References
- U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy. Coordinated framework for regulation of biotechnology; announcement of policy; notice for public comment. Fed Regist 1986; 51:23302 - 50; PMID: 11655807
- Food and Drug Administration. Statement of policy: foods derived from new plant varieties. Fed Regist 1992; 57:22,983 - 23,001
- Food and Drug Administration. Statement of policy: foods derived from new plant varieties. Fed Regist 1992; 57:22,984 - 22,985
- Food and Drug Administration. Statement of policy: foods derived from new plant varieties. Fed Regist 1992; 57:22,991
- Food and Drug Administration. Statement of policy: foods derived from new plant varieties. Fed Regist 1992; 57:22,991
- Alliance for Bio-Integrity v. Shalala, 116 F.Supp.2d 166 (D.D.C. 2000).
- Alliance for Bio-Integrity v. Shalala, 116 F.Supp.2d 166 (D.D.C. 2000at 178 n8.
- Food and Drug Administration. Biotechnology in the year 2000 and beyond; public meetings. Fed Regist 1999; 64:57,470 - 57,472
- Food and Drug Administration. Draft guidance for industry: voluntary labeling indicating whether foods have or have not been developed using bioengineering; notice. Fed Regist 2011; 66:4839 - 42
- Guidance for industry: voluntary labeling indicating whether foods have or have not been developed using bioengineering [Internet]. Washington (DC): Food and Drug Administration: cJan. 2011 [cited 2013 June 6]. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/LabelingNutrition/ucm059098.htm.
- Food and Drug Administration. Food labeling; labeling of food made from Aquadvantage salmon; public hearing; request for comments; Veterinary Medicine Advisory Committee notice of meeting; notices. Fed Regist 2010; 75:52601 - 5
- General Election Abstract of Votes; State Measure No. 27 (2002) [Internet]. Salem (OR): State of Oregon; c2002 [cited 2013 June 6]. Available from: http://oregonvotes.org/doc/history/nov52002/abstract/m27.pdf.
- Statement of Vote. Nov. 6, 2012, General Election (2012) [Internet]. Sacramento (CA); State of California: c2012 [cited 2013 June 6]. Available from: http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2012-general/sov-complete.pdf
- Welcome (2013) [Internet]. Bellingham (WA): Non-GMO Project: c2013 [cited 2013 June 6]. Available at http://www.nongmoproject.org/.
- Strom S. Major grocer to label foods with gene-modified content. N.Y. Times, March 8, 2013.
- National opinion poll on labeling of genetically modified foods [Internet]. Mobile (AL): Center for Science in the Public Interest: c2001 [cited 2013 June 6]. Available from: http://www.cspinet.com/new/poll_gefoods.html.
- Consumer perceptions of food technology [Internet]. Washington (DC): International Food Information Council: c2012 [cited 2013 June 6. Available from: http://www.foodinsight.org/Content/5438/FINAL%20Executive%20Summary%205-8-12.pdf.
- Adoption of Genetically Engineered Crops in the U.S. [Internet]. Washington (DC): United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service: c2012), available at http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/adoption-of-genetically-engineered-crops-in-the-us/recent-trends-in-ge-adoption.aspx#.Ua96tZzHYdk.
- Text of California Proposition 37 [Internet]. Ballotpedia: c2012 November [cited 2013 June 6]. Available from: http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Text_of_California_Proposition_37_%28November_2012%29.
- Cummins R, Paul K. Monsanto’s next target: democracy. AlterNet, Apr. 8, 2013.
- Sewell A. Label It Yourself' campaign — citizen action to label GMOs [Internet]. Digital J: c2012 March 20 [cited 2013 June 6]. Available from: http://digitaljournal.com/article/321535.
- National Research Council. Genetically modified pest-protected plants: science and regulation. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 2000.
- Report 2 of the Council on Science and Public Health (A-12), labeling of bioengineered foods (resolutions 508 and 509-a-11) (reference committee e) [Internet]. Washington (DC): American Medical Association: c2012 [cited 2013 June 6]. Available from: https://www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/443/a12-csaph2-bioengineeredfoods.pdf.
- Statement by the AAAS Board of Directors On labeling of genetically modified foods [Internet]. Washington (DC): American Association for the Advancement of Science: c2012 October 20 [c2013 June 20]. Available from: http://www.aaas.org/news/releases/2012/media/AAAS_GM_statement.pdf.
- Séralini GE, Clair E, Mesnage R, Gress S, Defarge N, Malatesta M, Hennequin D, de Vendômois JS. Long term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize. Food Chem Toxicol 2012; 50:4221 - 31; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2012.08.005; PMID: 22999595
- European Food Safety Authority. Review of the Séralini et al. (2012) publication on a 2 - year rodent feeding study with glyphosate formulations and GM maize NK603 as published online on 19 September 2012 in Food and Chemical Toxicology. EFSA Journal 2012; 10:291
- Robert W, Lerayer A, Fedoroff N, Giddings LV, Strauss SH, Leaver C, Shantharam S, Potrykus I, Fellous M, Burachik M, et al. We request a serious reconsideration of the recent paper by Seralini et al. alleging tumorigenesis in rats resulting from consumption of corn derived from crops improved through biotechnology (Séralini et al., 2012). Food Chem Toxicol 2013; 53:455 - 6; PMID: 23142392
- Revkin AC. Single-study syndrome and the G.M.O [Internet]. New York (NY): Food Fight, N.Y.Times Dot Earth; c2012 September 20 [cited 2013 June 6]. Available from: http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/20/the-gmo-food-fight-rats-cancer-and-single-study-syndrome/.
- Kassel v. Consolidated Freightways Corporation of Delaware, 450 U.S. 662 (1981).
- Int'l Dairy Foods Ass'n v. Amestoy, 92 F.3d 67 (2d Cir. 1996).
- Teisl MF, Caswell JA. Information policy and genetically modified food: weighing the benefits and costs. U. Mass. Amherst Dept Resource Econ Working Paper No. 2003-1 (2003).
- Miller HI. A rational approach to labeling biotech-derived foods. Science 1999; 284:1471 - 2; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5419.1471; PMID: 10383324
- Marchant GE, Cardineau GA, Reddick TP. Thwarting consumer choice: the case against mandatory labeling for genetically modified foods. Washington, D.C.: AEI Press, 2010.
- Just Label It [Internet]. Washington (DC): Just Label It: c2013 [cited 2013 June 6]. Available from: www.justlabelit.org.
- Carter CA, Gruère GP. Mandatory labeling of genetically modified foods: does it really provide consumer choice?. AgBioForum 2003; 6:69
- Bronner D. Labeling is the only way to win. The Organic and Non-GMO Report, Sept. 1, 2011, available at http://nongmoreport.com/articles/september2011/bronnergmfoodlabeling.php.
- Cummins R. Open letter to the organic community: the California ballot initiative to label GMOs, Aug. 2, 2012, available at https://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/08/02-0.
- Cummins R. No More GMOs! Please Donate Today, Organic Consumers Association (June 4, 2013), available at http://www.organicconsumers.org/fundraising.htm.
- Cummins R. Millions against Monsanto: the food fight of our lives. AlterNet, April 11, 2012, available at http://www.alternet.org/story/154951/millions_against_monsanto%3A_the_food_fight_of_our_lives).