Drosophila dosage compensation

References

• Hallacli E, Akhtar A. X chromosomal regulation in flies: when less is more. Chromosome Res 2009; 17:603 - 619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucchesi JC. The structure-function link of compensated chromatin in Drosophila. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2009; 19:550 - 556
   Google Scholar
• Meyer BJ. Targeting X chromosomes for repression. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2010; 20:179 - 189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ercan S, Giresi PG, Whittle CM, Zhang X, Green RD, Lieb JD. X chromosome repression by localization of the C. elegans dosage compensation machinery to sites of transcription initiation. Nat Genet 2007; 39:403 - 408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonel P, Jans J, Peterson BK, Meyer BJ. Clustered DNA motifs mark X chromosomes for repression by a dosage compensation complex. Nature 2006; 444:614 - 618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blauwkamp TA, Csankovszki G. Two classes of dosage compensation complex binding elements along Caenorhabditis elegans X chromosomes. Mol Cell Biol 2009; 29:2023 - 2031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jans J, Gladden JM, Ralston EJ, Pickle CS, Michel AH, Pferdehirt RR, et al. A condensin-like dosage compensation complex acts at a distance to control expression throughout the genome. Genes Dev 2009; 23:602 - 618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow J, Heard E. X inactivation and the complexities of silencing a sex chromosome. Curr Op Cell Biol 2009; 21:359 - 366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian D, Sun S, Lee JT. The long noncoding RNA, Jpx, is a molecular switch for X chromosome inactivation. Cell 2010; 143:390 - 403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller J, Hart CM, Francis NJ, Vargas ML, Sengupta A, Wild B, et al. Histone methyltransferase activity of a Drosophila polycomb group repressor complex. Cell 2002; 111:197 - 208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva J, Mak W, Zvetkova I, Appanah R, Nesterova TB, Webster Z, et al. Establishment of histone H3 methylation on the inactive X chromosome requires transient recruitment of Eed-Enx1 polycomb group complexes. Dev Cell 2003; 4:481 - 495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Sun BK, Erwin JA, Song JJ, Lee JT. Polycomb proteins targeted by a short repeat RNA to the mouse X chromosome. Science 2008; 322:750 - 756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonkers I, Barakat TS, Achame EM, Monkhorst K, Kenter A, Rentmeester E, et al. RNF12 is an X-encoded dose-dependent activator of X chromosome inactivation. Cell 2009; 139:999 - 1011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin J, Bossenz M, Chung Y, Ma H, Byron M, Taniguchi-Ishigaki N, et al. Maternal Rnf12/RLIM is required for imprinted X-chromosome inactivation in mice. Nature 2010; 467:977 - 981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schütt C, Nöthiger R. Structure, function and evolution of sex-determining systems in Dipteran insects. Development 2000; 127:667 - 677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell LR, Horabin JI, Schedl P, Cline TW. Positive autoregulation of Sex-lethal by alternative splicing maintains the female determined state in Drosophila. Cell 1991; 65:229 - 239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salz HK, Erickson JW. Sex determination in Drosophila: The view from the top. Fly 2010; 4:60 - 70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley RL, Wang J, Bell L, Kuroda MI. Sex lethal controls dosage compensation in Drosophila by a nonsplicing mechanism. Nature 1997; 387:195 - 199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou S, Yang Y, Scott MJ, Pannuti A, Fehr K, Eisen A, et al. Male-specific lethal 2, a dosage compensation gene of Drosophila, undergoes sex-specific regulation and encodes a protein with a RING finger and a metallothionein-like cysteine cluster. EMBO J 1995; 14:2884 - 2895
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bashaw GJ, Baker BS. The regulation of the Drosophila msl-2 gene reveals a function for Sex-lethal in translational control. Cell 1997; 89:789 - 798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckmann K, Grskovic M, Gebauer Ft, Hentze MW. A dual inhibitory mechanism restricts msl-2 mRNA translation for dosage compensation in Drosophila. Cell 2005; 122:529 - 540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley RL, Solovyeva I, Lyman LM, Richman R, Solovyev V, Kuroda MI. Expression of Msl-2 causes assembly of dosage compensation regulators on the X chromosomes and female lethality in Drosophila. Cell 1995; 81:867 - 877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang KA, Kuroda MI. Modulation of MSL1 Abundance in female drosophila contributes to the sex specificity of dosage compensation. Genetics 1998; 150:699 - 709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladstein N, McKeon MN, Horabin JI. Requirement of male-specific dosage compensation in Drosophila females—implications of early X chromosome gene expression. PLoS Genet 2010; 6:1001041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bashaw GJ, Baker BS. The msl-2 dosage compensation gene of Drosophila encodes a putative DNA-binding protein whose expression is sex specifically regulated by Sex-lethal. Development 1995; 121:3245 - 3258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell KA, Hilfiker A, Lucchesi JC. Dosage compensation in Drosophila: the X chromosome binding of MSL-1 and MSL-2 in female embryos is prevented by the early expression of the Sxl gene. Mech Dev 1996; 57:113 - 119
   Google Scholar
• Rastelli L, Richman R, Kuroda MI. The dosage compensation regulators MLE, MSL-1 and MSL-2 are interdependent since early embryogenesis in Drosophila. Mech Dev 1995; 53:223 - 233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uenoyama T, Uchida S, Fukunaga A, Oishi K. Studies on the sex-specific lethals of Drosophila melanogaster. IV. Gynadomorph analysis of thress male-specific lethals mle, msl-227 AND mle(3)132. Genetics 1982; 102:223 - 231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alekseyenko AA, Larschan E, Lai WR, Park PJ, Kuroda MI. High-resolution ChIP-chip analysis reveals that the Drosophila MSL complex selectively identifies active genes on the male X chromosome. Genes Dev 2006 2006; 20:848 - 857
   Google Scholar
• Alekseyenko AA, Peng S, Larschan E, Gorchakov AA, Lee OK, Kharchenko P, et al. A sequence motif within chromatin entry sites directs MSL establishment on the Drosophila X chromosome. Cell 2008; 134:599 - 609
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gilfillan GD, Straub T, de Wit E, Greil F, Lamm R, van Steensel B, et al. Chromosome-wide gene-specific targeting of the Drosophila dosage compensation complex. Genes Dev 2006; 20:858 - 870
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kind J, Vaquerizas JM, Gebhardt P, Gentzel M, Luscombe NM, Bertone P, et al. Genome-wide analysis reveals MOF as a key regulator of dosage compensation and gene expression in Drosophila. Cell 2008; 133:813 - 828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legube G, McWeeney SK, Lercher MJ, Akhtar A. X-chromosome-wide profiling of MSL-1 distribution and dosage compensation in Drosophila. Genes Dev 2006; 20:871 - 883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straub T, Grimaud C, Gilfillan GD, Mitterweger A, Becker PB. The chromosomal high-affinity binding sites for the Drosophila dosage compensation complex. PLoS Genet 2008; 4:1000302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendja S, Taipale M, Kind J, Holz H, Gebhardt P, Schelder M, et al. Nuclear pore components are involved in the transcriptional regulation of dosage compensation in Drosophila. Mol Cell 2006; 21:811 - 823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prestel M, Feller C, Straub T, Mitloehner H, Becker PB. The activation potential of MOF is constrained for dosage compensation. Mol Cell 2010; 38:815 - 826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raja SJ, Charapitsa I, Conrad T, Vaquerizas JM, Gebhardt P, Holz H, et al. The nonspecific lethal complex is a transcriptional regulator in Drosophila. Mol Cell 2010; 38:827 - 841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai Y, Jin J, Swanson SK, Cole MD, Choi SH, Florens L, et al. Subunit composition and substrate specificity of a MOF-containing histone acetyltransferase distinct from the male-specific lethal (MSL) complex. J Biol Chem 2010; 285:4268 - 4272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith ER, Allis CD, Lucchesi JC. Linking global histone acetylation to the transcription enhancement f X-chromosomal genes in Drosophila males. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:31483 - 31486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kind J, Akhtar A. Cotranscriptional recruitment of the dosage compensation complex to X-linked target genes. Genes Dev 2007; 21:2030 - 2040
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fagegaltier D, Baker BS. X Chromosome sites autonomously recruit the dosage compensation complex in Drosophila males. PLoS Biol 2004; 2:341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh H, Bone JR, Kuroda MI. Multiple Classes of MSL binding sites target dosage Compensation to the X chromosome of Drosophila. Curr Biol 2004; 14:481 - 487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorchakov AA, Alekseyenko AA, Kharchenko P, Park PJ, Kuroda M. Long-range spreading of dosage compensation in Drosophila captures transcribed autosomal genes inserted on X. Genes Dev 2009; 23:2266 - 2271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotlikova IV, Demakova OV, Semeshin VF, Shloma VV, Boldyreva LV, Kuroda MI, et al. The Drosophila dosage compensation complex binds to polytene chromosomes independently of developmental changes in transcription. Genetics 2006; 172:963 - 974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelbart ME, Larschan E, Peng S, Park PJ, Kuroda MI. Drosophila MSL complex globally acetylates H4K16 on the male X chromosome for dosage compensation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2009; 16:825 - 832
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pardue ML, Lowenhaupt K, Rich A, Nordheim A. (dCdA)n.(dG-dT)n sequences have evolutionarily conserved chromosomal locations in Drosophila with implications for roles in chromosome structure and function. EMBO J 1987; 6:1781 - 1789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenberg P, Pettersson F, Saura A, Berglund A, Larsson J. Sequence signature analysis of chromosome identity in three Drosophila species. BMC Bioinformatics 2005; 6:158 - 1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley RL, Meller VH, Gordadze PR, Roman G, Davis RL, Kuroda MI. Epigenetic spreading of the Drosophila dosage compensation complex from roX RNA genes into flanking chromatin. Cell 1999; 98:513 - 522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilfillan GD, Koenig C, Dahlsveen IK, Prakoura N, Straub T, Lamm R, et al. Cumulative contributions of weak DNA determinants to targeting the Drosophila dosage compensation complex. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:3561 - 3572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallach M, Arnau V, Aldecoa R, Marin I. A sequence motif enriched in regions bound by the Drosophila dosage compensation complex. BMC Genomics 2010; 11:169 - 1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallach M, Arnau V, Marin I. Global patterns of sequence evolution in Drosophila. BMC Genomics 2007; 8:408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shilatifard A. Chromatin modifications by methylation and ubiquitination: Implications in the regulation of gene expression. Ann Rev Biochem 2006; 75:243 - 269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anamika K, Krebs AR, Thompson J, Poch O, Devys D, Tora L. Lessons from genome-wide studies: an integrated definition of the coactivator function of histone acetyl transferases. Epigenetics Chromatin 2010; 3:18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrozza MJ, Utley RT, Workman JL, Cote J. The diverse functions of histone acetyltransferase complexes. Trends Genet 2003; 19:321 - 329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdone L, Agricola E, Caserta M, Di Mauro E. Histone acetylation in gene regulation. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic 2006; 5:209 - 221
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Akhtar A, Becker PB. Activation of transcription through histone H4 acetylation by MOF, an acetyltransferase essential for dosage compensation in Drosophila. Mol Cell 2000; 5:367 - 375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bone JR, Kuroda MI. Dosage compensation regulatory proteins and the evolution of sex chromosomes in Drosophila. Genetics 1996; 144:705 - 713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilfiker A, Hilfiker-Kleiner D, Pannuti A, Lucchesi JC. mof, a putative acetyl transferase gene related to the Tip60 and MOZ human genes and to the SAS genes of yeast, is required for dosage compensation in Drosophila. EMBO J 1997; 16:2054 - 2060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell O, Schwaiger M, Oakeley EJ, Lienert F, Beisel C, Stadler MB, et al. Accessibility of the Drosophila genome discriminates PcG repression, H4K16 acetylation and replication timing. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2010; 17:894 - 900
   Google Scholar
• Shogren-Knaak M, Ishii H, Sun JM, Pazin MJ, Davie JR, Peterson CL. Histone H4-K16 acetylation controls chromatin structure and protein interactions. Science 2006; 311:844 - 847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin Y, Wang Y, Johansen Jr, Johansen KM. Jil-1, a Chromosomal kinase implicated in regulation of chromatin structure, associates with the male specific lethal (Msl) dosage compensation complex. J Cell Biol 2000; 149:1005 - 1010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenuwein T, Allis CD. Translating the Histone Code. Science 2001; 293:1074 - 1080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas T, Dixon MP, Kueh AJ, Voss AK. Mof (MYST1 or KAT8) is essential for progression of embryonic development past the blastocyst stage and required for normal chromatin architecture. Mol Cell Biol 2008; 28:5093 - 5105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Guerin-Peyrou TG, Sharma GG, Park C, Agarwal M, Ganju RK, et al. The mammalian ortholog of Drosophila MOF that acetylates histone H4 lysine 16 is essential for embryogenesis and oncogenesis. Mol Cell Biol 2008; 28:397 - 409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Corsa CA, Pan PW, Wu L, Ferguson D, Yu X, et al. MOF and H4 K16 acetylation play important roles in DNA damage repair by modulating recruitment of DNA damage repair protein Mdc1. Mol Cell Biol 2010; 30:5335 - 5347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma GG, So S, Gupta A, Kumar R, Cayrou C, Avvakumov N, et al. MOF and histone H4 acetylation at lysine 16 are critical for DNA damage response and double-strand break repair. Mol Cell Biol 2010; 30:3582 - 3595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taipale M, Rea S, Richter K, Vilar A, Lichter P, Imhof A, et al. hMOF histone acetyltransferase is required for histone H4 lysine 16 acetylation in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25:6798 - 6810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Sharma GG, Young CS, Agarwal M, Smith ER, Paull TT, et al. Involvement of human MOF in ATM function. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25:5292 - 5305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith ER, Cayrou C, Huang R, Lane WS, Cĉté J, Lucchesi J. A human protein complex homologous to the Drosophila MSL complex is responsible for the majority of histone H4 acetylation at lysine 16. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25:9175 - 9188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell O, Conrad T, Kind J, Wirbelauer C, Akhtar A, Schübeler D. Transcription-coupled methylation of histone H3 at lysine 36 regulates dosage compensation by enhancing recruitment of the MSL complex in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Cell Biol 2008; 28:3401 - 3409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larschan E, Alekseyenko AA, Gortchakov AA, Peng S, Li B, Yang P, et al. MSL complex is attracted to genes marked by H3K36 trimethylation using a sequence-independent mechanism. Molecular Cell 2007; 28:121 - 133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barski A, Cuddapah S, Cui K, Roh TY, Schones DE, Wang Z, et al. High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell 2007; 129:823 - 837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pokholok DK, Harbison CT, Levine S, Cole M, Hannett NM, Lee TI, et al. Genome-wide map of nucleosome acetylation and methylation in yeast. Cell 2005; 122:517 - 527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim D, Blus BJ, Chandra V, Huang P, Rastinejad F, Khorasanizadeh S. Corecognition of DNA and a methylated histone tail by the MSL3 chromodomain. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2010; 17:1027 - 1029
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore SA, Ferhatoglu Y, Jia Y, Al-Jiab RA, Scott MJ. Structural and biochemical studies on the chromobarrel domain of male specific lethal 3 (MSL3) reveal a binding preference for mono or dimethyl lysine 20 on histone H4. J Biol Chem 2010; 285:40879 - 40890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng H, Zhang W, Bao X, Martin J, Girton J, Johansen J, et al. The JIL-1 kinase regulates the structure of Drosophila polytene chromosomes. Chromosoma 2005; 114:173 - 182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin Y, Wang Y, Walker DL, Dong H, Conley C, Johansen J, et al. JIL-1: a novel chromosomal tandem kinase implicated in transcriptional regulation in Drosophila. Molecular Cell 1999; 4:129 - 135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Zhang W, Jin Y, Johansen Jr, Johansen KM. The JIL-1 tandem kinase mediates histone H3 phosphorylation and is required for maintenance of chromatin structure in Drosophila. Cell 2001; 105:433 - 443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Jin Y, Ji Y, Girton J, Johansen J, Johansen KM. Genetic and phenotypic analysis of alleles of the Drosophila chromosomal JIL-1 kinase reveals a functional requirement at multiple developmental stages. Genetics 2003; 165:1341 - 1354
   Google Scholar
• Ivaldi MS, Karam CS, Corces VG. Phosphorylation of histone H3 at Ser10 facilitates RNA polymerase II release from promoter-proximal pausing in Drosophila. Genes Dev 2007; 21:2818 - 2831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zippo A, Serafini R, Rocchigiani M, Pennacchini S, Krepelova A, Oliviero S. Histone crosstalk between H3S10ph and H4K16ac generates a histone code that mediates transcription elongation. Cell 2009; 138:1122 - 1136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karam CS, Kellner WA, Takenaka N, Clemmons AW, Corces VG. 14-3-3 mediates histone cross-talk during transcription elongation in Drosophila. PLoS Genet 2010; 6:1000975 - 1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler GS, Kristjuhan A, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Svejstrup JQ. Elongator is a histone H3 and H4 acetyltransferase important for normal histone acetylation levels in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99:3517 - 3522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai W, Bao X, Deng H, Jin Y, Girton J, Johansen J, et al. RNA polymerase II-mediated transcription at active loci does not require histone H3S10 phosphorylation in Drosophila. Development 2008; 135:2917 - 2925
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciurciu A, Komonyi O, Boros IM. Loss of ATAC-specific acetylation of histone H4 at Lys12 reduces binding of JIL-1 to chromatin and phosphorylation of histone H3 at Ser10. J Cell Sci 2008; 121:3366 - 3372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng H, Bao X, Cai W, Blacketer MJ, Belmont AS, Girton J, et al. Ectopic histone H3S10 phosphorylation causes chromatin structure remodeling in Drosophila. Development 2008; 135:699 - 705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Deng H, Bao X, Lerach S, Girton J, Johansen Jr, et al. The JIL-1 histone H3S10 kinase regulates dimethyl H3K9 modifications and heterochromatic spreading in Drosophila. Development 2006; 133:229 - 235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng H, Cai W, Wang C, Lerach S, Delattre M, Girton J, et al. JIL-1 and Su(var)3-7 interact genetically and counteract each other's effect on position-effect variegation in Drosophila. Genetics 2010; 185:1183 - 1192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze SR, Wallrath LL. Gene regulation by chromatin structure: Paradigms established in Drosophila melanogaster. Ann Rev Entomol 2006; 52:171 - 192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mito Y, Henikoff JG, Henikoff S. Genome-scale profiling of histone H3.3 replacement patterns. Nat Genet 2005; 37:1090 - 1097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furuhashi H, Nakajima M, Hirose S. DNA super-coiling factor contributes to dosage compensation in Drosophila. Development 2006; 133:4475 - 4483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deuring R, Fanti L, Armstrong JA, Sarte M, Papoulas O, Prestel M, et al. The ISWI chromatin-remodeling protein is required for gene expression and the maintenance of higher order chromatin structure in vivo. Mol Cell 2000; 5:355 - 365
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bai X, Larschan E, Kwon SY, Badenhorst P, Kuroda MI. Regional control of chromatin organization by noncoding roX RNAs and the NURF remodeling complex in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 2007; 176:1491 - 1499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spierer A, Seum C, Delattre M, Spierer P. Loss of the modifiers of variegation Su(var)3-7 or HP1 impacts male X polytene chromosome morphology and dosage compensation. J Cell Sci 2005; 118:5047 - 5057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patalano S, Mihailovich M, Belacortu Y, Paricio N, Gebauer F. Dual sex-specific functions of Drosophila Upstream of N-ras in the control of X chromosome dosage compensation. Development 2009; 136:689 - 698
   Google Scholar
• Spierer A, Begeot F, Spierer P, Delattre M. SU(VAR)3-7 Links Heterochromatin and Dosage Compensation in Drosophila. PLoS Genet 2008; 4:1000066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Q, Barkess Gi, Qian H. Chromatin looping and the probability of transcription. Trends Genet 2006; 22:197 - 202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunesdogan U, Jackle H. Herzig A. A genetic system to assess in vivo the functions of histones and histone modifications in higher eukaryotes. EMBO Rep 2010; 11:772 - 776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetze S, Mateos-Langerak J, van Driel R. Three-dimensional genome organization in interphase and its relation to genome function. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2007; 18:707 - 714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehler A, Hurt E. Gene Regulation by nucleoporins and links to cancer. Mol Cell 2010; 38:6 - 15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolzer A, Kreth G, Solovei I, Koehler D, Saracoglu K, Fauth C, et al. Three-dimensional maps of all chromosomes in human male fibroblast nuclei and prometaphase rosettes. PLoS Biol 2005; 3:157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cremer T, Cremer C. Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells. Nat Rev Genet 2001; 2:292 - 301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown KE, Baxter J, Graf D, Merkenschlager M, Fisher AG. Dynamic repositioning of genes in the nucleus of lymphocytes preparing for cell division. Mol Cell 1999; 3:207 - 217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambeyron S, Bickmore WA. Does looping and clustering in the nucleus regulate gene expression?. Curr Op Cell Biol 2004; 16:256 - 262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimaud C, Becker PB. Form and function of dosage-compensated chromosomes—a chicken-and-egg relationship. Bioessays 2010; 32:709 - 717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpi EV, Chevret E, Jones T, Vatcheva R, Williamson J, Beck S, et al. Large-scale chromatin organization of the major histocompatibility complex and other regions of human chromosome 6 and its response to interferon in interphase nuclei. J Cell Sci 2000; 113:1565 - 1576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhtar A, Gasser SM. The nuclear envelope and transcriptional control. Nat Rev Genet 2007; 8:507 - 517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon BB, Sarma NJ, Pasula S, Deminoff SJ, Willis KA, Barbara KE, et al. Reverse recruitment: The Nup84 nuclear pore subcomplex mediates Rap1/Gcr1/Gcr2 transcriptional activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:5749 - 5754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland H, Bickmore WA. Transcription factories: gene expression in unions?. Nat Rev Genet 2009; 10:457 - 466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misteli T. Concepts in nuclear architecture. Bioessays 2005; 27:477 - 487
   Google Scholar
• Papantonis A, Cook PR. Genome architecture and the role of transcription. Cur Opin Cell Biol 2010; 22:271 - 276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarma NJ, Haley TM, Barbara KE, Buford TD, Willis KA, Santangelo GM. Glucose-responsive regulators of gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae function at the nuclear periphery via a reverse recruitment mechanism. Genetics 2007; 175:1127 - 1135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dieppois G, Stutz F. Connecting the transcription site to the nuclear pore: a multi-tether process that regulates gene expression. J Cell Sci 2010; 123:1989 - 1999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmody SR, Wente SR. mRNA nuclear export at a glance. J Cell Sci 2009; 122:1933 - 1937
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lainé JP, Singh BN, Krishnamurthy S, Hampsey M. A physiological role for gene loops in yeast. Genes Dev 2009; 23:2604 - 2609
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tan-Wong SM, Wijayatilake HD, Proudfoot NJ. Gene loops function to maintain transcriptional memory through interaction with the nuclear pore complex. Genes Dev 2009; 23:2610 - 2624
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Titus LC, Dawson TR, Rexer DJ, Ryan KJ, Wente SR. Members of the RSC chromatin-remodeling complex are required for maintaining proper nuclear envelope structure and pore complex localization. Mol Biol Cell 2010; 21:1072 - 1087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed S, Brickner DG, Light WH, Cajigas I, McDonough M, Froyshteter AB, et al. DNA zip codes control an ancient mechanism for gene targeting to the nuclear periphery. Nat Cell Biol 2010; 12:111 - 118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurshakova MM, Krasnov AN, Kopytova DV, Shidlovskii YV, Nikolenko JV, Nabirochkina EN, et al. SAGA and a novel Drosophila export complex anchor efficient transcription and mRNA export to NPC. EMBO J 2007; 26:4956 - 4965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brickner DG, Cajigas I, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, Ahmed S, Lee PC, Widom J, et al. H2A.Z-mediated localization of genes at the nuclear periphery confers epigenetic memory of previous transcriptional state. PLoS Biol 2007; 5:81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dieppois G, Iglesias N, Stutz F. Cotranscriptional recruitment to the mRNA export receptor Mex67p contributes to nuclear pore anchoring of activated genes. Mol Cell Biol 2006; 26:7858 - 7870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou C, Dale R, Dean A. Cell type specificity of chromatin organization mediated by CTCF and cohesin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107:3651 - 3656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlsson R, Lobanenkov V, Klenova E. Does CTCF mediate between nuclear organization and gene expression?. Bioessays 2010; 32:37 - 50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Casolari JM, Brown CR, Komili S, West J, Hieronymus H, Silver PA. Genome-wide localization of the nuclear transport machinery couples transcriptional status and nuclear organization. Cell 2004; 117:427 - 439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luthra R, Kerr SC, Harreman MT, Apponi LH, Fasken MB, Ramineni S, et al. Actively transcribed GAL genes can be physically linked to the nuclear pore by the SAGA chromatin modifying complex. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:3042 - 3049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid M, Arib G, Laemmli C, Nishikawa J, Durussel T, Laemmli UK. Nup-PI: the nucleopore-promoter interaction of genes in yeast. Mol Cell 2006; 21:379 - 391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabut G, Lénárt P, Ellenberg J. Dynamics of nuclear pore complex organization through the cell cycle. Cur Op Cell Biol 2004; 16:314 - 321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimowska G, Aris JP, Paddy MR. A Drosophila Tpr protein homolog is localized both in the extrachromosomal channel network and to nuclear pore complexes. J Cell Sci 1997; 110:927 - 944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimowska G, Paddy MR. Structures and dynamics of Drosophila Tpr inconsistent with a static, filamentous structure. Exp Cell Res 2002; 276:223 - 232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capelson M, Liang Y, Schulte R, Mair W, Wagner U, Hetzer MW. Chromatin-bound nuclear pore components regulate gene expression in higher eukaryotes. Cell 2010; 140:372 - 383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalverda B, Pickersgill H, Shloma VV, Fornerod M. Nucleoporins directly stimulate expression of developmental and cell cycle genes inside the nucleoplasm. Cell 2010; 140:360 - 371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaquerizas JM, Suyama R, Kind J, Miura K, Luscombe NM, Akhtar A. Nuclear pore proteins nup153 and megator define transcriptionally active regions in the Drosophila genome. PLoS Genet 2010; 6:1000846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenfelder S, Sexton T, Chakalova L, Cope NF, Horton A, Andrews S, et al. Preferential associations between co-regulated genes reveal a transcriptional interactome in erythroid cells. Nat Genet 2010; 42:53 - 61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimaud C, Becker PB. The dosage compensation complex shapes the conformation of the X chromosome in Drosophila. Genes Dev 2009; 23:2490 - 2495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar