Compromise, Country Women and Cancer: Women’s Health Policy in Australia

References

• Adelsward, V. & Sachs, L. (1996) ‘The meaning of 6.8: Numeracy and normality in health information talks’, Social Science and Medicine, 43,8: 1179–87.
   Google Scholar
• Atterstam,1. (1999) ‘Mammography has hard critics’, Svenska Dagbladet, 20 July: 1.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) (1998) Breast and cervical screening in Australia 1996–97, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Barger-Lux, M.l & Heaney, R.P. (1986) ‘For better and worse: The technological imperative in health care’, Social Science and Medicine, 22, 12: 1313–20.
   Google Scholar
• Broom, D.H. (1991) Damned If We Do: Contradictions in women’s health care, Allen and Unwin, North Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Burgmann, V. (1993) Power and Protest: Moements for change in Australian society, Allen and Unwin, St. Leonards.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth Department of Community Services and Health (1989) National Womens Health Policy; Adancing women’s health in Australia, report presented to Australian Health Ministers in Burnie, 21 March 1989, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Dowse, S. (1983) The women’s movement’s fandango with the state: The movement’s role in public policy since 1972’. In c.Y. Baldock & B. Cass (eds) Women, Social Welfare and the State in Australia, Allen and Unwin, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Doyal, L. (1995) What Makes Women Sick? Gender and the political economy of health, Macmillan, London.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, P. (1995), Women and the Health Care Industry: An unhealthy relationship?, Open University Press, Buckingham.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, G. (1999) ‘Women’s health in a restructuring state’. In L. Hancock (ed) Women, Public Policy and the State, Macmillan Education, South Yarra.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, L. (1996) ‘Social movements and the construction of health knowledge: A case study of the women’s health movement’, Annual Review of Health Social Sciences, 6: 157–72.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, L. (1998) ‘Primary health care for women: An evolving speciality’. In C. Rogers-Clark and A. Smith (eds) Women:~ Health: A primary health care approach, MacLennan and Petty, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Ingram, H. & Schneider, A. (1993) ‘Constructing citizenship: The subtle messages of policy design’. In H. Ingram & S. Rathgeb Smith (eds) Public Policy for Democracy, The Brookings Institution, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufert, PA. (1996) ‘Women and the debate over mammography: An economic, political, and moral history’. In c.P. Sargent & C.B. Brettell, Gender and Health: An international perspective, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Kavanagh, A (in press) ‘Epidemiology and technologies of quantification’. In J. Daly, M. Guillemin & S. Hill (eds) Critical Compromise, Oxford University Press, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Little, M. (1998) ‘Assignments of meaning in epidemiology’, Social Science and Medicine, 47, 9: 1135–45.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (1993) ‘Risk as moral danger: The social and political functions of risk discourse in public health’, International Journal of Health Services, 23,3: 425–35.
   Google Scholar
• Marlin, A, Redman, S., Clarke, C, Clark, R. & Boyle, F. (1996) Breast Cancer Research in Australia: Current research and future priorities, NHMRC National Breast Cancer Centre, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Nettleton, S. (1996) ‘Women and the new paradigm of health and medicine’, Critical Social Policy, 16: 33–53.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, A (1993) ‘Women, health and knowledge: Travels through and beyond foreign parts’, Health Care for Women International, 14: 327–44.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Status of Women, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (1992) National Agenda for Women: Implementation report, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J. G. (1990) ‘The epidemiology of mass breast cancer screening - A plea for a valid measure of benefit’, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43, 3: 215–55.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S., Venet, W., Strax, P., Venet, L. & Roeser, R. (1982) ‘Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality’, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 69, 2: 349–355.
   Google Scholar
• Short, L.M. (1995) ‘Only the tip of the iceberg: A consumer perspective on breast cancer screening research and policy development’, Annual Review of Health Social Sciences, 5: 99–114.
   Google Scholar
• Slaytor, E.K. & Ward, J.E. (1998) ‘How risks of breast cancer and benefits of screening are communicated to women: Analysis of 58 pamphlets’, British Medical Journal, 317, 25 (July): 263–4.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C.L., Kricker, A. & Armstrong, B.K. (1998) ‘Breast cancer mortality trends in Australia: 1921 to 1994’, The Medical Journal of Australia, 158, 5 January: 11–4.
   Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsen, The National Board of Health and Welfare (1998) Mammography Screening for Early Detection of Breast Cancer in Sweden, abbreviated version in English of the report, Mammography Screening for Early Detection of Breast Cancer, NBHW Series Publication No. 17, National Board of Health and Welfare.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D.A. (1993) ‘Clinical authority in the construction of citizenship’. In H. Ingram & S. Rathgeb Smith (eds) Public Policy for Democracy, The Brookings Institution, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Tabar, L., Fagerberg, C.J.G., Gad, A., Baldetorp, L., Holmberg, L. H., Grantoft, 0., Ljungquist, D., Lundstrom, B., Manson, J.c., Eklund, G., Day, N.E. & Pettersson, F. (1985) ‘Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography’, The Lancet, 13 April: 829–32.
   Google Scholar
• Tornberg, S. (1999) Director, Cancer Cause and Control, Karolinksa Institute, Stockholm (personal communication): 16th September 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Wardle, J. & Pope, R. (1992) ‘The psychological costs of screening for cancer’, Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 36, 7: 609–24.
   Google Scholar