66
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Towards an integrated model of practice evaluation balancing accountability, critical knowledge and developmental perspectives

&
Pages 133-146 | Received 18 Jan 2011, Accepted 03 Mar 2011, Published online: 17 Dec 2014

References

  • Arnkil, R. (2006) ‘Hyvien käytäntöjen levittäminen EU: n kehittämisstrategiana’ [Disseminating good practices as a strategy of European Union] in Seppänen-Järvelä, R.; and Karjalainen, V. (eds.) Kehittämistyön risteyksiä [At the crossroads of developing practices] Stakes: Vaajakoski, pp. 55–72.
  • Arnkil, T. E.; Seikkula, J.; and Arnkil, R. (2005) ‘Hyvien käytäntöjen tutkittavuudesta, siirrettävyydestä ja jatkuvuudesta’ [Issues of continuity, transferring and researching good practices] Yhteiskuntapolitiikka 70(6):639–649.
  • Bailey, R.; and Brake, M. (eds.) (1975) Radical social work Edward Arnold: London.
  • Balogh, R.; Quinn, H.; Simpson, A.; and Bond, S. (1998) ‘A comparative analysis of six audit systems for mental health nursing’ International Journal for Quality in Health Care 10(1):43–52.
  • Berk, R. A.; and Rossi, P. H. (1999) Thinking about program evaluation 2 Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Castells, M. (1977) The urban question Edward Arnold: London.
  • Chelimsky, E. (1997) ‘The coming transformations in evaluation’ in Chelimsky, E.; Shadish, W R. (eds.) Evaluation for 21st century: A handbook Sage: Thousand Oaks, pp. 1–26.
  • Chen, H. (1990) Theory-driven evaluation Sage: Beverly Hills, CA.
  • Clarke, J. (2000) ‘A world of difference? Globalisation and the study of social policy’ in Lewis, G.; Gewitz, S.; and Clarke, J. (eds.) Rethinking social policy Sage: London, pp. 18–37.
  • Clarke, J. (2001) ‘Globalisation and welfare states: Some unsettling thoughts’ in Sykes, R.; Palier, B.; and Prior, P. (eds.) Globalisation and European welfare states Palgrave: Basingstoke, pp. 19–37.
  • Clarke, J. (2008) ‘Performance paradoxes: The politics of evaluation in public services’ in Davis, H.; and Martin, S. (eds.) Public services inspection in the UK Jessica Kingsley: London, pp. 120–134.
  • Corby, B. (2006) Applying research in social work practice Open University Press: Maidenhead.
  • Davies, H.; Nutley, S.; and Smith, P. (2000) What works? Evidence-based policy and practice in public services Policy Press: Bristol.
  • Dean, M. (1999) Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society Sage: London.
  • Ferguson, I. (2008) Reclaiming social work Sage: London.
  • Ferguson, I.; and Woodward, R. (2009) Radical social work practice: Making a difference Policy Press: Bristol.
  • Ford, D.; and Stepney, P. (2003) ‘Hospital discharge and the citizenship rights of older people: Will the UK become a test-bed for Eastern Europe?’ European Journal of Social Work 6(3):257–272.
  • Foster, N. (2005) ‘Control, citizenship and “risk” in mental health: Perspectives from UK, USA and Australia’ in Ramon, S.; and Williams, J. (eds.) Mental health at the crossroads: The promise of the psychosocial approach Ashgate: Aldershot, UK, pp. 25–37.
  • Glasby, J.; and Henwood, M. (2007) ‘Part of the problem or part of the solution? The role of care homes in tackling delayed hospital discharge’ British Journal of Social Work 37:299–312.
  • Gray, M.; and Webb, S. A. (2009) ‘Critical social work’ in Gray, M.; and Webb, S. A. (eds.) Social work theories and methods Sage: London, pp. 76–85.
  • Guba, E.; and Lincoln, Y. (1982) ‘Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry’ Education Communication and Technology Journal 30(4):233–252.
  • Harris, J. (2005) ‘Modernised social services in the UK: Franchised social work in the McMunicipality’. Paper at the 7th Annual Conference of the Association of Social Work Research, The changing place of municipal social work: Finland in the 21st century, University of Tampere, Finland, 3 Feb.
  • Healy, K. (2005) Social work theories in context Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke.
  • Heino, T. (2006) ‘Tiedon tuottamisen tilat läheisneuvonpidossa’ [Spaces for knowledge production in the Family Group Conference Approach] in Seppänen-Järvelä, R.; and Karjalainen,V. (eds.) Kehittämistyön risteyksiä [At the crossroads of developing practices] Stakes: Vaajakoski, pp. 167–194.
  • Hugman, R. (2005) ‘Looking back: The view from here’ British Journal of Social Work 35:609–620.
  • Huxley, P.; Evans, S.; Gately, C.; Webber, M.; Mears, A.; Pajak, S.; Kendall, T.; Medina, J.; and Katona, C. (2005) ‘Stress and pressures in mental health social work: The worker speaks’ British Journal of Social Work 35(7):1063–1079.
  • Jordan, B. (2007) Social work and well-being Russell House: Lyme Regis.
  • Karjalainen, V (2006) ‘Verkostokehittäminen – palveluparadigman muutosvoima’ [Use of networking – empowering service paradigm] in Seppänen-Järvelä, R.; and Karjalainen, V. (eds.) Kehittämistyön risteyksiä [At the crossroads of developing practices] Stakes: Vaajakoski, pp. 251–268.
  • Kazi, M. (2003) Realist evaluation in practice Sage: London.
  • Kirk, S.; and Reid, W. (2002) Science and social work: A critical appraisal Columbia University Press: New York.
  • Laming, L. (2003) Report of the inquiry into the death of Victoria Climbié Stationary Office: London.
  • Larner, W; and Walters, W. (eds.) (2004) Global governmentalityRoutledge: London.
  • Marsh, P.; and Doe, M. (2005) The task-centred practice book Routledge: London.
  • Mullaly, B. (2007) The new structural social work Oxford University Press: Don Mills, Canada.
  • Munro, E. (2004) ‘The impact of audit on social work practice’ British Journal of Social Work 34(8):1075–1095.
  • Neil, J.; and Williams, J. (1994) ‘Hospital discharge project’ Social Services Research 1:65.
  • Newman, T.; Moseley, A.; Tierney, S.; and Ellis, A. (2005) Evidence-based social work: A guide for the perplexed Russell House: Lyme Regis.
  • Novotny, H.; Scott, P.; and Gibbons, M. (2001) Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in the age of uncertainty Polity Press: Cambridge.
  • Orr, L. (1999) Social experiments: Evaluating public programs with experimental methods Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Pearson, G. (1975) The deviant imagination Macmillan: Basingstoke.
  • Pease, B. (2007) ‘Critical social work theory meets evidence-based practice in Australia: Towards critical knowledge informed practice in social work’ in Yokota, K. (ed.) Empowering people through emancipatory social work Sekai Shisou-sya: Kyoto, pp. 103–138.
  • Plath, D. (2009) ‘Evidence-based practice’ in Gray, M.; and Webb, S. A. (eds.) Social work theories and methods Sage: London pp. 172–183.
  • Prince, M. (2001) ‘How social is social policy? Fiscal and market discourse in North American welfare states’ Social Policy and Administration 35(1):2–13.
  • Rostila, I. (1988) Subjektina sosiaalitoimistossa? Asiakassuhteen analysointia toimeentulotuki-, PAV-ja lastensuojeluasiakkaiden kokemusten avulla [Clients as agents in social work? Analysing practitioner–client relationships through experiences of clients in social welfare and child protection] Sosiaalihallitus: Helsinki.
  • Saario, S.; and Stepney, P. (2009) ‘Managerial audit and mental health: A study of rationalising practices in Finnish psychiatric clinics’ European Journal of Social Work 12(1):41–56.
  • Sackett, D. L.; Rosenberg, W. M.; Gray, J. A.; Haynes. R. B.; and Richardson, W. S. (1996) ‘Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t’ British Medical Journal 312(7023):71–72.
  • Satka, M.; Karvinen-Niinikoski, S.; and Nylund, M. (2005) ‘Mitä käytäntötutkimus on’ [What is practice research] in Satka, M.; Karvinen-Niinikoski, S.; Nylund, M.; and Hoikkala, S. (eds.) [Social work practice research] Palmenia-kustannus: Helsinki, pp. 9–19.
  • Sawyer, A.-M. (2005) ‘From therapy to administration: Deinstitutionalisation and the ascendancy of ‘risk thinking”’ Health Sociology Review 14(3):283–296.
  • Sayer, A. (2000) Realism and social science Sage: London.
  • Schwandt,T. A. (2002) Evaluation practice reconsidered Peter Lang Publishing Inc.: New York.
  • Schwandt, T. A.; and Dahler-Larsen, P. (2006) ‘When evaluation meets the “rough ground” in communities’ Evaluation 12:496–505.
  • Scull, A. (2006) Madhouse: A tragic tale of megalomania and modern medicine Routledge: London.
  • Shaw, I. (2004) ‘Evaluation for a learning organization?’ in Gould, N.; and Baldwin, M. (eds.) Social work, critical reflection and the learning organization Bodmin: Ashgate, pp. 117–128.
  • Shaw, I.; and Faulkner, A. (2006) ‘Practitioner evaluation at work’ American Journal of Evaluation 27:44–63.
  • Shaw, I.; and Gould, N. (2001) Qualitative research in social work Sage: London.
  • Sheldon, B. (2000) ‘Cognitive behavioural methods in social care’ in Stepney, P.; and Ford, D. (eds.) Social work models, methods and theories: A framework for practice Russell House Publishing: Lyme Regis, pp. 65–83.
  • Stein, J. (2001) The cult of efficiency House of Anansi Press: Toronto.
  • Stepney, P. (2006) ‘Mission impossible? Critical practice in social work’ British Journal of Social Work 36(8):1289–1307.
  • Stepney, P. (2009) ‘English social work at the crossroads: A critical view’ Australian Social Work 62(1):10–27.
  • Stepney, P. (2010) ‘Social welfare at the crossroads: Evidence-based practice or critical practice?’ The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences 5(5):105–120.
  • Stepney, P.; and Davis, P. (2004) ‘Social inclusion, mental health and the green agenda’ Journal of Social Work in Health Care 39(3/4):387–409.
  • Stepney, P.; and Popple, K. (2008) Social work and the community: A critical context for practice Palgrave: Basingstoke.
  • Szasz, T. (1973) The manufacture of madness Paladin: London.
  • Trinder, L. (2000) ‘A critical appraisal of evidence-based practice’ in Trinder, L.; and Reynolds, S. (eds.) Evidence-based practice: A critical appraisal Blackwell: Oxford, pp. 212–241.
  • Webb, S. (2001) ‘Some considerations on the validity of evidence-based practice in social work’ British Journal of Social Work 31(1):57–79.
  • Webb, S. (2006) Social work in a risk society Palgrave: London.
  • Wistow, G. (2000) ‘Working in the NHS’ Research Matters (Community Care) April: 22–25.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.