Genome stability control by checkpoint regulation of tRNA gene transcription

References

• McFarlane RJ, Whitehall SK. tRNA genes in eukaryotic genome organization and reorganization. Cell Cycle 2009; 8:3102 - 3106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard GF, Kerrest A, Dujon B. Comparative genomics and molecular dynamics of DNA repeats in eukaryotes. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2008; 72:686 - 727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marck C, Kachouri-Lafond R, Lafontaine I, Westhof E, Dujon B, Grosjean H. The RNA polymerase III-dependent family of genes in hemiascomycetes: comparative RNomics, decoding strategies, transcription and evolutionary implications. Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34:1816 - 1835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu P, Wu S, Sun Y, Yuan CC, Kobayashi R, Myers MP, et al. Characterization of human RNA polymerase III identifies orthologues for Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNA polymerase III subunits. Mol Cell Biol 2002; 22:8044 - 8055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertens C, Roeder RG. Different functional modes of p300 in activation of RNA polymerase III transcription from chromatin templates. Mol Cell Biol 2008; 28:5764 - 5776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schramm L, Hernandez N. Recruitment of RNA polymerase III to its target promoters. Genes Dev 2002; 16:2593 - 2620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huibregtse JM, Evans CF, Engelke DR. Comparison of tRNA gene transcription complexes formed in vitro and in nuclei. Mol Cell Biol 1987; 7:3212 - 3220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciesla M, Boguta M. Regulation of RNA polymerase III transcription by Maf1 protein. Acta Biochim Pol 2008; 55:215 - 225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upadhya R, Lee J, Willis IM. Maf1 is an essential mediator of diverse signals that repress RNA polymerase III transcription. Mol Cell 2002; 10:1489 - 1494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson D. New connections identify Sch9 as a central node in ribosome biosynthesis. Cell Cycle 9:26 - 27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis IM, Desai N, Upadhya R. Signaling repression of transcription by RNA polymerase III in yeast. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 2004; 77:323 - 353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson DL, Johnson SA. Cell biology: RNA metabolism and oncogenesis. Science 2008; 320:461 - 462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White RJ. RNA polymerases I and III, growth control and cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2005; 6:69 - 78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottesfeld JM, Wolf VJ, Dang T, Forbes DJ, Hartl P. Mitotic repression of RNA polymerase III transcription in vitro mediated by phosphorylation of a TFIIIB component. Science 1994; 263:81 - 84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White RJ, Gottlieb TM, Downes CS, Jackson SP. Cell cycle regulation of RNA polymerase III transcription. Mol Cell Biol 1995; 15:6653 - 6662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donze D, Kamakaka RT. RNA polymerase III and RNA polymerase II promoter complexes are heterochromatin barriers in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J 2001; 20:520 - 531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simms TA, Dugas SL, Gremillion JC, Ibos ME, Dandurand MN, Toliver TT, et al. TFIIIC binding sites function as both heterochromatin barriers and chromatin insulators in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot Cell 2008; 7:2078 - 2086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull MW, Erickson J, Johnston M, Engelke DR. tRNA genes as transcriptional repressor elements. Mol Cell Biol 1994; 14:1266 - 1277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshpande AM, Newlon CS. DNA replication fork pause sites dependent on transcription. Science 1996; 272:1030 - 1033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labib K, Gambus A. A key role for the GINS complex at DNA replication forks. Trends Cell Biol 2007; 17:271 - 278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiduschek EP, Kassavetis GA. The RNA polymerase III transcription apparatus. J Mol Biol 2001; 310:1 - 26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivessa AS, Lenzmeier BA, Bessler JB, Goudsouzian LK, Schnakenberg SL, Zakian VA. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae helicase Rrm3p facilitates replication past nonhistone protein-DNA complexes. Mol Cell 2003; 12:1525 - 1536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardeleben C, Kassavetis GA, Geiduschek EP. Encounters of Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNA polymerase III with its transcription factors during RNA chain elongation. J Mol Biol 1994; 235:1193 - 1205
   Google Scholar
• Azvolinsky A, Giresi PG, Lieb JD, Zakian VA. Highly transcribed RNA polymerase II genes are impediments to replication fork progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell 2009; 34:722 - 734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekedat MD, Fenyo D, Rogers RS, Tackett AJ, Aitchison JD, Chait BT. GINS motion reveals replication fork progression is remarkably uniform throughout the yeast genome. Mol Syst Biol 2010; 6:353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryce DW, Ramayah S, Jaendling A, McFarlane RJ. Recombination at DNA replication fork barriers is not universal and is differentially regulated by Swi1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:4770 - 4775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer BJ, Fangman WL. A replication fork barrier at the 3′ end of yeast ribosomal RNA genes. Cell 1988; 55:637 - 643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linskens MH, Huberman JA. Organization of replication of ribosomal DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1988; 8:4927 - 4935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein R, Michel B, Gangloff S. Replication fork pausing and recombination or “gimme a break”. Genes Dev 2000; 14:1 - 10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Loza MC, Wellinger RE, Aguilera A. Stimulation of direct-repeat recombination by RNA polymerase III transcription. DNA Repair (Amst) 2009; 8:620 - 626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliodori S, Percudani R, Braglia P, Ferrari R, Guffanti E, Ottonello S, et al. A composite upstream sequence motif potentiates tRNA gene transcription in yeast. J Mol Biol 2003; 333:1 - 20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ong WC, Ibrahim M, Town M, Johnson JD. Functional differences among the six Saccharomyces cerevisiae tRNATrp genes. Yeast 1997; 13:1357 - 1362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Admire A, Shanks L, Danzl N, Wang M, Weier U, Stevens W, et al. Cycles of chromosome instability are associated with a fragile site and are increased by defects in DNA replication and checkpoint controls in yeast. Genes Dev 2006; 20:159 - 173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payen C, Koszul R, Dujon B, Fischer G. Segmental duplications arise from Pol32-dependent repair of broken forks through two alternative replication-based mechanisms. PLoS Genet 2008; 4:1000175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessler JB, Zakian VA. The amino terminus of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA helicase Rrm3p modulates protein function altering replication and checkpoint activity. Genetics 2004; 168:1205 - 1218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azvolinsky A, Dunaway S, Torres JZ, Bessler JB, Zakian VA. The S. cerevisiae Rrm3p DNA helicase moves with the replication fork and affects replication of all yeast chromosomes. Genes Dev 2006; 20:3104 - 3116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boule JB, Zakian VA. Roles of Pif1-like helicases in the maintenance of genomic stability. Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34:4147 - 4153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty BK, Bairwa NK, Bastia D. The Tof1p-Csm3p protein complex counteracts the Rrm3p helicase to control replication termination of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:897 - 902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson B, Calzada A, Labib K. Mrc1 and Tof1 regulate DNA replication forks in different ways during normal S phase. Mol Biol Cell 2007; 18:3894 - 3902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghavidel A, Schultz MC. TATA binding protein-associated CK2 transduces DNA damage signals to the RNA polymerase III transcriptional machinery. Cell 2001; 106:575 - 584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston IM, Allison SJ, Morton JP, Schramm L, Scott PH, White RJ. CK2 forms a stable complex with TFIIIB and activates RNA polymerase III transcription in human cells. Mol Cell Biol 2002; 22:3757 - 3768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crighton D, Woiwode A, Zhang C, Mandavia N, Morton JP, Warnock LJ, et al. p53 represses RNA polymerase III transcription by targeting TBP and inhibiting promoter occupancy by TFIIIB. EMBO J 2003; 22:2810 - 2820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reina JH, Azzouz TN, Hernandez N. Maf1, a new player in the regulation of human RNA polymerase III transcription. PLoS One 2006; 1:e134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert S, Carr AM. Checkpoint responses to replication fork barriers. Biochimie 2005; 87:591 - 602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budzowska M, Kanaar R. Mechanisms of dealing with DNA damage-induced replication problems. Cell Biochem Biophys 2009; 53:17 - 31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedel AM, Pike BL, Gasser SM. ATR/Mec1: coordinating fork stability and repair. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2009; 21:237 - 244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toczyski DP, Galgoczy DJ, Hartwell LH. CDC5 and CKII control adaptation to the yeast DNA damage checkpoint. Cell 1997; 90:1097 - 1106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz MC. DNA damage regulation of the RNA components of the translational apparatus: new biology and mechanisms. IUBMB Life 2003; 55:243 - 247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasch AP, Huang M, Metzner S, Botstein D, Elledge SJ, Brown PO. Genomic expression responses to DNA-damaging agents and the regulatory role of the yeast ATR homolog Mec1p. Mol Biol Cell 2001; 12:2987 - 3003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen VC, Clelland BW, Hockman DJ, Kujat-Choy SL, Mewhort HE, Schultz MC. Replication stress checkpoint signaling controls tRNA gene transcription. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2010; 17:976 - 981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szilard RK, Jacques PE, Laramee L, Cheng B, Galicia S, Bataille AR, et al. Systematic identification of fragile sites via genome-wide location analysis of γ-H2AX. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2010; 17:299 - 305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paciotti V, Lucchini G, Plevani P, Longhese MP. Mec1p is essential for phosphorylation of the yeast DNA damage checkpoint protein Ddc1p, which physically interacts with Mec3p. EMBO J 1998; 17:4199 - 4209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cha RS, Kleckner N. ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones. Science 2002; 297:602 - 606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kats ES, Albuquerque CP, Zhou H, Kolodner RD. Checkpoint functions are required for normal S-phase progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae RCAF- and CAF-I-defective mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:3710 - 3715
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabart P, Lee J, Willis IM. Facilitated recycling protects human RNA polymerase III from repression by Maf1 in vitro. J Biol Chem 2008; 283:36108 - 36117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang M, Elledge SJ. Identification of RNR4, encoding a second essential small subunit of ribonucleotide reductase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1997; 17:6105 - 6113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimada K, Oma Y, Schleker T, Kugou K, Ohta K, Harata M, et al. Ino80 chromatin remodeling complex promotes recovery of stalled replication forks. Curr Biol 2008; 18:566 - 575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison AJ, Kim JA, Person MD, Highland J, Xiao J, Wehr TS, et al. Mec1/Tel1 phosphorylation of the INO80 chromatin remodeling complex influences DNA damage checkpoint responses. Cell 2007; 130:499 - 511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tercero JA, Longhese MP, Diffley JF. A central role for DNA replication forks in checkpoint activation and response. Mol Cell 2003; 11:1323 - 1336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourriere H, Pasero P. Maintenance of fork integrity at damaged DNA and natural pause sites. DNA Repair (Amst) 2007; 6:900 - 913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozenzhak S, Mejía-Ramírez E, Williams JS, Schaffer L, Hammond JA, Head SR, et al. Rad3ATR decorates critical chromosomal domains with γH2A to protect genome integrity during S-phase in fission yeast. PLoS Genet 2010; 6:1001032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson M, Haeusler RA, Good PD, Engelke DR. Nucleolar clustering of dispersed tRNA genes. Science 2003; 302:1399 - 1401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons AB, Lopez A, Givoni IE, Williams DE, Gray CA, Porter J, et al. Exploring the mode-of-action of bioactive compounds by chemical-genetic profiling in yeast. Cell 2006; 126:611 - 625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White RJ. RNA polymerase III transcription—a battleground for tumour suppressors and oncogenes. Eur J Cancer 2004; 40:21 - 27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson SA, Dubeau L, Johnson DL. Enhanced RNA polymerase III-dependent transcription is required for oncogenic transformation. J Biol Chem 2008; 283:19184 - 19191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall L, Kenneth NS, White RJ. Elevated tRNA(iMet) synthesis can drive cell proliferation and oncogenic transformation. Cell 2008; 133:78 - 89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenneth NS, Ramsbottom BA, Gomez-Roman N, Marshall L, Cole PA, White RJ. TRRAP and GCN5 are used by c-Myc to activate RNA polymerase III transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104:14917 - 14922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negrini S, Gorgoulis VG, Halazonetis TD. Genomic instability—an evolving hallmark of cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010; 11:220 - 228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halazonetis TD, Gorgoulis VG, Bartek J. An oncogene-induced DNA damage model for cancer development. Science 2008; 319:1352 - 1355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairns CA, White RJ. p53 is a general repressor of RNA polymerase III transcription. EMBO J 1998; 17:3112 - 3123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesnokov I, Chu WM, Botchan MR, Schmid CW. p53 inhibits RNA polymerase III-directed transcription in a promoter-dependent manner. Mol Cell Biol 1996; 16:7084 - 7088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Maraia RJ. Comparison of the RNA polymerase III transcription machinery in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and human. Nucleic Acids Res 2001; 29:2675 - 2690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pluta K, Lefebvre O, Martin NC, Smagowicz WJ, Stanford DR, Ellis SR, et al. Maf1p, a negative effector of RNA polymerase III in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 2001; 21:5031 - 5040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson SS, Zhang C, Fromm J, Willis IM, Johnson DL. Mammalian Maf1 is a negative regulator of transcription by all three nuclear RNA polymerases. Mol Cell 2007; 26:367 - 379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demidova AR, Aau MY, Zhuang L, Yu Q. Dual regulation of Cdc25A by Chk1 and p53-ATF3 in DNA replication checkpoint control. J Biol Chem 2009; 284:4132 - 4139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolomietz E, Meyn MS, Pandita A, Squire JA. The role of Alu repeat clusters as mediators of recurrent chromosomal aberrations in tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2002; 35:97 - 112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oler AJ, Alla RK, Roberts DN, Wong A, Hollenhorst PC, Chandler KJ, et al. Human RNA polymerase III transcriptomes and relationships to Pol II promoter chromatin and enhancer-binding factors. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2010; 17:620 - 628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panning B, Smiley JR. Activation of expression of multiple subfamilies of human Alu elements by adenovirus type 5 and herpes simplex virus type 1. J Mol Biol 1995; 248:513 - 524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang RB, Wang HY, Lu HY, Xiong J, Li HH, Qiu XH, et al. Increased level of polymerase III transcribed Alu RNA in hepatocellular carcinoma tissue. Mol Carcinog 2005; 42:93 - 96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsantoulis PK, Kotsinas A, Sfikakis PP, Evangelou K, Sideridou M, Levy B, et al. Oncogene-induced replication stress preferentially targets common fragile sites in preneoplastic lesions. A genome-wide study. Oncogene 2008; 27:3256 - 3264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar