Money or children? Power sources in divorce mediation¹

References

• Albeck, S., & Kaydar, D. (2002). Divorced mothers: Their network of friends pre- and postdivorce. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 36, 111–138.
   Google Scholar
• Arulampalam, W., Booth, A., & Bryan, M. (2007). Is there a glass ceiling over Europe? Exploring the gender pay gaps across the wage distribution. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 60(2), 163–186.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2007). Lifetime marriage and divorce trends. In Australian Social Trends (Cat. No. 4102.0), Canberra, ACT: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Baitar, R., Buysse, A., Brondeel, R., De Mol, J., & Rober, P. (2012). Post-divorce wellbeing in Flanders: Facilitative professionals and quality of arrangements matter. Journal of Family Studies, 18(1), 62–75.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2004). Sexual economics: Sex as female resource for social exchange in heterosexual interactions. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 339–363.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, C. J. A., & Sales, B. D. (2001). Family mediation: Facts, myths and future prospects. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, S. M., Subaiya, L., & Kahn, J. R. (1999). The gender gap in the economic well-being of nonresident fathers and custodial mothers. Demography, 36, 195–203.
   Google Scholar
• Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2007). The gender pay gap: Have women gone as far as they can? Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, 7–23.
   Google Scholar
• Bouman, A. M. (2004). Financiële gevolgen van echtscheiding voor man en vrouw. Bevolkingstrends, 2, 67–74.
   Google Scholar
• Braver, S. L., Fitzpatrick, P., & Bay, C. (1991). Noncustodial parent’s reports of child support payments. Family Relations, 40, 180–185.
   Google Scholar
• Brescoll, V. L., & Uhlmann, E. L. (2008). Can an angry woman get ahead? Status conferral, gender, and expression of emotion in the workplace. Psychological Science, 19(3), 268–275.
   Google Scholar
• Brett, J. M. (2001). Negotiating globally: How to negotiate deals, resolve disputes, and make decisions across cultural boundaries? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bruins, J. (1999). Social power and influence tactics: A theoretical introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Buehler, C. (1987). Initiator status and the divorce transition. Family Relations, 36(1), 82–86.
   Google Scholar
• Bugental, D. B., & Lewis, J. C. (1999). The paradoxical misuse of power by those who see themselves as powerless: How does it happen? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 51–64.
   Google Scholar
• Carli, L. L. (1999). Gender, interpersonal power, and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 55(1), 81–99.
   Google Scholar
• Carli, L. L. (2001). Gender and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 725–741.
   Google Scholar
• Casals, M. M. (2005). Divorce mediation in Europe: An introductory outline. Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, 9. Retrieved from http://www.ejcl.org/92/art92–2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cashmore, J. (2011). Reasons for disputes in high conflict families. Journal of Family Studies, 17(3), 187–203.
   Google Scholar
• Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. (2010). Persberichten Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek d.d. 10 februari 2010 (PB10–006) en 29 november 2009 (PB09–075).
   Google Scholar
• Coltrane, S., & Adams, M. (2003). The social construction of the divorce ‘problem’: Morality, child victims, and the politics of gender. Family Relations, 52(4), 363–372.
   Google Scholar
• Cotter, D. A., Hermsen, J. M., Ovadia, S., & Vanneman, R. (2001). The glass ceiling effect. Social Forces, 80(2), 655–682.
   Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K. W., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2004). The influence of power on the information search, impression formation, and demands in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(3), 303–319.
   Google Scholar
• Demo, D. H., & Fine, M. A. (2010). Beyond the average divorce. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, D., & Wight, L. (1998). Theorizing power in divorce negotiations: Implications for practice. Mediation Quarterly, 15(3), 227–244.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power dependence relations: Two experiments. Sociometry, 27, 282–298.
   Google Scholar
• Emery, R. E., & Dillon, P. (1994). Conceptualizing the divorce process: Renegotiating boundaries of intimacy and power in the divorced family system. Family Relations, 43(4), 374–379.
   Google Scholar
• Emery, R. E., Sbarra, D., & Grover, T. (2005). Divorce mediation: Research and reflections. Family Court Review, 43(1), 22–37.
   Google Scholar
• Falbo, T., & Peplau, L. A. (1980). Power strategies in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(4), 618–628.
   Google Scholar
• Fineman, M. L. A. (1991). The illusion of equality: The rhetoric and reality of divorce reform. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fineman, M. L. A. (1995). The neutered mother, the sexual family and other twentieth century tragedies. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fineman, M. L. A. (2000). Cracking the foundational myths: Independence, autonomy, and self-sufficiency. Journal ofGender, Social Policy & the Law, 8, 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Fineman, M. L. A. (2001). Why marriage? University of Virginia Journal of Law and Social Policy, 9(1), 239–272.
   Google Scholar
• Fineman, M. L. A. (2004). Progress and progression in family law. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Fiol, C. M., O’Connor, E. J., & Aguinis, H. (2001). All for one and one for all? The development and transfer of power across organization levels. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 224–242.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. J., & Grégoire, Y. (2006). Gender differences in decision satisfaction within established dyads: Effects of competitive and cooperative behaviors. Psychology & Marketing, 23(4), 313–333.
   Google Scholar
• Foa, U. G., Converse, J., Törnblom, K. Y., & Foa, E. B. (1993). Resource theory: Explorations and applications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forder, C., & Verbeke, A. (2005). Geen woorden maar daden. In C. Forder & A. Verbeke (Eds.), Gehuwd of niet: Maakt het iets uit? (pp. 548–555). Antwerp, Belgium: Intersentia.
   Google Scholar
• French, J. R. P. J., & Raven, B. H. (1959). The basis of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for social research.
   Google Scholar
• Funder, K. (1986). Work and the marriage partnership. In P. McDonald (Ed.), Settling up: Property and income distribution on divorce in Australia. Melbourne, VIC: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Funder, K. (1993). Women’s post-separation employment and reliance on social security. In K. Funder, M. Harrison, & R. Weston (Eds.), Settling down: Pathways of parents after divorce. Melbourne, VIC: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Gale, J., Mowery, R. L., Hermann, M. S., & Hollett, N. (2002). Considering effective divorce mediation: Three potential factors. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 19(4), 389–420.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, B. M., Cropanzano, R., Stein, J. H., Shapiro, D. L., Thatcher, S., & Ko, J. (2008). The role of ideology in mediated disputes at work: A justice perspective. International Journal of Conflict Management, 19(3), 210–233.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, S. M., Beckman, L. J., Browner, C. H., & Sherman, C. A. (2002). Relationship power, decision making, and sexual relations: An exploratory study couple of Mexican origin. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 284–291.
   Google Scholar
• House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, R., & Kirby, J. J. (2000). Strengthening evaluation strategies for divorcing family support services: Perspectives of parent educators, mediators, attorneys, and judges. Family Relations, 49(1), 53–61.
   Google Scholar
• Huston, T. L. (2002). Power. In H. H. Kelley, Berscheid, A. Christensen, J. H. Harvey, & T. L. Huston (Eds.),Close relationships (pp. 265–314). Clinton Corners, NY: Percheron Press.
   Google Scholar
• Institute for Women’s Policy Research. (2008). Retrieved from http://www.iwpr.org/pdf/C350.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Izumi, C. (2010). Implicit bias and the illusion of mediator neutrality. Journal of Law & Policy, 34, 71–155.
   Google Scholar
• Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S. M., & Wilkinson, I. (1980). Intraorganizational influence tactics: Explorations in getting one’s way. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 440–452.
   Google Scholar
• Konrad, M., Ritchie, J. J., Lieb, P., & Corrigal, E. (2000). Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126(4), 593–641.
   Google Scholar
• Kreider, R. M., & Fields, J. M. (2001). Number, timing, and duration of marriages and divorces: Fall 1996. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, E. P. (2012). Discovering the importance of mediator style – An interdisciplinary challenge. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 5(4), 340–353.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R. S., Perlman, D., & Brehm, S. S. (2007). Intimate relationships (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Montada, L., & Kals, E. (2007). Mediation: Ein Lehrbuch auf psychologischer Grundlage [Mediation: A psychologically based textbook]. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz PVU.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with power: Politics and influence in organisations. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pines, A. M., Gat, H., & Tal, Y. (2002). Gender differences in content and style of argument between couples during divorce mediation. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 20(1), 23–50.
   Google Scholar
• Pryor, J., & Rodgers, B. (2001). Children in changing families. Life after parental separation. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, B. H. (2001). Power/interaction and interpersonal influence: Experimental investigations and case studies. In A. Y. Lee-Chai & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The use and abuse of power: Multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption (pp. 217–240). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, C. L., & Bourg, C. (2004). Gender as status: An expectation states theory approach. In A. H. Eagly, A. E. Beall, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (pp. 217–241). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rudman, L. A., & Phelan, J. E. (2008). Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 61–79.
   Google Scholar
• Scherpe, J. (2011). Marital agreements and private autonomy in comparative perspective. Oxford, England: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan, G., & Hughes, J. (2001). Division of matrimonial property in Australia (Research Paper No. 25). Melbourne, VIC: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, C. (1990). Law’s power, the sexed body, and feminist discourse. Journal of Law and Society, 17(2), 194–209.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, C. (2000). Divorce and changing family practices in a post-traditional society. Family Matters, 56, 10–19.
   Google Scholar
• Smock, P. J., Manning, W D., & Sanjiv, G. (1999). The effect of marriage and divorce on women’s economic well-being. American Sociological Review, 64, 794–812.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, B. M., & Weston, R. (2000). Financial living standards after divorce: A recent snapshot (Research Paper No. 23). Melbourne, VIC: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Somary, K., & Emery, R. E. (1991). Emotional anger and grief in divorce mediation. Mediation Quarterly, 8, 185–198.
   Google Scholar
• Stuhlmacher, A. F., & Walters, A. E. (1999). Gender differences in negotiation outcome: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 653–677.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney, M. M., & Horwitz, A. V. (2001). Infidelity, initiation, and the emotional climate of divorce: Are there implications for mental health? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42(3), 295–309.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, R., & Amato, P. R. (1999). The post-divorce family: Research and policy issues. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Verbeke, A. (1997). Le contrat de mariage de séparation de biens: Plaidoyer pour une solution équitable. Antwerp, Belgium: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Verbeke, A. (2001). Naar een billijk relatievermogensrecht. Tijdschrift voor Privaatrecht, 38(1), 373–401.
   Google Scholar
• Verbeke, A. (2002). De legitieme ontbloot of dood? Leve de echtgenoot! Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Verbeke, A. (2006). Marital property planning in a Belgian nutshell. In Over erven: Liber amicorum Mieken Puelinckx-Coene (pp. 473–498). Antwerp, Belgium: Wolters Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Verbeke, A. (2009). Ongelijkheid in huwelijks- en samenlevingsovereenkomsten. Tijdschrift voor Conflicthantering, 8, 21–30.
   Google Scholar
• Vogels, R. J. M. (2011). De stand van mediation in Nederland. Zoetermeer, The Netherlands: Stratus.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, R. G., Goesling, B., & Avellar, S. (2007). The effect of marriage on health: A synthesis of recent research evidence. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Worell, J. (2001). Encyclopaedia of women and gender: Sex similarities and differences and the impact of society on gender (Vol. 1). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yarn, D. H. (1999). Dictionary of conflict resolution. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Yukl, G., & Falbe, C. M. (1990). Influence tactics and objectives in upward, downward and lateral influence attempts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 132–140.
   Google Scholar