breaks. J Cell Biol 2006; 173:195 - 206; PMID: 16618811; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200510130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekker-Jensen S, Rendtlew Danielsen J, Fugger K, Gromova I, Nerstedt A, Lukas C, et al. HERC2 coordinates ubiquitin-dependent assembly of DNA repair factors on damaged chromosomes. Nat Cell Biol 2010; 12:80 - 86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukas J, Lukas C, Bartek J. More than just a focus: The chromatin response to DNA damage and its role in genome integrity maintenance. Nat Cell Biol 2011; 13:1161 - 1169; PMID: 21968989; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovejoy CA, Cortez D. Common mechanisms of PIKK regulation. DNA Repair (Amst) 2009; 8:1004 - 1008; PMID: 19464237; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatti S, Kozlov S, Farooqi AA, Naqi A, Lavin M, Khanna KK. ATM protein kinase: the linchpin of cellular defenses to stress. Cell Mol Life Sci 2011; 68:2977 - 3006; PMID: 21533982; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-011-0683-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polo SE, Jackson SP. Dynamics of DNA damage response proteins at DNA breaks: a focus on protein modifications. Genes Dev 2011; 25:409 - 433; PMID: 21363960; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.2021311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramaekers CH, Wouters BG. Regulatory functions of ubiquitin in diverse DNA damage responses. Curr Mol Med 2011; 11:152 - 169; PMID: 21342128; http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/156652411794859269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derheimer FA, Kastan MB. Multiple roles of ATM in monitoring and maintaining DNA integrity. FEBS Lett 2010; 584:3675 - 3681; PMID: 20580718; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2010.05.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavin MF. Ataxia-telangiectasia: from a rare disorder to a paradigm for cell signalling and cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2008; 9:759 - 769; PMID: 18813293; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perlman SL, Boder Deceased E, Sedgewick RP, Gatti RA. Ataxia-telangiectasia. Handb Clin Neurol 2011; 103:307 - 332; PMID: 21827897; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-51892-7.00019-X
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neal JA, Meek K. Choosing the right path: Does DNAPK help make the decision?. Mutat Res 2011; 711:73 - 86; PMID: 21376743; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2011.02.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam EA, Cortez D. ATR signalling: more than meeting at the fork. Biochem J 2011; 436:527 - 536; PMID: 21615334; http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BJ20102162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziv Y, Bielopolski D, Galanty Y, Lukas C, Taya Y, Schultz DC, et al. Chromatin relaxation in response to DNA double-strand breaks is modulated by a novel ATM- and KAP-1 dependent pathway. Nat Cell Biol 2006; 8:870 - 876; PMID: 16862143; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodarzi AA, Noon AT, Deckbar D, Ziv Y, Shiloh Y, Lobrich M, et al. ATM signaling facilitates repair of DNA double-strand breaks associated with heterochromatin. Mol Cell 2008; 31:167 - 177; PMID: 18657500; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.05.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rechsteiner M, Hill CP. Mobilizing the proteolytic machine: cell biological roles of proteasome activators and inhibitors. Trends Cell Biol 2005; 15:27 - 33; PMID: 15653075; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2004.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill CP, Masters EI, Whitby FG. The 11S regulators of 20S proteasome activity. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2002; 268:73 - 89; PMID: 12083009; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59414-4_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao I, Liu J, Li X, Luo H. REGgamma, a proteasome activator and beyond?. Cell Mol Life Sci 2008; 65:3971 - 3980; PMID: 18679578; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-008-8291-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stadtmueller BM, Hill CP. Proteasome activators. Mol Cell 2011; 41:8 - 19; PMID: 21211719; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.12.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Lonard DM, Jung SY, Malovannaya A, Feng Q, Qin J, et al. The SRC-3/AIB1 coactivator is degraded in a ubiquitin- and ATP-independent manner by the REGgamma proteasome. Cell 2006; 124:381 - 392; PMID: 16439211; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.11.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie J, Wu M, Wang J, Xing G, He F, Zhang L. REGgamma proteasome mediates degradation of the ubiquitin ligase Smurf1. FEBS Lett 2010; 584:3021 - 3027; PMID: 20580715; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2010.05.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriishi K, Shoji I, Mori Y, Suzuki R, Suzuki T, Kataoka C, et al. Involvement of PA28gamma in the propagation of hepatitis C virus. Hepatology 2010; 52:411 - 420; PMID: 20683941; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.23680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki R, Moriishi K, Fukuda K, Shirakura M, Ishii K, Shoji I, et al. Proteasomal turnover of hepatitis C virus core protein is regulated by two distinct mechanisms: a ubiquitin-dependent mechanism and a ubiquitin-independent but PA28gamma-dependent mechanism. J Virol 2009; 83:2389 - 2392; PMID: 19091860; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01690-08
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori Y, Moriishi K, Matsuura Y. Hepatitis C virus core protein: its coordinate roles with PA28gamma in metabolic abnormality and carcinogenicity in the liver. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2008; 40:1437 - 1442; PMID: 18321762; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2008.01.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ying H, Furuya F, Zhao L, Araki O, West BL, Hanover JA, et al. Aberrant accumulation of PTTG1 induced by a mutated thyroid hormone beta receptor inhibits mitotic progression. J Clin Invest 2006; 116:2972 - 2984; PMID: 17039256; http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI28598
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Barton LF, Chi Y, Clurman BE, Roberts JM. Ubiquitin-independent degradation of cell-cycle inhibitors by the REGgamma proteasome. Mol Cell 2007; 26:843 - 852; PMID: 17588519; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.05.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Amazit L, Long W, Lonard DM, Monaco JJ, O'Malley BW. Ubiquitin- and ATP-independent proteolytic turnover of p21 by the REGgamma-proteasome pathway. Mol Cell 2007; 26:831 - 842; PMID: 17588518; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.05.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Yu G, Zhao Y, Zhao D, Wang Y, Wang L, et al. REGgamma modulates p53 activity by regulating its cellular localization. J Cell Sci 2010; 123:4076 - 4084; PMID: 21084564; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.067405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zannini L, Lecis D, Buscemi G, Carlessi L, Gasparini P, Fontanella E, et al. REGgamma proteasome activator is involved in the maintenance of chromosomal stability. Cell Cycle 2008; 7:504 - 512; PMID: 18235248; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.7.4.5355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zannini L, Buscemi G, Fontanella E, Lisanti S, Delia D. REGgamma/PA28gamma proteasome activator interacts with PML and Chk2 and affects PML nuclear bodies number. Cell Cycle 2009; 8:2399 - 2407; PMID: 19556897; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.8.15.9084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie A, Odate S, Chandramouly G, Scully R. H2AX post-translational modifications in the ionizing radiation response and homologous recombination. Cell Cycle 2010; 9:3602 - 3610; PMID: 20703100; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.9.17.12884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao W, McNutt MA, Zhu WG. The comet assay: a sensitive method for detecting DNA damage in individual cells. Methods 2009; 48:46 - 53; PMID: 19269328; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2009.02.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai WB, Chung YM, Takahashi Y, Xu Z, Hu MC. Functional interaction between FOXO3a and ATM regulates DNA damage response. Nat Cell Biol 2008; 10:460 - 467; PMID: 18344987; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyal L, Lerenthal Y, Gana-Weisz M, Mass G, So S, Wang SY, et al. Requirement of ATM-Dependent Monoubiquitylation of Histone H2B for Timely Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks. Mol Cell 2011; 41:529 - 542; PMID: 21362549; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.02.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stap J, Krawczyk PM, Van Oven CH, Barendsen GW, Essers J, Kanaar R, et al. Induction of linear tracks of DNA double-strand breaks by alpha-particle irradiation of cells. Nat Methods 2008; 5:261 - 266; PMID: 18309310; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinoshita E, Kinoshita-Kikuta E, Ujihara H, Koike T. Mobility shift detection of phosphorylation on large proteins using a Phos-tag SDS-PAGE gel strengthened with agarose. Proteomics 2009; 9:4098 - 4101; PMID: 19658103; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200900020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagemann C, Patel R, Blank JL. MEKK3 interacts with the PA28 gamma regulatory subunit of the proteasome. Biochem J 2003; 373:71 - 79; PMID: 12650640; http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BJ20021758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Wang L, Zhou P, Wang G, Zeng Y, Wang Y, et al. Regulation of REGgamma cellular distribution and function by SUMO modification. Cell Res 2011; 21:807 - 816; PMID: 21445096; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cr.2011.57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blickwedehl J, Agarwal M, Seong C, Pandita RK, Melendy T, Sung P, et al. Role for proteasome activator PA200 and postglutamyl proteasome activity in genomic stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105:16165 - 16170; PMID: 18845680; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803145105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blickwedehl J, McEvoy S, Wong I, Kousis P, Clements J, Elliott R, et al. Proteasomes and proteasome activator 200 kDa (PA200) accumulate on chromatin in response to ionizing radiation. Radiat Res 2007; 167:663 - 674; PMID: 17523843; http://dx.doi.org/10.1667/RR0690.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell SJ, Reed SH, Huang W, Friedberg EC, Johnston SA. The 19S regulatory complex of the proteasome functions independently of proteolysis in nucleotide excision repair. Mol Cell 1999; 3:687 - 695; PMID: 10394357; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(01)80001-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquemont C, Taniguchi T. Proteasome function is required for DNA damage response and fanconi anemia pathway activation. Cancer Res 2007; 67:7395 - 7405; PMID: 17671210; http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Aroya S, Agmon N, Yuen K, Kwok T, McManus K, Kupiec M, et al. Proteasome nuclear activity affects chromosome stability by controlling the turnover of Mms22, a protein important for DNA repair. PLoS Genet 2010; 6:1000852; PMID: 20174551; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000852
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudmundsdottir K, Lord CJ, Ashworth A. The proteasome is involved in determining differential utilization of double-strand break repair pathways. Oncogene 2007; 26:7601 - 7606; PMID: 17563742; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1210579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin CP, Ban Y, Lyu YL, Desai SD, Liu LF. A ubiquitin-proteasome pathway for the repair of topoisomerase I-DNA covalent complexes. J Biol Chem 2008; 283:21074 - 21083; PMID: 18515798; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M803493200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ju D, Wang X, Ha SW, Fu J, Xie Y. Inhibition of proteasomal degradation of rpn4 impairs nonhomologous end-joining repair of DNA double-strand breaks. PLoS ONE 2010; 5:9877; PMID: 20376190; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schauber C, Chen L, Tongaonkar P, Vega I, Lambertson D, Potts W, et al. Rad23 links DNA repair to the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway. Nature 1998; 391:715 - 718; PMID: 9490418; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krogan NJ, Lam MH, Fillingham J, Keogh MC, Gebbia M, Li J, et al. Proteasome involvement in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol Cell 2004; 16:1027 - 1034; PMID: 15610744; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2004.11.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raman M, Havens CG, Walter JC, Harper JW. A Genome-wide Screen Identifies p97 as an Essential Regulator of DNA Damage-Dependent CDT1 Destruction. Mol Cell 2011; 44:72 - 84; PMID: 21981919; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.06.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner SA, Beli P, Weinert BT, Nielsen ML, Cox J, Mann M, Choudhary C A. Proteome-wide, quantitative survey of in vivo ubiquitylation sites reveals widespread regulatory roles. Mol Cell Proteomics 2011; 10:111.013284; PMID: 21890473; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M111.013284
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cabrera R, Sha Z, Vadakkan TJ, Otero J, Kriegenburg F, Hartmann-Petersen R, et al. Proteasome nuclear import mediated by Arc3 can influence efficient DNA damage repair and mitosis in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Biol Cell 2010; 21:3125 - 3136; PMID: 20668161; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E10-06-0506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Blank JL, Peters T, Liu XJ, Rappoli DM, Pickard MD, et al. Genome-wide siRNA screen for modulators of cell death induced by proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. Cancer Res 2010; 70:4318 - 4326; PMID: 20460535; http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/00085472.CAN-09-4428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zecevic A, Hagan E, Reynolds M, Poage G, Johnston T, Zhitkovich A. XPA impacts formation but not proteasome-sensitive repair of DNA-protein cross-links induced by chromate. Mutagenesis 2010; 25:381 - 388; PMID: 20410141; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mutage/geq017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim W, Bennett EJ, Huttlin EL, Guo A, Li J, Possemato A, et al. Systematic and quantitative assessment of the ubiquitin-modified proteome. Mol Cell 2011; 44:325 - 340; PMID: 21906983; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.08.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramadan K, Meerang M. Degradation-linked ubiquitin signal and proteasome are integral components of DNA double strand break repair: New perspectives for anti-cancer therapy. FEBS Lett 2011; 585:2868 - 2875; PMID: 21536036; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2011.04.046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi W, Ma Z, Willers H, Akhtar K, Scott SP, Zhang J, et al. Disassembly of MDC1 foci is controlled by ubiquitin-proteasome-dependent degradation. J Biol Chem 2008; 283:31608 - 31616; PMID: 18757370; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M801082200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi W, Ma Z, Willers H, Akhtar K, Scott SP, Zhang J, et al. Disassembly of MDC1 foci is controlled by ubiquitin-proteasome-dependent degradation. J Biol Chem 2008; 283:31608 - 31616; PMID: 18757370; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M801082200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murakawa Y, Sonoda E, Barber LJ, Zeng W, Yokomori K, Kimura H, et al. Inhibitors of the proteasome suppress homologous DNA recombination in mammalian cells. Cancer Res 2007; 67:8536 - 8543; PMID: 17875693; http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Hakim A, Escribano-Diaz C, Landry MC, O'Donnell L, Panier S, Szilard RK, et al. The ubiquitous role of ubiquitin in the DNA damage response. DNA Repair (Amst) 2010; 9:1229 - 1240; PMID: 21056014; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.09.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukas J. The interface between the ubiquitin family and the DNA damage response. EMBO Rep 2010; 11:907 - 909; PMID: 21072060; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/embor.2010.180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriishi K, Okabayashi T, Nakai K, Moriya K, Koike K, Murata S, et al. Proteasome activator PA28gamma-dependent nuclear retention and degradation of hepatitis C virus core protein. J Virol 2003; 77:10237 - 10249; PMID: 12970408; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.77.19.10237-49.2003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salton M, Lerenthal Y, Wang SY, Chen DJ, Shiloh Y. Involvement of matrin 3 and SFPQ/NONO in the DNA damage response. Cell Cycle 2010; 9:1568 - 1576; PMID: 20421735; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.9.8.11298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal S, van Cappellen WA, Guenole A, Eppink B, Linsen SE, Meijering E, et al. ATP-dependent and independent functions of Rad54 in genome maintenance. J Cell Biol 2011; 192:735 - 750; PMID: 21357745; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201011025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puget N, Knowlton M, Scully R. Molecular analysis of sister chromatid recombination in mammalian cells. DNA Repair (Amst) 2005; 4:149 - 161; PMID: 15590323; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.08.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansour WY, Schumacher S, Rosskopf R, Rhein T, Schmidt-Petersen F, Gatzemeier F, et al. Hierarchy of nonhomologous end-joining, single-strand annealing and gene conversion at site-directed DNA double-strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36:4088 - 4098; PMID: 18539610; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce AJ, Johnson RD, Thompson LH, Jasin M. XRCC3 promotes homology-directed repair of DNA damage in mammalian cells. Genes Dev 1999; 13:2633 - 2638; PMID: 10541549; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.13.20.2633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vindeløv LL, Christensen IJ. A review of techniques and results obtained in one laboratory by an integrated system of methods designed for routine clinical flow cytometric DNA analysis. Cytometry 1990; 11:753 - 770; PMID: 2272241; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.990110702
   PubMedGoogle Scholar