ICT driven pedagogies and its impact on learning outcomes in high school mathematics

References

• Bell, A. (1993). Principles for the design of teaching. Journal Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(1), 5–34. California Department of Education. (2012). STAR. Retrieved from http://star.cde.ca.gov/star2004/help_comparescores.asp
   Google Scholar
• Chandra, V., & Lloyd, M. (2008). The methodological nettle: ICT and student achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 1087–1098.
   Google Scholar
• Chandra, V., & Watters, J. (2011). Re-thinking physics teaching with web-based learning. Computers and Education, 58(1), 631–640.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H. (1991). Enhancement of creativity in computer environments. American Education Research Journal, 28(1), 173–187.
   Google Scholar
• Crook, C., Harrison, C., Farrington-Flint, L., Tomas, C., & Underwood, J. (2010). The impact of technology: Value added classroom practice: Final report. Retrieve from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/1771/
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Diaper, G. (1990). The Hawthorne effect: A fresh examination. Educational Studies, 16, 261–267.
   Google Scholar
• Fogarty, G. (2007). Research on the progressive achievement tests and academic achievement in secondary schools. Retrieved from http://www.acer.edu.au/documents/ACERPress_PAT_Supp.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fox, M. J. (2010). A funny thing happened on the way to the future: Twists and turns and lessons. Sydney, NSW: Hachette.
   Google Scholar
• Funkhouser, C. P. (1993). The infl uence of problem-solving software on student attitudes about mathematics. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25(3), 339–346.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, C. M., Simmons, P. E., & Simpson, R. D. (1992). The effects of CAI and hands-on activities on elementary students’ attitudes and weather knowledge. School Science and Mathematics, 92(6), 334–336.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
   Google Scholar
• Hew, K., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt, J., & Scardamalia, M. (1998). Design principles for distributed knowledge building processes. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 75–96.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, S. (2003). Does ICT improve learning and teaching in schools? Nottingham, England: British Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Joy, E. H., & Garcia, F. (2000). Measuring learning effectiveness: A new look at no-significant difference findings. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4(1), 33–39.
   Google Scholar
• Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2008). New learning: Elements of a science of education. Port Melbourne, VIC: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H. K., & Rissel, D. (2008). Instructors’ integration of computer technology: Examining the role of interaction. Foreign Language Annals, 41(1), 61–81.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsey, J., Stephanou, A., Urbach, D., & Sadler, A. (2005). PATMaths progressive achievement tests in mathematics third edition teacher manual. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Loong, E. Y.-K. (2010). Web-based mathematics: Student perspectives. MERGA 2010: Shaping the future of mathematics education: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 352–359). Fremantle, WA: MERGA.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (2009). Stories of my life: The autobiography. Sydney, NSW: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I., Martin, M., Gonzalez, E., & Chrostowski, S. (2004). TIMMS 2003 International Mathematics Report: Findings From Iea’s Trends In International Mathematics And Science Study At The Fourth And Eighth Grades. Boston, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, D. M., & Kulm, G. (2005). Using web-based practice to enhance mathematics learning and achievement. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 3(3).
   Google Scholar
• Oblinger, D. G., & Oblinger, J. L. (Eds.). (2005). Educating the net generation. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world: First Results from PISA 2003. Paris, France: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Page, M. S. (2002). Technology-enriched classrooms: Effects on students of low socio-economic status. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(4), 389–409.
   Google Scholar
• Reglin, G. L. (1989). CAI effects on mathematics achievement and academic self-concept seminar. Journal of Education Technology Systems, 18(1), 43–48.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., & Groff, C. (2009). Effective programs in middle and high school mathematics: A best evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 839–911.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, M. E. (1990). The effects of computer-based instruction on the achievement of college students as a function of achievement status and mode of presentation. Computers in Human Behavior, 6(4), 351–360.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher sociological processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, T.-H. (2011). Implementation of Web-based dynamic assessment in facilitating junior high school students to learn mathematics. Computers & Education, 56, 1062–1071.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfram, C. (2010). Conrad Wolfram: Teaching kids real math with computers. Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/conrad_wolfram_teaching_kids_real_math_with_computers.html
   Google Scholar