The consequences of integrating complementary and alternative medicine: An analysis of impacts on practice

References

• Adams, V. (2002). Randomised controlled crime: Postcolonial sciences in alternative medicine research. Social Studies of Science, 2(32), 659–690.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bensoussan, A., & Myers, S. P. (1996). Towards a safer choice: The practice of traditional Chinese medicine in Australia. Sydney: University of Western Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Calnan, M., & Williams, S. (1994). Lay perceptions of modern medicine and modern medical practice. In I. Robinson (Ed.), The social consequences of life and death technology (pp. 211–234). Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. (2007). Evidence and CAM research: Challenges and opportunites. In J. Adams (Ed.), Researching complementary and alternative medicine (pp. 89–104). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, P., & Leister, V. (2004). Medicalisation, markets and consumers. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 45(Extra issue), 158–176.
   Google Scholar
• Coulter, I., & Willis, E. (2007). Explaining the growth of complementary and alternative medicine. Health Sociology Review, 16(3–4), 214–225.
   Google Scholar
• Draper, M. (1997). Theoretical frameworks for women’s policy development. The Australian Quarterly, 63(6), 321–335.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, D. M., Kessler, R. C., Foster, C., Norlock, F. E., Caulkins, D. R., & Delbanco, T. L. (1993). Unconventional medicine in the United States: Prevalence, costs, and patterns of use. The New England Journal of Medicine, 328, 246–252.
   Google Scholar
• Expert Committee on Complementary Medicines in the Health System. (2003). Complementary medicines in the Australian health system, report to the parliamentary secretary to the minister for Health and Ageing, Australia. Retrieved from http://www. tga.gov.au/pdf/archive/committees-eccmhs-report-031031.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Faas, N. (2001). Integrating complementary medicine into health systems. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Friedson, E. (1988). Professions of medicine. London, England: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gwyther, G., & Possamai-Inesedy, A. (2010). Methodologies a la carte: An examination of emerging qualitative methodologies in social research. In A. Possamai-Inesedy & G. Gwyther (Eds.), New methods in social justice for the twenty-first century. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, S., & Ahmad, W. (2000). Medical autonomy and the UK state 1975 to 2025. Sociology, 34(1), 129–146.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, S., & Petersen, A. (Eds.). (2002). Consuming health: The commodification of health care. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hollenberg, D. (2006). Unchartered ground: Patterns of professional interaction among complementary/ alternative and biomedical practitioners in integrative health care settings. Social Science and Medicine, 62(3), 731–744.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. (2005). Complementary and alternative medicine in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11182&page=R1
   Google Scholar
• Kadetz, P. (2011). Assumptions of global beneficence: Health-care disparity, the WHO and the outcomes of integrative health-care policy at local levels in the Philippines. BioSocieties, 6(1), 88–105.
   Google Scholar
• Kaptchuk, T., & Miller, F. (2005). Viewpoint: What is the best and most ethical model for the relationship between mainstream and alternative medicine: Opposition, integration or pluralism. Academic Medicine, 80(3), 286–290.
   Google Scholar
• Kelner, M., Wellman, B., Boon, H., & Welsh, S. (2004). Responses of established healthcare to the professionalisation of complementary and alternative medicine in Ontario. Social Science and Medicine, 59, 915–930.
   Google Scholar
• Langevin, H. M., Wayne, P. M., Macpherson, H., Schnyer, R., Milley, R. M., Napadow, V., … Hammerschlag, R. (2011). Paradoxes in acupuncture research: Strategies for moving forward. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine: eCAM, 2011, 180805.
   Google Scholar
• Lewith, G., & Robinson, N. (2009). Complementary and alternative medicine: What the public want and how it may be delivered safely and effectively. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 102(10), 411–414.
   Google Scholar
• Liamputtong, P., & Ezzy, D. (1999). Qualitative research methods: A health focus. Melbourne, VIC: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2012). Medicine as culture: Illness, disease and the body (3rd ed.). London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• NHMRC. (2007). 2007–2009 Strategic plan. Retrieved from http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines/publications/nh80
   Google Scholar
• NHMRC. (2010). 2010–2012 Strategic plan. Retrieved from http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/nh132_strat_plan_2010_2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, C., & Britten, N. (2003). Acupuncture for people with chronic illness: Combining qualitative and quantitative outcome assessment. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 9(5), 671–681.
   Google Scholar
• Pescosolido, B. A., & Boyer, C. A. (2001). The American health care system: Entering the twenty-first Century with high risk, major challenges and great opportunities. In W. C. Cockerham (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to medial sociology (pp. 180–198). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, A. (1997). Risk, governance and the new public health. In A. Peterson & R. Bunton (Eds.), Foucault, health and medicine (pp. 189–206). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, A., & Lupton, D. (1996). The new public health: Health and self in the age of risk. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pietroni, P. C. (1992). Alternative medicine: Methinks the doctor protests too much and incidentally befuddles the debate. Journal of Medical Ethics, 18, 23–25.
   Google Scholar
• Polich, G., Dole, C., & Kaptchuk, T. J. (2010). The need to act a little more ‘scientific’: Biomedical researchers investigating complementary and alternative medicine. Sociology of Health and Illness, 32(1), 106–122.
   Google Scholar
• Rothman, B. K. (1986). The tentative pregnancy: How amniocentesis changes the experience of motherhood. New York, NY: Viking Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A. (2009). Are we there yet? The state of the mixed methods community. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(4), 287–291.
   Google Scholar
• Verhoef, M. J., Mulkins, A., & Boon, H. (2005). Integrative health care: How can we determine whether patients benefit. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 11(1), 57–65.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, E. (2006). Introduction: Taking stock of medical dominance. Health Sociology Review, 15(5), 421–431.
   Google Scholar
• Winnick, T. A. (2005). From quakery to ‘complementary’ medicine: The American medical profession confronts alternative therapies. Social Problems, 1, 38–61.
   Google Scholar
• Witt, C. M. (2011). Clinical research on acupuncture – Concepts and guidance on efficacy and effectiveness research. Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional & Western Medicine, 17(3), 166–172.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. (1978). Primary health care: Report of the international conference on primary health care, Alma-Ata, U.S.S.R. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Zhan, M. (2001). Does it take a miracle? Negotiating knowledges, identities, and communities of traditional Chinese medicine. Cultural Anthropology, 16(4), 453–480.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, X., Carlton, A., & Bensoussan, A. (2009). Development in an challenge for traditional Chinese medicine in Australia. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 15(6), 685–688.
   Google Scholar