43
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Multimedia as a Test Method Facet in Oral Proficiency Tests

Pages 37-48 | Published online: 17 Dec 2014

References

  • Alderson, J. C. (1986). Computers in language testing. In G. N. Leech (Ed.). Computers in English language education and research. London: Longman, pp.99–110.
  • Alderson, J. C. (2000). Technology in testing: The present and the future. System, 28(4), 593.
  • Alderson, J. C. & Banerjee, J. (2001). Language testing and assessment (Part 1) State of-the-art review. Language Teaching, 18, 213–238.
  • Amiri, F. (2000). IT-literacy for language teachers: Should it include computer programming? System, 28(1), 77–84.
  • Bachman, L. F. & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Brown, J. D. (1997). Computers in language testing: Present research and some future directions. Language Learning and Technology, 1(1), 44–59.
  • Burke, M. J., Normand, J. & Raju, N. S. (1987). Examinee attitudes toward computer administered ability testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 3(2), 95–107.
  • Carr, N. T. Pan, M., Vongpumivitch, V. & Xi, X. (2002). Validity issues in a web-based language assessment system (WebLAS). Language Testing in Global Contexts: 24th Language Testing Research Colloquium, Hong Kong.
  • Chalhoub-Deville, M. (2001). Language learning and technology: Past and future. Language Learning and Technology, 5(2), 95–98.
  • Chalhoub-Deville, M. (2002). Technology in standardized language assessments. In R. B. Kay (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Chalhoub-Deville, M. & Deville, C. (1999). Computer adaptive testing in second language contexts. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 273–299.
  • Chan, M. S. & Leung, L. K. (2003). A comparison of students’ perception of using computers between conventional undergraduate students and distance learners. AAOU Conference: Networking and Partnership for Strengthening. Collaborative and Distance Education, Thailand.
  • Chapelle, C. A. (2007). Utilizing technology in language assessment. In E. Shohamy, (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language Education, 2nd Edition: Volume 7. Language Testing and Assessment. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. pp. 123–134.
  • Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Chapelle, C. and Douglas, D. (2006). Assessing Language though Computer Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Choi, I. C., Kim, K. S. & Boo, J. (2003). Comparability of a paper-based language test and computer-based language test. Language Testing, 20(3), 295–320.
  • Davidson, P. (2003). Why technology had had only a minimal impact on testing in education? Proceedings from the 2nd Education Technology Conference and Exhibition. Oman: Sultan Qaboos University.
  • Deitel, H. M., Deitel, P. J. & Nieto, T. R. (1999). Visual Basic 6: How to program. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  • Douglas, D. and Hegelheimer, V. (2008). Assessing language using computer technology. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 2007 27, 115–132.
  • Dunkel, P. (1991). Computer assisted language learning and testing: Research issues and practice. New York: Newbury House.
  • Elder, C., Iwashita, N. & McNamara, T. (2002). Estimating the difficulty of oral proficiency tasks: What does the test-taker have to offer? Language Testing, 19(4), 347–368.
  • Farhady, H., Jafarpur, A. & Birjandi, P. (1994). Testing language skills: From theory to practice. Tehran: SAMT Publication.
  • Feyten, C. (1991). The power of listening ability: An overlooked dimension in language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 75, 173–180.
  • Frosini, G., Lazzerini, B. & Marcelloni, F. (1998). Performing automatic exams. Computers and Education, 31(3), 281–300.
  • Fulcher, G. (2000). Computers in language testing. In P. Brett and G. Motteram (Eds.) A special interest in computers, (pp.93–107). Manchester: IATEFL Publications.
  • Genesee, F. & Upshur, J. A. (1996). Classroom-based evaluation in second language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hartley, K. W. (1999). Media overload in instructional web pages and the impact on learning. Educational Media International, 36(2), 145–150.
  • Larson, J. W. (2000). Testing oral language skills via the computer. CALICO Journal, 18(1), 53–66.
  • Lee, H. K. (2004). A comparative study of ESL writers’ performance in a paper-based and computer-delivered writing test. Assessing Writing, 9, 4–26.
  • Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Malabonga, V., Kenyon, D. M. & Carpenter, H. (2005). Self-assessment, preparation and response time on a computerized oral proficiency test. Language Testing, 22(1), 59–92.
  • McDonald, A. S. (2002). The impact of individual differences on the equivalence of computer-based and paper-and-pencil educational assessments. Computers and Education, 39(3), 299–312.
  • Oller, J. W. (1979). Language tests at school: A pragmatic approach. London: Longman.
  • Parshall, C. & Balizet S. (2001). Audio computer-based tests (CBTs): An initial framework for the use of sound in computerized tests. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 20(2), 5–15.
  • Patri, M. (2002). The influence of peer feedback on self- and peer-assessment of oral skills. Language Testing, 19(2), 109–131.
  • Phinney, M. (1991). Computer-assisted writing and writing apprehension in ESL students. In P. Dunkel (Ed.), Computer-assisted language learning and testing: Research issues and practice. New York: Newbury House, pp.189–204.
  • Sawaki, Y. (2001). Comparability of conventional and computerized tests of reading in second language. Language Learning and Technology, 5(2), 38–59.
  • Spolsky, B. (1990). Oral examinations: An historical note. Language Testing, 7(2), 158–173.
  • Spolsky, B. (1995). Measured words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Stevenson, J. & Gross, S. (1991). Use of a computerized adaptive testing model for ESOL/bilingual entry/exit decision making. In P. Dunkel (Ed.). Computer-assisted language learning and testing: Research issues and practice. New York: Newbury House, pp. 223–235.
  • van den Branden, K., Depauw, V. & Gysen, S. (2002). A computerized task-based test of second language Dutch for vocational training purposes. Language Testing, 19(4), 438–452.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.