The clustering of CpG islands may constitute an important determinant of the 3D organization of interphase chromosomes

References

• Holwerda S, de Laat W. Chromatin loops, gene positioning, and gene expression. Front Genet 2012; 3:217; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2012.00217; PMID: 23087710
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Wit E, de Laat W. A decade of 3C technologies: insights into nuclear organization. Genes Dev 2012; 26:11 - 24; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.179804.111; PMID: 22215806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palstra RJ. Close encounters of the 3C kind: long-range chromatin interactions and transcriptional regulation. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic 2009; 8:297 - 309; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elp016; PMID: 19535505
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Laat W, Grosveld F. Spatial organization of gene expression: the active chromatin hub. Chromosome Res 2003; 11:447 - 59; http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024922626726; PMID: 12971721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Laat W, Klous P, Kooren J, Noordermeer D, Palstra RJ, Simonis M, Splinter E, Grosveld F. Three-dimensional organization of gene expression in erythroid cells. Curr Top Dev Biol 2008; 82:117 - 39; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0070-2153(07)00005-1; PMID: 18282519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordermeer D, de Laat W. Joining the loops: beta-globin gene regulation. IUBMB Life 2008; 60:824 - 33; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/iub.129; PMID: 18767169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavrilov AA, Razin SV. Spatial configuration of the chicken alpha-globin gene domain: immature and active chromatin hubs. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36:4629 - 40; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn429; PMID: 18621783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou GL, Xin L, Song W, Di LJ, Liu G, Wu XS, Liu DP, Liang CC. Active chromatin hub of the mouse alpha-globin locus forms in a transcription factory of clustered housekeeping genes. Mol Cell Biol 2006; 26:5096 - 105; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.02454-05; PMID: 16782894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernimmen D, De Gobbi M, Sloane-Stanley JA, Wood WG, Higgs DR. Long-range chromosomal interactions regulate the timing of the transition between poised and active gene expression. EMBO J 2007; 26:2041 - 51; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601654; PMID: 17380126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernimmen D, Marques-Kranc F, Sharpe JA, Sloane-Stanley JA, Wood WG, Wallace HA, Smith AJ, Higgs DR. Chromosome looping at the human alpha-globin locus is mediated via the major upstream regulatory element (HS -40). Blood 2009; 114:4253 - 60; http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-03-213439; PMID: 19696202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulianov SV, Gavrilov AA, Razin SV. Spatial organization of the chicken beta-globin gene domain in erythroid cells of embryonic and adult lineages. Epigenetics Chromatin 2012; 5:16; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-8935-5-16; PMID: 22958419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavrilov AA, Gushchanskaya ES, Strelkova O, Zhironkina O, Kireev II, Iarovaia OV, Razin SV. Disclosure of a structural milieu for the proximity ligation reveals the elusive nature of an active chromatin hub. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 41:3563 - 75; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt067; PMID: 23396278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razin SV, Gavrilov AA, Ioudinkova ES, Iarovaia OV. Communication of genome regulatory elements in a folded chromosome. FEBS Lett 2013; 587:1840 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2013.04.027; PMID: 23651551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misteli T. Concepts in nuclear architecture. Bioessays 2005; 27:477 - 87; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bies.20226; PMID: 15832379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misteli T. Beyond the sequence: cellular organization of genome function. Cell 2007; 128:787 - 800; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.028; PMID: 17320514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne CS, Chakalova L, Brown KE, Carter D, Horton A, Debrand E, Goyenechea B, Mitchell JA, Lopes S, Reik W, et al. Active genes dynamically colocalize to shared sites of ongoing transcription. Nat Genet 2004; 36:1065 - 71; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng1423; PMID: 15361872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faro-Trindade I, Cook PR. Transcription factories: structures conserved during differentiation and evolution. Biochem Soc Trans 2006; 34:1133 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BST0341133; PMID: 17073768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter DR, Eskiw C, Cook PR. Transcription factories. Biochem Soc Trans 2008; 36:585 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BST0360585; PMID: 18631121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland H, Bickmore WA. Transcription factories: gene expression in unions?. Nat Rev Genet 2009; 10:457 - 66; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg2592; PMID: 19506577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razin SV, Gavrilov AA, Pichugin A, Lipinski M, Iarovaia OV, Vassetzky YS. Transcription factories in the context of the nuclear and genome organization. Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 39:9085 - 92; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr683; PMID: 21880598
