Examining washback in second language education contexts: A high stakes provincial exam and the teacher factor in classroom practice in Quebec secondary schools

References

• Alderson, J.C. (2004). Forward. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods, pp.ix-xii. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Alderson, J.C. & Hamp-Lyons, L. 1996. TOEFL preparation courses: A study of washback. Language Testing, 13(3), 280–297.
   Google Scholar
• Alderson, J.C. &Wall, D. 1993. Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics 14, 115–129.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, S. (2004). Washback and curriculum innovation. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods, pp.37–50. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, S., Fullilove, J. & Wong. Y. (2002). Targeting washback: A case-study. System, 30, 207–223.
   Google Scholar
• Assessment Reform Group (ARF). Assessment for learning: Research-based principles of assessment for learning to guide classroom practice. Retrieved August 10, 20080 from http://www.qca.org.uk/qca_4336.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Bachman, L.F. & Palmer, A.S. (1996). Language Testing in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, K.M. (1996). Working for washback: A review of the washback concept in language testing. Language Testing, 13(3), 257–279.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998a). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–73.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998b). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 139–144.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (2003). In praise of educational research: Formative assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 29(5), 623–637.
   Google Scholar
• Blais, J.G. & Laurier, M. (2005, April). Accountability and standardized testing in Quebec and some neighbouring US states. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, QC.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan, R. & Biklen, S. (1998). Qualitative research for education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. (2005, April). Research on formative classroom assessment. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec.
   Google Scholar
• Burrows, C. (2004). Washback in classroom-based assessment: A study of the washback effect in the Australian adult migrant English program. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contexts and method, pp.113–128. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, L., Watanabe, Y. & Curtis, A. (Eds.) (2004). Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Colby-Kelly, C. & Turner, C.E. (2007). AFL research in the L2 classroom and evidence of usefulness: Taking formative assessment to the next level. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(1), 9–38.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J & Clark, V.L.P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, C. (2004). The contradictory culture of classroom-based assessment: Teacher assessment practices in senior secondary English. Language Testing 21(3), 305–334.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, C. (2008, June). Using summative assessments for formative purposes; The ultimate justification for learners and teachers. Paper presented at the 30th Language Testing Research Colloquium, Hangzhou, China.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, C. & Hamp-Lyons (2008, June). Applying school-based assessment for learning in a formal examination system. Workshop presented at the 30th Language Testing Research Colloquium, Hangzhou, China.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J. (2004, October). Language test impact: Practices and Possibilities. Paper presented at the Midwestern Association of Language Testers, Cleveland, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M.G. & Stiegelbauer, S. (1991). The new meaning of educational change (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H. (1989). Psychometric test theory and educational assessment. In H. Simons & J. Elliot (Eds.), Rethinking assessment, pp.140–148. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gouvernement du Québec, Ministère de l`Éducation. (2008). Document d`Information: Épreuves Uniques, Anglais, Langue Seconde, de cinquième année de secondaire 156–544. Juin, août 2008, janvier 2009, grille d’évaluation. Retrieved August 12, 2008 from http://www.meq.gouv.qc.ca/dgfj/de/docinfosec.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R.B. & Onwuegbuzie. A.J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. (2007, June). Mixed-methods designs in language testing research: Review and suggestions. Paper presented at the 29th annual Language Testing Research Colloquium, Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, C. & Mohan, B. (2004). Teacher formative assessment and talk in classroom contexts: Assessment as discourse and assessment of discourse. Language Testing, 21(3), 336–359.
   Google Scholar
• Markee, N. (1997). Managing curricular innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, C. & Rossman, G.B. (1989). Designing qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, T. (1998). Policy and social considerations in language assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 304–309.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, T. & Roever, C. (2006). Language testing: The social dimension. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13(3), 241–256).
   Google Scholar
• Milanovic, M. & Saville, N. (1996). Considering the impact of Cambridge EFL examinations. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate.
   Google Scholar
• O’Loughlin, K. (2006). Learning about second language assessment: Insights from a postgraduate student on-line subject forum. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 1, 71–85.
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, J.W, Chudowsky, N. & Glaser, R. (Eds.). (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rea-Dickins, P. (2006). Currents and eddies in the discourse of assessment: A learning-focused interpretation. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 164–188.
   Google Scholar
• Saif, Aiming for positive washback: A case study of international teaching assistants. Language Testing, 23(1), 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Shih, C. (2007). A new washback model of students’ learning. Canadian Modern Language, 64(1), 135–161.
   Google Scholar
• Shohamy, E. (1992). Beyond proficiency testing: A diagnostic feedback testing model for assessment foreign language learning. Modern Language Journal, 76, 513–521.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, P.G. (2002). The assessment bridge: Positive ways to link tests to learning, standards, and curriculum improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stobart, G. (2003). The impact of assessment: Intended and unintended consequences. Assessment in Education, 16(2), 139–140.
   Google Scholar
• Teasdale, A. & Leung, C. (2000). Teacher assessment and psychometric theory: A case of paradigm crossing? Language Testing, 17(2), 163–184.
   Google Scholar
• Tesch, R. 1990. Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. New York: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, C.E. (2001a). Developing an empirically based rating scale for evaluating speaking ability at the secondary 4 and 5 levels. (Report) Quebec: Ministry of Education of Quebec.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, C.E. (2001b). The need for impact studies of L2 performance testing and rating: Identifying areas of potential consequences at all levels of the testing cycle. In A. Brown et al. (Eds.), Experimenting with uncertainty: Language testing essays in honour of Alan Davies, Studies in Language Testing 11, pp.127–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, C.E. (2006). Professionalism and high stakes test: Teachers’ perspectives when dealing with educational change introduced through provincial exams. TESL Canada Journal, 23(2), 54–76.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, C.E. (2008, June). The specificity of the ‘research approach’ in classroom studies: Probing the predictability of washback through teacher conceptual and instrumental evidence in Quebec high schools. In Turner (Organizer), The ‘teacher’ factor in washback contexts: Evidence from mixed methods research in Canada, China and Malaysia. Symposium conducted at the 30th Language Testing Research Colloquium, Hangzhou, China.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, C.E., Laurier, M. & Wei, J. (2007, June). Health care access for linguistic minorities: Identifying nurse speech acts for assessment. Presented at the 29th Language Testing Research Colloquium (LTRC ’07). Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, D. (2000). The impact of high-stakes testing on teaching and learning: Can this be predicted or controlled? System, 28, 499–509.
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe, Y. (2004). Methodology in washback studies. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing. Research contexts and method, pp.19–37. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe, Y. (2006). Does grammar translation come from the entrance examination ? Preliminary findings from classroom-based research. Language Testing, 13(3), 318–333.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, J. (2007). Assessment for learning – Why the theory needs the practice. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 3(2), 52–59.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, D. (1996). Teacher cognition in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar