94
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Rich assessment in a first-year, teacher education (primary) mathematics education subject

Pages 62-72 | Received 02 Dec 2010, Accepted 13 Aug 2012, Published online: 17 Dec 2014

References

  • ACER. (2008). Attracting, engaging and retaining: New conversations about learning. Australasian survey of student engagement report. Retrieved from http://www.acer.edu.au/documents/AUSSE_2007AustralasianStudentEngagementReport.pdf
  • Aitken, E. N. (2007). Preservice teachers’ results on grade 6 provincial math achievement test. International Journal of Learning, 13(10), 137–146.
  • Anthony, G., & Walshaw, M. (2007). Characteristics of effective pedagogy for mathematics education. In H. Forgaz, A. Barkatsas, A. Bishop, B. Clarke, S. Keast, W. T. Seah, & P. Sullivan (Eds.), MERGA Research in Mathematics Education in Australasia 2004–2007: Vol. 12. New directions in mathematics and science education (pp. 195–222). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  • Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 90(4), 449–466.
  • Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (3rd ed.). Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
  • Boud, D. (2007). Reframing assessment as if learning were important. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term (pp. 14–25). London, England: Routledge.
  • Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2007a). Developing assessment for informing judgement. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term (pp. 181–197). London, England: Routledge.
  • Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2007b). Introduction: Assessment for the longer term. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term (pp. 3–13). London, England: Routledge.
  • Boud, D., & Hawke, G. (2004). Sustainable assessment. Sydney, NSW: The Australian centre for organisational, vocational and adult-learning, University of Technology, Sydney.
  • Brew, A. (1999). Towards autonomous assessment: Using self-assessment and peer assessment. In S. Brown & A. Glasner (Eds.), Assessment matters in higher education: Choosing and using diverse approaches (pp. 159–171). Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
  • Campbell, C., & Martin, D. (2010). Interactive whiteboards and the first year experience: Integrating IWBs into pre service education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(6), 68–75. Retrieved from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/vol35/iss6/5
  • Donnison, S., Edwards, D., Itter, D., Martin, D., & Yager, Z. (2009). Refl ecting on improving our practice: Using collaboration as an approach to enhance first year transition in higher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 34(3), 18–29. Retrieved from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/vol34/iss3/2
  • Goos, M., Smith, T., & Thornton, S. (2008). Research on pre-service education of teachers of mathematics. In H. Forgaz, A. Barkatsas, A. Bishop, B. Clarke, S. Keast, W. T. Seah, & P. Sullivan (Eds.), MERGA Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2004–2007: Vol. 12. New directions in mathematics and science education. (pp. 291–312). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  • Hill, H. C., Sleep, L., Lewis, J. M., & Ball, D. L. (2007). Assessing teachers’ mathematical knowledge. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 111–155). Charlotte, NC: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Ingvarson, L., Beavis, A., Bishop, A., Peck, R., & Elsworth, G. (2004). Investigation of effective mathematics teaching and learning in Australian secondary schools. Canberra, ACT: Australia Council for Educational Research.
  • Itter, D. (2010). Preservice primary teachers’ knowledge of fractions and decimals (Unpublished master’s dissertation). The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC.
  • Kift, S., & Field, R. (2009, June 29–July 1). Intentional first year curriculum design as a means of facilitating student engagement: Some exemplars. In J. Thomas (Ed.), 12th Pacific rim first year in higher education conference proceedings. Brisbane, QLD: QUT.
  • Krause, K., & Coates, H. (2008). Students engagement in first-year university. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 493–505.
  • Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540–563.
  • Kvale, S. (2007). Contradictions of assessment for learning in institutions of higher learning. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term (pp. 57–71). London, England: Routledge.
  • Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Masters, J. (2008). Connecting with education: The first year experience progress report (unpublished report). Bendigo, VIC: Faculty of Education, La Trobe University.
  • Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. (2003). A national framework for professional standards for teaching: Teacher quality and educational leadership taskforce. Carlton South, VIC: Curriculum Corporation.
  • Ryan, J., & Williams, J. (2007). Children’s mathematics 4–15: Learning from errors and misconceptions. Berkshire, England: McGraw-Hill.
  • Seaman, C. E., & Szydlik, J. E. (2007). Mathematical sophistication among preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(2), 167–182.
  • Simon, M. A. (2008). The challenge of mathematics teacher education in an era of mathematics education reform. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.), The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional (pp. 17–19). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  • Southwell, B., & Penglase, M. (2005). Mathematical knowledge of pre-service primary teachers. In H. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 4, pp. 209–216). Melbourne, VIC: PME.
  • Stacey, K., Helme, S., Steinle, V., Baturo, A., Irwin, K., & Bana, J. (2001). Preservice teachers’ knowledge of difficulties in decimal numeration. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4(3), 205–225.
  • Sullivan, P., Clarke, D., & Clarke, B. (2009). Converting mathematics tasks to learning opportunities: An important aspect of knowledge for mathematics teaching. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(1), 85–105.
  • Thomas, G., Martin, D., & Pleasants, K. (2011). Using self- and peer-assessment to enhance pre-service teachers’ future-learning in higher education. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 8(1), 1–17. Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol8/iss1/5

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.