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook PR. A model for all genomes: the role of transcription factories. J Mol Biol 2010; 395:1 - 10; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2009.10.031; PMID: 19852969
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenfelder S, Clay I, Fraser P. The transcriptional interactome: gene expression in 3D. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2010; 20:127 - 33; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2010.02.002; PMID: 20211559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenfelder S, Sexton T, Chakalova L, Cope NF, Horton A, Andrews S, Kurukuti S, Mitchell JA, Umlauf D, Dimitrova DS, et al. Preferential associations between co-regulated genes reveal a transcriptional interactome in erythroid cells. Nat Genet 2010; 42:53 - 61; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.496; PMID: 20010836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett J, Blagojevic J, Carter D, Eskiw C, Fromaget M, Job C, Shamsher M, Trindade IF, Xu M, Cook PR. Specialized transcription factories. Biochem Soc Symp 2006; 67 - 75; PMID: 16626288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne CS, Chakalova L, Mitchell JA, Horton A, Wood AL, Bolland DJ, Corcoran AE, Fraser P. Myc dynamically and preferentially relocates to a transcription factory occupied by Igh. PLoS Biol 2007; 5:e192; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050192; PMID: 17622196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philonenko ES, Klochkov DB, Borunova VV, Gavrilov AA, Razin SV, Iarovaia OV. TMEM8 - a non-globin gene entrapped in the globin web. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37:7394 - 406; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp838; PMID: 19820109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalczyk MS, Hughes JR, Babbs C, Sanchez-Pulido L, Szumska D, Sharpe JA, Sloane-Stanley JA, Morriss-Kay GM, Smoot LB, Roberts AE, et al. Nprl3 is required for normal development of the cardiovascular system. Mamm Genome 2012; 23:404 - 15; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00335-012-9398-y; PMID: 22538705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flint J, Tufarelli C, Peden J, Clark K, Daniels RJ, Hardison R, Miller W, Philipsen S, Tan-Un KC, McMorrow T, et al. Comparative genome analysis delimits a chromosomal domain and identifies key regulatory elements in the alpha globin cluster. Hum Mol Genet 2001; 10:371 - 82; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hmg/10.4.371; PMID: 11157800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufarelli C, Hardison R, Miller W, Hughes J, Clark K, Ventress N, Frischauf AM, Higgs DR. Comparative analysis of the alpha-like globin clusters in mouse, rat, and human chromosomes indicates a mechanism underlying breaks in conserved synteny. Genome Res 2004; 14:623 - 30; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.2143604; PMID: 15060003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klochkov D, Rincón-Arano H, Ioudinkova ES, Valadez-Graham V, Gavrilov A, Recillas-Targa F, Razin SV. A CTCF-dependent silencer located in the differentially methylated area may regulate expression of a housekeeping gene overlapping a tissue-specific gene domain. Mol Cell Biol 2006; 26:1589 - 97; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.26.5.1589-1597.2006; PMID: 16478981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razin SV, Kekelidze MG, Lukanidin EM, Scherrer K, Georgiev GP. Replication origins are attached to the nuclear skeleton. Nucleic Acids Res 1986; 14:8189 - 207; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/14.20.8189; PMID: 3774556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonis M, Klous P, Splinter E, Moshkin Y, Willemsen R, de Wit E, van Steensel B, de Laat W. Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture-on-chip (4C). Nat Genet 2006; 38:1348 - 54; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng1896; PMID: 17033623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolhuis B, Blom M, Kerkhoven RM, Pagie L, Teunissen H, Nieuwland M, Simonis M, de Laat W, van Lohuizen M, van Steensel B. Interactions among Polycomb domains are guided by chromosome architecture. PLoS Genet 2011; 7:e1001343; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001343; PMID: 21455484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips-Cremins JE, Sauria ME, Sanyal A, Gerasimova TI, Lajoie BR, Bell JS, Ong CT, Hookway TA, Guo C, Sun Y, et al. Architectural protein subclasses shape 3D organization of genomes during lineage commitment. Cell 2013; 153:1281 - 95; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.053; PMID: 23706625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Splinter E, Heath H, Kooren J, Palstra RJ, Klous P, Grosveld F, Galjart N, de Laat W. CTCF mediates long-range chromatin looping and local histone modification in the beta-globin locus. Genes Dev 2006; 20:2349 - 54; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.399506; PMID: 16951251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim TH, Abdullaev ZK, Smith AD, Ching KA, Loukinov DI, Green RD, Zhang MQ, Lobanenkov VV, Ren B. Analysis of the vertebrate insulator protein CTCF-binding sites in the human genome. Cell 2007; 128:1231 - 45; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.048; PMID: 17382889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essien K, Vigneau S, Apreleva S, Singh LN, Bartolomei MS, Hannenhalli S. CTCF binding site classes exhibit distinct evolutionary, genomic, epigenomic and transcriptomic features. Genome Biol 2009; 10:R131; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2009-10-11-r131; PMID: 19922652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakahashi H, Kwon KR, Resch W, Vian L, Dose M, Stavreva D, Hakim O, Pruett N, Nelson S, Yamane A, et al. A genome-wide map of CTCF multivalency redefines the CTCF code. Cell Rep 2013; 3:1678 - 89; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2013.04.024; PMID: 23707059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cayrou C, Coulombe P, Puy A, Rialle S, Kaplan N, Segal E, Méchali M. New insights into replication origin characteristics in metazoans. Cell Cycle 2012; 11:658 - 67; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.11.4.19097; PMID: 22373526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besnard E, Babled A, Lapasset L, Milhavet O, Parrinello H, Dantec C, Marin JM, Lemaitre JM. Unraveling cell type-specific and reprogrammable human replication origin signatures associated with G-quadruplex consensus motifs. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2012; 19:837 - 44; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2339; PMID: 22751019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman-Aiden E, van Berkum NL, Williams L, Imakaev M, Ragoczy T, Telling A, Amit I, Lajoie BR, Sabo PJ, Dorschner MO, et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 2009; 326:289 - 93; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1181369; PMID: 19815776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanyal A, Lajoie BR, Jain G, Dekker J. The long-range interaction landscape of gene promoters. Nature 2012; 489:109 - 13; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11279; PMID: 22955621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermann FA, Cremer M, Walter J, Kreth G, von Hase J, Bauer K, Wienberg J, Cremer C, Cremer T, Solovei I. Arrangements of macro- and microchromosomes in chicken cells. Chromosome Res 2001; 9:569 - 84; http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1012447318535; PMID: 11721954
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbieri M, Fraser J, Lavitas LM, Chotalia M, Dostie J, Pombo A, Nicodemi M. A polymer model explains the complexity of large-scale chromatin folding. Nucleus 2013; 4:267 - 73; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/nucl.25432; PMID: 23823730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagano T, Lubling Y, Stevens TJ, Schoenfelder S, Yaffe E, Dean W, Laue ED, Tanay A, Fraser P. Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure. Nature 2013; 502:59 - 64; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12593; PMID: 24067610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sexton T, Umlauf D, Kurukuti S, Fraser P. The role of transcription factories in large-scale structure and dynamics of interphase chromatin. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2007; 18:691 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2007.08.008; PMID: 17950637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deaton AM, Bird A. CpG islands and the regulation of transcription. Genes Dev 2011; 25:1010 - 22; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.2037511; PMID: 21576262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin S, Pombo A. Transcription factories: quantitative studies of nanostructures in the mammalian nucleus. Chromosome Res 2003; 11:461 - 70; http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024926710797; PMID: 12971722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iborra FJ, Pombo A, Jackson DA, Cook PR. Active RNA polymerases are localized within discrete transcription “factories’ in human nuclei. J Cell Sci 1996; 109:1427 - 36; PMID: 8799830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson DA, Iborra FJ, Manders EM, Cook PR. Numbers and organization of RNA polymerases, nascent transcripts, and transcription units in HeLa nuclei. Mol Biol Cell 1998; 9:1523 - 36; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.9.6.1523; PMID: 9614191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavrilov AA, Zukher IS, Philonenko ES, Razin SV, Iarovaia OV. Mapping of the nuclear matrix-bound chromatin hubs by a new M3C experimental procedure. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 38:8051 - 60; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq712; PMID: 20705651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cayrou C, Coulombe P, Vigneron A, Stanojcic S, Ganier O, Peiffer I, Rivals E, Puy A, Laurent-Chabalier S, Desprat R, et al. Genome-scale analysis of metazoan replication origins reveals their organization in specific but flexible sites defined by conserved features. Genome Res 2011; 21:1438 - 49; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.121830.111; PMID: 21750104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sequeira-Mendes J, Díaz-Uriarte R, Apedaile A, Huntley D, Brockdorff N, Gómez M. Transcription initiation activity sets replication origin efficiency in mammalian cells. PLoS Genet 2009; 5:e1000446; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000446; PMID: 19360092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujita M, Ishimi Y, Nakamura H, Kiyono T, Tsurumi T. Nuclear organization of DNA replication initiation proteins in mammalian cells. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:10354 - 61; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111398200; PMID: 11779870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hozák P, Cook PR. Replication factories. Trends Cell Biol 1994; 4:48 - 52; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0962-8924(94)90009-4; PMID: 14731866
