Making sense of methodologies: A paradigm framework for the novice researcher

References

• Angus, LB (1986): Research traditions, ideology and critical ethnography. Discourse, 7(1): 61-78. Berg, BL (2001): Qualitative research methods for the social sciences, Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Blaxter, L, Hughes, C & Tight, M (2001): How to research, Philadelphia University Press, Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H (1969): Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
   Google Scholar
• Candy, PC (1989): Alternative paradigms in educational research. Australian Educational Researcher, 16(3): 1-11.
   Google Scholar
• Carr,W & Kemmis, S (1986): Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research, Falmer Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Charon, JM (1998): Symbolic interactionism: An introduction, an interpretation, an integration, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
   Google Scholar
• Cheek, J (2000): Postmodern and poststructuralist approaches to nursing research, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, J (1988): The predicament of culture: Twentieth-century ethnography, literature and art, Harvard University Press, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, P (1992): The end(s) of ethnography: From realism to social criticism, Routledge, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Cocks, J (1989): The oppositional imagination: Feminism, critique and political theory, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Couzens Hoy, D & McCarthy,T (1994): Critical theory, Blackwell, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Crotty, M (1998): The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, NK & Lincoln,YS (eds.) (1994): The handbook of qualitative research, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, NK & Lincoln,YS (eds.) (1998): Strategies of qualitative inquiry, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Dickson, GL (1990): A feminist poststructural analysis of knowledge of menopause. Advanced Nursing Science, 12(3): 15-31.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N (1995): Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language, Longman, London.
   Google Scholar
• Farber, M (1943): The foundation of phenomenology, Edmund Husserl, and the quest for a rigorous science of philosophy, State University of NewYork Press, Albany.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M (1974): The archaeology of knowledge, Tavistock, London.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M (1986): The subject and power. In: Wallis, B (ed.) Art after modernism: Rethinking representation. New Museum of Contemporary Art, NewYork.
   Google Scholar
• Gage, NL (1989): The paradigm wars and their aftermath: A “historical” sketch of research on teaching since 1989. Educational Researcher, October: 4-10.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, J (2000): Sexualities, queer theory, and qualitative research. In: Denzin, NK and Lincoln,YS (eds.) The handbook of qualitative research, pp. 347-365. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
   Google Scholar
• Gavey, N (1989): Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13: 459-475.
   Google Scholar
• Giddings, LS & Wood, PJ (2000):The methodological journey of a grounded theorist: An interview with Denise Dignam. Nursing Praxis in New Zealand, 15(2): 4-16.
   Google Scholar
• Giddings, LS & Wood, PJ (2001a): Engaging with radical hermeneutics: An interview with Margaret Southwick. Nursing Praxis in New Zealand, 17(1): 4-15.
   Google Scholar
• Giddings, LS & Wood, PJ (2001b): Phenomenology — Telling a story: An interview with Liz Smythe. Nursing Praxis in New Zealand, 17(3): 15-26.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, BG & Strauss, AL (1967): Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, Aldine, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, M (1994): Epistemology and educational research: The influence of recent approaches to knowledge. Review of research in education, 20: 423-464.
   Google Scholar
• Grossberg, L, Nelson, C & Treichler, P (eds.) (1992): Cultural studies, Routledge, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, EG & Lincoln,YS (1994): Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin, NK and Lincoln,YS (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 105-117. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S (ed.) (1987): Feminism and methodology: Social science issues, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
   Google Scholar
• Janks, H (1997): Critical discourse analysis as a research tool. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 18(3): 329-342.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A (1993): Becoming a‘girl’: Post-structuralist suggestions for educational research. Gender and Education, 5(2): 157-166.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, PJ, Blacksin, B & Mason, E (2001): Factors affecting substance abuse treatment completion for women. Issues in Mental Health, 22: 287-304.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S & McTaggart, R (eds.) (1988): The action research planner, Deakin University Press, Geelong.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, G & Wickham, G (1999): Using Foucault’s methods, Sage Publications, London.
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, JL & Mclaren, PL (1994): Rethinking critical theory and qualitative reseaarch. In: Denzin, NK and Lincoln, YS (eds.) The handbook of qualitative research, pp. 138-157. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T (1970): The structure of scientific revolutions, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P (1991): Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern, Routledge, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Lawler, J (1998): Phenomenologies as research methodologies for nursing: From philosophy to researching practice. Nursing Inquiry, 5: 194-211.
   Google Scholar
• Macrone, M (1994): A little knowledge: What Archimedes really meant and 80 other key ideas expanded, Ebury Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Maeve, K (1997): Nursing practice with incarcerated women: Caring with mandated (sic) alienation. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 18: 495-510.
   Google Scholar
• Manias, E & Street, A (2000): Possibilities for critical social theory and Foucault’s work: A toolbox approach. Nursing Inquiry, 7: 50-60.
   Google Scholar
• McCouat, M & Peile, C (1995):The micro politics of qualitative research traditions. Qualitative research: Beyond the boundaries, pp. 2-16. Curtin University of Technology & Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Fremantle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• McWilliam, E (1993):‘Post’ haste: Plodding research and galloping theory. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 14(2): 199-205.
   Google Scholar
• McWilliam, E (1995): Educative research in initial teacher education: Postpositivist possibilities. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(1): 55-66.
   Google Scholar
• Pohatu, GH (1998): The university, Maori Studies and Treaty praxis. Unpublished PhD Thesis, The University of Otago, Dunedin.
   Google Scholar
• Polit, DF, Beck, CT & Hungler, BP (2001): Essentials of nursing research: Methods, appraisal, and utilization, Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, D (1983): Methodology for the human sciences: Systems of inquiry, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K (1992/1959): The logic of scientific discovery, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Powers, P (2001): The methodology of discourse analysis, Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Reason, P (1994): Three approaches to participative learning. In: Denzin, NK and Lincoln, YS (eds.) The handbook of qualitative research, pp. 324-329. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
   Google Scholar
• Rein, M (1983):Value critical policy analysis. In: Callahan, D and Jennings, B (eds.) Ethics, the social sciences, and policy analysis. Plenum Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Reinharz, S (1992): Feminist methods in social research, Oxford University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Robson, C (1993): Real world research, Blackwell, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Sarantakos, S (1993): Social research, MacMillan Education, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber, R (1996): (Re)defining myself: Women’s process of recovery from depression. Qualitative Health Research, 6(4): 469-491.
   Google Scholar
• Siebold, C (2000): Qualitative research from a feminist perspective in the postmodern era: Methodological, ethical and reflexive concerns. Nursing Inquiry, 7: 147-155.
   Google Scholar
• Small, D (1989): Participatory research: The whys and wherefores. Race, gender, class,8: 38-48.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, LT (1999): Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples, Zed Books Ltd & Otago University Press, London & Dunedin.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R (1993): Potentials for empowerment in critical education research. Australian Educational Researcher, 20(2): 75-93.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, L & Wise, S (1983): Breaking out: Feminist consciousness and feminist research, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss,AL & Corbin, JM (eds.) (1997): Grounded theory in practice, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Thorne, SE, Kirkham, SR & Henderson, A (1999): Ideological implications of paradigm discourse. Nursing Inquiry, 6: 123-131.
   Google Scholar
• van Manen, M (1990): Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy, State University of New York Press, Albany, N.Y.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, G (1990): Putting praxis into practice. First World Congress on Action Research. Griffith University, Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Weedon, C (1987): Feminist practice and poststructural theory, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Wertheim, M (1995): Pythagoras’ trousers: God, physics and the gender wars, Times Books, New York.
   Google Scholar