Regulation of cellular chromatin state

References

• Bird A. DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes Dev 2002; 16:6 - 21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner BM. Defining an epigenetic code. Nat Cell Biol 2007; 9:2 - 6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaeser MD, Emerson BM. Remodeling plans for cellular specialization: unique styles for every room. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2006; 16:508 - 512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reik W. Stability and flexibility of epigenetic gene regulation in mammalian development. Nature 2007; 447:425 - 432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadorn E. Constancy, variation and type of determination and differentiation in cells from male genitalia rudiments of Drosophila melanogaster in permanent culture in vivo. Dev Biol 1966; 13:424 - 509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffman SA. Control circuits for determination and transdetermination. Science 1973; 181:310 - 318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan Q, Yoshida T, McDonald OG, Owens GK. Concise review: epigenetic mechanisms contribute to pluripotency and cell lineage determination of embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 2007; 25:2 - 9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zernicka-Goetz M, Morris SA, Bruce AW. Making a firm decision: multifaceted regulation of cell fate in the early mouse embryo. Nat Rev Genet 2009; 10:467 - 477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson JC, Lemons D, McGinnis W. Modulating Hox gene functions during animal body patterning. Nat Rev Genet 2005; 6:893 - 904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charge SB, Rudnicki MA. Cellular and molecular regulation of muscle regeneration. Physiol Rev 2004; 84:209 - 238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deschamps J, van NJ. Developmental regulation of the Hox genes during axial morphogenesis in the mouse. Development 2005; 132:2931 - 2942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botas J. Control of morphogenesis and differentiation by HOM/Hox genes. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1993; 5:1015 - 1022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinnis W, Krumlauf R. Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell 1992; 68:283 - 302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hombria JC, Lovegrove B. Beyond homeosis—HOX function in morphogenesis and organogenesis. Differentiation 2003; 71:461 - 476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneuwly S, Klemenz R, Gehring WJ. Redesigning the body plan of Drosophila by ectopic expression of the homoeotic gene Antennapedia. Nature 1987; 325:816 - 818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis EB. A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila. Nature 1978; 276:565 - 570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz YB, Pirrotta V. Polycomb silencing mechanisms and the management of genomic programmes. Nat Rev Genet 2007; 8:9 - 22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuettengruber B, Chourrout D, Vervoort M, Leblanc B, Cavalli G. Genome regulation by polycomb and trithorax proteins. Cell 2007; 128:735 - 745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlando V, Jane EP, Chinwalla V, Harte PJ, Paro R. Binding of trithorax and Polycomb proteins to the bithorax complex: dynamic changes during early Drosophila embryogenesis. EMBO J 1998; 17:5141 - 5150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracken AP, Dietrich N, Pasini D, Hansen KH, Helin K. Genome-wide mapping of Polycomb target genes unravels their roles in cell fate transitions. Genes Dev 2006; 20:1123 - 1136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan CS, Rastelli L, Pirrotta V. A Polycomb response element in the Ubx gene that determines an epigenetically inherited state of repression. EMBO J 1994; 13:2553 - 2564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller J, Bienz M. Long range repression conferring boundaries of Ultrabithorax expression in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J 1991; 10:3147 - 3155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon J, Chiang A, Bender W, Shimell MJ, O’Connor M. Elements of the Drosophila bithorax complex that mediate repression by Polycomb group products. Dev Biol 1993; 158:131 - 144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillib S, Petruk S, Sedkov Y, Kuzin A, Fujioka M, Goto T, et al. Trithorax- and Polycomb-group response elements within an Ultrabithorax transcription maintenance unit consist of closely situated but separable sequences. Mol Cell Biol 1999; 19:5189 - 5202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz YB, Kahn TG, Dellino GI, Pirrotta V. Polycomb silencing mechanisms in Drosophila. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 2004; 69:301 - 308