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cseresnyes Z, Schwarz U, Green CM. Analysis of replication factories in human cells by super-resolution light microscopy. BMC Cell Biol 2009; 10:88; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2121-10-88; PMID: 20015367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis RJ. Macromolecular crowding: obvious but underappreciated. Trends Biochem Sci 2001; 26:597 - 604; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0004(01)01938-7; PMID: 11590012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock R. A role for macromolecular crowding effects in the assembly and function of compartments in the nucleus. J Struct Biol 2004; 146:281 - 90; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2003.12.008; PMID: 15099570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marenduzzo D, Micheletti C, Cook PR. Entropy-driven genome organization. Biophys J 2006; 90:3712 - 21; http://dx.doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.105.077685; PMID: 16500976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolis IK, McKay DJ, Mantouvalou E, Lomvardas S, Merika M, Thanos D. Transcription factors mediate long-range enhancer-promoter interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:20222 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0902454106; PMID: 19923429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botta M, Haider S, Leung IX, Lio P, Mozziconacci J. Intra- and inter-chromosomal interactions correlate with CTCF binding genome wide. Mol Syst Biol 2010; 6:426; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/msb.2010.79; PMID: 21045820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zlatanova J, Caiafa P. CCCTC-binding factor: to loop or to bridge. Cell Mol Life Sci 2009; 66:1647 - 60; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-009-8647-z; PMID: 19137260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips JE, Corces VG. CTCF: master weaver of the genome. Cell 2009; 137:1194 - 211; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.001; PMID: 19563753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlsson R, Lobanenkov V, Klenova E. Does CTCF mediate between nuclear organization and gene expression?. Bioessays 2010; 32:37 - 50; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bies.200900118; PMID: 20020479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong CT, Corces VG. CTCF: an architectural protein bridging genome topology and function. Nat Rev Genet 2014; 15:234 - 46; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg3663; PMID: 24614316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee BK, Iyer VR. Genome-wide studies of CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) and cohesin provide insight into chromatin structure and regulation. J Biol Chem 2012; 287:30906 - 13; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R111.324962; PMID: 22952237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Narváez EA, Campos H. Evolutionary rate heterogeneity of Alu repeats upstream of the APOA5 gene: do they regulate APOA5 expression?. J Hum Genet 2008; 53:247 - 53; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10038-008-0245-7; PMID: 18193158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beug H, Doederlein G, Freudenstein C, Graf T. Erythroblast cell lines transformed by a temperature-sensitive mutant of avian erythroblastosis virus: a model system to study erythroid differentiation in vitro. J Cell Physiol Suppl 1982; 1:195 - 207; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcp.1041130427; PMID: 6279674
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beug H, von Kirchbach A, Döderlein G, Conscience JF, Graf T. Chicken hematopoietic cells transformed by seven strains of defective avian leukemia viruses display three distinct phenotypes of differentiation. Cell 1979; 18:375 - 90; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(79)90057-6; PMID: 227607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Splinter E, de Wit E, van de Werken HJ, Klous P, de Laat W. Determining long-range chromatin interactions for selected genomic sites using 4C-seq technology: from fixation to computation. Methods 2012; 58:221 - 30; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.04.009; PMID: 22609568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol 2009; 10:R25; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25; PMID: 19261174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner-Garden M, Frommer M. CpG islands in vertebrate genomes. J Mol Biol 1987; 196:261 - 82; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(87)90689-9; PMID: 3656447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huppert JL, Balasubramanian S. G-quadruplexes in promoters throughout the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:406 - 13; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl1057; PMID: 17169996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlando V. Mapping chromosomal proteins in vivo by formaldehyde-crosslinked-chromatin immunoprecipitation. Trends Biochem Sci 2000; 25:99 - 104; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0004(99)01535-2; PMID: 10694875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotova ES, Sorokina IV, Akopov SB, Nikolaev LG, Sverdlov ED. Expression of chicken CTCF gene in COS-1 cells and partial purification of CTCF protein. Biochemistry (Mosc) 2013; 78:879 - 83; http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S0006297913080038; PMID: 24228875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 2012; 9:357 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1923; PMID: 22388286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Liu T, Meyer CA, Eeckhoute J, Johnson DS, Bernstein BE, Nusbaum C, Myers RM, Brown M, Li W, et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol 2008; 9:R137; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137; PMID: 18798982
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobanenkov VV, Nicolas RH, Plumb MA, Wright CA, Goodwin GH. Sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins which interact with (G + C)-rich sequences flanking the chicken c-myc gene. Eur J Biochem 1986; 159:181 - 8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1986.tb09850.x; PMID: 3743569
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klenova EM, Nicolas RH, Paterson HF, Carne AF, Heath CM, Goodwin GH, Neiman PE, Lobanenkov VV. CTCF, a conserved nuclear factor required for optimal transcriptional activity of the chicken c-myc gene, is an 11-Zn-finger protein differentially expressed in multiple forms. Mol Cell Biol 1993; 13:7612 - 24; PMID: 8246978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar