References
- Chambliss, D. F., & Schutt, R. K. (2006). Making sense of the social world – Methods of investigation (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
- Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (1992). Doing qualitative research. Research methods for primary care, vol. 3. London: Sage.
- Daly, J., Willis, K., Small, R., Green, J., Welch, N., Kealy, M., & Hughes, E. (2007). A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 43–49.
- Gasper, D. (2000). Evaluating the ‘logical framework approach’ towards learning-oriented development evaluation. Public Administration and Development, 20(1), 17–28.
- Glesne, C., & Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming qualitative researchers – An introduction. White Plains, NY: Longman.
- Grbich, C. (1999). Qualitative research in health. St Leonards, NSW: Allen and Unwin.
- Hebel, R., & McCarter, R. (2006). Quote from randomised clinical trials (chap. 14). In Epidemiology and biostatistics (6th ed., p. 123). London: Jones and Bartlett.
- Howe, K. R. (1988). Against the quantitative–qualitative incompatibility thesis or dogmas die hard. Educational Researcher, 17, 10–16.
- Jackson, B. (2000). Designing projects and project evaluations using the logical framework approach. IUCN. Gland: The World Conservation Union. Retrieved from http://www.infra.kth.se/courses/1H1146/Files/logical-frameworkapproach.pdf
- Julian, D. A., Jones, A., & Deyo, D. (1995). Open systems evaluation and the logic model: program planning and evaluation tools. Evaluation and Program Planning, 18(4), 333–341.
- Leech, N., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality and Quantity, 43, 265–275.
- Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Originally published in Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.
- White, B. L. (2006). The unintended consequences of misapplied technology (chap. 5). In The requirements of justice arising from the ‘digital divide’. Oakland, CA: Strategic Technology Institute.