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soshnikova N, Duboule D. Epigenetic regulation of Hox gene activation: the waltz of methyls. Bioessays 2008; 30:199 - 202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klymenko T, Muller J. The histone methyltransferases Trithorax and Ash1 prevent transcriptional silencing by Polycomb group proteins. EMBO Rep 2004; 5:373 - 377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz YB, Kahn TG, Nix DA, Li XY, Bourgon R, Biggin M, et al. Genome-wide analysis of Polycomb targets in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Genet 2006; 38:700 - 705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolhuis B, de WE, Muijrers I, Teunissen H, Talhout W, van SB, et al. Genome-wide profiling of PRC1 and PRC2 Polycomb chromatin binding in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Genet 2006; 38:694 - 699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blastyak A, Mishra RK, Karch F, Gyurkovics H. Efficient and specific targeting of Polycomb group proteins requires cooperative interaction between Grainyhead and Pleiohomeotic. Mol Cell Biol 2006; 26:1434 - 1444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujioka M, Yusibova GL, Zhou J, Jaynes JB. The DNA-binding Polycomb-group protein Pleiohomeotic maintains both active and repressed transcriptional states through a single site. Development 2008; 135:4131 - 4139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohd-Sarip A, Venturini F, Chalkley GE, Verrijzer CP. Pleiohomeotic can link polycomb to DNA and mediate transcriptional repression. Mol Cell Biol 2002; 22:7473 - 7483
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mohd-Sarip A, Cleard F, Mishra RK, Karch F, Verrijzer CP. Synergistic recognition of an epigenetic DNA element by Pleiohomeotic and a Polycomb core complex. Genes Dev 2005; 19:1755 - 1760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oktaba K, Gutierrez L, Gagneur J, Girardot C, Sengupta AK, Furlong EE, et al. Dynamic regulation by polycomb group protein complexes controls pattern formation and the cell cycle in Drosophila. Dev Cell 2008; 15:877 - 889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Brown JL, Cao R, Zhang Y, Kassis JA, Jones RS. Hierarchical recruitment of polycomb group silencing complexes. Mol Cell 2004; 14:637 - 646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock HW, van LM. The Polycomb group—no longer an exclusive club?. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2001; 11:175 - 181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negre N, Hennetin J, Sun LV, Lavrov S, Bellis M, White KP, et al. Chromosomal distribution of PcG proteins during Drosophila development. PLoS Biol 2006; 4:170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuettengruber B, Ganapathi M, Leblanc B, Portoso M, Jaschek R, Tolhuis B, et al. Functional anatomy of polycomb and trithorax chromatin landscapes in Drosophila embryos. PLoS Biol 2009; 7:13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra RK, Yamagishi T, Vasanthi D, Ohtsuka C, Kondo T. Involvement of polycomb-group genes in establishing HoxD temporal colinearity. Genesis 2007; 45:570 - 576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sing A, Pannell D, Karaiskakis A, Sturgeon K, Djabali M, Ellis J, et al. A vertebrate Polycomb response element governs segmentation of the posterior hindbrain. Cell 2009; 138:885 - 897
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson F, Pratt H, Atchison ML. PcG recruitment by the YY1 REPO domain can be mediated by Yaf2. J Cell Biochem 2009;
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer LA, Plath K, Zeitlinger J, Brambrink T, Medeiros LA, Lee TI, et al. Polycomb complexes repress developmental regulators in murine embryonic stem cells. Nature 2006; 441:349 - 353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senthilkumar R, Mishra RK. Novel motifs distinguish multiple homologues of Polycomb in vertebrates: expansion and diversification of the epigenetic toolkit. BMC Genomics 2009; 10:549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon JA, Kingston RE. Mechanisms of polycomb gene silencing: knowns and unknowns. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009; 10:697 - 708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz YB, Pirrotta V. Polycomb complexes and epigenetic states. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2008; 20:266 - 273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon JA, Tamkun JW. Programming off and on states in chromatin: mechanisms of Polycomb and trithorax group complexes. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2002; 12:210 - 218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azuara V, Perry P, Sauer S, Spivakov M, Jorgensen HF, John RM, et al. Chromatin signatures of pluripotent cell lines. Nat Cell Biol 2006; 8:532 - 538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein BE, Mikkelsen TS, Xie X, Kamal M, Huebert DJ, Cuff J, et al. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 2006; 125:315 - 326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ku M, Koche RP, Rheinbay E, Mendenhall EM, Endoh M, Mikkelsen TS, et al. Genomewide analysis of PRC1 and PRC2 occupancy identifies two classes of bivalent domains. PLoS Genet 2008; 4:1000242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soshnikova N, Duboule D. Epigenetic temporal control of mouse Hox genes in vivo. Science 2009; 324:1320 - 1323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soshnikova N, Duboule D. Epigenetic regulation of vertebrate Hox genes: A dynamic equilibrium. Epigenetics 2009; 4
   Google Scholar
• Hansen KH, Bracken AP, Pasini D, Dietrich N, Gehani SS, Monrad A, et al. A model for transmission of the H3K27me3 epigenetic mark. Nat Cell Biol 2008; 10:1291 - 1300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis NJ, Follmer NE, Simon MD, Aghia G, Butler JD. Polycomb proteins remain bound to chromatin and DNA during DNA replication in vitro. Cell 2009; 137:110 - 122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra BP, Ansari KI, Mandal SS. Dynamic association of MLL1, H3K4 trimethylation with chromatin and Hox gene expression during the cell cycle. FEBS J 2009; 276:1629 - 1640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coller HA, Sang L, Roberts JM. A new description of cellular quiescence. PLoS Biol 2006; 4:83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider C, King RM, Philipson L. Genes specifically expressed at growth arrest of mammalian cells. Cell 1988; 54:787 - 793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppock DL, Kopman C, Scandalis S, Gilleran S. Preferential gene expression in quiescent human lung fibroblasts. Cell Growth Differ 1993; 4:483 - 493
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Venezia TA, Merchant AA, Ramos CA, Whitehouse NL, Young AS, Shaw CA, et al. Molecular signatures of proliferation and quiescence in hematopoietic stem cells. PLoS Biol 2004; 2:301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekholm SV, Reed SI. Regulation of G(1) cyclin-dependent kinases in the mammalian cell cycle. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2000; 12:676 - 684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais A, Dynlacht BD. E2F-associated chromatin modifiers and cell cycle control. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2007; 19:658 - 662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Infante A, Laresgoiti U, Fernandez-Rueda J, Fullaondo A, Galan J, az-Uriarte R, et al. E2F2 represses cell cycle regulators to maintain quiescence. Cell Cycle 2008; 7:3915 - 3927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frolov MV, Dyson NJ. Molecular mechanisms of E2F-dependent activation and pRB-mediated repression. J Cell Sci 2004; 117:2173 - 2181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyagi S, Chabes AL, Wysocka J, Herr W. E2F activation of S phase promoters via association with HCF-1 and the MLL family of histone H3K4 methyltransferases. Mol Cell 2007; 27:107 - 119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ait-Si-Ali S, Guasconi V, Fritsch L, Yahi H, Sekhri R, Naguibneva I, et al. A Suv39 h-dependent mechanism for silencing S-phase genes in differentiating but not in cycling cells. EMBO J 2004; 23:605 - 615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sang L, Coller HA, Roberts JM. Control of the reversibility of cellular quiescence by the transcriptional repressor HES1. Science 2008; 321:1095 - 1100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sang L, Coller HA. Fear of commitment: Hes1 protects quiescent fibroblasts from irreversible cellular fates. Cell Cycle 2009; 8:2161 - 2167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigoryev SA, Nikitina T, Pehrson JR, Singh PB, Woodcock CL. Dynamic relocation of epigenetic chromatin markers reveals an active role of constitutive heterochromatin in the transition from proliferation to quiescence. J Cell Sci 2004; 117:6153 - 6162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebastian S, Sreenivas P, Sambasivan R, Cheedipudi S, Kandalla P, Pavlath GK, et al. MLL5, a trithorax homolog, indirectly regulates H3K4 methylation, represses cyclin A2 expression, and promotes myogenic differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:4719 - 4724
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhawan J, Rando TA. Stem cells in postnatal myogenesis: molecular mechanisms of satellite cell quiescence, activation and replenishment. Trends Cell Biol 2005; 15:666 - 673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau HM, Webster C, Chiu CP, Guttman S, Chandler F. Differentiation properties of pure populations of human dystrophic muscle cells. Exp Cell Res 1983; 144:495 - 503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milasincic DJ, Dhawan J, Farmer SR. Anchorage-dependent control of muscle-specific gene expression in C2C12 mouse myoblasts. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 1996; 32:90 - 99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartorelli V, Caretti G. Mechanisms underlying the transcriptional regulation of skeletal myogenesis. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2005; 15:528 - 535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palacios D, Puri PL. The epigenetic network regulating muscle development and regeneration. J Cell Physiol 2006; 207:1 - 11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudnicki MA, Schnegelsberg PN, Stead RH, Braun T, Arnold HH, Jaenisch R. MyoD or Myf-5 is required for the formation of skeletal muscle. Cell 1993; 75:1351 - 1359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puri PL, Sartorelli V. Regulation of muscle regulatory factors by DNA-binding, interacting proteins and post-transcriptional modifications. J Cell Physiol 2000; 185:155 - 173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber AN, Klesert TR, Bergstrom DA, Tapscott SJ. Two domains of MyoD mediate transcriptional activation of genes in repressive chromatin: a mechanism for lineage determination in myogenesis. Genes Dev 1997; 11:436 - 450
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis RL, Weintraub H, Lassar AB. Expression of a single transfected cDNA converts fibroblasts to myoblasts. Cell 1987; 51:987 - 1000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weintraub H, Tapscott SJ, Davis RL, Thayer MJ, Adam MA, Lassar AB, et al. Activation of muscle-specific genes in pigment, nerve, fat, liver and fibroblast cell lines by forced expression of MyoD. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989; 86:5434 - 5438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekel I, Magal Y, Pearson-White S, Emerson CP, Shani M. Conditional conversion of ES cells to skeletal muscle by an exogenous MyoD1 gene. New Biol 1992; 4:217 - 224
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weintraub H, Genetta T, Kadesch T. Tissue-specific gene activation by MyoD: determination of specificity by cis-acting repression elements. Genes Dev 1994; 8:2203 - 2211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mal A, Harter ML. MyoD is functionally linked to the silencing of a muscle-specific regulatory gene prior to skeletal myogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100:1735 - 1739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caretti G, Di PM, Micales B, Lyons GE, Sartorelli V. The Polycomb Ezh2 methyltransferase regulates muscle gene expression and skeletal muscle differentiation. Genes Dev 2004; 18:2627 - 2638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang CL, McKinsey TA, Olson EN. Association of class II histone deacetylases with heterochromatin protein 1: potential role for histone methylation in control of muscle differentiation. Mol Cell Biol 2002; 22:7302 - 7312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mal AK. Histone methyltransferase Suv39 h1 represses MyoD-stimulated myogenic differentiation. EMBO J 2006; 25:3323 - 3334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mal A, Sturniolo M, Schiltz RL, Ghosh MK, Harter ML. A role for histone deacetylase HDAC1 in modulating the transcriptional activity of MyoD: inhibition of the myogenic program. EMBO J 2001; 20:1739 - 1753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puri PL, Iezzi S, Stiegler P, Chen TT, Schiltz RL, Muscat GE, et al. Class I histone deacetylases sequentially interact with MyoD and pRb during skeletal myogenesis. Mol Cell 2001; 8:885 - 897
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rampalli S, Li L, Mak E, Ge K, Brand M, Tapscott SJ, et al. p38 MAPK signaling regulates recruitment of Ash2L-containing methyltransferase complexes to specific genes during differentiation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2007; 14:1150 - 1156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Serna I, Carlson KA, Imbalzano AN. Mammalian SWI/SNF complexes promote MyoD-mediated muscle differentiation. Nat Genet 2001; 27:187 - 190
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de la Serna I, Ohkawa Y, Berkes CA, Bergstrom DA, Dacwag CS, Tapscott SJ, et al. MyoD targets chromatin remodeling complexes to the myogenin locus prior to forming a stable DNA-bound complex. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25:3997 - 4009
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ohkawa Y, Marfella CG, Imbalzano AN. Skeletal muscle specification by myogenin and Mef2D via the SWI/SNF ATPase Brg1. EMBO J 2006; 25:490 - 501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohkawa Y, Yoshimura S, Higashi C, Marfella CG, Dacwag CS, Tachibana T, et al. Myogenin and the SWI/SNF ATPase Brg1 maintain myogenic gene expression at different stages of skeletal myogenesis. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:6564 - 6570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simone C, Forcales SV, Hill DA, Imbalzano AN, Latella L, Puri PL. p38 pathway targets SWI-SNF chromatin-remodeling complex to muscle-specific loci. Nat Genet 2004; 36:738 - 743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes CA, Bergstrom DA, Penn BH, Seaver KJ, Knoepfler PS, Tapscott SJ. Pbx marks genes for activation by MyoD indicating a role for a homeodomain protein in establishing myogenic potential. Mol Cell 2004; 14:465 - 477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Habas R, bate-Shen C. MSX1 cooperates with histone H1b for inhibition of transcription and myogenesis. Science 2004; 304:1675 - 1678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais A, Tsikitis M, costa-Alvear D, Sharan R, Kluger Y, Dynlacht BD. An initial blueprint for myogenic differentiation. Genes Dev 2005; 19:553 - 569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Kumar RM, Penn BH, Berkes CA, Kooperberg C, Boyer LA, et al. Global and gene-specific analyses show distinct roles for Myod and Myog at a common set of promoters. EMBO J 2006; 25:502 - 511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins CA. Satellite cell self-renewal. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2006; 6:301 - 306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guasconi V, Puri PL. Chromatin: the interface between extrinsic cues and the epigenetic regulation of muscle regeneration. Trends Cell Biol 2009; 19:286 - 294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzmann M, Carnac G, Vandromme M, Primig M, Lamb NJ, Fernandez A. The muscle regulatory factors MyoD and myf-5 undergo distinct cell cycle-specific expression in muscle cells. J Cell Biol 1998; 142:1447 - 1459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchamp JR, Heslop L, Yu DS, Tajbakhsh S, Kelly RG, Wernig A, et al. Expression of CD34 and Myf5 defines the majority of quiescent adult skeletal muscle satellite cells. J Cell Biol 2000; 151:1221 - 1234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duquet A, Polesskaya A, Cuvellier S, it-Si-Ali S, Hery P, Pritchard LL, et al. Acetylation is important for MyoD function in adult mice. EMBO Rep 2006; 7:1140 - 1146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megeney LA, Kablar B, Garrett K, Anderson JE, Rudnicki MA. MyoD is required for myogenic stem cell function in adult skeletal muscle. Genes Dev 1996; 10:1173 - 1183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins CA, Gnocchi VF, White RB, Boldrin L, Perez-Ruiz A, Relaix F, et al. Integrated functions of Pax3 and Pax7 in the regulation of proliferation, cell size and myogenic differentiation. PLoS One 2009; 4:4475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuang S, Charge SB, Seale P, Huh M, Rudnicki MA. Distinct roles for Pax7 and Pax3 in adult regenerative myogenesis. J Cell Biol 2006; 172:103 - 113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinnell IW, Ishibashi J, Le GF, Punch VG, Addicks GC, Greenblatt JF, et al. Pax7 activates myogenic genes by recruitment of a histone methyltransferase complex. Nat Cell Biol 2008; 10:77 - 84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olguin HC, Yang Z, Tapscott SJ, Olwin BB. Reciprocal inhibition between Pax7 and muscle regulatory factors modulates myogenic cell fate determination. J Cell Biol 2007; 177:769 - 779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepper C, Conway SJ, Fan CM. Adult satellite cells and embryonic muscle progenitors have distinct genetic requirements. Nature 2009; 460:627 - 631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annunziato AT. Split decision: what happens to nucleosomes during DNA replication?. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:12065 - 12068
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ng RK, Gurdon JB. Epigenetic inheritance of cell differentiation status. Cell Cycle 2008; 7:1173 - 1177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boheler KR. Stem cell pluripotency: a cellular trait that depends on transcription factors, chromatin state and a checkpoint deficient cell cycle. J Cell Physiol 2009; 221:10 - 17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conboy MJ, Karasov AO, Rando TA. High incidence of non-random template strand segregation and asymmetric fate determination in dividing stem cells and their progeny. PLoS Biol 2007; 5:102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinin V, Gayraud-Morel B, Gomes D, Tajbakhsh S. Asymmetric division and cosegregation of template DNA strands in adult muscle satellite cells. Nat Cell Biol 2006; 8:677 - 687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss FP, Leblond CP. Satellite cells as the source of nuclei in muscles of growing rats. Anat Rec 1971; 170:421 - 435
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Molofsky AV, Pardal R, Morrison SJ. Diverse mechanisms regulate stem cell self-renewal. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2004; 16:700 - 707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valk-Lingbeek ME, Bruggeman SW, van LM. Stem cells and cancer; the polycomb connection. Cell 2004; 118:409 - 418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee TI, Jenner RG, Boyer LA, Guenther MG, Levine SS, Kumar RM, et al. Control of developmental regulators by Polycomb in human embryonic stem cells. Cell 2006; 125:301 - 313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buszczak M, Spradling AC. Searching chromatin for stem cell identity. Cell 2006; 125:233 - 236
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Serra C, Palacios D, Mozzetta C, Forcales SV, Morantte I, Ripani M, et al. Functional interdependence at the chromatin level between the MKK6/p38 and IGF1/ PI3K/AKT pathways during muscle differentiation. Mol Cell 2007; 28:200 - 213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner BM. Open chromatin and hypertranscription in embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2008; 2:408 - 410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikkelsen TS, Ku M, Jaffe DB, Issac B, Lieberman E, Giannoukos G, et al. Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. Nature 2007; 448:553 - 560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohn F, Weber M, Rebhan M, Roloff TC, Richter J, Stadler MB, et al. Lineage-specific polycomb targets and de novo DNA methylation define restriction and potential of neuronal progenitors. Mol Cell 2008; 30:755 - 766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meshorer E, Yellajoshula D, George E, Scambler PJ, Brown DT, Misteli T. Hyperdynamic plasticity of chromatin proteins in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Dev Cell 2006; 10:105 - 116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meshorer E, Misteli T. Chromatin in pluripotent embryonic stem cells and differentiation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006; 7:540 - 546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efroni S, Duttagupta R, Cheng J, Dehghani H, Hoeppner DJ, Dash C, et al. Global transcription in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2008; 2:437 - 447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee BM, Mahadevan LC. Stability of histone modifications across mammalian genomes: implications for ‘epigenetic’ marking. J Cell Biochem 2009; 108:22 - 34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringrose L. Polycomb comes of age: genome-wide profiling of target sites. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2007; 19:290 - 297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietersen AM, van LM. Stem cell regulation by polycomb repressors: postponing commitment. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2008; 20:201 - 207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparmann A, van LM. Polycomb silencers control cell fate, development and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2006; 6:846 - 856
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullwood MJ, Ruan Y. ChIP-based methods for the identification of long-range chromatin interactions. J Cell Biochem 2009; 107:30 - 39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihaly J, Hogga I, Barges S, Galloni M, Mishra RK, Hagstrom K, et al. Chromatin domain boundaries in the Bithorax complex. Cell Mol Life Sci 1998; 54:60 - 70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith AE, Chronis C, Christodoulakis M, Orr SJ, Lea NC, Twine NA, et al. Epigenetics of human T cells during the G0-G1 transition. Genome Res 2009; 19:1325 - 1337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar