871
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Clinical and public health research using methylated DNA Immunoprecipitation (MeDIP): A comparison of commercially available kits to examine differential DNA methylation across the genome

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 106-112 | Received 17 Jul 2011, Accepted 03 Nov 2011, Published online: 01 Jan 2012

References

  • Down TA, Rakyan VK, Turner DJ, Flicek P, Li H, Kulesha E, et al. A Bayesian deconvolution strategy for immunoprecipitation-based DNA methylome analysis. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:779 - 85; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt1414; PMID: 18612301
  • Vucic EA, Wilson IM, Campbell JM, Lam WL. Methylation analysis by DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP). Methods Mol Biol 2009; 556:141 - 53; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-192-9_10; PMID: 19488876
  • Bock C, Tomazou EM, Brinkman AB, Muller F, Simmer F, Gu H, et al. Quantitative comparison of genome-wide DNA methylation mapping technologies. Nat Biotechnol 2010; 28:1106 - 14; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1681; PMID: 20852634
  • Reed K, Poulin ML, Yan L, Parissenti AM. Comparison of bisulfite sequencing PCR with pyrosequencing for measuring differences in DNA methylation. Anal Biochem 2010; 397:96 - 106; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2009.10.021; PMID: 19835834
  • Shen R, Fan JB, Campbell D, Chang W, Chen J, Doucet D, et al. High-throughput SNP genotyping on universal bead arrays. Mutat Res 2005; 573:70 - 82; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.07.022; PMID: 15829238
  • Mohn F, Weber M, Schubeler D, Roloff TC. Methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP). Methods Mol Biol 2009; 507:55 - 64; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-522-0_5; PMID: 18987806
  • Serre D, Lee BH, Ting AH. MBD-isolated Genome Sequencing provides a high-throughput and comprehensive survey of DNA methylation in the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 38:391 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp992; PMID: 19906696
  • Irizarry RA, Ladd-Acosta C, Carvalho B, Wu H, Brandenburg SA, Jeddeloh JA, et al. Comprehensive high-throughput arrays for relative methylation (CHARM). Genome Res 2008; 18:780 - 90; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.7301508; PMID: 18316654
  • Karimi M, Johansson S, Stach D, Corcoran M, Grander D, Schalling M, et al. LUMA (LUminometric Methylation Assay)–a high throughput method to the analysis of genomic DNA methylation. Exp Cell Res 2006; 312:1989 - 95; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.03.006; PMID: 16624287
  • Oda M, Greally JM. The HELP assay. Methods Mol Biol 2009; 507:77 - 87; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-522-0_7; PMID: 18987808
  • Ammerpohl O, Martín-Subero JI, Richter J, Vater I, Siebert R. Hunting for the 5th base: Techniques for analyzing DNA methylation. Biochim Biophys Acta 2009; 1790:847-62.
  • Schuebel KE, Chen W, Cope L, Glockner SC, Suzuki H, Yi JM, et al. Comparing the DNA hypermethylome with gene mutations in human colorectal cancer. PLoS Genet 2007; 3:1709 - 23; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0030157; PMID: 17892325
  • Yamashita K, Upadhyay S, Osada M, Hoque MO, Xiao Y, Mori M, et al. Pharmacologic unmasking of epigenetically silenced tumor suppressor genes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Cell 2002; 2:485 - 95; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1535-6108(02)00215-5; PMID: 12498717
  • Nair SS, Coolen MW, Stirzaker C, Song JZ, Statham AL, Strbenac D, et al. Comparison of methyl-DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) and methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD) protein capture for genome-wide DNA methylation analysis reveal CpG sequence coverage bias. Epigenetics 2011; 6:34 - 44; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/epi.6.1.13313; PMID: 20818161
  • Jacinto FV, Ballestar E, Esteller M. Methyl-DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP): hunting down the DNA methylome. Biotechniques 2008; 44:35, 7, 9 passim.
  • Weng YI, Huang TH, Yan PS. Methylated DNA immunoprecipitation and microarray-based analysis: detection of DNA methylation in breast cancer cell lines. Methods Mol Biol 2009; 590:165 - 76; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-378-7_10; PMID: 19763503
  • Harris RA, Wang T, Coarfa C, Nagarajan RP, Hong C, Downey SL, et al. Comparison of sequencing-based methods to profile DNA methylation and identification of monoallelic epigenetic modifications. Nat Biotechnol 2010; 28:1097 - 105; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1682; PMID: 20852635
  • Robinson MD, Stirzaker C, Statham AL, Coolen MW, Song JZ, Nair SS, et al. Evaluation of affinity-based genome-wide DNA methylation data: effects of CpG density, amplification bias, and copy number variation. Genome Res 2010; 20:1719 - 29; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.110601.110; PMID: 21045081
  • Hoque MO, Lee CC, Cairns P, Schoenberg M, Sidransky D. Genome-wide genetic characterization of bladder cancer: a comparison of high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays and PCR-based microsatellite analysis. Cancer Res 2003; 63:2216 - 22; PMID: 12727842
  • Scacheri PC, Crawford GE, Davis S. Statistics for ChIP-chip and DNase hypersensitivity experiments on NimbleGen arrays. Methods Enzymol 2006; 411:270 - 82; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(06)11014-9; PMID: 16939795
  • Myers RM, Stamatoyannopoulos J, Snyder M, Dunham I, Hardison RC, Bernstein BE, et al. A user's guide to the encyclopedia of DNA elements (ENCODE). PLoS Biol 2011; 9:e1001046; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001046; PMID: 21526222

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.