Separation of intra-S checkpoint protein contributions to DNA replication fork protection and genomic stability in normal human fibroblasts

References

• Paulsen RD, Cimprich KA. The ATR pathway: fine-tuning the fork. DNA Repair (Amst) 2007; 6:953 - 66; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2007.02.015; PMID: 17531546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann WK. The human intra-S checkpoint response to UVC-induced DNA damage. Carcinogenesis 2010; 31:751 - 65; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgp230; PMID: 19793801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam EA, Cortez D. ATR signalling: more than meeting at the fork. Biochem J 2011; 436:527 - 36; http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BJ20102162; PMID: 21615334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDougall CA, Byun TS, Van C, Yee MC, Cimprich KA. The structural determinants of checkpoint activation. Genes Dev 2007; 21:898 - 903; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1522607; PMID: 17437996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou L, Elledge SJ. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 2003; 300:1542 - 8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1083430; PMID: 12791985
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou L, Cortez D, Elledge SJ. Regulation of ATR substrate selection by Rad17-dependent loading of Rad9 complexes onto chromatin. Genes Dev 2002; 16:198 - 208; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.950302; PMID: 11799063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermudez VP, Lindsey-Boltz LA, Cesare AJ, Maniwa Y, Griffith JD, Hurwitz J, et al. Loading of the human 9-1-1 checkpoint complex onto DNA by the checkpoint clamp loader hRad17-replication factor C complex in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100:1633 - 8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0437927100; PMID: 12578958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison V, Stillman B. Biochemical characterization of DNA damage checkpoint complexes: clamp loader and clamp complexes with specificity for 5′ recessed DNA. PLoS Biol 2003; 1:E33; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0000033; PMID: 14624239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delacroix S, Wagner JM, Kobayashi M, Yamamoto K, Karnitz LM. The Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 (9-1-1) clamp activates checkpoint signaling via TopBP1. Genes Dev 2007; 21:1472 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1547007; PMID: 17575048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chini CC, Chen J. Human claspin is required for replication checkpoint control. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:30057 - 62; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M301136200; PMID: 12766152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsal-Kaçmaz K, Mullen TE, Kaufmann WK, Sancar A. Coupling of human circadian and cell cycles by the timeless protein. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25:3109 - 16; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.8.3109-3116.2005; PMID: 15798197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsal-Kaçmaz K, Chastain PD, Qu PP, Minoo P, Cordeiro-Stone M, Sancar A, et al. The human Tim/Tipin complex coordinates an Intra-S checkpoint response to UV that slows replication fork displacement. Mol Cell Biol 2007; 27:3131 - 42; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.02190-06; PMID: 17296725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshizawa-Sugata N, Masai H. Human Tim/Timeless-interacting protein, Tipin, is required for efficient progression of S phase and DNA replication checkpoint. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:2729 - 40; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M605596200; PMID: 17102137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Roe SL, Patel SS, Simpson DA, Zhou YC, Rao S, Ibrahim JG, et al. Timeless functions independently of the Tim-Tipin complex to promote sister chromatid cohesion in normal human fibroblasts. Cell Cycle 2011; 10:1618 - 24; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.10.10.15613; PMID: 21508667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotter AL, Suppa C, Emanuel BS. Mammalian TIMELESS and Tipin are evolutionarily conserved replication fork-associated factors. J Mol Biol 2007; 366:36 - 52; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2006.10.097; PMID: 17141802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp MG, Akan Z, Yilmaz S, Grillo M, Smith-Roe SL, Kang TH, et al. Tipin-replication protein A interaction mediates Chk1 phosphorylation by ATR in response to genotoxic stress. J Biol Chem 2010; 285:16562 - 71; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.110304; PMID: 20233725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serçin O, Kemp MG. Characterization of functional domains in human Claspin. Cell Cycle 2011; 10:1599 - 606; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.10.10.15562; PMID: 21478680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Piccoli G, Katou Y, Itoh T, Nakato R, Shirahige K, Labib K. Replisome stability at defective DNA replication forks is independent of S phase checkpoint kinases. Mol Cell 2012; 45:696 - 704; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.01.007; PMID: 22325992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown EJ, Baltimore D. ATR disruption leads to chromosomal fragmentation and early embryonic lethality. Genes Dev 2000; 14:397 - 402; PMID: 10691732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Guntuku S, Cui XS, Matsuoka S, Cortez D, Tamai K, et al. Chk1 is an essential kinase that is regulated by Atr and required for the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint. Genes Dev 2000; 14:1448 - 59; PMID: 10859164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotter AL, Manganaro T, Weaver DR, Kolakowski LF Jr., Possidente B, Sriram S, et al. A time-less function for mouse timeless. Nat Neurosci 2000; 3:755 - 6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/77653; PMID: 10903565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casper AM, Nghiem P, Arlt MF, Glover TW. ATR regulates fragile site stability. Cell 2002; 111:779 - 89; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01113-3; PMID: 12526805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkin SG, Arlt MF, Howlett NG, Glover TW. Depletion of CHK1, but not CHK2, induces chromosomal instability and breaks at common fragile sites. Oncogene 2006; 25:4381 - 8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1209466; PMID: 16732333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam MH, Liu Q, Elledge SJ, Rosen JM. Chk1 is haploinsufficient for multiple functions critical to tumor suppression. Cancer Cell 2004; 6:45 - 59; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2004.06.015; PMID: 15261141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Focarelli ML, Soza S, Mannini L, Paulis M, Montecucco A, Musio A. Claspin inhibition leads to fragile site expression. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2009; 48:1083 - 90; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gcc.20710; PMID: 19760606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leman AR, Noguchi C, Lee CY, Noguchi E. Human Timeless and Tipin stabilize replication forks and facilitate sister-chromatid cohesion. J Cell Sci 2010; 123:660 - 70; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.057984; PMID: 20124417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Muller EG, Rothstein R. A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools. Mol Cell 1998; 2:329 - 40; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80277-4; PMID: 9774971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myung K, Datta A, Kolodner RD. Suppression of spontaneous chromosomal rearrangements by S phase checkpoint functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 2001; 104:397 - 408; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00227-6; PMID: 11239397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen CS, Syljuåsen RG. Safeguarding genome integrity: the checkpoint kinases ATR, CHK1 and WEE1 restrain CDK activity during normal DNA replication. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40:477 - 86; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr697; PMID: 21937510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones RM, Petermann E. Replication fork dynamics and the DNA damage response. Biochem J 2012; 443:13 - 26; http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BJ20112100; PMID: 22417748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voineagu I, Freudenreich CH, Mirkin SM. Checkpoint responses to unusual structures formed by DNA repeats. Mol Carcinog 2009; 48:309 - 18; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mc.20512; PMID: 19306277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarlane RJ, Mian S, Dalgaard JZ. The many facets of the Tim-Tipin protein families’ roles in chromosome biology. Cell Cycle 2010; 9:700 - 5; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.9.4.10676; PMID: 20139726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dheekollu J, Wiedmer A, Hayden J, Speicher D, Gotter AL, Yen T, et al. Timeless links replication termination to mitotic kinase activation. PLoS One 2011; 6:e19596; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019596; PMID: 21573113
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dheekollu J, Lieberman PM. The replisome pausing factor Timeless is required for episomal maintenance of latent Epstein-Barr virus. J Virol 2011; 85:5853 - 63; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02425-10; PMID: 21490103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu G, Chen X, Gao Y, Lewis T, Barthelemy J, Leffak M. Altered replication in human cells promotes DMPK (CTG)(n) · (CAG)(n) repeat instability. Mol Cell Biol 2012; 32:1618 - 32; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.06727-11; PMID: 22354993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leman AR, Dheekollu J, Deng Z, Lee SW, Das MM, Lieberman PM, et al. Timeless preserves telomere length by promoting efficient DNA replication through human telomeres. Cell Cycle 2012; 11:2337 - 47; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.20810; PMID: 22672906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katou Y, Kanoh Y, Bando M, Noguchi H, Tanaka H, Ashikari T, et al. S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 2003; 424:1078 - 83; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature01900; PMID: 12944972
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bando M, Katou YM, Komata M, Tanaka H, Itoh T, Sutani T, et al. Csm3, Tof1, and Mrc1 form a heterotrimeric mediator complex that associates with DNA replication forks. J Biol Chem 2009; 284:34355 - 65; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.065730; PMID: 19819872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou DM, Elledge SJ. Tipin and Timeless form a mutually protective complex required for genotoxic stress resistance and checkpoint function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:18143 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0609251103; PMID: 17116885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang XH, Shiotani B, Classon M, Zou L. Chk1 and Claspin potentiate PCNA ubiquitination. Genes Dev 2008; 22:1147 - 52; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1632808; PMID: 18451105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith KD, Fu MA, Brown EJ. Tim-Tipin dysfunction creates an indispensible reliance on the ATR-Chk1 pathway for continued DNA synthesis. J Cell Biol 2009; 187:15 - 23; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200905006; PMID: 19805627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka K. Multiple functions of the S-phase checkpoint mediator. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2010; 74:2367 - 73; http://dx.doi.org/10.1271/bbb.100583; PMID: 21150122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noguchi E, Noguchi C, McDonald WH, Yates JR 3rd, Russell P. Swi1 and Swi3 are components of a replication fork protection complex in fission yeast. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:8342 - 55; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.19.8342-8355.2004; PMID: 15367656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedelcheva MN, Roguev A, Dolapchiev LB, Shevchenko A, Taskov HB, Shevchenko A, et al. Uncoupling of unwinding from DNA synthesis implies regulation of MCM helicase by Tof1/Mrc1/Csm3 checkpoint complex. J Mol Biol 2005; 347:509 - 21; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2005.01.041; PMID: 15755447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Errico A, Costanzo V. Mechanisms of replication fork protection: a safeguard for genome stability. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 2012; 47:222 - 35; http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10409238.2012.655374; PMID: 22324461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chini CC, Wood J, Chen J. Chk1 is required to maintain claspin stability. Oncogene 2006; 25:4165 - 71; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1209447; PMID: 16501606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petermann E, Maya-Mendoza A, Zachos G, Gillespie DA, Jackson DA, Caldecott KW. Chk1 requirement for high global rates of replication fork progression during normal vertebrate S phase. Mol Cell Biol 2006; 26:3319 - 26; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.26.8.3319-3326.2006; PMID: 16581803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chastain PD 2nd, Heffernan TP, Nevis KR, Lin L, Kaufmann WK, Kaufman DG, et al. Checkpoint regulation of replication dynamics in UV-irradiated human cells. Cell Cycle 2006; 5:2160 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.5.18.3236; PMID: 16969085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petermann E, Helleday T, Caldecott KW. Claspin promotes normal replication fork rates in human cells. Mol Biol Cell 2008; 19:2373 - 8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E07-10-1035; PMID: 18353973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scorah J, McGowan CH. Claspin and Chk1 regulate replication fork stability by different mechanisms. Cell Cycle 2009; 8:1036 - 43; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.8.7.8040; PMID: 19270516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkin SG, Glover TW. Chromosome fragile sites. Annu Rev Genet 2007; 41:169 - 92; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.41.042007.165900; PMID: 17608616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petermann E, Helleday T. Pathways of mammalian replication fork restart. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010; 11:683 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2974; PMID: 20842177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown EJ, Baltimore D. Essential and dispensable roles of ATR in cell cycle arrest and genome maintenance. Genes Dev 2003; 17:615 - 28; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1067403; PMID: 12629044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang K, Pereira E, Maxfield M, Russell B, Goudelock DM, Sanchez Y. Regulation of Chk1 includes chromatin association and 14-3-3 binding following phosphorylation on Ser-345. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:25207 - 17; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M300070200; PMID: 12676962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang YW, Otterness DM, Chiang GG, Xie W, Liu YC, Mercurio F, et al. Genotoxic stress targets human Chk1 for degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Mol Cell 2005; 19:607 - 18; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2005.07.019; PMID: 16137618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits VA, Reaper PM, Jackson SP. Rapid PIKK-dependent release of Chk1 from chromatin promotes the DNA-damage checkpoint response. Curr Biol 2006; 16:150 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.11.066; PMID: 16360315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speroni J, Federico MB, Mansilla SF, Soria G, Gottifredi V. Kinase-independent function of checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) in the replication of damaged DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109:7344 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116345109; PMID: 22529391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arlt MF, Glover TW. Inhibition of topoisomerase I prevents chromosome breakage at common fragile sites. DNA Repair (Amst) 2010; 9:678 - 89; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.03.005; PMID: 20413351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka H, Kubota Y, Tsujimura T, Kumano M, Masai H, Takisawa H. Replisome progression complex links DNA replication to sister chromatid cohesion in Xenopus egg extracts. Genes Cells 2009; 14:949 - 63; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2443.2009.01322.x; PMID: 19622120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjögren C, Nasmyth K. Sister chromatid cohesion is required for postreplicative double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Biol 2001; 11:991 - 5; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00271-8; PMID: 11448778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urtishak KA, Smith KD, Chanoux RA, Greenberg RA, Johnson FB, Brown EJ. Timeless Maintains Genomic Stability and Suppresses Sister Chromatid Exchange during Unperturbed DNA Replication. J Biol Chem 2009; 284:8777 - 85; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M806103200; PMID: 19112184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unal E, Arbel-Eden A, Sattler U, Shroff R, Lichten M, Haber JE, et al. DNA damage response pathway uses histone modification to assemble a double-strand break-specific cohesin domain. Mol Cell 2004; 16:991 - 1002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2004.11.027; PMID: 15610741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabouri N, McDonald KR, Webb CJ, Cristea IM, Zakian VA. DNA replication through hard-to-replicate sites, including both highly transcribed RNA Pol II and Pol III genes, requires the S. pombe Pfh1 helicase. Genes Dev 2012; 26:581 - 93; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.184697.111; PMID: 22426534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petermann E, Woodcock M, Helleday T. Chk1 promotes replication fork progression by controlling replication initiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107:16090 - 5; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1005031107; PMID: 20805465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shechter D, Costanzo V, Gautier J. ATR and ATM regulate the timing of DNA replication origin firing. Nat Cell Biol 2004; 6:648 - 55; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1145; PMID: 15220931
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maya-Mendoza A, Petermann E, Gillespie DA, Caldecott KW, Jackson DA. Chk1 regulates the density of active replication origins during the vertebrate S phase. EMBO J 2007; 26:2719 - 31; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601714; PMID: 17491592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer JC, Kaufmann WK, Brylawski BP, Cordeiro-Stone M. Defective postreplication repair in xeroderma pigmentosum variant fibroblasts. Cancer Res 1990; 50:2593 - 8; PMID: 2109654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heffernan TP, Simpson DA, Frank AR, Heinloth AN, Paules RS, Cordeiro-Stone M, et al. An ATR- and Chk1-dependent S checkpoint inhibits replicon initiation following UVC-induced DNA damage. Mol Cell Biol 2002; 22:8552 - 61; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.22.24.8552-8561.2002; PMID: 12446774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson DA, Livanos E, Heffernan TP, Kaufmann WK. Telomerase expression is sufficient for chromosomal integrity in cells lacking p53 dependent G1 checkpoint function. J Carcinog 2005; 4:18; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-3163-4-18; PMID: 16209708
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou T, Chou JW, Simpson DA, Zhou Y, Mullen TE, Medeiros M, et al. Profiles of global gene expression in ionizing-radiation-damaged human diploid fibroblasts reveal synchronization behind the G1 checkpoint in a G0-like state of quiescence. Environ Health Perspect 2006; 114:553 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8026; PMID: 16581545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson EM, Birmingham A, Baskerville S, Reynolds A, Maksimova E, Leake D, et al. Experimental validation of the importance of seed complement frequency to siRNA specificity. RNA 2008; 14:853 - 61; http://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.704708; PMID: 18367722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar