Effect of salinity tolerant PDH45 transgenic rice on physicochemical properties, enzymatic activities and microbial communities of rhizosphere soils

References

• Fukuda A, Nakamura A, Tagiri A, Tanaka H, Miyao A, Hirochika H, et al. Function, intracellular localization and the importance in salt tolerance of a vacuolar Na(+)/H(+) antiporter from rice. Plant Cell Physiol 2004; 45:146 - 59; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pch014; PMID: 14988485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahoo RK, Gill SS, Tuteja N. Pea DNA helicase 45 promotes salinity stress tolerance in IR64 rice with improved yield. Plant Signal Behav 2012; 7:1042 - 6; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/psb.20915; PMID: 22827940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanan-Mishra N, Pham XH, Sopory SK, Tuteja N. Pea DNA helicase 45 overexpression in tobacco confers high salinity tolerance without affecting yield. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:509 - 14; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0406485102; PMID: 15630095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham XH, Reddy MK, Ehtesham NZ, Matta B, Tuteja N. A DNA helicase from Pisum sativum is homologous to translation initiation factor and stimulates topoisomerase I activity. Plant J 2000; 24:219 - 29; http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00869.x; PMID: 11069696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee YE, Yang SH, Bae TW, Kang HG, Lim PO, Lee HY. Effects of field-grown genetically modified Zoysia grass on bacterial community structure. J Microbiol Biotechnol 2011; 21:333 - 40; PMID: 21532315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch JM, Benedetti A, Insam H, Nuti MP, Smalla K, Torsvik V, et al. Microbial diversity in soil: ecological theories, the contribution of molecular techniques and the impact of transgenic plants and transgenic microorganisms. Biol Fertil Soils 2004; 40:363 - 85; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00374-004-0784-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxena D, Stotsky G. Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxin released from root exudates and biomass of Bt corn has no apparent effect on earthworms, nematodes, protozoa, bacteria, and fungi in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 2001; 33:1225 - 30; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00027-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vettori C, Paffetti D, Saxena D. Persistence of toxins and cells of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. Kurstaki introduced in sprays to Sardinia soils. Soil Biol Biochem 2003; 35:1635 - 42; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2003.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackwood CB, Buyer JS. Soil microbial communities associated with Bt and non-Bt corn in three soils. J Environ Qual 2004; 33:832 - 6; http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/jeq2004.0832; PMID: 15224917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trasar-Capeda C, Lieros MC, Seoane S, Gil-Sotres F. Limitations of soil enzymes as indicators of soil pollution. Soil Biol Biochem 2000; 32:1867 - 75; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00160-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookes PC. The use of microbial parameters in monitoring soil pollution by heavy metal. Biol Fertil Soils 1995; 19:269 - 79; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00336094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Icoz I, Saxena D, Andow DA, Zwahlen C, Stotzky G. Microbial populations and enzyme activities in soil in situ under transgenic corn expressing cry proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis.. J Environ Qual 2008; 37:647 - 62; http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/jeq2007.0352; PMID: 18396552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira A, Pampulha ME. Effects of long-term heavy metal contamination on soil microbial characteristics. J Biosci Bioeng 2006; 102:157 - 61; http://dx.doi.org/10.1263/jbb.102.157; PMID: 17046527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruinsma M, Kowalchuk GA, van Veen JA. Effects of genetically modified plants on microbial communities and processes in soil. Biol Fertil Soils 2003; 37:329 - 37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andow DA, Zwahlen C. Assessing environmental risks of transgenic plants. Ecol Lett 2006; 9:196 - 214; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00846.x; PMID: 16958885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aira M, Brandon MG, Lazcano C, Baath E, Dominguez J. Plant genotype strongly modifies the structure and growth of maize rhizosphere microbial communities. Soil Biol Biochem 2010; 42:2276 - 81; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.08.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu W, Lu HH, Wu W, Wei QK, Chen YX, Thies JE. Transgenic Bt rice does not affect enzyme activities and microbial composition in the rhizosphere during crop development. Soil Biol Biochem 2008; 40:475 - 86; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira AP, Pampulha ME, Bennett JP. A two-year field study with transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis maize: effects on soil microorganisms. Sci Total Environ 2008; 405:351 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.05.046; PMID: 18656246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li XG, Liu BA, Cui JJ, Liu DD, Ding SA, Gilna B, et al. No evidence of persistent effects of continuously planted transgenic insect-resistant cotton on soil microorganisms. Plant Soil 2011; 339:247 - 57; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0572-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mina U, Chaudhary A, Kamra A. Effect of Bt cotton on enzymes activity and microorganisms in rhizosphere. J Agric Sci 2011; 3:1 - 9
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhry V, Dang HQ, Tran NQ, Mishra A, Chauhan PS, Gill SS, et al. Impact of salinity-tolerant MCM6 transgenic tobacco on soil enzymatic activities and the functional diversity of rhizosphere microbial communities. Res Microbiol 2012; 163:511 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2012.08.004; PMID: 22989673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brusetti L, Francia P, Bertolini C, Pagliuca A, Borin S, Sorlini C, et al. Bacterial communities associated with the rhizosphere of transgenic Bt 176 maize (Zea mays) and its non transgenic counterpart. Plant Soil 2005; 266:11 - 21; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-5399-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahoo RK, Tuteja N. Development of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation technology for mature seed-derived callus tissues of indica rice cultivar IR64. GM Crops Food 2012; 3:123 - 8; PMID: 22538224
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gupta PK. Methods in environmental analysis water, soil and air. Agrobios, India 2004; pp 242-245.
   Google Scholar
• Walkley A, Black IA. An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 1934; 37:29 - 38; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson ML. Soil. Chem Anal 1958; 214 - 21
   Google Scholar
• Page AL. Methods of soil analysis, Agron. 9, Part 2: Chemical and mineralogical properties, 2nd ed., Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI, USA. 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Richards LA. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. USDA Agriculture Handbook 60, Washington D.C. 1954.
   Google Scholar
• Chesnin L, Yien C. Turbidimetric determination of available sulphate. Proc- Soil Sci Soc Am 1951; 15:149 - 51; http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1951.036159950015000C0032x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jodral-segado AM, Navarro-alarco N, Serrana DL, Lopez-martinez MC. Calcium and magnesium levels in agricultural soil and sewage sludge in an industrial area from Southeastern Spain: relationship with plant (Saccharum officinarum) disposition. Soil & Sediment Contamination 2006; 15:367 - 77; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15320380600751736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno-Torres R, Navarro M, Ruiz-Lopez MD, Artacho R, Lopez MC. Comparison of wet and dry mineralization procedures for determining calcium and phosphorus in cow’s milk. Aust J Dairy Technol 2000; 55:23 - 7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MS. Screening of free-living rhizospheric bacteria for their multiple plant growth promoting activities. Microbiol 2006; 163:173 - 81
   Google Scholar
• Collee J, Miles RS. Tests for identification of bacteria. In: College, J.R., Duguid, J.P., Fraser, A.G., Marmion, B.P. (eds). Mackie and McCartney’s Practical Medical Microbiology. 13th ed. Churchill Livingstone/Longman, London. 1989; 141-160.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gundy SD. Nematodes. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR. (Eds). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, 1982; 1124-128.
   Google Scholar
• Min H, Ye YF, Chen ZY, Wu WX, Yufeng D. Effects of butachlor on microbial populations and enzyme activities in paddy soil. J Environ Sci Health B 2001; 36:581 - 95; http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/PFC-100106187; PMID: 11599722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM. Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol Biochem 1969; 1:301 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(69)90012-1
   Google Scholar
• Tabatabai MA. Soil enzymes. In: Weaver RW, Angel JS, Bottomley PS. (Eds). Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Microbial and biochemical properties. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, 1994. 775–833.
   Google Scholar
• Abdellmagid HM, Tabatabai MA. Nitrate reductase activity of soils. Soil Biol Biochem 1987; 19:421 - 27; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(87)90033-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar